| Literature DB >> 36009636 |
Fengming Chen1, Jieyi He2,3, Xin Wang2, Tuo Lv2, Chunjie Liu2, Liping Liao2, Zibo Li1, Jun Zhou1, Bingsheng He1, HuaJiao Qiu2, Qian Lin1,2.
Abstract
To investigate the effects of different levels of ramie powder (Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaudich.) (i.e., 0%, 6%, 12% and 24%) on the production performance, serum biochemical indices, antioxidative capacity and intestinal development of Yanling white geese, a total of 256 geese at 56 days of age were randomly divided into four groups and fed a control diet and the control diet supplemented with 6%, 12% and 24% ramie powder, respectively, for 42 days. The results show that dietary supplementation with 12% ramie powder significantly increased the average final weight (p < 0.05) and tended to improve the average daily gain (ADG) and feed/gain ratio (F/G) of the test geese (0.05 < p < 0.10). Moreover, the dietary inclusion of 12 and 24% ramie powder improved meat qualities by reducing the L* value (p < 0.05) and cooking loss (0.05 < p < 0.10) of thigh muscle. Compared with the control group, the ramie powder supplementation at different levels increased the serum activities of glutathione peroxidase and glutathione, promoting the antioxidative capacity of the body (0.05 < p < 0.10). This study demonstrates that moderate ramie powder is beneficial to the production performance of Yanling white geese and has the potential to be used as a poultry feed ingredient. In conclusion, 12% was the proper supplementation rate of ramie powder in Yanling white geese feed.Entities:
Keywords: Yanling white goose; antioxidative capacity; production performance; ramie; serum biochemical indices
Year: 2022 PMID: 36009636 PMCID: PMC9404410 DOI: 10.3390/ani12162045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Composition and nutrient levels of the basal diets (air-dry basis, %).
| Item | Diets | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6.00% | 12.00% | 24.00% | |
| Ingredients (%) | ||||
| Corn | 44.92 | 46.71 | 48.73 | 52.54 |
| Soybean meal | 25.46 | 22.96 | 20.41 | 15.42 |
| Rice husk | 13.34 | 10.02 | 6.67 | 0.00 |
| Ramie powder | 0.00 | 6.00 | 12.00 | 24.00 |
| Oil | 8.70 | 7.23 | 5.61 | 2.48 |
| Wheat bran | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
| Limestone | 2.10 | 1.56 | 1.04 | 0.00 |
| CaHPO4·2H2O | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.05 | 1.00 |
| 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.17 | |
| 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.09 | |
| NaCl | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| 1% Premix 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Nutrient Levels 2 (%) | ||||
| ME/(Mcal/kg) | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
| Crude protein | 15.00 | 15.00 | 15.00 | 15.00 |
| Crude fiber | 8.68 | 8.68 | 8.68 | 8.68 |
| Calcium | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.07 |
| Total phosphorus | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.53 |
| Available phosphorus | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Lysine | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 |
| Methionine | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.29 |
| Methionine + cystine | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.55 |
1 The premix provided the following (per kilogram of complete diet) micronutrients: VA, 12, 000 IU; VD3, 2, 500 IU; VE, 20 mg; VK3, 3 mg; VB1, 3 mg; VB2, 8 mg; VB6, 7 mg; VB12, 0.03 mg; D-pantothenic acid, 20 mg; nicotinic acid, 50 mg; biotin, 0.1 mg; folic acid, 1.5 mg; Cu (as copper sulfate), 9 mg; Zn (as zinc sulfate), 110 mg; Fe (as ferrous sulfate), 100 mg; Mn (as manganese sulfate), 100 mg; Se (as sodium selenite), 0.16 mg; I (as Potassium iodide), 0.6 mg. 2 Nutrient levels are calculated values.
