Selemon Bekele1,2, Kristi Singh1,2, Evan Helton3, Sanaz Farajollahi1,2, Rajesh R Naik4, Patrick Dennis1, Nancy Kelley-Loughnane1, Rajiv Berry1. 1. Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, WPAFB, Ohio 45433-7131, United States. 2. UES Inc., Dayton, Ohio 45432, United States. 3. Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio 45435, United States. 4. 711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, WPAFB, Ohio 45433, United States.
Abstract
Sclerotization of the Nereis virens jaw is mediated by metal binding to the histidine-rich jaw protein, Nvjp-1. Previous studies showed that the mechanical properties of Nvjp-1 hydrogels could be modulated with zinc binding as well as the associated anion. Here, we show that the mechanical properties of Nvjp-1 hydrogels can be modulated by pH and that zinc binding to Nvjp-1 is stable at both acidic and alkaline pH conditions. To probe the mechanism of Zn2+ binding to Nvjp-1 at different pH conditions, we utilized all atom molecular dynamics simulations employing a polarizable force field. At low pH conditions, polar residues predominantly interacted with Zn2+, with at most two residues interacting with a given zinc ion. Surprisingly, little to no Zn2+ binding was observed with the abundant Nvjp-1 acidic residues, which form salt-bridges with the protonated histidines to effectively block their binding to Zn2+ ions. As the pH was shifted to alkaline conditions, Zn2+ binding residues reconfigured to form additional coordination bonds with histidine, resulting in a reduction in the radius of gyration that correlated with hydrogel sclerotization. Furthermore, acetate ions were shown to facilitate the capture of zinc ions through association with protonated histidines at low pH, freeing acidic residues to interact with Zn2+ ions and increasing the number of Zn2+ ions that diffuse into the Nvjp-1 interior. Thus, these studies provide valuable molecular insights into how amino acid residues in Nvjp-1 manage metal salt binding and coordination in hydrogels as a function of the pH and ionic environments.
Sclerotization of the Nereis virens jaw is mediated by metal binding to the histidine-rich jaw protein, Nvjp-1. Previous studies showed that the mechanical properties of Nvjp-1 hydrogels could be modulated with zinc binding as well as the associated anion. Here, we show that the mechanical properties of Nvjp-1 hydrogels can be modulated by pH and that zinc binding to Nvjp-1 is stable at both acidic and alkaline pH conditions. To probe the mechanism of Zn2+ binding to Nvjp-1 at different pH conditions, we utilized all atom molecular dynamics simulations employing a polarizable force field. At low pH conditions, polar residues predominantly interacted with Zn2+, with at most two residues interacting with a given zinc ion. Surprisingly, little to no Zn2+ binding was observed with the abundant Nvjp-1 acidic residues, which form salt-bridges with the protonated histidines to effectively block their binding to Zn2+ ions. As the pH was shifted to alkaline conditions, Zn2+ binding residues reconfigured to form additional coordination bonds with histidine, resulting in a reduction in the radius of gyration that correlated with hydrogel sclerotization. Furthermore, acetate ions were shown to facilitate the capture of zinc ions through association with protonated histidines at low pH, freeing acidic residues to interact with Zn2+ ions and increasing the number of Zn2+ ions that diffuse into the Nvjp-1 interior. Thus, these studies provide valuable molecular insights into how amino acid residues in Nvjp-1 manage metal salt binding and coordination in hydrogels as a function of the pH and ionic environments.
There is a growing interest
in biomaterials with spatially graded
chemical compositions and mechanical properties. Improving the stress
distribution at interfaces and minimizing contact deformation are
highly desirable in man-made materials and may be achieved by mimicking
the structural and chemical properties of biological systems which
often prevent damage by employing a smooth transition from hard to
soft through mechanical gradients that dissipate large forces.[1] Insights into the relationships between structure
and mechanical properties such as hardness, fracture toughness, and
wear resistance may be garnered by exploring the properties of hard
tissues found in biological organisms to inform design paradigms.
