Xiao Shan1, Maolin Qian1, Lan Wang1, Xiaoqin Liu2. 1. Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China. 2. Department of outpatient, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China. lxqnt@126.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) and female sexual dysfunction (FSD) are symptoms that affect the quality of life of patients with cervical cancer (CC) after treatment. Our purpose was to estimate the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) and fecal incontinence (FI) associated with PFD and prevalence of FSD in CC patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to 31 January 2021 and selected articles assessing UI, FI and FSD in women with CC. Observational studies were included if they investigated UI, FI, and FSD. RESULTS: We included 14 of the 1,233 studies: 7 investigated FSD, 9 UI, and 3 FI. The results were highly heterogeneous because of the different populations and treatment methods. The prevalence of FSD, UI, and FI in CC patients after treatment was 45.0% (95% CI, 21.8-68.3%), 34.1% (95% CI, 25.5-42.7%), and 11.1% (95% CI, 4.8-17.3%). The results showed that different countries were the source of high heterogeneity of UI and FI (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, the prevalence of PFD and FSD was high. These results are important for drawing attention to PFD and its early prevention and rehabilitation.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) and female sexual dysfunction (FSD) are symptoms that affect the quality of life of patients with cervical cancer (CC) after treatment. Our purpose was to estimate the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) and fecal incontinence (FI) associated with PFD and prevalence of FSD in CC patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to 31 January 2021 and selected articles assessing UI, FI and FSD in women with CC. Observational studies were included if they investigated UI, FI, and FSD. RESULTS: We included 14 of the 1,233 studies: 7 investigated FSD, 9 UI, and 3 FI. The results were highly heterogeneous because of the different populations and treatment methods. The prevalence of FSD, UI, and FI in CC patients after treatment was 45.0% (95% CI, 21.8-68.3%), 34.1% (95% CI, 25.5-42.7%), and 11.1% (95% CI, 4.8-17.3%). The results showed that different countries were the source of high heterogeneity of UI and FI (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, the prevalence of PFD and FSD was high. These results are important for drawing attention to PFD and its early prevention and rehabilitation.
Authors: Aparna S Ramaseshan; Jessica Felton; Dana Roque; Gautam Rao; Andrea G Shipper; Tatiana V D Sanses Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: William Small; Monica A Bacon; Amishi Bajaj; Linus T Chuang; Brandon J Fisher; Matthew M Harkenrider; Anuja Jhingran; Henry C Kitchener; Linda R Mileshkin; Akila N Viswanathan; David K Gaffney Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Claudia Allemani; Tomohiro Matsuda; Veronica Di Carlo; Rhea Harewood; Melissa Matz; Maja Nikšić; Audrey Bonaventure; Mikhail Valkov; Christopher J Johnson; Jacques Estève; Olufemi J Ogunbiyi; Gulnar Azevedo E Silva; Wan-Qing Chen; Sultan Eser; Gerda Engholm; Charles A Stiller; Alain Monnereau; Ryan R Woods; Otto Visser; Gek Hsiang Lim; Joanne Aitken; Hannah K Weir; Michel P Coleman Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Marc Arbyn; Elisabete Weiderpass; Laia Bruni; Silvia de Sanjosé; Mona Saraiya; Jacques Ferlay; Freddie Bray Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Taís Pereira Miguel; Carla Elaine Laurienzo; Eliney Ferreira Faria; Almir José Sarri; Isabela Queiroz Castro; Renato José Affonso Júnior; Carlos Eduardo Mattos da Cunha Andrade; Marcelo de Andrade Vieira; Ricardo Dos Reis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 3.240