Literature DB >> 36001156

Convergent evolutionary counterion displacement of bilaterian opsins in ciliary cells.

Kazumi Sakai1, Hiroki Ikeuchi1, Chihiro Fujiyabu1, Yasushi Imamoto1, Takahiro Yamashita2.   

Abstract

Opsins are universal photoreceptive proteins in animals. Vertebrate rhodopsin in ciliary photoreceptor cells photo-converts to a metastable active state to regulate cyclic nucleotide signaling. This active state cannot photo-convert back to the dark state, and thus vertebrate rhodopsin is categorized as a mono-stable opsin. By contrast, mollusk and arthropod rhodopsins in rhabdomeric photoreceptor cells photo-convert to a stable active state to stimulate IP3/calcium signaling. This active state can photo-convert back to the dark state, and thus these rhodopsins are categorized as bistable opsins. Moreover, the negatively charged counterion position crucial for the visible light sensitivity is different between vertebrate rhodopsin (Glu113) and mollusk and arthropod rhodopsins (Glu181). This can be explained by an evolutionary scenario where vertebrate rhodopsin newly acquired Glu113 as a counterion, which is thought to have led to higher signaling efficiency of vertebrate rhodopsin. However, the detailed evolutionary steps which led to the higher efficiency in vertebrate rhodopsin still remain unknown. Here, we analyzed the xenopsin group, which is phylogenetically distinct from vertebrate rhodopsin and functions in protostome ciliary cells. Xenopsins are blue-sensitive bistable opsins that regulate cAMP signaling. We found that a bistable xenopsin of Leptochiton asellus had Glu113 as a counterion but did not exhibit elevated signaling efficiency. Therefore, our results show that vertebrate rhodopsin and L. asellus xenopsin regulate cyclic nucleotide signaling in ciliary cells and displaced the counterion position from Glu181 to Glu113 via convergent evolution, whereas subsequently only vertebrate rhodopsin elevated its signaling efficiency by acquiring the mono-stable property.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ciliary photoreceptor cell; Counterion; Molecular evolution; Opsin; Rhodopsin; Xenopsin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36001156     DOI: 10.1007/s00018-022-04525-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci        ISSN: 1420-682X            Impact factor:   9.207


  5 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of eyes and photoreceptor cell types.

Authors:  Detlev Arendt
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.203

2.  Co-expression of xenopsin and rhabdomeric opsin in photoreceptors bearing microvilli and cilia.

Authors:  Oliver Vöcking; Ioannis Kourtesis; Sharat Chandra Tumu; Harald Hausen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Extraocular, rod-like photoreceptors in a flatworm express xenopsin photopigment.

Authors:  Kate A Rawlinson; Francois Lapraz; Edward R Ballister; Mark Terasaki; Jessica Rodgers; Richard J McDowell; Johannes Girstmair; Katharine E Criswell; Miklos Boldogkoi; Fraser Simpson; David Goulding; Claire Cormie; Brian Hall; Robert J Lucas; Maximilian J Telford
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  The visual pigment xenopsin is widespread in protostome eyes and impacts the view on eye evolution.

Authors:  Clemens Christoph Döring; Suman Kumar; Sharat Chandra Tumu; Ioannis Kourtesis; Harald Hausen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Human melanopsin forms a pigment maximally sensitive to blue light (λmax ≈ 479 nm) supporting activation of G(q/11) and G(i/o) signalling cascades.

Authors:  Helena J Bailes; Robert J Lucas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 5.349

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.