| Literature DB >> 36009383 |
Andreas Ritsch1, Monika Hunjadi1, Tatjana Stojakovic2, Jürgen E Scherberich3, Günther Silbernagel4, Hubert Scharnagl5, Graciela E Delgado6, Marcus E Kleber6, Winfried März5,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Impaired renal function is associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. In the general population, HDL-cholesterol is associated with cardiovascular events, which is not true in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This has been attributed to abnormal HDL function in CKD.Entities:
Keywords: cardiovascular risk; cholesterol efflux capacity; high-density lipoprotein; kidney function; single nucleotide polymorphism; uromodulin
Year: 2022 PMID: 36009383 PMCID: PMC9404976 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10081832
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059
Baseline characteristics of LURIC study participants.
| All | eGFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | >90 ( | 60–90 ( | ≤60 ( | ||
| Age (years, mean ± SD) | 62.8 ± 10.4 | 56.0 ± 9.9 | 65.5 ± 8.3 | 71.1 ± 8.1 | <0.001 |
| Male sex (%) | 68.1 | 78.0 | 64.8 | 54.1 | <0.001 |
| Body mass index (kg/m², mean ± SD) | 27.5 ± 4.1 | 27.3 ± 4.0 | 27.7 ± 4.1 | 27.5 ± 4.4 | 0.002 |
| Waist hip ratio (mean ± SD) | 0.96 ± 0.08 | 0.96 ± 0.08 | 0.96 ± 0.08 | 0.96 ± 0.08 | 0.463 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg, mean ± SD) | 141 ± 24 | 136 ± 22 | 143 ± 24 | 145 ± 24 | 0.081 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg, mean ± SD) | 81 ± 11 | 82 ± 11 | 82 ± 11 | 79 ± 12 | 0.001 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL, mean ± SD) | 208 ± 44 | 209 ± 46 | 209 ± 43 | 204 ± 48 | 0.175 ‡ |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dL, mean ± SD) | 116 ± 35 | 116 ± 36 | 117 ± 34 | 110 ± 36 | 0.001 ‡ |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL, mean ± SD) | 39.1 ± 10.7 | 39.4 ± 10.5 | 39.6 ± 10.8 | 36.8 ± 10.9 | <0.001 ‡ |
| Effective HDL (mg/dL, mean ± SD) | 35.1 ± 17.8 | 38.5 ± 18.1 | 34.9 ± 17.7 | 26.3 ± 13.9 | <0.001 ‡ |
| Apolipoprotein AI (mg/dL, mean ± SD) | 130 ± 25 | 131 ± 25 | 131 ± 25 | 125 ± 26 | <0.001 ‡ |
| Apolipoprotein AII (mg/dL, mean ± SD) | 41.8 ± 9.5 | 44.1 ± 9.3 | 41.3± 9.3 | 37.4 ± 9.3 | <0.001 ‡ |
| Apolipoprotein B (mg/dL, mean ± SD) | 104 ± 25 | 104 ± 26 | 104 ± 24 | 103 ± 27 | 0.491 ‡ |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL, median, Q1 to Q3) | 146 (108–201) | 144 (106–199) | 143 (107–197) | 156 (119–214) | <0.001 ‡,§ |
| CETP (μg/mL, median, Q1 to Q3) | 1.12 (0.86–1.49) | 1.10 (0.84–1.45) | 1.13 (0.87–1.52) | 1.16 (0.86–1.57) | 0.048 § |
| CRP (mg/dL, mean ± SD) | 1.72 ± 0.77 | 1.56 ± 0.72 | 1.74 ± 0.78 | 2.06 ± 0.78 | <0.001 |
| SAA (mg/L, mean ± SD) | 29.8 ± 114.7 | 22.6 ± 90.8 | 28.8 ± 106.8 | 52.8 ± 179.7 | 0.002 |
| Urea (mg/dL, mean ± SD) | 39.3 ± 15.2 | 32.4 ± 8.2 | 38.5 ± 9.8 | 60.2 ± 23.5 | <0.001 |
| Diabetes mellitus (%) | 28.9 | 20.8 | 30.7 | 43.5 | <0.001 |
| Lipid lowering therapy (%) | 49.7 | 49.9 | 49.6 | 49.8 | 0.990 |
| CAD (%) | 77.0 | 73.0 | 78.4 | 82.5 | 0.001 |
| Smoking | |||||
| Never (%) | 37.5 | 29.4 | 40.8 | 46.5 | |
| Past (%) | 43.2 | 43.4 | 42.9 | 44.1 | |
| Current (%) | 19.3 | 27.2 | 16.3 | 9.4 | <0.001 |
| eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2) | 81.6 ± 19.9 | 101.4 ± 7.9 | 77.0 ± 8.4 | 46.2 ± 11.2 | <0.001 |
* Analysis of variance or logistic regression, respectively, adjusted for age and gender. ‡ Adjusted for use of lipid lowering drugs. § ANOVA of logarithmically transformed values.
Figure 1Association of kidney function parameters with corresponding genetic data from SNP analysis. Upper panel: Association of a genetic score of 53 independent SNPs with eGFR (left) and with cholesterol efflux capacity (right). Lower panel: Association of polymorphism rs12917707 with serum uromodulin (left) and with cholesterol efflux capacity (right). Diagrams are showing estimated marginal means and 95% confidence intervals obtained in a general linear model, adjusted for age, gender, lipid-lowering therapy, CAD-status, body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, smoking history (never, former, current), hypertension, LDL-C/HDL-C ratio, apolipoprotein AI, and triglycerides.
Figure 2Association of kidney function parameters with cholesterol efflux. Multivariable-adjusted estimated marginal means of cholesterol efflux capacity in subgroups of participants of the LURIC study according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, left panel) as well as uromodulin plasma concentration (right panel). Subgroup analyses were performed corresponding to gender and HDL-C plasma concentration. Results are adjusted for age, gender, use of statins, CAD, BMI, diabetes mellitus, glycosylated hemoglobin, smoking, LDL/HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and ApoAI.
Hazard ratio for cardiovascular death according to cholesterol efflux.
| Cardiovascular Mortality | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
|
| 1.0ref | 1.0ref | 1.0ref | |||
|
|
|
| 0.800 (0.625–1.025) | 0.077 | 0.814 (0.634–1.044) | 0.105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
|
| 1.0ref | 1.0ref | ||||
|
| 0.820 (0.639–1.052) | 0.118 | 0.813 (0.623–1.061) | 0.127 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 0.793 (0.608–1.035) | 0.087 | 0.765 (0.577–1.013) | 0.062 | ||
Model 1: not adjusted. Model 2: adjusted for age and gender. Model 3: adjusted for age, gender, use of statins, CAD, BMI, diabetes mellitus, smoking, CRP, LDL/HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. Model 4: model 3 + adjustment for eGFR. Model 5: model 3 + adjustment for score53 (eGFR related SNPs). CI = confidence interval, HR = hazard ratio. Significant results are presented in bold.