Effect of different ramie powder levels in the diets on the growth performance of Yanling white geese (56–98 day).
| Item | Ramie Powder Level | Linear and Quadratic Effects of Ramie Powder | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6.00% | 12.00% | 24.00% | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| Body weight at 56 days (g) | 2892.00 ± 51.19 | 2904.00 ± 57.27 | 2900.00 ± 61.24 | 2904.00 ± 50.30 | 0.984 | 0.776 | 0.873 |
| Body weight at 98 days (g) | 3691.33 ± 95.24 b | 3720.00 ± 107.63 b | 3850.67 ± 67.30 a | 3803.33 ± 69.12 ab | 0.036 | 0.016 | 0.341 |
| ADG (g) | 19.03 ± 2.64 | 19.43 ± 1.58 | 22.64 ± 1.90 | 21.41 ± 2.70 | 0.072 | 0.036 | 0.435 |
| ADFI (g) | 173.88 ± 14.71 | 178.22 ± 24.84 | 187.15 ± 25.32 | 182.89 ± 12.32 | 0.751 | 0.386 | 0.640 |
| F/G | 9.20 ± 0.64 | 9.16 ± 0.86 | 8.24 ± 0.51 | 8.59 ± 0.50 | 0.089 | 0.049 | 0.515 |
a,b Within a row, values with different superscript letters mean there were significant differences (p < 0.05). ADG, average daily body weight gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; F/G, feed/gain ratio.
Effect of the different ramie powder levels in the diets on the proportion of the organs compared to the body weight of the Yanling white geese (56–98 day).
| Item | Ramie Powder Level | Linear and Quadratic Effects of Ramie Powder | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6.00% | 12.00% | 24.00% | ||||
| Linear | Quadratic | ||||||
| Spleen percentage (%) | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.353 | 0.084 | 0.978 |
| Heart percentage (%) | 0.69 ± 0.06 | 0.70 ± 0.03 | 0.64 ± 0.04 | 0.66 ± 0.09 | 0.504 | 0.334 | 0.885 |
| Liver percentage (%) | 2.06 ± 0.22 | 1.91 ± 0.23 | 1.80 ± 0.26 | 1.68 ± 0.16 | 0.077 | 0.011 | 0.895 |
| Gizzard percentage (%) | 3.64 ± 0.54 | 3.98 ± 0.79 | 3.61 ± 0.13 | 3.49 ± 0.26 | 0.473 | 0.438 | 0.314 |
| Kidney percentage (%) | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 0.47 ± 0.08 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 0.45 ± 0.06 | 0.821 | 0.498 | 0.834 |
| Proventriculus percentage (%) | 0.36 ± 0.10 | 0.33 ± 0.08 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.32 ± 0.05 | 0.775 | 0.355 | 0.766 |
| Duodenum percentage (%) | 0.63 ± 0.14 | 0.64 ± 0.13 | 0.67 ± 0.07 | 0.62 ± 0.08 | 0.904 | 0.922 | 0.566 |
| Jejunum percentage (%) | 1.32 ± 0.23 | 1.34 ± 0.40 | 1.08 ± 0.25 | 1.02 ± 0.08 | 0.172 | 0.045 | 0.716 |
| Ileum percentage (%) | 1.44 ± 0.29 | 1.11 ± 0.22 | 1.20 ± 0.23 | 1.38 ± 0.30 | 0.208 | 0.893 | 0.046 |
Effect of the different ramie powder levels in the diets on the meat quality of the Yanling white geese muscle (98 d).
| Item | Ramie Powder Level | Linear and Quadratic Effects of Ramie Powder | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6.00% | 12.00% | 24.00% | Linear | Quadratic | |||
| Breast Muscle | ||||||||
| 45 min meat color | L* | 34.02 ± 4.42 | 29.88 ± 1.08 | 29.39 ± 6.63 | 27.80 ± 3.75 | 0.190 | 0.046 | 0.529 |