This calls for an understanding of the structural and biochemical
principles that govern functionality in biological systems through
interactions with biotic/abiotic materials to help in the design of
synthetic materials with desired properties.Many of the functional
properties of biological materials have
been attributed to the presence of metal centers. While calcium based
biominerals are responsible for the hardening of teeth and bones in
vertebrates, marine invertebrates have also been shown to contain
metallized, hard tissues.[2] Invertebrate
jaws are different from the more familiar calcified bones and teeth
of vertebrates in that they contain high levels of transition metals
such as zinc and copper.[2] For instance,
the jaws of the marine polychaete Glycera dibranchiata contain copper which is present in a crystalline form as the mineral
atacamite that is organized into fibers that reinforce the material
by enhancing the hardness of the jaw tip.[3] Another example is the Nereis virens marine worm
jaw which is used for grasping, piercing, and tearing. The jaw was
found to exhibit high levels of Zn that correlated with the presence
of a highly proteinaceous material enriched in glycine (Gly) and histidine
(His).[4,5] Despite the lack of mineralization, the N. virens jaw possesses hardness and stiffness properties
comparable to human dentin and mechanical properties superior to synthetically
engineered polymers.[2] Extensive coordination
of Zn2+ by a histidine-rich protein framework has been
shown to be responsible for the remarkable mechanical properties of
the N. virens jaw, where the nonuniform distribution
of the glycine and histidine rich proteinaceous material, in coordination
with a 3 wt % zinc content, was shown to be highest at the jaw tip
and serrated cutting edge while decreasing gradually to the base.[4,6] This imparts the jaw with mechanical and chemical gradients that
greatly enhance functionality.Proteomic analysis of the N. virens jaw material
revealed dominant polypeptides at 38 kDa named Nvjp-1, consisting
of more than 25 mol % histidine and 35 mol % glycine residues and
correlating well with earlier amino acid analyses of the crude jaw
material.[5,6] Tyrosine and glutamate/aspartate are also
highly represented amino acids present in the Nvjp-1 polypeptide,
and it was demonstrated that Nvjp-1 could be recombinantly expressed
and purified from E. coli.[6] Subsequent studies showed that recombinant preparations of Nvjp-1
could be processed into hydrogels by photochemical and enzymatic cross-linking
techniques through the abundant tyrosine residues.[7−9] Placing the
Nvjp-1 hydrogels in salt solutions led to condensation and reduced
water content, but only treatment with Zn salts resulted in a 2 order-of-magnitude
increase in the hydrogel’s compressive modulus.[8] As was shown in the natural worm jaw, the metal-mediated
increase in mechanical properties was reversible with Zn2+ chelation.[10] Furthermore, the choice
of anion in the Zn salt had profound effects on the viscoelastic properties
of the Nvjp-1 hydrogels. Zinc paired with an acetate ion demonstrated
more uniform metallization of the hydrogel but higher levels of stress
relaxation and viscous behavior at high strain rates. In the presence
of chloride ions, reduced stress relaxation and increased elastic
behavior at high strain rates were observed, indicating the stabilization
of Zn2+ coordination bonding with chloride. This is consistent
with earlier observations that zinc levels in the worm jaw closely
correlate with that of Cl–, and the presence of
His approximately follows Zn2+ and Cl– concentrations.[10,11] Combining this information with
extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) and X-ray absorption
near edge structure (XANES) data, it has been suggested that zinc
acts as a cross-linker of the proteinaceous matrix by forming Zn(His)3Cl-like units.[4] Together these
observations indicated coordination of Zn2+ by His residues
and chloride and showed that the presence of Nvjp-1 is sufficient
to explain the effects of metal binding on worm jaw mechanical properties.It is difficult to experimentally determine which residues in Nvjp-1
are interacting with Zn2+ under different environmental
conditions. As an initial approach to this problem, Chou et al.[7] carried out a multiscale computational study
of the Nvjp-1 protein where they employed density functional theory
(DFT) calculations, replica exchange molecular dynamics (REMD) simulations,
and a coarse-grained elastic network model to elucidate the role played
by metal coordination in Nvjp-1 cross-linking mechanisms. The results
from DFT analysis, which involved different complexes of histidine
with Zn2+, indicated that the highest occupied molecular
orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO)
are mostly localized in the histidine side chains rather than in the
Zn2+ ions. This suggests a mostly electrostatic interaction
between the positively charged ions and the lone pairs of electrons
of either oxygen or nitrogen atoms.While the DFT study implied
interactions between Zn2+ and lone pairs on atoms of the
protein, the REMD simulations involved
the nonpolarizable CHARMM force field for protein atoms and the TIP3
water model where polarization effects are accounted for in a mean-field
manner by fixing partial atomic charges of the system to effective
values which remain fixed throughout a simulation. The REMD simulations
predicted different mechanical responses as a function of changing
ion concentrations. However, it is well-known that the charge distribution
of a molecule can change in response to its environment; i.e., molecules
are polarizable.[12] For example, the conformation
of a peptide affects its electronic distribution,[13] and the electronic distribution of a ligand changes upon
binding to a protein.[14] Neither of these
effects would be captured by a nonpolarizable force field. For ex vivo processing of Nvjp-1 into reconfigurable materials,
we were interested in determining how metal binding of the protein
could be modulated by changing the pH environment and the presence
of the metal salt counteranion. Here we show that stable binding of
Zn2+ metal ions in Nvjp-1 hydrogels allows the mechanical
properties of the hydrogels to be modulated by shifting the pH conditions
of the environment without additional exposure to the metal. To probe
how the Nvjp-1 protein manages Zn2+ ion binding through
varying pH conditions, as well as the effect of the anion partner
of Zn2+, all atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were
employed using a polarizable force field where each of the Nvjp-1
structures was solvated in zinc chloride and zinc acetate solutions
for a total of 10 simulations. The results of these studies suggest
a system where polar residues mediate metal binding at low pH conditions
and pass them to a carboxylate/imidazole coordination pocket as the
pH approaches neutrality in ZnCl2. To the best of our knowledge
this work is the first computational study of the Nvjp-1 protein in
microscopic detail where polarization effects are taken into account
explicitly.
Materials and Methods
Expression and
purification of Nvjp-1 were performed according
to a previously published method.[8] The
enzymatic cross-linking of Nvjp1 hydrogels was carried out as described
earlier.[8,9]
Nvjp-1 Mechanical Testing
The mechanical testing of
Nvjp-1 hydrogels was performed using a CellScale MicroTester G2 using
parallel plate compression. Hydrogels were kept within a bath of the
respective buffer at room temperature throughout testing. The instrument
was operated using the displacement control in ramp mode, which applies
the displacement at a constant nominal rate. The cycle test parameters
were set to ramp to a 5% strain over 30 s, followed by a 1 s hold
time and a 30 s unload. The data and images were both captured at
a frequency of 5 Hz. Young’s modulus was calculated using E = stress/strain = (F/A)/(ΔL/L0) where E is the Young’s modulus; F is the force applied; A is the area through
which the force is applied; ΔL is the displacement
and L0 is the initial position of the
compression plate. The slope of the stress–strain curve is
calculated using the least-squares method for determining the best
fit for the data. Experiments were performed on at least three different
hydrogels, and the standard error was calculated.
