The Radar Imager for Mars Subsurface Experiment instrument has conducted the first rover-mounted ground-penetrating radar survey of the Martian subsurface. A continuous radar image acquired over the Perseverance rover's initial ~3-kilometer traverse reveals electromagnetic properties and bedrock stratigraphy of the Jezero crater floor to depths of ~15 meters below the surface. The radar image reveals the presence of ubiquitous strongly reflecting layered sequences that dip downward at angles of up to 15 degrees from horizontal in directions normal to the curvilinear boundary of and away from the exposed section of the Séitah formation. The observed slopes, thicknesses, and internal morphology of the inclined stratigraphic sections can be interpreted either as magmatic layering formed in a differentiated igneous body or as sedimentary layering commonly formed in aqueous environments on Earth. The discovery of buried structures on the Jezero crater floor is potentially compatible with a history of igneous activity and a history of multiple aqueous episodes.
The Radar Imager for Mars Subsurface Experiment instrument has conducted the first rover-mounted ground-penetrating radar survey of the Martian subsurface. A continuous radar image acquired over the Perseverance rover's initial ~3-kilometer traverse reveals electromagnetic properties and bedrock stratigraphy of the Jezero crater floor to depths of ~15 meters below the surface. The radar image reveals the presence of ubiquitous strongly reflecting layered sequences that dip downward at angles of up to 15 degrees from horizontal in directions normal to the curvilinear boundary of and away from the exposed section of the Séitah formation. The observed slopes, thicknesses, and internal morphology of the inclined stratigraphic sections can be interpreted either as magmatic layering formed in a differentiated igneous body or as sedimentary layering commonly formed in aqueous environments on Earth. The discovery of buried structures on the Jezero crater floor is potentially compatible with a history of igneous activity and a history of multiple aqueous episodes.
Identifying and characterizing Martian lithological structures is a key goal for the Perseverance rover mission toward determining the geological history of Jezero crater and the geologic context of collected samples. Orbital imaging data have identified the presence of deltaic sedimentary structures deposited along the northern and western margins of the crater (–), but the nature and history of the Jezero crater stratigraphic sequence based on orbital observations has not been established conclusively (–). The Mars 2020 mission provides an opportunity to observe this sequence in situ (, ). On Earth, ground-penetrating radar has become an invaluable tool for imaging otherwise inaccessible subsurface morphologies (, ). The Radar Imager for Mars Subsurface Experiment (RIMFAX) ground-penetrating radar instrument on the Perseverance rover provides analogous subsurface imaging capabilities for Mars at spatial scales of tens of centimeter to hundreds of meters ().
RESULTS
RIMFAX acquired a continuous radar image of the subsurface beneath the rover along traverses totaling ~2.6 km, starting at the landing location on 18 February 2021 (Sol 0) and ending on 19 September 2021 (Sol 204; Fig. 1) (). The rover path generally curves around the Séitah structural feature on the Jezero crater floor and then heads eastward crossing the Artuby Ridge on Sol 201 and entering the Séitah formation. Figure 2 shows a three times vertically exaggerated, low-resolution radar image along the traverse path as a function of linear odometry, starting at Sol 86 and ending at Sol 204. After Sol 204, the rover then traversed ~160 m eastward within the Séitah formation to acquire samples at Brac and then traversed back westward toward the Artuby Ridge along a similar path to acquire samples at Issole. Figure 3 shows the rover path and low-resolution radar image of the Brac-Issole traverse.
Fig. 1.
High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) orbital color image map of the Perseverance rover sol path from Sol 0 to Sol 204.
The white numbers indicate the rover’s sol traverse end points. Traverse path segments A to D highlight sections (blue boxes) where the rover traverse path was generally perpendicular to the boundary of Séitah and dipping reflectors are observed (see Fig. 2). HIRISE images ESP_037330_1990, ESP_037396_1985, ESP_037818_1990, ESP_042315_1985, ESP_045994_1985, ESP_046060_1985, ESP_048842_1985, and ESP_048908_1985 are used in this map.
Fig. 2.
RIMFAX ground-penetrating amplitude only radar image displayed at low resolution for all sounding data acquired from Sol 102 to Sol 204.
