| Literature DB >> 36004882 |
Ana Rita Azevedo1, Ana Sofia Pais2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Teresa Almeida-Santos2,3,9, Virgínia M R Pires10,11, Pedro Pessa12, Carla C Marques1, Sofia Nolasco10,13, Pedro Castelo-Branco14, José A M Prates10,15, Luís Lopes-da-Costa10,15, Mafalda Laranjo4,5,6,7,8, Maria Filomena Botelho4,5,6,7,8, Rosa M L N Pereira1,10, Jorge M B G A Pimenta1,10.
Abstract
Ovarian tissue cryopreservation is a female fertility preservation technique that presents major challenges for the maintenance of follicular viability after transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the application of L-Mesitran Soft®, a product containing 40% medical grade honey (MGH), with other strategies to improve ovarian grafts' viability. For this purpose, bovine ovarian tissue was vitrified, warmed and randomly assigned to culture groups: (1) control, (2) MGH 0.2% in vitro, (3) MGH in vivo (direct application in the xenotransplantation), (4) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF 50 ng/mL) and (5) vitamin D (100 Nm), during a 48 h period. A sixth group (6) of fragments was thawed on transplantation day and was not cultured. The tissue was xenotransplanted into immunodeficient (Rowett nude homozygous) ovariectomized rats. Grafts were analyzed 48 h after culture, and 7 and 28 days after transplantation. The tissue was subjected to histological and immunohistochemical analysis. Treatments using MGH showed the highest angiogenic and cell proliferation stimulation, with cellular apoptosis, within a healthy cellular turnover pathway. In conclusion, MGH should be considered as a potentially effective and less expensive strategy to improve ovarian tissue transplantation.Entities:
Keywords: cryopreservation; fertility; honey; ovarian; vitrification; xenografting
Year: 2022 PMID: 36004882 PMCID: PMC9405527 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9080357
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) ISSN: 2306-5354
Figure 1Experimental layout. Cortical fragments of bovine ovarian tissue were cryopreserved, thawed and distributed to each group. Forty ovarian fragments were removed for histological and immunohistochemical analysis at each stage of the study. The number (n) indicates the number of different bovine samples in each condition; all were analyzed in two sections by two independent investigators. MGH, medical grade honey—L-Mesitran Soft® 0.2%; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; Vit.D, vitamin D.
Figure 2Surgical procedures performed on female Rowett nude rats. For ovariectomy, a longitudinal median laparotomy in the lower area of the abdomen was performed (A), the ovaries were identified and removed (B) and, after abdominal wall suture, they were administrated a subcutaneous analgesia (C). Bovine ovarian tissue was transplanted after a blunt dissection of a subcutaneous pocket (D–F). Fragments were recovered after 7 (G,H) and 28 days (I).
Figure 3Histological evaluation of bovine ovarian fragments immediately after thawing (A), from the control group of in vitro culture (B) and after transplantation (C,D). Arrows indicate some of the identified follicles in the tissue. Source: authors’ images.
Figure 4Immunohistochemistry evaluation of ovarian tissue. (A) Immunostaining with factor VIII. (B) Immunostaining with Ki-67. (C) Immunostaining with Caspase-3. Arrows indicate positive staining. Source: authors’ images.
Figure 5Follicular Quantification. (A,D) Primordial Follicles. (B,E) Primary Follicles. (C,F) Secondary Follicles. Arrows indicate some of the identified follicles in the tissue; a: indicate statistical differences (p ≤ 0.05). Source: authors’ images.
Figure 6Endothelial Density in ovarian tissue. (A) Immunostaining with factor VIII (arrows indicate positive staining). (B) Endothelial density, with factor VIII marking at 48 h, 7 and 28 days. (C) Endothelial density over time, with factor VIII marking. Arrows indicate positive staining. a–c: indicate statistical differences (p ≤0.05). Source: authors’ images.
Figure 7Cell Proliferation in ovarian tissue. (A) Follicle with positive marking for Ki-67. (B) Follicle with negative marking for Ki-67. (C) Cellular proliferation in the follicles, with Ki-67 marking at 48 h, 7 and 28 days. (D) Cellular proliferation in the follicles, with Ki-67 marking over time. (E) Stroma quality marking with Ki-67 (arrows indicate positive staining). (F) Stroma quality, with Ki-67 marking at 48 h, 7 and 28 days. (G) Stroma quality, with Ki-67 marking over time. Arrows indicate positive staining. a–c: indicate statistical differences (p ≤ 0.05). Source: authors’ images.
Figure 8Cellular Apoptosis in ovarian tissue. (A) Follicle with positive marking for Caspase-3. (B) Follicle with negative marking for Caspase-3. (C) Cellular apoptosis in the follicles, with Caspase-3 marking at 48 h, 7 and 28 days. (D) Cellular apoptosis in the follicles, with Caspase-3 marking over time. (E) Stroma quality marking with Caspase-3 (arrows indicate positive staining). (F) Stroma quality with Caspase-3 marking at 48 h, 7 and 28 days. (G) Stroma quality with Caspase-3 marking over time. Arrows indicate positive staining. a–c: indicate statistical differences (p ≤ 0.05). Source: authors’ images.