| Literature DB >> 36003990 |
Hongmei Chen1, Shanshan Li2, Weijie Zhao3, Jiaheng Deng4, Jianhua Zheng4, Zhuohong Yan5, Tingting Zhang2, Shu' An Wen2, Haiping Guo2, Lei Li6, Jianfeng Yuan6, Hongtao Zhang5, Liping Ma1, Mengqiu Gao1, Yu Pang2.
Abstract
Background: Here, we conducted a peptidomic study in murine model to identify novel antigen biomarkers for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) with improved performance.Entities:
Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein 64; diagnostics; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; peptidomics; tuberculosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36003990 PMCID: PMC9394730 DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S373652
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Drug Resist ISSN: 1178-6973 Impact factor: 4.177
Figure 1A schematic of the experimental design. First, recombinant MTB secreted proteins were expressed and purified. Then those proteins were intravenously injected in the tail vein of BALB/c mice and serum was separated and processed for LC-MS/MS analysis. Based on the frequency appeared in the results of LC-MS/MS and antigenicity analysis, 5 peptides from MPT64, CFP10, PstS1 and MPT32 were selected for serological analysis. Directed competitive ELISA were used for detection of those 5 peptides degraded from MTB secreted proteins in serum. ROC with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to analyze the diagnostic validity.
Figure 2Comparative analysis of MPT64, CFP10, PstS1 and MPT32 ELISA. A total of 73 serum samples were used for ELISA analysis, including 43 from patients with pulmonary TB and 30 from non-TB patients. ****, P<0.0001.
Diagnostic Validity of MPT64-2, CFP10-2 and PstS1-2 Direct Competitive ELISA with Human Serum Samples
| Direct Competitive ELISA | Samples, No | % (95% CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary TB (n=43) | Non-TB (n=30) | |||||
| True Positive | False Negative | True Negative | False Positive | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
| MPT64-2 | 35 | 8 | 25 | 5 | 81.4 (66.6–91.6) | 83.3 (65.3–94.4) |
| CFP10-2 | 26 | 17 | 26 | 4 | 60.5 (44.4–75.0) | 86.7 (69.3–96.2) |
| PstS1-2 | 29 | 14 | 28 | 2 | 67.4 (51.3–80.5) | 93.3 (76.5–98.8) |
| MPT64-2- CFP10-2a | 23 | 20 | 29 | 1 | 53.5 (37.8–68.5) | 96.7 (80.9–99.8) |
| MPT64-2+ CFP10-2b | 38 | 5 | 22 | 8 | 88.4 (74.1–95.6) | 73.3 (53.8–87.0) |
| MPT64-2- PstS1-2c | 26 | 17 | 30 | 0 | 60.5 (44.5–74.6) | 100 (85.9–100) |
| MPT64-2- PstS1-2d | 38 | 5 | 23 | 7 | 88.4 (74.1–95.6) | 76.7 (58.3–89.4) |
Notes: aThe positive results are defined as “MPT64-2 and CFP10-2 are all positive”. bThe positive results are defined as “MPT64-2 is positive or CFP10-2 is positive”. cThe positive results are defined as “MPT64-2 and PstS1-2 are all positive”. dThe positive results are defined as “MPT64-2 is positive or PstS1-2 is positive”.
Figure 3Receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) of MPT64-2, CFP10-2 and PstS1-2 (A) and one to one match results between laboratory evidence and ELISAs (B). Solid circle: TB patients with positive results by GeneXpert; hollow circle, TB patients with negative results by GeneXpert.