Rover sol end points are shown across the top of the image. Plotted are reflected strength as a function of linear distance (in meters) and depth (in meters) with 3× vertical exaggeration, accounting for the topographic profile of the rover’s traverse. Radar image in (A) is traverse path from Sol 102 to Sol 124, (B) Sol 126 to Sol 131, (C) Sol 134 to Sol 168, (D) Sol 169 to 177, and (E) Sol 178 to Sol 204. Traverse path segments A to D highlight sections where the rover traverse path was generally perpendicular to the boundary of Séitah and dipping reflectors are observed (see Fig. 1).
Fig. 3.
RIMFAX radargram acquired from Sol 278 to Sol 286.
(A) HiRISE orbital color image map of the Perseverance rover sol paths across Séitah between Issole and Brac. (B) RIMFAX reflected strength as a function of linear from distance (in meters) and depth (in meters) with no vertical exaggeration accounting for the topographic profile of the rover’s traverse from Sol 278 to Sol 286 between Brac and Issole. (C) Interpretive cross section of the Brac-Issole traverse radar image. White lines show the rover’s eastward traverse path (Sols 201 to 248). Red lines show the rover’s westward traverse path (Sols 278 to 286). EOD, End of Drive.
High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) orbital color image map of the Perseverance rover sol path from Sol 0 to Sol 204.
The white numbers indicate the rover’s sol traverse end points. Traverse path segments A to D highlight sections (blue boxes) where the rover traverse path was generally perpendicular to the boundary of Séitah and dipping reflectors are observed (see Fig. 2). HIRISE images ESP_037330_1990, ESP_037396_1985, ESP_037818_1990, ESP_042315_1985, ESP_045994_1985, ESP_046060_1985, ESP_048842_1985, and ESP_048908_1985 are used in this map.
RIMFAX ground-penetrating amplitude only radar image displayed at low resolution for all sounding data acquired from Sol 102 to Sol 204.
Rover sol end points are shown across the top of the image. Plotted are reflected strength as a function of linear distance (in meters) and depth (in meters) with 3× vertical exaggeration, accounting for the topographic profile of the rover’s traverse. Radar image in (A) is traverse path from Sol 102 to Sol 124, (B) Sol 126 to Sol 131, (C) Sol 134 to Sol 168, (D) Sol 169 to 177, and (E) Sol 178 to Sol 204. Traverse path segments A to D highlight sections where the rover traverse path was generally perpendicular to the boundary of Séitah and dipping reflectors are observed (see Fig. 1).
RIMFAX radargram acquired from Sol 278 to Sol 286.
(A) HiRISE orbital color image map of the Perseverance rover sol paths across Séitah between Issole and Brac. (B) RIMFAX reflected strength as a function of linear from distance (in meters) and depth (in meters) with no vertical exaggeration accounting for the topographic profile of the rover’s traverse from Sol 278 to Sol 286 between Brac and Issole. (C) Interpretive cross section of the Brac-Issole traverse radar image. White lines show the rover’s eastward traverse path (Sols 201 to 248). Red lines show the rover’s westward traverse path (Sols 278 to 286). EOD, End of Drive.RIMFAX imaging depths are calculated by assuming a spatially uniform, depth-independent radar propagation velocity of 0.1 m/ns, which is derived from fitting the shapes of 65 diffraction hyperbolas observed between Sols 47 and 210 using a geometric model that accounts for the height of the RIMFAX radar antenna above the surface (see Materials and Methods and fig. S1). The derived average velocity corresponds to a relative dielectric permittivity of 9.0, which is consistent with that expected for low-porosity rocks with mafic composition (see Materials and Methods) (–). Penetration depths vary spatially but are typically 15 m below the surface.The RIMFAX radar images reveal the presence of ubiquitous subsurface layering along the rover’s path (Figs. 2 and 3). Ground-penetrating radar layer reflections are caused by the presence of vertical contrasts in the dielectric properties on <10-cm scales. In the absence of interstitial liquid water, which is not expected to be present because of low Martian temperatures, reflectors can be attributed primarily to changes in the density/porosity of the subsurface (, ). During Sols 113 to 127, 178 to 201, and 278 to 280, RIMFAX detects a thick near-surface layer that exhibits lower than average internal radar reflectivity. These low reflectivity zones indicate a relative absence of contrasting dielectric materials and of internal scattering at ≪10-cm length scales (). Overall subsurface layering structure appears to generally be horizontal along rover