| Literature DB >> 36003517 |
Hui-Yu Chen1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Jian Liu1,3,4,5,6,7, Ding-Zhou Weng1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Li Yan2,3,4,5,6,7, Chun-Shui Pan2,3,4,5,6,7, Kai Sun2,3,4,5,6,7, Xiao Guo1,3,4,5,6,7, Di Wang1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Gulinigaer Anwaier1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Ying-Qian Jiao1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Zhi-Xin Li1,3,4,5,6,7, Jing-Yan Han1,2,3,4,5,6,7.
Abstract
Background: Chronic stress-induced diarrhea is a common clinical condition, characterized by an abnormal bowel movement and loose stools, which lacks effective treatment in the clinic. Si-Ni-San (SNS) is a compound traditional Chinese medicine extensively used in China for stress-related diarrhea. However, the mechanism is unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Si-Ni-San; energy metabolism; intestinal mucosal barrier; sympathetic nerves excitation; tight junctions
Year: 2022 PMID: 36003517 PMCID: PMC9393244 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.940463
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
Number of rats in each group and used in each parameter.
| Parameter/Group | Control | CRS + NS | CRS + SNS (0.6944 g/kg) | CRS + SNS (1.3888 g/kg) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bracketed numbers indicated that the samples used for Molecular biology and Mesenteric arteriole tension measurement were from the eight rats used for Weight/Food-intake, and the samples used for Histological staining were from the five rats used for Stool score evaluation. The bold values 0.6944 g/kg and 1.3888 g/kg indicates the dosages of the drug used in rats and the bold numbers are represents the number of rats used in each group or for each parameter.
FIGURE 1Effect of the SNS treatment on rat weight, food-intake, and stools. (A) The changes in the food-intake in different groups. F = 11.99. p < 0.0001. (B) The changes in the body weight in different groups. F = 1.967. p = 0.1345. (C) The fecal score of different groups. F = 112.7. p < 0.0001. Results are presented as mean ± SEM.*p < 0.05 vs. Control group; #p < 0.05 vs. CRS + NS group. (A,B) n = 8. (C) n = 5.
FIGURE 2Effect of the SNS treatment on the expression of DβH and c-fos in locus coeruleus. (A) Representative immunofluorescent images of DβH (green) and nuclei (blue) in the Control (a1), CRS + NS (b1), CRS + SNS (0.6944 g/kg) (c1), and CRS + SNS (1.3888 g/kg) (d1) groups, respectively. Bar = 25 μm. (A) is the image of DβH in the Control group in a low-power lens. Bar = 50 μm. (B) Representative immunofluorescent images of c-fos (green) and nuclei (blue) in the Control (e1), CRS + NS (f1), CRS + SNS (0.6944 g/kg) (g1), and CRS + SNS (1.3888 g/kg) (h1) groups, respectively. Bar = 25 μm. (F) is the image of c-fos in the CRS + NS group in a low-power lens. Bar = 50 μm. (C) Western blot of DβH in the locus coeruleus of different groups with quantification showing below. F = 6.178. p = 0.0054. (D) Western blot of c-fos in locus coeruleus of different groups with quantification showing below. F = 11.94. p = 0.0002. Results are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 vs. Control group; #p < 0.05 vs. CRS + NS group. (A,B) n = 3. (C,D) n = 5.
FIGURE 3Effect of the SNS treatment on the level of NE in the ileum tissue and plasma and the expression of MLCK, p-MLC, and MLC in the colon tissue. (A) NE concentration in the ileum tissue from different groups. F = 6.027. p = 0.0060. (B) NE concentration in plasma from different groups. F = 6.458. p = 0.0075. (C) Western blot of MLCK in the colon tissue from different groups with quantification showing below. F = 6.947. p = 0.0058. (D) Western blot of p-MLC in colon tissue from different groups with quantification showing below. F = 10.83. p = 0.0010. (E) Western blot of MLC in colon tissue from different groups with quantification showing below. F = 17.71. p = 0.0001. Results are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 vs. Control group; #p < 0.05 vs. CRS + NS group. (A) n = 5. (B–E) n = 4.
FIGURE 4Effect of the SNS treatment on the morphological changes of small arteries in the ileum. (A) Representative low magnification of immunofluorescent images of small arteries in the ileum in Control (a1), CRS + NS (b1), CRS + SNS (0.6944 g/kg) (c1), CRS + SNS (1.3888 g/kg) (d1), respectively. Bar = 25 μm. (B) Representative high magnification of the immunofluorescent images of small arteries in the ileum in the Control (a2), CRS + NS (b2), CRS + SNS (0.6944 g/kg) (c2), and CRS + SNS (1.3888 g/kg) (d2) groups, respectively. Bar = 50 μm. The sections were immunochemically stained for α-SMA (green), CD31 (red), and nuclei (blue). (A,B) n = 3.
