Literature DB >> 36004159

Commentary: "Käytännöllistelemälläkin": Antiaggregants, anticoagulants, and endocarditis.

Ari A Mennander1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 36004159      PMCID: PMC9390181          DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JTCVS Open        ISSN: 2666-2736


× No keyword cloud information.
Ari A. Mennander, MD, PhD Antiaggregants and anticoagulation may add to the complex clinical scenario of infection during endocarditis. See Article page 301. The clumsy first word in the title of this Commentary is in Finnish and signifies approximately “doing something practical too.” Although grammatically correct, the word is relatively uncommon also in Finland, if concerns of oversimplifying a matter exists. “Keep it simple” and “stay on the main subject” are examples of compensating expressions, but there is a limit in dealing with complex matters in condensed fashion. An ingenious preclinical theory may add to clinical research and future practice. Although cardiac endothelium is naturally resistant to transient bacteremia, it may become vulnerable upon injury or inflammation, eg, during sepsis. Preclinical research suggests that endothelial injury and subsequent inflammation are associated with the accumulation of circulating bacteria., Some antiaggregants may impact coagulation, fibrinolysis, inflammation, and endothelial function, thus interacting with the development and magnitude of infection. This study by Theys and colleagues investigated in an unprejudiced manner the association of antiaggregants or anticoagulants with the risk of endocarditis in 2 retrospective cohorts that included 333 patients with aortic valve bioprosthesis between 2009 and 2019 and 137 patients with infected native aortic valves between 2007 and 2015. Multivariable Fine–Gray and logistic regression models were used. There was no association between antiaggregants and bioprosthesis valve endocarditis, whereas vitamin K antagonists, double antiplatelet therapy, novel oral anticoagulants, and fondaparinux or low-molecular-weight heparins, but not acetylsalicylic acid, were associated with native-valve endocarditis. The authors rightfully concluded that investigating the possible protective effect of antiaggregants or anticoagulants requires well-controlled studies. Indeed, the antithrombotic therapies included many options: vitamin K antagonists, such as acenocoumarin, fenprocoumon, and warfarin; acetyl salicylic acid and its derivates; novel oral anticoagulants including rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran; P2Y12-receptor antagonists, including clopidogrel, ticagrelor, prasugrel, ticlopidine, and cangrelor; fondaparinux and low-molecular-weight heparins such as enoxaparin, dalteparin, and nadroparin; and dual antiplatelet medication consisting of P2Y12-receptor antagonist and acetyl salicylic acid. Some patients received several antithrombotic therapies. The complex molecular mechanisms of these drugs cannot be overestimated. Causative pathogens were also divergent and numerous. Pathogens such as Streptococcus species, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis react very differently and necessitate different antibiotic combinations. Combined with the different patient characteristics and surgical techniques, excluding patients with stenotic or mechanical valves and those with endocarditis within some other anatomical location besides the aortic valve position may not suffice to obtain homogeneous research cohorts. In contrast, the confidence intervals of several outcome results appeared wide, suggesting the relatively small number of patients. The authors speculate that large numbers of patients could be included in future studies through collaboration with other centers, since only limited patient databases of infective endocarditis are available. There may be another important message for discussion. Lumping different patients and information together in hope of obtaining large registry data sets without strict selection criteria may mask important and individual details beyond meaningful analysis of the results. Maybe some diseases and related therapies are too complex to address in a generalized way. The study by Theys and colleagues confirms that patients with endocarditis are a very heterogeneous and complex group of individuals.
  4 in total

1.  Inhibition of Protease-Activated Receptor (PAR1) Reduces Activation of the Endothelium, Coagulation, Fibrinolysis and Inflammation during Human Endotoxemia.

Authors:  Christian Schoergenhofer; Michael Schwameis; Georg Gelbenegger; Nina Buchtele; Barbara Thaler; Marion Mussbacher; Gernot Schabbauer; Johann Wojta; Petra Jilma-Stohlawetz; Bernd Jilma
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 5.249

2.  Host-pathogen interactions of clinical S. aureus isolates to induce infective endocarditis.

Authors:  Christian Schwarz; Yasemin Töre; Vanessa Hoesker; Sabine Ameling; Katja Grün; Uwe Völker; P Christian Schulze; Marcus Franz; Cornelius Faber; Frieder Schaumburg; Silke Niemann; Verena Hoerr
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.882

3.  Podoplanin Drives Motility of Active Macrophage via Regulating Filamin C During Helicobacter pylori Infection.

Authors:  Yi Ying Cheok; Grace Min Yi Tan; Keith Conrad Fernandez; Yee Teng Chan; Chalystha Yie Qin Lee; Heng Choon Cheong; Chung Yeng Looi; Jamuna Vadivelu; Suhailah Abdullah; Won Fen Wong
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 7.561

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.