| Literature DB >> 36006321 |
Masanori Aida1, Ryouichi Yamada1, Shin-Ichi Nakamura2, Taishi Imaoka3, Hikari Shimonishi3, Toshiki Matsuo4, Itaru Taniguchi4, Takamitsu Tsukahara2.
Abstract
To determine whether it could also improve the production performance of Eimeria-infected broilers, Weizmannia coagulans strain SANK70258 (WC) supplementation was compared with coccidiostat lasalocid-A sodium (AM) administration. First, to determine the optimum WC dose, newly hatched broiler chick groups (n = 10) were untreated or consecutively given WC (0.005%, 0.01%, 0.03%, and 0.1%) and AM until slaughter (31 days of age). At day 21, all chicks were infected with coccidia. From the economical and practical viewpoints, 0.03% WC supplementation was the best dose. Second, newly hatched broiler chick groups (n = 10) were untreated or given 0.03% WC and AM. Each group was run in triplicate. At day 21, two chicks/pen with the farthest body weights as per the group's mean body weight were spared, and the remaining inoculated with coccidia. At days 42 and 49, the WC and AM groups had significantly greater body weights and daily weight gains. Intestinal lesion scores were lower in 29-day-old AM and WC. Oocyst numbers were lower in 29- and 49-day-old AM and WC, but only 29- and 49-day-old AM had higher Escherichia coli levels. To conclude, although WC and AM induced similar growth performance in coccidium-infected chicks, unlike AM, the E. coli levels did not increase with WC.Entities:
Keywords: Escherichia coli; Weizmannia coagulans strain SANK70258; broilers; coccidiosis; lasalocid-A sodium; lesion scores
Year: 2022 PMID: 36006321 PMCID: PMC9416079 DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9080406
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Sci ISSN: 2306-7381
The body weights, feed conversion ratios, lesion scores, oocyst numbers in the cecum, and in the intestinal lengths of broiler chicks in Experiment 1.
| Parameter | C | WC_0.005 | WC_0.01 | WC_0.03 | WC_0.1 | A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | |||||||
| Day 0 | 37 ± 2 | 37 ± 2 | 36 ± 1 | 36 ± 2 | 37 ± 2 | 37 ± 2 | 0.990 |
| Day 21 | 795 ± 114 | 812 ± 99 | 810 ± 105 | 864 ± 135 | 870 ± 74 | 849 ± 81 | 0.480 |
| Day 31 | 1657 ± 205 | 1698 ± 196 | 1670 ± 176 | 1697 ± 223 | 1774 ± 159 | 1740 ± 171 | 0.768 |
| Feed conversion ratio (g/g) | |||||||
| Day 0–21 | 1.87 | 1.87 | 1.86 | 1.79 | 1.63 | 1.90 | – |
| Day 21–31 | 1.84 | 1.76 | 1.79 | 1.57 | 1.43 | 1.65 | – |
| Day 0–31 | 1.86 | 1.81 | 1.82 | 1.66 | 1.52 | 1.76 | – |
| Lesion score (score 0–4 ‡) | |||||||
| Small intestine | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 1.6 ± 0.7 | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 0.298 |
| Cecum | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 1.1 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 1.4 | 0.720 |
| Oocyst numbers in the cecum | 8.66 ± 1.79 | 7.69 ± 0.88 | 6.87 ± 0.78 | 6.86 ± 1.96 | 6.64 ± 1.20 | 9.92 ± 6.34 | 0.104 |
| Intestinal length (cm) | |||||||
| Small intestine | 154.6 ± 10.8 | 161.5 ± 16.3 | 175.9 ± 18.3 | 163.9 ± 20.3 | 165.3 ± 16.4 | 164.6 ± 17.3 | 0.154 |
| Cecum | 16.3 ± 2.2 | 16.4 ± 3.1 | 16.4 ± 2.5 | 16.0 ± 2.4 | 17.0 ± 1.8 | 17.9 ± 1.8 | 0.504 |
Except for the feed conversion ratios, all parameters are shown as the means ± standard deviations (n = 10). Feed conversion ratios are shown as single values because broiler chicks of a same group were allocated together into pens. C, non-treatment control; WC_0.005, supplementation with 5 × 104 CFU of Weizmannia coagulans strain SANK70258/g; WC_0.01, 1 × 105 CFU/g; WC_0.03, 3 × 105 CFU/g; WC_0.1, 1 × 106 CFU/g of feed; A, 75 ppm of sodium lasalocid-A in feed. Days indicate the ages of broiler chicks. † Probability value of one-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal–Wallis test. ‡ The criteria for the lesion scores were as described by Johnson and Reid [21].