Metal Analysis of Hydrogels
Energy dispersive spectroscopy
(EDS) was used to estimate the zinc content of the hydrogels. EDS
analysis was performed using a Zeiss Gemini 500 SEM equipped with
an Xmax 80 detector by Oxford Instruments operated at an acceleration
voltage of 15 kV for the measurements. The raw data were analyzed
using Aztec software to determine the elemental composition and atomic
percentages of each element. Data were accumulated from three areas
on each hydrogel and the results averaged.
Structure Modeling
The Rosetta[15] macromolecular modeling program was used to generate the initial
structure of the Nvjp-1 protein. The methods employed in the program
optimized the value of an energy or scoring function to generate an
ensemble of structures with conformations corresponding to energies
close to the global energy minimum. Conformational variation in the
target protein structure was achieved by inserting fragments of nine
or three residues taken from a preselected fragment library starting
from a linear conformation of the target sequence. Different clustering
algorithms were used to obtain five model structures. An example of
the three-dimensional Nvjp-1 structure is shown in Figure S1 of the Supporting Information.
Force Field
The CHARMM force field modified to include
polarization effects by incorporating the Drude polarizable force
field was used.[16−21] The system prepared according to the specifications outlined was
then submitted to the CHARMM-GUI[22,23] web server
to generate the necessary input files for simulations. All simulations
were carried out using the NAMD (nanoscale molecular dynamics) package.[24] The simulations incorporated polarization effects
by adding the so-called Drude particles to all the heavy atoms in
the system for simulation with the Drude polarizable force field.
The system before the addition of the Drude particles, i.e., without
polarization, was subjected to a sufficiently long minimization to
ensure the system will have no particle overlap when adding Drude
particles.The SWM4-ND polarizable model was used to simulate
water.[25] Nonbonded interactions were modeled
by means of dispersive and electrostatic forces. The electrostatic
interactions were modeled by a Coulombic potential with long-range
corrections treated using the particle mesh Ewald (PME) method.[26,27] A 12–6 Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential was used to model dispersive
interactions with the LJ parameters for unlike interactions determined
by Lorentz–Berthelot mixing rules.[28] The cutoff distance for all interactions was 12 Å.The
dimensions of the simulation box were chosen so that periodic
images of the Nvjp-1 protein did not interact with each other, and
periodic boundary conditions were applied in three dimensions. The
simulations were performed in the canonical NPT ensemble
at a pH of 5 and 8 and a temperature of 500 K. The higher temperature
was chosen to enhance the mobility of the ionic species in the system
and hence obtain data in a reasonable amount of time instead of running
at room temperature which would entail prohibitively long simulation
times. The temperature is well below the degradation temperature of
Nvjp-1, and its disordered nature is also not affected. The Langevin
thermostat[29,30] with a relaxation time of 100
fs was used to keep the system temperature fixed at 500 K. The equations
of motion were solved using the velocity-Verlet algorithm with a time
step of 0.5 fs. Trajectory data were saved every 25 ps.
Nvjp-1 Simulation Setup
To mimic the pH environment
of Nvjp-1, PROPKA[31,32] was first used to create models
of Nvjp-1 with protonation states corresponding to different pH values. Supporting Information Figure S2 shows the protonated
fraction as a function of pH as calculated by PROPKA for histidine
and acidic residues. At physiological pH, about 50% of the histidines
are protonated and almost all the acidic residues (aspartates and
glutamates) are deprotonated (Supporting Information Figure S2a,c). As expected, the histidines become progressively
deprotonated at pH values greater than 6, existing predominantly in
the δ form. When the Nvjp-1 protein is introduced into a solution
containing zinc ions, initially no ions would be present in the interior
of the protein. To replicate this condition in the simulation, the
volume occupied by the protein was determined in order to keep ions
outside the protein at the beginning of a simulation. For this purpose,
distributions of distances for histidine imidazole nitrogen and acidic
residue carboxylic oxygen, with respect to the center of mass of the
protein, were built as these would potentially be on the surface of
the protein because of their hydrophilic character (Supporting Information Figure S3). The distributions for nitrogen
and oxygen have very similar peak positions and widths, so there was
likely no bias by randomly placing the ionic species outside the protein
in terms of which residues may capture zinc ions first. Based on the
plots in Supporting Information Figure S3, ions within a 50 Å radius from the center of mass of the protein
were excluded. The rest of the simulation volume needs to have a sufficient
number of zinc cations and anions to make sure the whole system remained
neutral. We started with a sufficiently large number of ions in the
simulation box, removing all the ions within a specified radius from
the protein center of mass, and then randomly removed ions from the
rest of the system volume until the concentration reached a value
of 200 mM. At pH 5, acetate has a larger pKa value than ASP and GLU. At this pH, the ratio of the ionic form
to the acidic one is approximately 1.76:1 which implies there would
be excess acetate ions over the acidics. To make matters simple, we
have not modified the protonation state of the acetate ions dissociating
from Zn(OAc)2. See section 1 of the Supporting Information for more details.
Results and Discussion
Mechanical Testing of Nvjp-1 Hydrogels
In studying
the conditions necessary for the metal loading of Nvjp-1 cross-linked
hydrogels, we tested whether the hydrogels could bind zinc under low
pH conditions in sufficient amounts to support hydrogel sclerotization
when the pH was raised. Nvjp-1 solutions (3 wt % Nvjp-1, 5% glycerol)
were enzymatically cross-linked with horseradish peroxidase as described
previously and air-dried (Figure a), followed by rehydration in 200 mM NaOAc or 300
mM Zn(OAc)2 solutions at pH 5 (Figure b).[8,9] The metallized hydrogels
were then soaked in NaOAc buffer at pH 5 to remove any unbound zinc
(Figure b). Mechanical
testing of the resulting hydrogels demonstrated little to no increase
in the compressive modulus with the Zn2+ treated hydrogels
when compared to the Na+ control, consistent with the idea
that the histidines are largely protonated at this pH. As the hydrogels
were moved to NaOAc, pH 7, the Zn2+ treated hydrogels demonstrated
a significant increase in compressive modulus, where only a minor
increase in mechanical properties was observed with the Na+ control (Figure b).
