| Literature DB >> 36006936 |
Pattarawadee Siriprapanonkul1, Nalina Orprayoon2, Punkavee Tuntiviriyapun1, Phanupong Phutrakool3, Unnop Jaisamrarn2, Apiwat Mutirangura4, Sukanya Chaikittisilpa2.
Abstract
Menopause, which may accelerate the hallmarks of the natural aging process, represents a point in time characterized by the permanent cessation of menstruation following the loss of ovarian estrogen production. Unlike natural menopause, which is characterized by a gradual decrease in estrogen production, when both ovaries are removed before the natural age of menopause, the onset of estrogen deprivation is abrupt. Further, a decrease in genome methylation frequently occurs in aging cells, and the major interspersed repetitive DNA elements in humans are Alu elements. In blood cells, Alu demethylation starts at an age of approximately 40 years, and increases with age. Here, we explored the Alu methylation levels corresponding to age-matched pre-menopausal, naturally postmenopausal, and surgically postmenopausal women aged 45-55 years (n = 60 in each group). Our results indicated that the body mass index (BMI), time-since-menopause, and Alu methylation levels corresponding to the three groups were significantly different. However, no correlations between Alu methylation level and BMI, time-since-menopause, or age were observed. Additionally, the Alu methylation level corresponding to the natural post-menopause group was significantly lower those corresponding to the pre-menopausal (p = 0.001) and surgical post-menopausal (p = 0.037) groups. In conclusion, Alu hypomethylation occurs in naturally postmenopausal women, implying that when women reach the age of natural menopause, the cell aging process may progress significantly with genome hypomethylation. These findings, notwithstanding, further studies are necessary to clarify whether bilateral oophorectomy before the age of menopause affects the cell aging process to a greater extent than natural menopause, and whether estrogen therapy or other interventions can delay cell aging in this regard.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36006936 PMCID: PMC9409535 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273403
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Demographic data corresponding to the participants in each group and Post-hoc comparison.
| Variables | Total | Overall (n = 180) | Menopause status, Median (IQR) |
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre (n = 60) | Natural (n = 60) | Surgical (n = 60) | 1st group (Pre vs. Natural) | 2nd group (Pre vs. Surgical) | 3rd group (Natural vs. Surgical) | |||||
| BMI | 180 | 24.4 (21.6–27.6) | 24.9 (22.5–28.3) | 23.2 (21.2–24.9) | 26.2 (21.8–28.3) | 8.988 | 0.011 | 0.022 | > 0.999 | 0.010 |
| Year since menopause, year | 120 | 3 (2–5) | - | 3 (1–4) | 4 (2–6) | 6.287 | 0.012 | |||
| Total Alu level (%) | 180 | 58.9 (56.6–61.6) | 60.0 (58.1–62.6) | 57.6 (55.6–60.0) | 59.6 (55.5–62.1) | 12.633 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.308 | 0.037 |
| Smoking, n (%) | 180 | - | - | |||||||
| • No | 180 (100) | 60 (100) | 60 (100) | 60 (100) | ||||||
| • Yes | - | - | - | - | ||||||
aSignificance level at 0.05 (two-tailed)
bSignificance level at 0.01 (two-tailed)
Fig 1Variation in the total Alu level (%) with menopausal status.
Dunn’s post-hoc test showing differences in the total Alu level. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Fig 2Correlation between the Alu methylation level and BMI among A) all participants, B) pre-menopause group, C) natural menopause group, and D) surgical menopause group. Data were analyzed using Spearman’s correlation analysis.
Fig 4Correlation between the Alu methylation level and age among A) all participants, B) pre-menopause group, C) natural menopause group, and D) surgical menopause group. Data were analyzed using Spearman’s correlation analysis.