Rosyli F Reveron-Thornton1, Natalie S Lui2. 1. Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif. 2. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.
Rosyli F. Reveron-Thornton, MD, MS, and Natalie S. Lui, MD, MASAATS awardees demonstrated academic achievements, but the true impact of the awards cannot be determined without additional data, leaving an opportunity to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion.See Article page 282.In this issue of JTCVS Open, Aranda-Michel and colleagues describe the scholastic and career impacts of 2 American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Foundation research grants for early-career cardiothoracic (CT) surgeons. The Research Scholarship started in 1986 and is awarded in the basic sciences, whereas the Surgical Investigator Program started in 2014 and focuses on clinical and translational research. Study participants include the 42 recipients of the Research Scholarship and 24 recipients of the Surgical Investigator Program.Faculty who received these awards had significant subsequent academic achievements by several measures. Awardee publications were cited a median of 4733 (Research Scholarship) and 1346 (Surgical Investigator Program) times with a median H-index of 33 and 17, respectively. Most awardees were academically promoted (71%), and close to one-half currently hold leadership positions. Most impressively, 45% of awardees (across both grants) secured subsequent funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). In the Research Scholarship cohort, 54% of the eligible awardees secured subsequent NIH funding, with 85% of these grants being K-, R-, or P-level mechanisms. Of the Surgical Investigator Program awardees, already 26% of eligible awardees secured NIH funding (all of which were K-, R-, and U-level grants). The funding rates are much greater than the overall 20.6% success rate of grants funded by the NIH in the 2020 fiscal year.It is clear that the AATS Foundation research grants are associated with substantial academic success. However, the primary limitation of this study is the lack of a comparison group, making it challenging to determine the true effect of the awards. In addition, several variables that affect advancement, such as race, age, training institution, and previous grants, were not available.3, 4, 5, 6, 7 It was shocking to learn that only 2 (4.8%) women have been awarded the Research Scholarship and 4 (16.7%) the Surgical Investigator Program recipients. Although these proportions reflect the demographics of our specialty over the long time period, there is much room for improvement in promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion. It is estimated that 17%, 5%, and 3% of CT surgeons in academia are women, Hispanic, and Black, respectively with the latter 2 subgroups composing 3% and 5% of CT surgical faculty, respectively. The impact of gender bias within surgery, especially in CT surgery, where women make up <10% of the specialty, has been documented extensively.9, 10, 11 Furthermore, the study did not comment on the research fields, but the awards focus on basic science and clinical and translational research. There is an opportunity for the AATS Foundation to encourage other areas of research, such as health equity and education.In summary, AATS Foundation research grant awardees excelled at their research endeavors, but the impact of the awards themselves is difficult to determine without a comparison group and information about other important variables. Looking ahead, it is important to obtain these data about recipients and applicants to understand the impact of research funding. Purposeful awarding of these research grants has the ability address some of the systemic issues plaguing various surgical fields today, such as diversity and low rates of surgeon scientists. As the importance of diversity (including gender, race, and area of research) on innovation, work environment, and patient care continues to be documented, the level of detail at which we track these effects must be improved to help us draw clearer conclusions with limited research funds.
Authors: Anna Weiss; Katherine C Lee; Viridiana Tapia; David Chang; Julie Freischlag; Sarah L Blair; Sonia Ramamoorthy Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 2.565