Literature DB >> 36006434

Postural support requirements preferentially modulate late components of the gastrocnemius response to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Cassandra Russell1, Nathan Difford1, Alexander Stamenkovic2, Paul Stapley1, Darryl McAndrew1, Caitlin Arpel1, Colum MacKinnon3, Jonathan Shemmell4.   

Abstract

Mounting evidence suggests that motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded in upper limb muscles with postural support roles following transcranial magnetic stimulation receive contributions from both corticospinal and non-corticospinal descending pathways. We tested the hypothesis that neural structures responsible for regulating upright balance are involved in transmitting late portions of TMS-induced MEPs in a lower limb muscle. MEPs were recorded in the medial gastrocnemius muscles of each leg, while participants supported their upright posture in five postural conditions that required different levels of support from the target muscles. We observed that early and late portions of the MEP were modulated independently, with early MEP amplitude being reduced when high levels of postural support were required from a target muscle. Independent modulation of early and late MEPs by altered postural demand suggests largely separable transmission of each part of the MEP. The early component of the MEP is likely generated by fast-conducting corticospinal pathways, whereas the later component may be primarily transmitted along a polysynaptic cortico-reticulospinal pathway.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Balance control; Brainstem; Cortico-reticulospinal; Corticospinal; Posture; Reticular formation; Triceps surae

Year:  2022        PMID: 36006434     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06440-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  19 in total

1.  Lawrence and Kuypers (1968a, b) revisited: copies of the original filmed material from their classic papers in Brain.

Authors:  Roger N Lemon; W Landau; D Tutssel; D G Lawrence
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Excitation of the corticospinal tract by electromagnetic and electrical stimulation of the scalp in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  S A Edgley; J A Eyre; R N Lemon; S Miller
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway.

Authors:  H Devanne; B A Lavoie; C Capaday
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Influence of age and posture on spinal and corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  Stéphane Baudry; Sarah Collignon; Jacques Duchateau
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.032

5.  Comparison of nerve conduction study and transcranial magnetic stimulation for early diagnosis and prognosis prediction of idiopathic facial palsy.

Authors:  Huan-Jan Lin; Po-Cheng Chen; Tzu-Tung Tsai; Shih-Pin Hsu
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Impact of gravity loading on post-stroke reaching and its relationship to weakness.

Authors:  Randall F Beer; Michael D Ellis; Bradley G Holubar; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Reticular formation responses to magnetic brain stimulation of primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Karen M Fisher; Boubker Zaaimi; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests in psychiatry: a non-technical guide using JASP.

Authors:  Daniel S Quintana; Donald R Williams
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  Clinical Value of the Assessment of Changes in MEP Duration with Voluntary Contraction.

Authors:  Marisa Brum; Christopher Cabib; Josep Valls-Solé
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Enhanced reticulospinal output in patients with (REEP1) hereditary spastic paraplegia type 31.

Authors:  K M Fisher; P F Chinnery; S N Baker; M R Baker
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.