Figure 1The production performance parameters of broilers, pre- (0 to 21 days of age) and post- (21 to 49 days of age) coccidial infection, in Experiment 2. (a) Mean body weights throughout the experiment. (b) Daily weight gains post-coccidial infection. (c) Feed conversion ratios throughout the experiment. Bars represent the means of data per pens and error bars represent the standard deviations (n = 3). WC, supplementation with 3 × 105 CFU of Weizmannia coagulans strain SANK70258/g; AM, 75 ppm of sodium lasalocid-A in feed. Asterisks indicate the significant difference between groups (p < 0.05).
The body weights, lesion scores, oocyst numbers, total bacterial counts, E. coli levels, and intestinal lengths of broiler chicks slaughtered at 29 days of age.
| Parameter | Control | WC | AM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 1502 ± 87 | 1596 ± 92 * | 1579 ± 69 | 0.054 |
| Lesion score (score 0–4 §) | ||||
| Small intestine | 1.67 ± 0.71 | 0.89 ± 0.33 * | 0.67 ± 0.50 * | 0.001 |
| Cecum | 0.89 ± 0.60 | 0.67 ± 0.50 | 0.67 ± 0.50 | 0.603 |
| Oocyst numbers (oocyst/g) | ||||
| Small intestinal contents | 8511 ± 1609 | 6478 ± 1944 † | 5644 ± 716 * | <0.001 |
| Cecum contents | 2889 ± 909 | 2533 ± 781 | 2478 ± 342 | 0.554 |
| Total bacterial counts (log cell/g) | 10.5 ± 0.1 | 10.3 ± 0.1 * | 10.3 ± 0.2 * | <0.001 |
| Counts (log cell/g) | 6.65 ± 0.42 | 6.85 ± 0.49 | 7.56 ± 0.38 * | <0.001 |
| Ratio (%) | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.09 | 0.27 ± 0.18 * | <0.001 |
| Intestinal length (cm) | ||||
| Small intestine | 152 ± 16 | 155 ± 15 | 154 ± 19 | 0.924 |
| Cecum | 12.0 ± 1.5 | 12.2 ± 1.4 | 12.9 ± 2.2 | 0.503 |
All parameters are shown as the means ± standard deviations (n = 9). Control, non-treatment control; WC, supplementation with 3 × 105 CFU/g of W. coagulans strain SANK70258; AM, 75 ppm of sodium lasalocid-A in feed. The asterisks indicate significant differences between the control and WC or AM (p < 0.05). A dagger indicates a differential trend between the control and WC or AM (p < 0.1). ‡ Probability value of the one-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal–Wallis test. § The criteria for the lesion scores were as described by Johnson and Reid [21].
The body weights, lesion scores, oocyst numbers, total bacterial counts, E. coli levels, and intestinal lengths of the broiler chicks slaughtered at 49 days of age.
| Parameters | Control | WC | AM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 3316 ± 291 | 3538 ± 228 | 3574 ± 261 | 0.096 |
| Lesion score (score 0–4 §) | ||||
| Small intestine | 1.22 ± 0.44 | 0.89 ± 0.60 | 1.00 ± 0.71 | 0.489 |
| Cecum | 0.33 ± 0.50 | 0.33 ± 0.50 | 0.11 ± 0.33 | 0.494 |
| Oocyst numbers (oocyst/g) | ||||
| Small intestinal contents | 5867 ± 660 | 5100 ± 684 * | 4700 ± 522 * | 0.002 |
| Cecum contents | 1922 ± 156 | 1567 ± 387 * | 1578 ± 323 * | 0.033 |
| Total bacterial counts (log cell/g) | 10.6 ± 0.2 | 10.5 ± 0.1 | 10.2 ± 0.3 * | <0.001 |
| Counts (log cell/g) | 6.16 ± 0.48 | 5.90 ± 0.52 | 6.40 ± 0.44 * | 0.106 |
| Ratio (%) | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.03 ± 0.02 * | 0.004 |
| Intestinal length (cm) | ||||
| Small intestine | 155 ± 10 | 165 ± 8 | 158 ± 14 | 0.139 |
| Cecum | 15.4 ± 1.7 | 15.8 ± 2.0 | 16.6 ± 1.9 | 0.460 |
The asterisks indicate significant differences between the control and WC or AM (p < 0.05). ‡ Probability value of one-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal–Wallis test. § The criteria for the lesion scores were as described by Johnson and Reid [21]. Further information can be found in Table 2.
Figure 2The Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient between the body weights, number of oocysts (OPG), and intestinal lesion scores of the coccidiosis-infected broilers. The p values are shown in the lower left and the rho values in the upper right. (a) Twenty-nine days of age; (b) Forty-nine days of age.