| Literature DB >> 36004383 |
Kwan-Hee Yun1, Mi-Ja Ko1, Yong-Kown Chae1, Koeun Lee2, Ok-Hyung Nam3, Hyo-Seol Lee3, Kyounga Cheon4, Sung-Chul Choi3.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of doxycycline-loaded NO-releasing nanomatrix gel on pulp regeneration in replantation of avulsed rat teeth. A total of 28 maxillary first molars extracted from rats were replanted. The rats were divided into two groups based on the use of root surface treatment: doxycycline-loaded NO-releasing nanomatrix group and no treatment. Eight weeks after replantation, the rats were sacrificed, and the teeth were evaluated using histomorphometric analysis. On histomorphometric analysis, the NO-releasing nanomatrix group demonstrated a significantly lower grade of pulp inflammation (1.00 ± 1.11, mean ± standard deviation) compared to the no treatment group (2.21 ± 1.25, p = 0.014). NO-releasing nanomatrix group showed a significantly higher grade of pulp regeneration (2.57 ± 0.85, p = 0.012) and significantly lower grade of pulp inflammation (1.00 ± 0.68, p = 0.025) compared to the no treatment group. In conclusion, NO-releasing nanomatrix gel improved pulp regeneration of replanted teeth, though the sample size of this study was rather small. Within the limits of this study, NO-releasing nanomatrix gel can provide more favorable pulpal regeneration despite replantation.Entities:
Keywords: avulsion; nanomatrix gel; nitric oxide; pulp regeneration; replantation
Year: 2021 PMID: 36004383 PMCID: PMC9397492 DOI: 10.3390/app11136041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Sci (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3417 Impact factor: 2.838
Figure 1.PA-YK-NO nanomatrix gel after the gelation process. (a) Synthesis of peptide amphiphiles (PAs) using PA-YIGSR [CH3(CH2)14CONH-GTAGLIGQ-YIGSR] and PA-KKKKK [CH3(CH2)14CONHGTAGLIGQ-KKKKK]. (b) Self-assembly of PA-YK-NO (NO-releasing nanomatrix gel), the mixture of PA-YIGSR and PA-KKKKK was reacted with NO gas. (c) Encapsulation of doxycycline into the PA-YK-NO. (d) Formation of injectable PA-YK-NO.
Histomorphometric criteria used in this study.
| Grade | Description and Degree |
|---|---|
| 0 | Not observed pulp inflammation or regeneration |
| 1 | Less than 25% observed (<25%) |
| 2 | Less than 50% observed (<50%) |
| 3 | Less than 75% observed (<75%) |
| 4 | More than 75% observed (≥75%) |
Figure 2.Histologic observations of specimens. (a,c,e) are hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains of the experimental group, and (b,d,f) are high-magnification images of the squares in (a,c,e) respectively. (a) Pulp necrosis is observed. (b) Lymphocytes (arrows) and fibroblasts are observed in pulp proper. (c) Formation of calcified tissue in pulp is observed. A severe degree of external root resorption is progressed. (d) Extensive amount of bone-like tissue (arrows) is formed in pulp. Presence of blood vessel proliferation is visible. (e) Pulp regeneration is shown in pulp proper. (f) Disruption of the odontoblastic layer and formation of reparative dentin layer is visible. However, pulp proper is normal. Scale bars = 200 μm for (a,c,e) and 10 μm for (b,d,f). AV, alveolar bone; D, dentin; P, pulp proper; HC, hypercementosis; CT, calcified tissue; RD, reparative dentin; BV, blood vessel.
Figure 3.Histologic sections of teeth according to groups. (a,c) H&E stains of Group I and (b,d) those of Group II. D, dentin; P, pulp proper; CT, calcified tissue; BV, blood vessel; PN, pulp necrosis; black arrow, lymphocyte. Scale bars = 100 μm.
Histomorphometric analysis of the replantation after 30 min storage. There was no difference in the area of pulp regeneration in Group I and II, but there was a statistically significant difference in the area of pulp inflammation in Group I and II.
| Group I | Group II | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulp regeneration | 2.43 ± 0.85 | 2.21 ± 1.37 | 0.721 |
| pulp inflammation | 1.00 ± 1.11 | 2.21 ± 1.25 | 0.014 |
statistically significant (p < 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test).
Figure 4.Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. (a–d,i–l) IHC stains of Group I and (e–h,m–p) IHC stains of Group II. (b,d,f,h,j,l,n,p) High-magnification images of pulp proper of (a,c,e,g,j,k,m,o), respectively. (a,b) Healing with calcified tissue is observed. Infiltration of macrophages is hardly visible compared to Group II. (c,d) CD31-positive cells (asterisks) are visible around the vessel. Furthermore, an extensive amount of calcified tissue is formed around vessel. (e,f) Broad infiltration of macrophages is visible. (g,h) CD31-positive cells are visible around the vessel. An extensive amount of calcified tissue is formed around the vessel. (i,j) Healing with calcified tissue is observed. Additionally, infiltration of macrophages is hardly visible compared to the control group. (k,l) Regenerated pulp tissue similar to normal pulp tissue is visible. Greater vessel proliferation is observed compared to the control group. (m,n) Complete destruction of root with severe degree of inflammation (yellow arrows). Infiltration of macrophages in pulp proper is also visible. (o,p) Vessel proliferation is observed with mild amount of infiltration of macrophages. Scale 190 bars = 100 μm for (a,c,e,g,i,k,m,o) and 10 μm for (b,d,f,h,j,l,n,p). CT, calcified tissue; M, macrophage; BV, blood vessel.
Histomorphometric analysis of the replantation after 60 min storage. There were statistical differences in the areas of pulp regeneration and pulp inflammation in Groups I and II.
| Group I | Group II | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulp regeneration | 2.57 ± 0.85 | 1.57 ± 1.02 | 0.012 |
| pulp inflammation | 1.00 ± 0.68 | 1.57 ± 0.51 | 0.025 |
statistically significant (p < 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test).