traverses in the Máaz formation parallel to the boundary of Séitah. However, when the rover path becomes more perpendicular to the boundary of Séitah during Sols 135, 169, 170, and 178, the layering structure appears to dip downward away from Séitah at angles of up to 15° (see highlighted regions A to D in Figs. 1 and 2). The configuration of these downward dipping layers away from Séitah’s eastern and southern boundaries shows that the Séitah formation lies stratigraphically below the members of Máaz formation sampled by the rover ().During Sols 201 and 202, RIMFAX observed an 80-m-long section as the rover traversed to the north-east perpendicularly across the Artuby Ridge into Séitah that includes a range of diagnostic radar facies [see Fig. 4 (A and B) and fig. S4]. Most notable are strongly reflecting, dipping reflectors extending from the surface to depths of ~15 m. They are correlated with erosionally resistant rocky outcrops at the surface (Fig. 4, A and B) that run parallel to Artuby Ridge. The dipping layers represented by these strong subsurface reflectors and surface ridges are the outermost units of the Séitah formation. RIMFAX observed lower reflectivity zones between the strong reflecting layers that are correlated with bands of dusty regolith deposits at the surface. On the basis of migrated radargrams (see Materials and Methods), the apparent dip angle of the strong reflectors is 11° from horizontal along the rover path, which runs roughly 45° relative to Artuby ridge. If the layers are assumed to dip perpendicularly away from the ridge, then the true dip angle of these layers would be 15° from horizontal (see Materials and Methods and fig. S2). Vertical layer spacing varies from on the order of a few meters down to around 10 cm, which is the minimum that can be resolved by the instrument (). At depths of ~10 m below the surface, the lowermost strongly reflecting layers appear to gradually become more horizontal (Figs. 4 and 5). The radar image acquired along the Brac-Issole traverse (Fig. 3) shows an absence of distinct layering structure to the east of the strong dipping reflectors associated with the Artuby Ridge. Further to the east, a strongly reflecting boundary runs at depths of ~2 to 3 m below the surface from the traverse midpoint to Brac.
Fig. 4.
RIMFAX radargram acquired from Sol 201 and Sol 202.
(A) Sol 201 to 202 rover path from HiRISE. (B) RIMFAX amplitude-only radargram displayed at moderate resolution and (C) interpretive cross section. We have identified six selected areas (numbered 1 to 6) to illustrate high-resolution radar facies that are characteristic of the RIMFAX preconjunction dataset as a whole (Fig. 5). The larger box 6 indicates where the data shown in fig. S3B are taken.
Fig. 5.
RIMFAX radar facies observed during Sol 201 and Sol 202.
The different radar facies are indicated by the numbered boxes in Fig. 4C displayed at high resolution (left) and associated interpretations (right). The Artuby Top Facies (Radar facies 1) exhibits coherent near-surface layering that is subparallel to the local topography to depths of ~1 m. The Low Reflectivity Facies (Radar facies 2) is a 2- to 4-m-thick subsurface zone that is relatively free of coherent scatterers that can be traced for hundreds of meters as the rover traversed parallel to Artuby Ridge during Sols 178 to 200 (Fig. 2). The Low Reflectivity Facies appears to lie conformably on top of the Dipping High Reflectivity Facies (Radar facies 3), and we interpret it to be part of the same sequence of dipping layers that outcropped on the surface during the Sol 201 to 202 traverse. The Dipping High Reflectivity Facies consists of a set of strongly reflecting dipping parallel layers that are organized into packages with thicknesses that vary from 1 to 6 m. At ~10-m depth, the Dipping High Reflectivity Facies gradually become less highly inclined to form Deep Sub-Horizontal Facies (Radar facies 4). Last, there are also Upslope Dipping Facies (Radar facies 5) consisting of multiple lenticular reflectors with sigmoidal profiles sandwiched between the Dipping High Reflectivity layers with horizontal scales of 2 to 4 m (see fig. S3).
RIMFAX radargram acquired from Sol 201 and Sol 202.
(A) Sol 201 to 202 rover path from HiRISE. (B) RIMFAX amplitude-only radargram displayed at moderate resolution and (C) interpretive cross section. We have identified six selected areas (numbered 1 to 6) to illustrate high-resolution radar facies that are characteristic of the RIMFAX preconjunction dataset as a whole (Fig. 5). The larger box 6 indicates where the data shown in fig. S3B are taken.
RIMFAX radar facies observed during Sol 201 and Sol 202.