| a* | 15.04 ± 3.29 | 16.19 ± 2.32 | 12.83 ± 0.97 | 14.61 ± 2.18 | 0.192 | 0.333 | 0.770 | |
| b* | 4.71 ± 1.12 | 4.90 ± 0.69 | 4.12 ± 0.59 | 4.15 ± 0.69 | 0.328 | 0.140 | 0.819 | |
| Cooking loss (%) | 45 min | 42.51 ± 1.30 | 41.68 ± 2.56 | 40.51 ± 3.63 | 38.88 ± 3.19 | 0.236 | 0.048 | 0.752 |
| Drip loss (%) | 24 h | 11.70 ± 3.02 | 9.95 ± 1.84 | 11.29 ± 2.22 | 9.23 ± 2.68 | 0.388 | 0.240 | 0.893 |
| Shear force (kg·f) | 45 min | 4.01 ± 0.78 | 3.85 ± 0.74 | 3.51 ± 0.42 | 3.73 ± 0.76 | 0.708 | 0.407 | 0.546 |
| pH value | 45 min | 6.51 ± 0.26 | 6.37 ± 0.19 | 6.22 ± 0.22 | 6.24 ± 0.19 | 0.173 | 0.044 | 0.414 |
| Thigh Muscle | ||||||||
| 45 min meat color | L* | 35.52 ± 2.03 a | 33.00 ± 4.65 ab | 29.58 ± 4.19 b | 28.87 ± 2.88 b | 0.033 | 0.005 | 0.579 |
| a* | 16.01 ± 2.44 | 13.77 ± 2.96 | 15.56 ± 2.51 | 14.03 ± 2.74 | 0.481 | 0.448 | 0.770 | |
| b* | 4.70 ± 0.91 | 4.80 ± 1.23 | 4.60 ± 0.71 | 3.79 ± 0.82 | 0.339 | 0.138 | 0.297 | |
| Cooking loss (%) | 45 min | 42.42 ± 1.74 | 42.52 ± 3.35 | 40.96 ± 3.18 | 37.56 ± 4.23 | 0.092 | 0.024 | 0.245 |
| Drip loss (%) | 24 h | 9.10 ± 2.53 | 8.24 ± 2.75 | 7.68 ± 1.75 | 8.65 ± 2.68 | 0.824 | 0.704 | 0.418 |
| Shear force (kg·f) | 45 min | 5.63 ± 0.72 | 4.63 ± 0.67 | 4.60 ± 0.98 | 5.12 ± 0.79 | 0.179 | 0.340 | 0.050 |
| pH value | 45 min | 6.30 ± 0.39 | 6.24 ± 0.21 | 6.10 ± 0.22 | 6.27 ± 0.25 | 0.666 | 0.685 | 0.373 |
a,b Means in the same row with different superscript letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). L*, lightness; a*, redness; b*, yellowness.
Effect of the different ramie powder levels in the diets on the intestinal mucosal morphology of 98 day old Yanling white geese (μm).
| Item | Ramie Powder Level | Linear and Quadratic Effects of Ramie Powder | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6.00% | 12.00% | 24.00% | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| Duodenum | |||||||
| Villus height | 632.09 ± 100.10 | 636.98 ± 32.92 | 649.59 ± 47.37 | 611.16 ± 72.71 | 0.843 | 0.718 | 0.488 |
| Crypt depth | 136.75 ± 12.89 | 128.86 ± 9.29 | 133.10 ± 4.74 | 125.64 ± 17.04 | 0.494 | 0.239 | 0.969 |
| V/C | 4.61 ± 0.47 | 4.95 ± 0.22 | 4.89 ± 0.42 | 4.87 ± 0.10 | 0.436 | 0.311 | 0.265 |
| Jejunum | |||||||
| Villus height | 585.86 ± 70.14 | 609.54 ± 59.27 | 618.07 ± 83.13 | 586.34 ± 64.07 | 0.842 | 0.944 | 0.387 |
| Crypt depth | 111.62 ± 17.39 | 113.63 ± 11.29 | 120.93 ± 11.87 | 107.93 ± 8.78 | 0.451 | 0.884 | 0.206 |
| V/C | 5.34 ± 1.01 | 5.37 ± 0.26 | 5.11 ± 0.47 | 5.43 ± 0.41 | 0.852 | 0.986 | 0.604 |
| Ileum | |||||||
| Villus height | 643.29 ± 79.21 | 637.50 ± 20.20 | 632.86 ± 32.61 | 643.06 ± 101.60 | 0.994 | 0.969 | 0.794 |
| Crypt depth | 131.03 ± 8.78 | 129.87 ± 10.45 | 123.56 ± 7.54 | 124.37 ± 9.52 | 0.482 | 0.169 | 0.814 |
| V/C | 4.90 ± 0.29 | 4.93 ± 0.28 | 5.13 ± 0.17 | 5.15 ± 0.57 | 0.569 | 0.192 | 0.994 |
Effect of the different ramie powder levels in the diets on the serum biochemical indices of 98 day old Yanling white geese.
