| Literature DB >> 36004326 |
Chunmei Yan1, Fanzhen Hong1, Gang Xin1, Shuhong Duan1, Xiaohui Deng2, Yongping Xu1.
Abstract
Background: Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is a common pregnancy complication. Yet, the main cause of PPROM remains poorly understood. In this study, we used 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology to identify the differences in vaginal microbiota between pregnant women with PPROM and those who delivered at term.Entities:
Keywords: PPROM; PROM; PTB; preterm birth; vaginal microbiota
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36004326 PMCID: PMC9393476 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.858732
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 6.073
Clinical characteristics of the study subjects.
| PPROM group | Term delivery group | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age, years (mean±SD) | 31.0±5.03 | 29.67±3.71 | 0.072 |
| Gestational age at admission (mean±SD) | 32.55±2.73 | 31.34±3.47 | 0.066 |
| Racial/ethnic background (subjects) | all chinese | all chinese | |
| Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) | 1/48,2.1% | 0/54 | |
| Bacterial vaginitis(BV) | 1/48,2.1% | 0/54 | |
| Vaginal secretion smear G + cocci | 22/48,45.8% | – | |
| Vaginal secretion smear G-bacilli | 5 /48,10.4% | – | |
| Vaginal secretion smear G + cocci/G-bacilli | 8/48,16.7% | – | |
| abnormal vaginal secretion culture | 9/48,18.8% | – | |
| abnormal leucorrhea routine (RT) | 2/48,4.2% | 0/54 | |
| PH (mean±SD) | 5.71±0.41 | 4.81±0.46 | |
| Nugent Score (mean±SD) | 3.56±1.24 | 2.95±0.99 | |
| Group B streptococcal (GBS) carrier | 2/48,4.2% | 2/54 |
P value, Comparisons between the PPROM group and term delivery group.
Figure 1Vaginal microbiota composition and percentage of dominant taxa at species level. (A) Vaginal microbiota composition in the term delivery group at the species level. (B) Percentage of dominant species in the term delivery group. (C) Vaginal microbiota composition in the PPROM group at the species level. (D) Percentage of dominant species in the PPROM group.
Figure 2Comparisons of α- and β-diversities between the PPROM and term delivery groups. (A) Comparisons of α-diversity groups. ***It indicates that there is a significant difference between the two groups. (B) Comparisons of β-diversity between groups. (C) Differences in bacterial abundance in patients with PPROM versus controls.
Figure 3Disease classification based on vaginal microbiota signature. (A) The ROC curve of 8 different species. (B) The ROC curves of 8 different species.
Figure 4Identification of the vaginal microbial network. (A) The vaginal microbial network of the term delivery group. (B) The vaginal microbial network of the PPROM group.
Figure 5Comparisons of functions and metabolic pathways between the PPROM and term delivery groups. (A) Functional differences between groups were analyzed using principal coordinate analysis based on the Bray Curtis distance (p < 0.05). (B) Differential metabolic pathways identified by linear discriminant analysis effect size between groups.