Edoardo Nicolò Aiello1, Elena Fiabane2, Simona Margheritti3, Stefano Magnone4, Nadia Bolognini5, Massimo Miglioretti6, Ines Giorgi7. 1. PhD Program in Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza. e.aiello5@campus.unimib.it. 2. Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine of Genova Nervi Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Genova. elenamaria.fiabane@icsmaugeri.it. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano. s.margheritti2@campus.unimib.it. 4. Regional Secretary, ANAAO ASSOMED Lombardia Associazione Medici Dirigenti, Milano, Italy. magnonestefano@gmail.com. 5. Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano. nadia.bolognini@unimib.it. 6. Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano. massimo.miglioretti@unimib.it. 7. Dipartimento di Sanità pubblica, Medicina Sperimentale e Forense, University of Pavia, Pavia. ines.giorgi@unipv.it.
Abstract
This study aimed to standardize the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI), a psychometrically sound, worldwide-spread tool among Italian physicians. METHODS: Nine hundred and fifteen Italian physicians were web-administered the CBI, Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). The present CBI included 18 items (range=19-90) assessing Personal, Work-related and Client-related Burnout. Client-related adaptation was performed. Construct validity, factorial structure (Confirmatory Factor Analysis) and internal consistency were tested. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed simultaneously against the PHQ-8, GAD-7 and GSE. All CBI measures yielded optimal internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.90-0.96). RESULTS: The CBI met its original three-factor model (CFI=0.94; TLI=0.93; RMSEA=0.09; SRMR=0.04), was positively related to the PHQ-8 (r=0.76) and GAD-7 (r=0.73), whereas negatively with the GSE (r=0.39) and yielded optimal diagnostics (AUC=0.93; sensitivity=0.91 and specificity=0.85 at the optimal cutoff of 69/90). CONCLUSION: The CBI is thus a valid, reliable, and normed tool to assess burnout levels in physicians.
This study aimed to standardize the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI), a psychometrically sound, worldwide-spread tool among Italian physicians. METHODS: Nine hundred and fifteen Italian physicians were web-administered the CBI, Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). The present CBI included 18 items (range=19-90) assessing Personal, Work-related and Client-related Burnout. Client-related adaptation was performed. Construct validity, factorial structure (Confirmatory Factor Analysis) and internal consistency were tested. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed simultaneously against the PHQ-8, GAD-7 and GSE. All CBI measures yielded optimal internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.90-0.96). RESULTS: The CBI met its original three-factor model (CFI=0.94; TLI=0.93; RMSEA=0.09; SRMR=0.04), was positively related to the PHQ-8 (r=0.76) and GAD-7 (r=0.73), whereas negatively with the GSE (r=0.39) and yielded optimal diagnostics (AUC=0.93; sensitivity=0.91 and specificity=0.85 at the optimal cutoff of 69/90). CONCLUSION: The CBI is thus a valid, reliable, and normed tool to assess burnout levels in physicians.
Authors: Kurt Kroenke; Tara W Strine; Robert L Spitzer; Janet B W Williams; Joyce T Berry; Ali H Mokdad Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2008-08-27 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Carol R Thrush; Molly M Gathright; Timothy Atkinson; Erick L Messias; J Benjamin Guise Journal: Eval Health Prof Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Jovana Todorovic; Zorica Terzic-Supic; Jelena Divjak; Zeljka Stamenkovic; Stefan Mandic-Rajcevic; Sanja Kocic; Snezana Ukropina; Roberta Markovic; Olivera Radulovic; Aleksandra Arnaut; Pavle Piperac; Momcilo Mirkovic; Dejan Nesic Journal: Int J Occup Med Environ Health Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 1.843