Literature DB >> 36003858

Commentary: Rainmaking the "next-generation transcatheter aortic valve implantation" by anointing multidisciplinary perceptions.

Devendra K Agrawal1, Finosh G Thankam1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 36003858      PMCID: PMC9390130          DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2020.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JTCVS Open        ISSN: 2666-2736


× No keyword cloud information.
Devendra K. Agrawal, PhD (Biochem), PhD (Med Sci), MBA, and Finosh G. Thankam, PhD A multidisciplinary approach of decellularization, immunologically modified α-galactosidase, and 3D-printing technology improves the performance of next-gen TAVI. See Article page 14. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been the standard management strategy for aortic stenosis (AS) owing to its durability and fidelity, even in the patients with greater procedural risk. Introduced in 2002 by Cribier and colleagues, TAVI has revolutionized the care of patients with AS, as evident by drastic increase with success stories of the patients (>300,000 annually) who have undergone TAVI procedure. However, the risk of complications including stroke, concomitant coronary artery diseases, and postoperative lifelong antithrombotic therapeutic regimen offer serious challenges in TAVI-based management strategies. Even though the outcomes of TAVI are encouraging, the information regarding the fate of TAVI beyond 5 years remains obscure. Interestingly, these hurdles are not a limiting factor for TAVI; however, they pave multiple ways for refining the technology to explore alternative modalities for treating the patients with impaired vascular anatomy. In fact, the present-generation TAVI is the fruit of a progressive evolution, especially in the simplification of procedures, sophistication of valve and catheter technologies, incorporation of preprocedural planning using computed tomography imaging, and automation, ensuring the capability to predict the potential complications. As the TAVI research continues, novel concepts, modifications, and inventions are emerging and proceeding towards perfection. Application of the mechanical valve is limited, owing to the potential risk of bleeding due to the lifelong prophylactic anticoagulant medication administered to minimize thrombus formation. In contrast, the in vivo structural alterations in the biological valve increase the likelihood of reoperation. Interestingly, the advent of xenograft valves from porcine, bovine, and equine origins has significantly improved the hemodynamic profile, durability, and biological performance of TAVI. However, the immunogenicity of transplanted xeno-valves and subsequent peril of calcification have been an unaddressed puzzle in clinical cardiology and transplantation medicine. For instance, antigenicity of the carbohydrate moiety, galactose-α1,3-galactose (α-Gal), results in hyperacute immune rejection of the porcine xenograft as well as intensive calcification leading to the graft failure. Hence, the field of transplantation cardiology is hankering on next-generation (next-gen) xenografts to overcome such hurdles. In this context, Lim and coinvestigators in the current issue of the Journal demonstrated a promising strategy to address the immunogenicity of α-Gal and subsequent calcification in porcine TAVI using a multidisciplinary approach of decellularization, use of immunologically modified α-galactosidase, and 3-dimensional printing technology in their TAVI-sheep model. This evolving technology is schematically shown in Figure 1. The in vivo performance of the valves following the TAVI was exemplary, with proper stent fitting, outstanding coronary flow, better hemodynamic profile, and improved aortic valve function. Importantly, the study by Lim and colleagues is well appreciated for the minimal α-Gal–triggered immune reaction and calcification over the 8-month period. In addition, the findings in a clinically relevant large animal model could be translated to humans. Certainly, their encouraging findings and multidisciplinary approach inspire the next-gen TAVI and revolutionize the management of AS. However, the study is limited by finite element analysis, insufficient simulation of biomechanics, and lack of mechanistic findings, which warrant further research before clinical trials.
Figure 1

The overall stratagem demonstrating the potential advantage of multidisciplinary approach over the conventional approach in improving the performance of next-gen TAVI. TAVI, Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; α-Gal, galactose-α1,3-galactose; 3D, 3-dimensional printing.

The overall stratagem demonstrating the potential advantage of multidisciplinary approach over the conventional approach in improving the performance of next-gen TAVI. TAVI, Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; α-Gal, galactose-α1,3-galactose; 3D, 3-dimensional printing. Nonetheless, the findings by Lim and colleagues have launched a novel, multidisciplinary technological approach to improve the next-gen xenograft TAVI. In addition, imprinting the antistenotic mediators, prohealing signals, and anticalcification agents using 3-dimensional bioprinting technology would add more savor to the next-gen TAVI. Even though the findings are auspicious, the scrutiny of confounding comorbidities including hypertension and postimplantation complications including vascular injury, bleeding, and stroke warrants further attention before the translation into clinical arena. In conclusion, the multidisciplinary approach of amalgamating the elements/principles of immunology, biomaterials, molecular cardiology, and engineering would bolster next-gen TAVI, soothing the AS sufferers across the planet.
  6 in total

1.  Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Gideon Cohen; George T Christakis; Campbell D Joyner; Christopher D Morgan; Miguel Tamariz; Naoji Hanayama; Hari Mallidi; J P Szalai; Marko Katic; Vivek Rao; Stephen E Fremes; Bernard S Goldman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description.

Authors:  Alain Cribier; Helene Eltchaninoff; Assaf Bash; Nicolas Borenstein; Christophe Tron; Fabrice Bauer; Genevieve Derumeaux; Frederic Anselme; François Laborde; Martin B Leon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Durability of prostheses for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Mani Arsalan; Thomas Walther
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Recent developments and controversies in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Noman Ali; Peysh A Patel; Steven J Lindsay
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 15.534

5.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  T J Cahill; M Chen; K Hayashida; A Latib; T Modine; N Piazza; S Redwood; L Søndergaard; B D Prendergast
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 6.  Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: Upgrading a 50-Year Old Technology.

Authors:  Kan Yan Chloe Li
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-04-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.