Literature DB >> 36002653

CRISPR/Cas tool designs for multiplex genome editing and its applications in developing biotic and abiotic stress-resistant crop plants.

Jagmohan Singh1,2, Dimple Sharma3, Gagandeep Singh Brar4, Karansher Singh Sandhu5, Shabir Hussain Wani6, Ruchika Kashyap7, Amardeep Kour8, Satnam Singh9.   

Abstract

Crop plants are prone to several yield-reducing biotic and abiotic stresses. The crop yield reductions due to these stresses need addressing to maintain an adequate balance between the increasing world population and food production to avoid food scarcities in the future. It is impossible to increase the area under food crops proportionately to meet the rising food demand. In such an adverse scenario overcoming the biotic and abiotic stresses through biotechnological interventions may serve as a boon to help meet the globe's food requirements. Under the current genomic era, the wide availability of genomic resources and genome editing technologies such as Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases (TALENs), Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFNs), and Clustered-Regularly Interspaced Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated proteins (CRISPR/Cas) has widened the scope of overcoming these stresses for several food crops. These techniques have made gene editing more manageable and accessible with changes at the embryo level by adding or deleting DNA sequences of the target gene(s) from the genome. The CRISPR construct consists of a single guide RNA having complementarity with the nucleotide fragments of the target gene sequence, accompanied by a protospacer adjacent motif. The target sequence in the organism's genome is then cleaved by the Cas9 endonuclease for obtaining a desired trait of interest. The current review describes the components, mechanisms, and types of CRISPR/Cas techniques and how this technology has helped to functionally characterize genes associated with various biotic and abiotic stresses in a target organism. This review also summarizes the application of CRISPR/Cas technology targeting these stresses in crops through knocking down/out of associated genes.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36002653     DOI: 10.1007/s11033-022-07741-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Rep        ISSN: 0301-4851            Impact factor:   2.742


  94 in total

1.  Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system.

Authors:  Bernd Zetsche; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Omar O Abudayyeh; Ian M Slaymaker; Kira S Makarova; Patrick Essletzbichler; Sara E Volz; Julia Joung; John van der Oost; Aviv Regev; Eugene V Koonin; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Biotechnology: Rewriting a genome.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Charpentier; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Genome-wide prediction of highly specific guide RNA spacers for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in model plants and major crops.

Authors:  Kabin Xie; Jianwei Zhang; Yinong Yang
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 13.164

4.  Use of the Cas9 Orthologs from Streptococcus thermophilus and Staphylococcus aureus for Non-Homologous End-Joining Mediated Site-Specific Mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Jeannette Steinert; Carla Schmidt; Holger Puchta
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

Review 5.  The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway.

Authors:  Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.643

6.  Boosting plant genome editing with a versatile CRISPR-Combo system.

Authors:  Changtian Pan; Gen Li; Aimee A Malzahn; Yanhao Cheng; Benjamin Leyson; Simon Sretenovic; Filiz Gurel; Gary D Coleman; Yiping Qi
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 17.352

7.  Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities.

Authors:  Benjamin P Kleinstiver; Michelle S Prew; Shengdar Q Tsai; Ved V Topkar; Nhu T Nguyen; Zongli Zheng; Andrew P W Gonzales; Zhuyun Li; Randall T Peterson; Jing-Ruey Joanna Yeh; Martin J Aryee; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Le Cong; Winston X Yan; David A Scott; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Andrea J Kriz; Bernd Zetsche; Ophir Shalem; Xuebing Wu; Kira S Makarova; Eugene V Koonin; Phillip A Sharp; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Increasing the efficiency of CRISPR-Cas9-VQR precise genome editing in rice.

Authors:  Xixun Hu; Xiangbing Meng; Qing Liu; Jiayang Li; Kejian Wang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 9.803

10.  Rapid characterization of CRISPR-Cas9 protospacer adjacent motif sequence elements.

Authors:  Tautvydas Karvelis; Giedrius Gasiunas; Joshua Young; Greta Bigelyte; Arunas Silanskas; Mark Cigan; Virginijus Siksnys
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.