| Item | Ramie Powder Level | Linear and Quadratic Effects of Ramie Powder | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6.00% | 12.00% | 24.00% | ||||
| Linear | Quadratic | ||||||
| GLU (mmol/L) | 9.24 ± 0.50 | 9.53 ± 0.56 | 9.42 ± 0.36 | 10.03 ± 0.50 | 0.102 | 0.034 | 0.460 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.07 ± 0.16 | 1.10 ± 0.09 | 1.03 ± 0.12 | 1.10 ± 0.15 | 0.811 | 0.976 | 0.741 |
| TCHO (mmol/L) | 7.52 ± 0.61 | 8.23 ± 0.58 | 8.02 ± 0.60 | 8.59 ± 0.58 | 0.072 | 0.023 | 0.796 |
| UA (μmol/L) | 479.52 ± 50.58 | 468.31 ± 56.20 | 485.34 ± 50.00 | 420.02 ± 53.65 | 0.231 | 0.145 | 0.268 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 0.73 ± 0.15 | 0.80 ± 0.11 | 0.71 ± 0.07 | 0.68 ± 0.03 | 0.288 | 0.223 | 0.254 |
| Cr (μmol/L) | 113.34 ± 29.23 | 129.40 ± 7.15 | 122.06 ± 8.18 | 111.40 ± 19.02 | 0.403 | 0.724 | 0.121 |
| TP (g/L) | 37.52 ± 2.35 | 41.54 ± 4.18 | 38.63 ± 2.26 | 38.97 ± 1.90 | 0.183 | 0.798 | 0.162 |
| ALB (g/L) | 16.34 ± 0.62 | 18.03 ± 1.03 | 17.13 ± 1.31 | 17.88 ± 1.00 | 0.068 | 0.086 | 0.320 |
| GLB (g/L) | 21.17 ± 1.74 | 23.51 ± 3.41 | 21.50 ± 1.07 | 21.09 ± 1.04 | 0.241 | 0.589 | 0.154 |
| ALB GLB | 0.77 ± 0.04 | 0.78 ± 0.09 | 0.80 ± 0.04 | 0.85 ± 0.03 | 0.144 | 0.038 | 0.313 |
| ALP (U/L) | 17.27 ± 3.10 | 19.93 ± 4.71 | 20.30 ± 3.50 | 20.25 ± 5.43 | 0.640 | 0.293 | 0.491 |
| ALT (U/L) | 10.59 ± 1.33 | 8.76 ± 1.64 | 8.55 ± 1.46 | 9.66 ± 1.51 | 0.160 | 0.331 | 0.042 |
| AST (U/L) | 2.54 ± 0.13 | 2.37 ± 0.30 | 2.13 ± 0.22 | 2.48 ± 0.36 | 0.119 | 0.469 | 0.046 |
| AST ALT | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.08 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.04 | 0.606 | 0.809 | 0.456 |
GLU, glucose; TG, triglyceride; TCHO, total cholesterol; UA, uric acid; BUN, urea nitrogen; Cr, creatine; TP, total protein; ALB, albumin; GLB, globulin; ALB/GLB, albumin/globulin value; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT/AST, alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase value.
Effect of the different ramie powder levels in the diets on the serum antioxidant indices of 98 days old Yanling white geese.
| Item | Ramie Powder Level | Linear and Quadratic Effects of Ramie Powder | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6.00% | 12.00% | 24.00% | ||||
| Linear | Quadratic | ||||||
| SOD (U/mL) | 855.15 ± 88.99 | 891.31 ± 59.46 | 927.39 ± 57.22 | 872.43 ± 70.73 | 0.430 | 0.540 | 0.166 |
| GSH-Px (U/mL) | 619.82 ± 74.97 | 754.45 ± 76.47 | 734.10 ± 69.16 | 716.13 ± 77.88 | 0.052 | 0.091 | 0.036 |
| CAT (U/mL) | 3.70 ± 0.77 | 4.56 ± 0.70 | 3.82 ± 0.72 | 3.69 ± 0.70 | 0.218 | 0.596 | 0.149 |
| GSH (μmol/L) | 18.17 ± 2.75 | 24.44 ± 3.51 | 21.36 ± 4.98 | 18.74 ± 4.32 | 0.089 | 0.866 | 0.024 |
| T-AOC (mmol/L) | 0.91 ± 0.13 | 0.95 ± 0.13 | 0.92 ± 0.14 | 0.87 ± 0.10 | 0.808 | 0.599 | 0.430 |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 4.42 ± 0.40 | 4.21 ± 0.58 | 3.88 ± 0.27 | 4.40 ± 0.46 | 0.226 | 0.654 | 0.085 |
SOD, superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, catalase; GSH, glutathione; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; MDA, malondialdehyde.