The different radar facies are indicated by the numbered boxes in Fig. 4C displayed at high resolution (left) and associated interpretations (right). The Artuby Top Facies (Radar facies 1) exhibits coherent near-surface layering that is subparallel to the local topography to depths of ~1 m. The Low Reflectivity Facies (Radar facies 2) is a 2- to 4-m-thick subsurface zone that is relatively free of coherent scatterers that can be traced for hundreds of meters as the rover traversed parallel to Artuby Ridge during Sols 178 to 200 (Fig. 2). The Low Reflectivity Facies appears to lie conformably on top of the Dipping High Reflectivity Facies (Radar facies 3), and we interpret it to be part of the same sequence of dipping layers that outcropped on the surface during the Sol 201 to 202 traverse. The Dipping High Reflectivity Facies consists of a set of strongly reflecting dipping parallel layers that are organized into packages with thicknesses that vary from 1 to 6 m. At ~10-m depth, the Dipping High Reflectivity Facies gradually become less highly inclined to form Deep Sub-Horizontal Facies (Radar facies 4). Last, there are also Upslope Dipping Facies (Radar facies 5) consisting of multiple lenticular reflectors with sigmoidal profiles sandwiched between the Dipping High Reflectivity layers with horizontal scales of 2 to 4 m (see fig. S3).
DISCUSSION
Before the Perseverance landing, the units that comprise the Jezero crater floor had been interpreted to include lava flows (, ), magmatic intrusions (), impact condensates (, ), tephra deposits (–), and/or aeolian () and fluvial deposits (). Interpretations of in situ Perseverance rover measurements on a rock abrasion patch at Brac show that it has coarsely crystalline olivine cumulate lithology that is more likely of primary igneous rather than clastic origin (). The high average subsurface permittivity determined by RIMFAX is consistent with the presence of dense, low-porosity igneous rocks. The subsurface stratigraphy observed by RIMFAX is also potentially consistent with this interpretation, as igneous units on Earth can display both horizontal and inclined layered structures (, ). Alternatively, the RIMFAX stratigraphy is also consistent with sedimentary structures formed in-place in an aqueous environment, as the dip angles of the strongly reflecting layers are consistent with those expected for foreset and bottomset beds (–). Since dipping layers observed near Issole appear to be discontinuous with the horizontal layers observed near Brac, it is possible that Brac and Issole may represent two different units with differing origins.Examination of the Sol 201 and 202 radar image at highest resolution reveals the presence of multiple lenticular reflectors with sigmoidal profiles, sandwiched between the dipping high reflectivity layers (Fig. 5 and figs. S4 and S5), that have dip angles too steep to be consistent with diffraction hyperbolas for nadir and off-nadir scatterers (see Materials and Methods and fig. S1). These finer layers have along-track wavelengths of 2 to 4 m and dip angles that are comparable to those of the high reflectivity layers but in the opposite direction. The sheer dimensions and consistency of the radar facies requires that the lenticular reflectors are connected to the large strong reflecting layers and are not an artifact of interference from off-nadir structures.One explanation for the subsurface lenticular reflectors observed by RIMFAX is that they are igneous structures associated with the emplacement of a layered magma body (fig. S3). High-resolution ground-penetrating radars on Earth that do not penetrate as deeply into dense igneous units as RIMFAX is able to on Mars because of increased loss due to dielectric absorption and higher conductivity from water in the ground, and analogous terrestrial radar facies have not been observed in terrestrial field measurements. The RIMFAX lenticular reflectors may be interpreted as magmatic flow and shear structures as are observed in outcrops at margins of terrestrial magma bodies at similar scale ().Alternatively, the lenticular reflectors may be cyclic step structures that are commonly observed in sedimentary environments on Earth (–) and on Mars (, ). Cyclic steps of similar scale and morphology have been identified in 200-MHz to 1.5-GHz ground-penetrating radar surveys of terrestrial glacigenic subaqueous fan and delta settings and correlated sedimentary facies visible in outcrops (fig. S4) (). Cyclic steps can be differentiated from related cross-bedded clinoform structures. Subaqueous dunes, which form in subcritical flow regimes, have downslope-migrating lee-side depositional bedding patterns, which are opposite to