Figure 1
(a) Enzymatically cross-linked Nvjp-1 protein hydrogels after demolding
(left) and drying (right). The dried hydrogels are processed according
to the scheme shown in (b). Results from the mechanical testing of
the hydrogels incubated in Zn2+ and the controls are shown
in (c) where error bars represent the standard error. The numbers
displayed above the modulus values for the Zn2+ samples
represent the atomic % of Zn2+ as determined by EDS analysis.
(d) Hydrogels were metallized with zinc at pH 5 followed by multiple
rounds of cycling in sodium acetate buffer from pH 5 to 7. Mechanical
properties of the hydrogels were measured after each pH change.
(a) Enzymatically cross-linked Nvjp-1 protein hydrogels after demolding
(left) and drying (right). The dried hydrogels are processed according
to the scheme shown in (b). Results from the mechanical testing of
the hydrogels incubated in Zn2+ and the controls are shown
in (c) where error bars represent the standard error. The numbers
displayed above the modulus values for the Zn2+ samples
represent the atomic % of Zn2+ as determined by EDS analysis.
(d) Hydrogels were metallized with zinc at pH 5 followed by multiple
rounds of cycling in sodium acetate buffer from pH 5 to 7. Mechanical
properties of the hydrogels were measured after each pH change.Shifting the pH to 8 resulted in a further increase
in compressive
modulus with the zinc treated hydrogel. When the pH was adjusted back
to 5, the compressive moduli of both Na+ and Zn2+ treated hydrogels reverted to the initial pH 5 values. EDS analysis
was used to determine how the zinc levels changed as the hydrogels
were moved through the different pH conditions. After soaking in NaOAc
at pH 5, the zinc bound hydrogels were found to contain a 0.64 atomic
% of Zn2+ (Figure c). This level did not change significantly as the hydrogels
were placed at a neutral (pH 7) or alkaline (pH 8) conditions. However,
Zn2+ levels dropped significantly when the pH was adjusted
from 8 back to 5, corresponding to the decrease in compressive modulus
observed in Figure b. This was confirmed when Zn2+ treated hydrogels were
cycled numerous times between pH 5 and pH 7. In this experiment, Zn2+ mediated effects on compressive modulus dissipated quickly
after the first cycle, reaching a stable baseline by cycle 3 (Figure d). Together the
data indicate that Nvjp-1 hydrogels can be metallized at a low pH
to effectively enhance their mechanical properties with increasing
pH. This trend does not work in reverse, suggesting the mechanisms
of metal binding and metal transfer by Nvjp-1 at the different pHs
are asymmetrical.
Nvjp-1 Zinc Binding at pH 5
Molecular dynamics simulations
were performed at a pH of 5 in order to understand how Nvjp-1 might
be metallized under low pH conditions. Nvjp-1 is rich in glycine,
histidine, tyrosine, and acidic amino acids (aspartate and glutamate).
The pKa of histidine is about 6.0 which
corresponds to the pH where the number of protonated histidines are
equal to the neutral side chain. At a pH of 5, 80% of the Nvjp-1 histidines
are protonated making them positively charged (Supporting Information Figure S2a). At this pH, the zinc ions
cannot interact with the positively charged histidine residues for
coordination due to electrostatic repulsion. On the other hand, almost
90% of the acidic residues are negatively charged at a pH of 5. All
results presented in this work are from simulations run for over 300
ns. The equilibration of the Nvjp-1 protein is illustrated in the
plot of the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) as a function of time
(see Supporting Information Figure S4).
Coordination between the carboxylic oxygens and the positively charged
zinc ions was anticipated purely on the basis of attractive electrostatic
interaction between positive and negative charges. Contrary to expectation,
the simulation results indicated the majority of the aspartate and
glutamate residues did not make coordination bonds with zinc ions.
In contrast, polar residues were consistently observed to capture
zinc ions from the solution and remain coordinated with them throughout
the length of the 300 ns simulation time. This is readily explained
if the hydration of ions by water is considered. Water molecules are
naturally polar and can interact with ions as a result of charge redistribution
in response to the electric field produced by the ions. Similarly,
hydroxyl and amine groups on polar but neutral residues can interact
with ions as a result of polarization even though they do not have
overall explicit charge.Figure shows example snapshots of polar and protonated acidic
residues coordinating with the positively charged zinc ions. The distances
shown are in angstroms and correspond to peak positions obtained by
fitting distance distributions to Gaussian functions (see Figure S5). The heavy atoms have Drude particles
attached to them whose motions, as the result of their response to
imposed electric fields, mimic charge redistribution in real systems.
At pH of 5, 10% of the acidic residues are protonated which would
be expected to preclude any coordination with the positively charged
zinc ions. However, in addition to the polar residues(Figure a–c), the protonated
residues are also observed to coordinate with zinc ions (Figure e,f). Closer inspection
of these cases revealed that polarization of the hydroxyl oxygens
is responsible for the coordination (Supporting Information Figure S6a). Similarly, the positively charged
zinc ion may interact with a positively charged lysine residue as
a result of the polarization of the amine nitrogen and the zinc ion
(Supporting Information Figure S6b) in
addition to the polarization of atoms on side chains of nearby residues.
