Literature DB >> 36002747

A nutritional screening threshold for optimal outcomes after Hartmann's reversal.

Suzanne M Arnott1,2, Benjamin Zollinger3, Sarah Haviland4,5, Matthew Ng4, Vincent Obias4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Determining is nutritionally replete enough for Hartmann's reversal (HR) can be controversial and multifactorial. While there are many preoperative nutritional screening tools, the impact of malnourishment on HR has not been evaluated. The study aims to clarify how often patients undergoing HR are high risk for malnourishment at the time of surgery and how this impacts postoperative outcomes.
METHODS: From 2012-2019, all elective HRs were identified in ACS-NSQIP. Patients were categorized in a malnourished group if they met one of the following criteria: (1) BMI < 18.5 kg/m2, (2) albumin < 3.5 g/dL, or (3) > 10% body weight loss in the last 6 months. Bivariate associations of preoperative demographics and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors for 30-day mortality and organ space wound infection.
RESULTS: 8878 procedures were evaluated (well-nourished = 7116 and malnourished = 1762). The malnourished group had higher mortality (p < 0.001), shorter operating time (p < .001), longer length of stay (p = 0.016), and higher rates of infection (p = 0.011), reintubation (p = 0.002), bleeding (p < 0.001), sepsis (p = 0.001), and reoperation (p = 0.018). In multivariate regression models, malnourishment was an independent predictor for mortality (OR = 2.72, p < 0.001) and wound infection (OR = 1.19, p = 0.028).
CONCLUSION: A large percentage of patients undergoing HR were classified as being high-risk for malnutrition. Malnourishment was associated with some worse postoperative compilations including death and wound infection. Surgeons should routinely use preoperative screening for malnutrition to identify and attempt to optimize nutritional status prior to undergoing Hartmann's Reversal.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal surgery; Elective surgery; Hartmanns reversal; Malnutrition; Preoperative nutritional screening

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36002747     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04236-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.796


  6 in total

1.  Timing and method of reversal of Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  N W Pearce; S D Scott; S J Karran
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Preoperative nutritional status is an important predictor of survival in patients undergoing surgery for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Todd M Morgan; Dominic Tang; Kelly L Stratton; Daniel A Barocas; Christopher B Anderson; Justin R Gregg; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; S Duke Herrell; Joseph A Smith; Peter E Clark
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  The influence of nutritional status on complications after major intraabdominal surgery.

Authors:  Hülya Sungurtekin; Uğur Sungurtekin; Canan Balci; Mehmet Zencir; Ergün Erdem
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Nutritional predictors of complications following radical cystectomy.

Authors:  David C Johnson; Stephen B Riggs; Matthew E Nielsen; Jonathan E Matthews; Michael E Woods; Eric M Wallen; Raj S Pruthi; Angela B Smith
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Is transthyretin a good marker of nutritional status?

Authors:  S Dellière; L Cynober
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 7.324

6.  Simple Clinical Screening Underestimates Malnutrition in Surgical Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease-An ACS NSQIP Analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed A Abd-El-Aziz; Martin Hübner; Nicolas Demartines; David W Larson; Fabian Grass
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.