those that we observe (fig. S6) (). Subaqueous antidunes form in supercritical flow regimes and have symmetrical undulations rather than the strongly reflecting set boundary structures that we observe (). Aeolian dunes also have lee-side depositional bedding patterns and have slopes of 29° to 34° on Mars (), which are higher than what we observe. The weaker-reflecting backstepping layers and the stronger-reflecting set-boundary reflectors observed during Sols 201 and 202 have approximately equal dip angles, which would imply formation in a mixed partially depositional, partially erosional environment ().The discovery of buried structures in the Jezero crater floor is potentially compatible with a history of long-lived igneous activity and a history of multiple aqueous episodes. Interpretations of available Perseverance rover in situ characterizations of surface outcrops favor an igneous origin. However, the high-resolution radar facies associated with the steeply dipping layers of the Artuby ridge observed by RIMFAX strongly resemble those associated with aqueous sedimentary deposits. In either case, the initial RIMFAX data demonstrate the great potential of ground-penetrating radar surveys to reveal subsurface geologic structures on Mars.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Planetary Data System dataset and processing
The data used in this work can be found in the NASA PDS Geosciences Node (). The processing of the data is the same as described in the RIMFAX Calibrated Data Record Software Interface Specification. A gain with depth has been applied to the time domain data before displaying them.The radar wave velocity in the subsurface is not well constrained, as described in the section below. This means that migrating the data sometimes increases the noise level in the resulting image. Figures 2 to 5 therefore use unmigrated data to better preserve the image details. In fig. S4, a Kirchhoff migration with a two-layer velocity is used. The velocity model has a 75-cm air layer between the antenna and the ground with a subsurface velocity of 0.1 m/ns. Figures 2 to 4 show the magnitude of the reflected data, while the other radargrams show the real part of the waveform data.
Permittivity/wave velocity estimation
The relative dielectric permittivity ε′ can be derived from the radar wave propagation velocity v, assuming a dry, nonmagnetic, low-loss material, such that v = c/ holds, with speed of light c in free space. For the velocity derivation, we adapt the hyperbola matching method, a common technique used on Earth and for Moon-based ground-penetrating radar (, ). The characteristic reflection pattern for line measurements over a buried subwavelength-sized diffractor such as boulders or cavities is a hyperbola. Its shape is determined by the average velocity of the overlying material; thus, matching an analytic travel time curve to the hyperbolic shape yields the velocity. Here, we account for the refraction at the Martian surface by using a two-layered model with atmosphere and homogeneous subsurface (). The average permittivity along the traverse is 9.0 with an SD of 2.8 and an average diffractor depth of 1.9 m with 1.1-m SD.
Authors: Todd M Hoefen; Roger N Clark; Joshua L Bandfield; Michael D Smith; John C Pearl; Philip R Christensen Journal: Science Date: 2003-10-24 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Kathryn M Stack; Nathan R Williams; Fred Calef; Vivian Z Sun; Kenneth H Williford; Kenneth A Farley; Sigurd Eide; David Flannery; Cory Hughes; Samantha R Jacob; Linda C Kah; Forrest Meyen; Antonio Molina; Cathy Quantin Nataf; Melissa Rice; Patrick Russell; Eva Scheller; Christina H Seeger; William J Abbey; Jacob B Adler; Hans Amundsen; Ryan B Anderson; Stanley M Angel; Gorka Arana; James Atkins; Megan Barrington; Tor Berger; Rose Borden; Beau Boring; Adrian Brown; Brandi L Carrier; Pamela Conrad; Henning Dypvik; Sarah A Fagents; Zachary E Gallegos; Brad Garczynski; Keenan Golder; Felipe Gomez; Yulia Goreva; Sanjeev Gupta; Svein-Erik Hamran; Taryn Hicks; Eric D Hinterman; Briony N Horgan; Joel Hurowitz; Jeffrey R Johnson; Jeremie Lasue; Rachel E Kronyak; Yang Liu; Juan Manuel Madariaga; Nicolas Mangold; John McClean; Noah Miklusicak; Daniel Nunes; Corrine Rojas; Kirby Runyon; Nicole Schmitz; Noel Scudder; Emily Shaver; Jason SooHoo; Russell Spaulding; Evan Stanish; Leslie K Tamppari; Michael M Tice; Nathalie Turenne; Peter A Willis; R Aileen Yingst Journal: Space Sci Rev Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 8.017
Authors: A Deanne Rogers; Nicholas H Warner; Matthew P Golombek; James W Head; Justin C Cowart Journal: Geophys Res Lett Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 4.720