Zn2+–residue coordination occurs in a complex environment
which results in a distribution of configurations. Examples are shown
for GLU in Figure S7.
Figure 2
Shown are examples of
Zn2+ coordination with the hydroxyl
containing TYR and SER (a, b), the amine nitrogens on GLN and LYS
(c, d), and the protonated acidic residues ASP and GLU (e, f). The
distances shown are in angstroms. Unless specified otherwise, the
colors of atoms in the snapshots are such that oxygens are red, hydrogens
are white, nitrogens are blue, carbons are cyan, and zinc ions are
orange. The water molecules, counterions, Drude particles, and lone
pairs in the system are not shown for clarity.
Shown are examples of
Zn2+ coordination with the hydroxyl
containing TYR and SER (a, b), the amine nitrogens on GLN and LYS
(c, d), and the protonated acidic residues ASP and GLU (e, f). The
distances shown are in angstroms. Unless specified otherwise, the
colors of atoms in the snapshots are such that oxygens are red, hydrogens
are white, nitrogens are blue, carbons are cyan, and zinc ions are
orange. The water molecules, counterions, Drude particles, and lone
pairs in the system are not shown for clarity.Table T1 in the Supporting Information shows a comparison of interaction energies between
Zn2+ and various residues from the Drude model and DFT.
The energies
from DFT correspond to the structures optimized in vacuum using Gaussian16[33] and calculated as Eint = Ecomplex – (Eresidue + Ezn). Optimized
structures for some selected residues are shown in Figure S8. The DFT calculations predict binding of Zn2+ to the residues shown in Figure except for LYS. The differences between
the DFT energies and those from the Drude model are in the range 5–67
kcal/mol. However, an exhaustive combination of levels of theory and
basis sets needs to be explored in order to check if better agreement
with the Drude model can be obtained. We would like to note that the
energies from the Drude model are for Zn2+–residue
interactions in an aqueous environment with several residues, water
molecules, and anions in the vicinity of Zn2+ while those
from DFT are gas phase calculations for Zn2+ interacting
with a single residue. The CHARMM Drude force field uses ion parameters
developed with ions solvated in water. As a result, direct comparison
may not be warranted. We would like to emphasize at this point that
the development of ion parameters for use with protein residues is
necessary for realistic simulations where good agreement between DFT
and Drude ion–residue interaction energies may be obtained.
Role of Nvjp-1 Acidic Residues at Low pH
At a pH of
5, the acidic residues in Nvjp-1 do not coordinate with zinc ions
to a large extent, with the exception of a small number of protonated
carboxylic acids. To address this counterintuitive result, we looked
into whether the protonated histidines (HSP) are somehow influencing
the acidic residues, by preventing them from interacting with the
zinc ions. In order to see if there is any association between acidic
and protonated histidines, we calculated the radial distribution function
between carboxylic oxygen and imidazole nitrogen (Figure a,b). It is evident from these
plots that acidic residues are indeed interacting with the histidines
and the distances between the pair of atoms in the first g(r) peak are suggestive of hydrogen bonding between
the acidic oxygens and the δ or ε hydrogens bound to the
imidazole nitrogens. The association between acidic side chains and
protonated histidine residues is indicated in example snapshots (Figure c,d), where the aspartate
and glutamate residues are each surrounded by three histidines.
Figure 3
(a, b) Radial
distribution functions between carboxylic oxygens
and δ or ε nitrogens of the protonated histidines (HSP):
ND, δ hydrogen; NE, ε nitrogen. (c, d) Association of
acidic residues with protonated histidines: (left) aspartate; (right)
glutamate. The distances shown are in angstroms. One of the histidines
is a close neighbor.
(a, b) Radial
distribution functions between carboxylic oxygens
and δ or ε nitrogens of the protonated histidines (HSP):
ND, δ hydrogen; NE, ε nitrogen. (c, d) Association of
acidic residues with protonated histidines: (left) aspartate; (right)
glutamate. The distances shown are in angstroms. One of the histidines
is a close neighbor.Considering that the histidines have one unit of
positive charge
and an acidic residue has one unit of negative charge, the overall
charge of the assembly is positive and produces a region of high potential
from which the positively charged zinc ions would be repelled. To
confirm this, we looked into the nonbonded interactions between zinc
ions and the associating acidic and histidine residues. The distribution
of the nonbonded (van der Waals + Coulomb) interaction energies between
zinc ions and several associated acidic and protonated histidines
shows that the energies are mostly positive for the various acidic
+ histidine combinations, further supporting the idea that the zinc
ions experience a positively charged region wherever the acidic residues
are located (Figure ). In the cases where the interaction energy is close to zero or
slightly negative, there may not be a sufficient driving force that
leads to zinc ion coordination with the acidic residues. Taken together,
the simulations suggest that at low pH, the protonated histidines
preform a metal binding pocket by associating with the acidic side
chains, whereas metallization is primarily mediated by the polar amino
acids.
Figure 4
Nonbonded (van der Waals + Coulomb) interaction energies between
zinc ions and associating acidic and protonated histidines: (top)
Zn with ASP + HSP; (bottom) Zn with GLU + HSP.
Nonbonded (van der Waals + Coulomb) interaction energies between
zinc ions and associating acidic and protonated histidines: (top)
Zn with ASP + HSP; (bottom) Zn with GLU + HSP.
Role of Acetate vs Chloride in Zinc Binding at pH 5
Previous studies showed that the anion partner of zinc salts played
an important role in the metallization of Nvjp-1 hydrogels.[8] When chloride was used as the initial metallizing
counteranion, zinc was found to bind Nvjp-1 hydrogels tightly, creating
a hard outer shell that ruptured under strain. However, when acetate
was used as a counteranion, the zinc was able to penetrate the hydrogels
more readily, leading to even metallization throughout the hydrogel.
