| Literature DB >> 36006265 |
Mariam M Mirambo1, Vitus Silago1, Betrand Msemwa2, Helmut Nyawale1, Mlekwa G Mgomi1, Julius M Madeu1, William S Nasson1, Gabriel Emmanuel1, John Moses1, Namanya Basinda3, Ginethon Mhamphi4, Subira S Mwakabumbe5, Elifuraha B Mngumi6, Khadija S Majid7, Lucas Matemba8, Georgies Mgode4, Stephen E Mshana1.
Abstract
Leptospirosis is a zoonotic neglected tropical disease with a worldwide distribution caused by the pathogenic spirochetes of the genus Leptospira. Despite being a widespread disease in tropical regions, it has never been considered in the routine diagnostic panel for febrile patients. This study determined seropositivity and factors associated with Leptospira antibodies among febrile adult patients in Mwanza, Tanzania. The cross-sectional study involving 296 febrile patients attending different outpatient clinics in Mwanza region was conducted between May and July 2019. Detection of Leptospira serovars antibodies was done using a microscopic agglutination test (MAT). Descriptive analysis was done using STATA version 13. The median age of the febrile patients was 32 (IQR: 24-45 years). Out of 296 patients, 36 (12.16%, 95%CI: 8-15) were seropositive for Leptospira antibodies. Common circulating serovars were Sokoine 28 (9.45%), followed by Lora 12 (4.05%) and Grippotyphosa 2 (0.67%). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, the odds of being Leptospira seropositive were significantly higher with increased age (aOR: 1.03, 95%CI 1.00-1.07, p = 0.03). About one tenth of febrile patients in Mwanza were seropositive for Leptospira antibodies and this was significantly associated with age. With the decline of malaria fever in endemic areas, other causes of febrile illness like Leptospiral spp. should be considered in the routine diagnostic panel for febrile patients.Entities:
Keywords: Leptospira antibodies; Mwanza; adults; febrile
Year: 2022 PMID: 36006265 PMCID: PMC9416181 DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed7080173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Infect Dis ISSN: 2414-6366
Species, serogroups, serovars and strains used in MAT.
| Serial Number | Species | Serogroups | Serovars | Strains |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| Icterohaemorrhagiae | Sokoine | RMI-Cattle |
| 2 |
| Grippotyphosa | Grippotyphosa | Moskva-V |
| 3 |
| Pomona | Pomona | Pomona |
| 4 |
| Hebdomadis | Hebdomadis | Hebdomadis |
| 5 |
| Australis | Lora | TE1992 |
Sociodemographic characteristics of 296 febrile adults in Mwanza, Tanzania.
| Variable | Number (n)/Median/Mean | Percentage (%)/IQR/SD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 32 | 24–45 | |
| People in household | 6 | 4–7 | |
| Sex | Female | 226 | 76.35 |
| Male | 70 | 23.65 | |
| Residence | Rural | 70 | 23.65 |
| Urban | 226 | 76.35 | |
| Water source | Lake or pond | 48 | 16.22 |
| Tap water | 248 | 83.78 | |
| Toilet | Modern | 237 | 80 |
| Pit latrine | 59 | 19.93 | |
| House type | Brick/iron | 257 | 86.82 |
| Mud/mud | 39 | 13.18 | |
| Education | Primary | 114 | 38.91 |
| Secondary | 157 | 53.58 | |
| University/College | 22 | 7.51 | |
| Marital status | Married | 213 | 71.96 |
| Single | 83 | 28.04 | |
| Occupation | Business | 100 | 33.78 |
| Employed | 45 | 15.20 | |
| Housewife | 103 | 34.80 | |
| Student | 48 | 16.22 | |
Clinical characteristics of enrolled febrile adults in Mwanza.
| Variable | Number | Percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hematuria | No | 212 | 98.60 |
| Yes | 3 | 1.40 | |
| Micturia | No | 180 | 83.72 |
| Yes | 35 | 16.28 | |
| Bloody diarrhea | No | 205 | 99.51 |
| Yes | 1 | 0.49 | |
| Joint pain | No | 177 | 60.82 |
| Yes | 114 | 39.18 | |
| Headache | No | 33 | 11.15 |
| Yes | 263 | 88.85 | |
| Myalgia | No | 175 | 60.55 |
| Yes | 114 | 39.45 |
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of the factors associated with Leptospira seropositivity among 296 febrile adults in Mwanza, Tanzania.
| Overall Leptospirosis | Univariate Analysis | Multivariable Analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | Seropositivity (%) | Chi-Square/Odds Ratio (95%CI) | Odd’s Ratio (95%CI) | |||
| Age (years) | ** 40(IQR 30–56) | * 1.02(1.01–1.04) | 0.007 | 1.03(1.01–1.06) | 0.007 | |
| Sex | Female (226) | 25(11.06) | ||||
| Male (70) | 11(15.71) | 1.08 | 0.30 | |||
| Residence | Urban (226) | 24(10.62) | ||||
| Rural (70) | 12(17.14) | 2.13 | 0.14 | 1.22(0.49–2.99) | 0.77 | |
| Education | Primary (114) | 13(11.40) | ||||
| Tertiary (22) | 1(4.55) | |||||
| Secondary (157) | 22(14.01) | 1.74 | 0.28 | |||
| Household (people) | ** 6(IQR 4–7) | 0.91 | ||||
| Marital status | Single (83) | 7(8.43) | ||||
| Married (213) | 29(13.62) | 1.74 | 0.22 | |||
| Paddy cultivation | No (155) | 12(7.74) | ||||
| Yes (32) | 10(12.50) | 1.41 | 0.11 | 0.35(0.11–1.02) | 0.06 | |
| Sewage | No (60) | 9(15.00) | ||||
| Yes (236) | 27(11.44) | 0.57 | 0.45 | |||
| Rodent at home | No (142) | 12(8.45) | ||||
| Yes (73) | 8(10.96) | 0.36 | 0.06 | 0.57(0.25–1.29) | 0.18 | |
| Joint pain | No (177) | 18(10.17) | ||||
| Yes (114) | 18(15.79) | 2.02 | 0.13 | 1.49(0.68–3.2) | 0.312 | |
| Headache | No (33) | 5(15.15) | ||||
| Yes (263) | 31(11.79) | 0.31 | 0.58 | |||
| Myalgia | No (175) | 19(10.86) | ||||
| Yes (114) | 17(14.91) | 1.04 | 0.25 | |||
| Conjunctivitis | No (189) | 16(8.47) | ||||
| Yes (17) | 3(17.65) | 1.57 | 0.48 | |||
* logistic regression has been done, ** median and interquartile range.