FIGURE 5Effect of the SNS treatment on the contraction and expression of α1-ARs, MLCK, p-MLC, and MLC in mesenteric arteries. (A) 3 μmol/L NE-induced contraction in the rat mesenteric arteries. F = 23.36. p < 0.0001. (B) SNS-induced relaxation in mesenteric arteries. (C) Western blot of α1-ARs in mesenteric arteries from different groups with the quantification shown below. F = 12.49. p = 0.0005. (D) Western blot of MLCK in mesenteric arteries from different groups with the quantification shown below. F = 9.030. p = 0.0021. (E) Western blot of p-MLC in the mesenteric arteries from different groups with the quantification shown below. (F) = 17.28. p = 0.0001. (F) Western blot of MLC in the mesenteric arteries from different groups with quantification showing below. F = 6.582. p = 0.0070. Results are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 vs. Control group; #p < 0.05 vs. CRS + NS group. (A,B) n = 6. (C–F) n = 4.
FIGURE 6Effect of the SNS treatment on morphological changes of the ileum. (A) Representative low magnification of HE staining images of the ileum in the Control (a1), CRS + NS (b1), CRS + SNS(0.6944 g/kg) (c1), and CRS + SNS (1.3888 g/kg) (d1) groups, respectively. Bar = 50 μm. (B) Representative high magnification of HE-staining images of the ileum in the Control (a2), CRS + NS (b2), CRS + SNS(0.6944 g/kg) (c2), CRS + SNS (1.3888 g/kg) (d2) groups, respectively. Bar = 20 μm. (A,B) n = 3.
FIGURE 7Effect of the SNS treatment on the occludin expression in the ileum epithelium. (A) Representative low magnification of immunofluorescent staining images of ileum epithelium in Control (a1), CRS + NS (b1), CRS + SNS(0.6944 g/kg) (c1), CRS + SNS (1.3888 g/kg) (d1), respectively. The sections were immunochemically stained for Keratin (green), occludin (red), and nuclei (blue). Bar = 50 μm. (B) Representative high magnification of immunofluorescent staining images of the ileum epithelium in the Control (a2), CRS + NS (b2), CRS + SNS(0.6944 g/kg) (c2), CRS + SNS (1.3888 g/kg) (d2) groups, respectively. The sections were immunochemically stained for Keratin (green), Occludin (red), and nuclei (blue). Bar = 25 μm. (C) Western blot of the occludin in the ileum of different groups with quantification showing below. F = 6.376. p = 0.0033. Results are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 vs. Control group. (A,B) n = 3. (C) n = 6.
FIGURE 8Effect of the SNS treatment on the levels of ATP, ADP, and AMP in the ileum and colon tissues. (A) ATP concentration in the ileum tissues from different groups. F = 4.553. p = 0.0237. (B) ADP concentration in ileum tissues from different groups. F = 6.993. p = 0.0021. (C) AMP concentration in ileum tissues from different groups. F = 4.918. p = 0.0102. (D) ATP/ADP in ileum tissues from different groups. F = 4.760. p = 0.0207. (E) ATP/AMP in ileum tissues from different groups. F = 1.394. p = 0.2738. (F) ATP concentration in colon tissues from different groups. F = 4.228. p = 0.0295. (G) ADP concentration in colon tissues from different groups. F = 17.38. p = 0.0001. (H) AMP concentration in colon tissues from different groups. F = 7.342. p = 0.0047. (I) ATP/ADP in colon tissues from different groups. F = 4.419. p = 0.0259. (J) ATP/AMP in colon tissues from different groups. F = 9.628. p = 0.0016. Results are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 vs. Control group; #p < 0.05 vs. CRS + NS group, (B,C,E) n = 6. ((A,D,F–J) n = 4.
FIGURE 9Effect of the SNS treatment on the expression of ATP5D in the ileum and colon tissues. (A) Western blot of ATP5D in ileum tissues from different groups with quantification showing below. F = 6.504. p = 0073. (B) Western blot of ATP5D in colon tissues from different groups with quantification showing below. F = 10.96. p = 0.0009. Results are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 vs. Control group; #p < 0.05 vs. CRS + NS group. (A,B) n = 4.
FIGURE 10Effect of the SNS treatment on 5-HT content in the ileum tissue and plasma and on the number of ECs of the ileum. (A) 5-HT concentration in ileum tissues from different groups. F = 5.845. p = 0.0106. (B) 5-HT concentration in the plasma from different groups. F = 15.30. p = 0.0002. (C) Representative low magnification of immunehistochemical staining images of anti-5-HT antibody in the ileum tissues in Control (a1), CRS + NS (b1), CRS + SNS (0.6944 g/kg) (c1), CRS + SNS (1.3888 g/kg) (d1) groups, respectively. Bar = 50 μm. (D) Representative high magnification of immunohistochemical staining images of the anti-5-HT antibody in the ileum tissues in the Control (a2), CRS + NS (b2), CRS + SNS(0.6944 g/kg) (c2), CRS + SNS (1.3888 g/kg) (d2) groups, respectively. Bar = 20 μm. (E) The counts of ECs in the ileum tissue of the rats in each group. F = 8.487. p = 0072. Results are presented as mean ± SEM.*p < 0.05 vs. Control group; #p < 0.05 vs. CRS + NS group. (A,B) n = 4. (C–E) n = 3.