To determine how the anion partner affects zinc ion coordination,
the number of zinc ions inside the Nvjp-1 was calculated as a function
of time with either chloride or acetate as a counteranion (Figure a). Snapshots of
the zinc ion distribution in equlibrated Nvjp-1 structures are shown
in Supporting Information Figure S9. A
distance cutoff of 3 Å between zinc ions and oxygen or nitrogen
atoms of residues is used for the counting. For both solutions, the
number of coordinating zinc ions initially increased over the first
150 ns of simulation, before saturating over time. However, the rate
was faster in zinc acetate, reaching a value of NZn ∼ 25 in the first 20 ns, whereas with zinc chloride
it took ∼150 ns to attain the same value. Additionally, the
average saturated value of zinc ion coordination in the presence of
acetate is almost twice that observed in the presence of chloride.
The acetate counteranion is chemically similar to aspartate and glutamate
side chains that were shown to associate with the protonated histidines
at pH 5 (Figure a,c).
In the simulation, an acetate ion from Zn(OAc)2 substitutes
for a histidine-associated aspartate residue, allowing the aspartate
residue to interact with a zinc ion (Figures c and 5b). Thus, acetate
ions indirectly help the transport of zinc ions into the interior
of Nvjp-1, as the negatively charged acidic residues are freed from
their association with the protonated histidines and help to attract
the more positively charged zinc ions.
Figure 5
(a) Number of zinc ions
as a function of time inside the Nvjp-1
in ZnCl2 and Zn(OAc)2 solutions at pH = 5. A
distance cutoff of 3 Å between zinc ions and oxygen or nitrogen
atoms of residues is used for the counting. (b) Snapshot of associated
acetate ions with protonated histidines in the presence of Zn(OAc)2 allowing the aspartate residue to interact with a zinc ion.
(a) Number of zinc ions
as a function of time inside the Nvjp-1
in ZnCl2 and Zn(OAc)2 solutions at pH = 5. A
distance cutoff of 3 Å between zinc ions and oxygen or nitrogen
atoms of residues is used for the counting. (b) Snapshot of associated
acetate ions with protonated histidines in the presence of Zn(OAc)2 allowing the aspartate residue to interact with a zinc ion.
Zinc, Counterions and Nvjp-1 Radius of Gyration at Varying pH
Chou et al. demonstrated that hydrogel contraction increased with
zinc coordination compared to contraction in the presence of sodium,
and this was attributed to the larger number of cross-links that occurred
in the presence of zinc. Through MD simulations, we looked to see
how changing pH and the counteranion species might affect Nvjp-1 contraction
in the presence of zinc. The radius of gyration (Rg) provides information on the size and compactness of
protein molecules. Here we investigated how the Rg of Nvjp-1 responds to zinc metallization under acidic
and alkaline pH conditions as a function of chloride or acetate as
the counteranion. When metallization occurs in the presence of ZnCl2 at pH 5, the Rg of Nvjp-1 appears
to decrease at early times from its starting value but fluctuates
strongly over time (Figure S10a, red).
This can be explained by the prior observation that the majority of
acidic residues are bound with the protonated histidines and do not
make coordination bonds with zinc ions. Rather, polar residues are
primarily involved in the capture of zinc ions from the solution,
where coordination by polar side chains persists throughout the simulation
time. When the pH is shifted to 8, the Nvjp-1 Rg stabilizes (Figure S10a, blue)
and the Rg distribution is narrower, indicating
a contraction of Nvjp-1 due to an increase in coordination with zinc
ions (Figure a). It
should be noted at this point that no additional zinc ions were added
to the system when it was shifted from pH 5 to 8. In contrast, the Rg of Nvjp-1 metallized in zinc acetate, at pH
5, shows a decrease at early times but attains an average value with
much smaller fluctuations (Figure S10b).
However, the Rg distribution is substantially
narrower in the presence of acetate than with chloride at pH 5. Nvjp-1
metallized in zinc acetate also shows a narrowing of the Rg distribution when the pH is shifted to 8, but the shift
is smaller compared with zinc chloride (Figure b). This may be explained by a higher number
of acidic and polar residues interacting with zinc at pH 5 in the
presence of acetate compared to chloride. The differences in the Rg distributions suggest that the larger equilibrium
number of zinc ions coordinating with the Nvjp-1 in the presence of
acetate is likely the reason for the smaller fluctuation of Rg (Figure S11). As
the pH shifts to more alkaline levels, this results in a greater coordination
of zinc ions with histidine and acidic side chains further stabilizing
the protein structure.
Figure 6
Nvjp-1 radius of gyration distributions at pH 5 (blue)
and pH 8
(red): (a) in ZnCl2; (b) in Zn(OAc)2.
Nvjp-1 radius of gyration distributions at pH 5 (blue)
and pH 8
(red): (a) in ZnCl2; (b) in Zn(OAc)2.
pH and Counteranion Effects on Zinc Coordination
To
gain insights into how pH and counteranions influence the Rg of Nvjp-1 during metal binding, we studied
how the coordination state of Nvjp-1 changed with changing conditions.
Looking at the time averaged count of residues that coordinate with
zinc ions in ZnCl2 and Zn(OAc)2 solutions, it
is clear from the raw counts that the residues participating in capturing
zinc from solution at pH 5 are different in the presence of acetate
or chloride anions (Figure a,b). We note at this point that the total numbers of zinc
ions in the two systems are the same. The only difference is in how
many zinc ions were able to make coordinations with the Nvjp-1 protein
and which residues are involved. Figure S12 in the Supporting Information shows the normalized fractions of
coordinations with a given Zn2+. In the presence of the
chloride anion, the top three Zn2+ binding residues are
TYR, SER, and LYS (Figure a). The reduced role for acidic residues in Zn2+ binding is expected due to the formation of salt bridges with the
75% protonated histidines at pH 5 as shown previously. As a result,
the acidic residues do not coordinate with zinc ions, even though
90% are negatively charged. Alternatively, with acetate as the Zn2+ counterion, TYR, ASP, and HIS are the top three Zn2+ binding residues (Figure b), with the largest increases observed for TYR and ASP binding.
About a third of the acidic residues become free to coordinate with
zinc ions in zinc acetate at pH 5, stemming from the acetate’s
faster mobility, chemical similarity of its carboxylic group to the
acidic residues, and ability to interact with the protonated histidines.
Figure 7
(a, b)
Raw count of residues coordinating with Zn2+ in
ZnCl2 (left column) and Zn(OAc)2 (right column).
HD and HE represent histidines with hydrogens
on the δ and ε nitrogens, respectively. HP denotes
the protonated histidens. (c, d) Number of coordinations with a given
Zn2+ counting only protein residues.
(a, b)
Raw count of residues coordinating with Zn2+ in
ZnCl2 (left column) and Zn(OAc)2 (right column).
HD and HE represent histidines with hydrogens
on the δ and ε nitrogens, respectively. HP denotes
the protonated histidens. (c, d) Number of coordinations with a given
Zn2+ counting only protein residues.Zinc ions are mostly coordinated with four ligands
at pH 5 in the
presence of chloride, looking at the coordination number of Zn2+ counting water, counterions, and protein residues (Supporting Information Figure S13a), a number
that does not change when the pH is shifted from 5 to 8. In the presence
of acetate at pH 5, the coordination number of zinc is largely 3–4
but shifts to slightly higher coordination numbers when the pH changes
to 8 (Supporting Information Figure S13b). As the coordination number of Zn2+ in a proteinaceous
environment is expected to be 4,[4] these
results indicate that the counterions and water molecules satisfy
the coordination needs of Zn2+.When the pH is transitioned
from 5 to 8, with no additional zinc
ions added to the system, the coordination of zinc ions increases
from 1–2 residues (Figure c,d) to 1–4 in the presence of chloride or acetate
after a simulation of over 300 ns. The number of cases with one residue
coordination decreased by 70% and those with two residue coordination
was reduced by about 15% when switching from pH 5 to pH 8 in the presence
of chloride. This increase is likely due to the deprotonation of histidines
in Nvjp-1, breaking salt bridges formed with the acidic residues and
freeing the acidics and histidines to interact with the zinc ions
that were previously bound to polar side chains at pH 5. In contrast
to the model Zn(His)3Cl proposed in the literature for
sclerotization of the Nvjp-1,[4,8] the model presented
in this work suggests a combination of polar acidic and histidine
residues interacting with Zn2+ at high pH. Although Nvjp-1
in Zn(OAc)2 at pH 5 (Figure b) demonstrates a larger number of residues coordinating
with zinc ions and a larger fraction of free acidic residues, the
coordination number is limited to at most two residues (Figure d), similar to the situation
in ZnCl2 at the same pH. When Nvjp-1 in the presence of
zinc chloride is shifted to a pH of 8 (Figure c), coordination numbers of 3–4 residues
per Zn2+ increased. In contrast, the number of cases with
3 and 4 coordination per Zn2+ did not increase as dramatically
when shifting to pH 8 in the presence of acetate (Figure d). Inspection of the coordination
data indicates that the acetate ions coordinating with a given zinc
ion at pH 5 effectively shield it from interaction with the carboxylic
and histidine residues at pH 8. The implication of this intriguing
result is that sclerotization of the Nvjp-1 in zinc acetate is not
as efficient as in zinc chloride. This may be due to the ability of
the mobile acetate ions to respond to external stimulus relative to
the bulkier and sterically constrained protein side chains and may
explain the deformability of the Nvjp-1 hydrogel observed after treatment
with zinc acetate.[8]It has been mentioned
earlier that zinc acts as a cross-linker
of the proteinaceous matrix by forming Zn(His)3Cl-like
units.[4] However, as shown in Figure S8 and Figure c,d, counterions and water molecules are
needed in addition to protein residues to satisfy the coordination
needs of Zn2+. Also, whenever Zn2+ is coordinating
with protein residues in Nvjp-1, it is not exclusively with histidines. Figure shows various possibilities
for interaction with zinc. Panel a displays a zinc ion interacting
with HSD, TYR, and two ASP. In panel b, we see that ASP, TYR, and
two HSD are coordinating with zinc. Panel c exhibits zinc coordinating
with four different residues: ASP, HSE, TYR, GLU. Panel d shows an
example of three residues and a chloride ion interacting with Zn2+. Altogether, these results show that residues other than
histidines may also play a role in sclerotization of the Nvjp-1 hydrogel.
Figure 8
Snapshots
of a zinc ion coordinating with four residues: (a) ASP,
ASP, HSD, TYR; (b) ASP, HSD, HSD, TYR; (c) ASP, HSE, TYR, GLU. (d)
A chloride ion and three residues: ASP, HSD, TYR, Cl– at pH 8.
Snapshots
of a zinc ion coordinating with four residues: (a) ASP,
ASP, HSD, TYR; (b) ASP, HSD, HSD, TYR; (c) ASP, HSE, TYR, GLU. (d)
A chloride ion and three residues: ASP, HSD, TYR, Cl– at pH 8.
Summary
In this work, sclerotization
of Nvjp-1 in the presence of Zn2+ was investigated by all
atom molecular dynamics simulations
that employed a polarizable force field. The protonation state of
the protein determines which types of residues capture zinc ions from
solution. At pH 5 in ZnCl2, polar residues are predominantly
interacting with Zn2+ forming coordination bonds and at
most two residues are observed to interact with a given zinc ion.
At this pH, the negatively charged acidic residues form salt-bridges
with protonated histidines and are effectively unavailable for binding
with zinc ions. Changing the protonation state of Nvjp-1 to reflect
a pH of 8 resulted in a reconfiguration of the coordinate bonds where
up to four residues interact with a given zinc ion. This leads to
an accompanying reduction in the radius of gyration which may be taken
as an indication of sclerotization. Additionally, the effect of the
zinc salt anion partner was studied with metallization of Nvjp-1 at
pH 5. The acetate ion has been observed to facilitate the capture
of more zinc ions by associating with protonated histidines, essentially
freeing some acidic residues to interact with zinc ions and increasing
the number of zinc ions that diffuse into the Nvjp-1. With more zinc
ions interacting with residues, the radius of gyration with Zn(OAc)2 was found to be smaller than was observed with ZnCl2. However, while there is more metallization of the Nvjp-1 in zinc
acetate, residue coordination per Zn2+ did not show a significant
increase, suggesting less sclerotization. This may explain the dynamic
mechanical properties observed with zinc acetate treated Nvjp-1 hydrogels.
This result suggests a potential role for the sequestration of acidic
residues by protonated histidines at pH 5 in zinc chloride, where
the salt bridges would create future metal coordination pockets within
the protein by spatially localizing both coordinating carboxylates
and imidazoles. These pockets would then become active metal coordination
centers upon deprotonation of the imidazole side chains, a possibility
supported by the observation that polar, acidic, and imidazole side
chains are present together in many of the Zn2+ ligand
fields. This may also explain the observed asymmetrical sclerotization
response of Zn2+ treated hydrogels when comparing pH shifts
from low to high or from high to low. In the latter case, the hydrogels
may be unable to effectively rebind the relatively low Zn2+ levels released from the metal binding pockets as the pH level decreases.
One central question related to the above mechanism is whether processing
and metallization of Nvjp-1 occur at low pH in the natural system.
A benefit related to the high histidine content of Nvjp-1 is its increased
solubility at moderately low pH conditions. This property makes the
protein easier to purify without column chromatography and process
into hydrogels. The proximity of histidine’s pKa to neutrality would also make it easier for biological
systems to affect the protonation state of this amino acid side chain
in proteins through compartmentalized acidification. For example,
HRPII, from the malarial parasite Plasmodium falciparum, has a histidine content that rivals that of Nvjp-1 and its biological
function is to catalyze the formation of hemozoin crystals from degraded
hemoglobin in the parasites acidified food vacuole.[34] Hydrolytic organelles like the Plasmodium vacuole can maintain pH environments of 5.5 which would increase
the charge density of histidine rich proteins in a reversible manner.
Secretory vesicles also acidify the intracellular compartment to pH
5.5 before fusion with the plasma membrane and release.[35] The steps involved in Nvjp-1 processing to form
the sclerotized jaw are unknown, but it is not difficult to imagine
that pH may play an important role in transport and metallization
during the secretory process.DFT calculations in vacuum predict
binding of Zn2+ to
polar and negatively charged residues. The binding to LYS in the Drude
model is intriguing and requires further experimental and theoretical
investigation. The energies from the Drude model are for Zn2+–residue interactions in a complex environment. This suggests
that an exhaustive combination of levels of theory and basis sets
need to be explored in order to check if better agreement with theory
and the Drude model can be obtained. Thus, development of ion parameters
for use with protein residues is necessary for realistic simulations
where good agreement between DFT and Drude ion–residue interaction
energies may be obtained.
Authors: Benjamin P Partlow; Craig W Hanna; Jelena Rnjak-Kovacina; Jodie E Moreau; Matthew B Applegate; Kelly A Burke; Benedetto Marelli; Alexander N Mitropoulos; Fiorenzo G Omenetto; David L Kaplan Journal: Adv Funct Mater Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 18.808
Authors: Christopher C Broomell; Rashda K Khan; Dana N Moses; Ali Miserez; Michael G Pontin; Galen D Stucky; Frank W Zok; J Herbert Waite Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2007-02-22 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Pedro E M Lopes; Jing Huang; Jihyun Shim; Yun Luo; Hui Li; Benoît Roux; Alexander D Mackerell Journal: J Chem Theory Comput Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 6.006
Authors: James C Phillips; David J Hardy; Julio D C Maia; John E Stone; João V Ribeiro; Rafael C Bernardi; Ronak Buch; Giacomo Fiorin; Jérôme Hénin; Wei Jiang; Ryan McGreevy; Marcelo C R Melo; Brian K Radak; Robert D Skeel; Abhishek Singharoy; Yi Wang; Benoît Roux; Aleksei Aksimentiev; Zaida Luthey-Schulten; Laxmikant V Kalé; Klaus Schulten; Christophe Chipot; Emad Tajkhorshid Journal: J Chem Phys Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: James A Neal; Nathan J Oldenhuis; Andrea L Novitsky; Emil M Samson; William J Thrift; Regina Ragan; Zhibin Guan Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Hui Li; Van Ngo; Mauricio Chagas Da Silva; Dennis R Salahub; Karen Callahan; Benoît Roux; Sergei Yu Noskov Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 2.991