Literature DB >> 36000032

Clinical outcomes of multifocal papillary thyroid cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Likun Cui1, Dongdong Feng1, Chaofan Zhu1, Qiuyu Li1, Wenqing Li2, Baoguo Liu1.   

Abstract

Objective: Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is the most common endocrine malignancy with a steadily increasing incidence. Researches have reported that tumor multifocality occurs in an extensive number of cases. Nevertheless, the clinical characteristics and prognostic value remained controversial. This study was performed to investigate the relationship between multifocal PTC and adverse clinicopathologic features and the prognosis.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on three electronic databases up to December 31, 2021. Parameters of interest included five clinical features (extrathyroidal extension, lymphovascular invasion, central lymph node metastasis, lateral lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis) and were pooled into risk ratios (RRs). Time-to-event data (recurrence-free survival and all-cause mortality) were evaluated using hazard ratios (HRs). Publication bias was examined using funnel plots and Egger's test.
Results: A total of 23 articles were included according to the inclusion criteria; all of the studies were retrospective cohorts. In comparison with unifocality, multifocality showed an increased risk of extrathyroidal extension (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.25-1.53), lymphovascular invasion (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.04-1.55), central lymph node metastasis (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.12-1.30), lateral lymph node metastasis (RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.62-2.14), and distant metastasis (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.03-1.76). Multifocal patients were predisposed to postoperative recurrence (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.50-2.07). The rate of all-cause mortality did not reach a statistical difference. Level of Evidence: 2.
Conclusion: Multifocal PTC is more aggressive in contrast to unifocal PTC and is accompanied by an increased risk of recurrence. They were usually diagnosed in higher grades and stages. To achieve the maximal benefit, we recommend personalized therapy and close follow-up for multifocal PTC patients. Further prospective studies will clarify the best-fitted treatment plans.
© 2022 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical performance; multifocality; papillary thyroid cancer; risk factor

Year:  2022        PMID: 36000032      PMCID: PMC9392403          DOI: 10.1002/lio2.824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol        ISSN: 2378-8038


INTRODUCTION

Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) accounts for 80%–90% of thyroid neoplasms and the incidence continues to increase. Although patients with PTC have a much better outcome than individuals with other pathological subtypes of thyroid cancer, personalized regimens for low‐to‐medium risk patients remain to be determined. In clinical practice, controversies regarding the treatment of low‐to‐medium risk PTC include but are not limited to: dynamic surveillance, surgery extent, and postoperative radioactive iodine (RAI). , The American Thyroid Association (ATA) declared several clinicopathological characteristics as the stratification criterion for recurrence in differentiated thyroid cancer to help with clinical strategies. To date, the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC) TNM staging system still considers sex, age, tumor size and lymph node metastasis as independent factors for determining tumor prognosis. Risk for recurrence increases with the presence of tissue invasion, local/distal metastasis as well as microscopic/gross infiltration. Response to initial surgery and RAI therapy are also closely related with clinicopathological features. In present clinical practice, advanced age (over 55 years), minor extrathyroidal extension (mETE) and central/mediastinal (VI&VII compartment: pretracheal/paratracheal/prelaryngeal and mediastinal region) lymph node metastasis are well‐established indicators for PTC persistent/recurrence. Tumor multifocality, whether unilateral or bilateral, is not rare in thyroid cancer. However, the clinical evolution and the prognostic significance of multifocal PTCs are debated. The presence of multifocality is regarded as an unfavorable event that implies tumor deterioration. Related studies have reported the existence of tumor multifocality in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), medulloblastoma and prostate cancer, the curative effect and prognosis of them were inferior to those with unifocal disease. , , , Moreover, it is estimated that approximately 18%–87% of PTC patients were present with tumor multifocality. , McCarthy stated that the separate tumor foci usually originated from the same clone. However, an alternative view has suggested that multifocal PTCs developed from discrete clones with irrelevant genetic backgrounds. , In addition, scattered tumor lesions usually exist as microcarcinomas of less than 1 cm. The mean tumor size of multifocal PTCs is smaller than that of a solitary tumor, and thus the risk of multifocal PTCs might be misinterpreted. Several studies have shown that central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) was correlated with tumor multifocality in comparison with unifocality. , , A retrospective analysis of 150 pediatric thyroid cancer patients revealed a higher recurrence rate than adult patients with multifocal tumors. However, inconsistencies , in the reported clinical outcomes of multifocal PTCs led to confusion and dilemmas, which tended to depend on one's empirical understanding. In addition, the lack of existing consensus about the prognostic value for multifocal PTCs has impeded decision‐making. Currently, only two institutions emphasize multifocality as a risk of disease‐specific mortality. It is crucial to understand other indicators of disease screening. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis to identify the association between multifocality and adverse clinicopathologic outcomes in PTCs.

METHODS

This report was implemented in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA Statement). , MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases were retrieved up to December 31, 2021. The search was restricted to original studies concerning multifocality for PTC patients. Search terms are shown in Table 1. The study was performed with the following PICOS strategy
TABLE 1

Search strategy.

MEDLINEthyroid cancer, papillary [Mesh] AND (“multifocal”[Title/Abstract] OR “multifocality”[Title/Abstract])
Web of ScienceTI = (papillary thyroid cancer) OR TI = (papillary thyroid carcinoma) OR TI = (papillary thyroid neoplasm)) AND (TS = multifocal OR TS = multifocality
Embasemultifocality: ab, ti OR multifocal: ab, ti) AND (“papillary thyroid cancer”: ti OR “papillary thyroid carcinoma”: ti OR “papillary thyroid neoplasm”: ti
Population: patients presenting with PTC for the first time. Intervention: pathologically proved multifocal lesions. Comparison: a single unilateral tumor. Outcome: adverse clinicopathological performance, postoperative recurrence, and all‐cause mortality. Study design: retrospective cohorts. Search strategy.

Literature selection and quality assessment

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) patients undergone thyroid surgery for the first time, (b) the pathologic findings were confirmed as multifocal/unifocal PTC, and (c) studies reported both multifocality and unifocality. Level of confidence was determined according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine, Levels of Evidence (OCEBM Levels of Evidence 2009). Exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) non‐English articles; (b) insufficient data; (c) overlapping reports in multiple publications; (d) case report, editorials, letters or meeting abstracts; (e) patients with non‐neoplastic thyroid disease were included; and (f) restricted pathological subtypes or genetic background. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used by two investigators (LK Cui and CF Zhu) according to the Cochrane collaboration. Stars were awarded based on patient selection (four items), comparability (one item) and the evaluation of outcomes (three items). In cases of disagreement, another investigator (QY Li) provided assessment.

Data extraction and statistical analysis

Two investigators (LK Cui and DD Feng) independently extracted the original data as referred to the predetermined criteria. Extracted data include study design, patient demographics, clinicopathological features and follow‐up data. Disagreement was addressed through a review of the full‐text article and input from a third investigator (CF Zhu). Any disagreement was discussed in our group. Meta‐analysis was conducted using Stata 14.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX), RevMan 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen) and Comprehensive Meta‐Analysis 2.0 (Biostat, Englewood, NJ). Relative risk (RR), hazard ratio (HR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. To avoid confounding factors, only multivariant adjusted time‐to‐effect data were collected. We quantified the heterogeneity across studies with the I 2 statistic. An I 2 ≥ 50% indicates that there was medium to high heterogeneity among eligible studies. A random‐effects model was used for heterogeneous trials. Sources of the inconsistency among studies were identified by: (a) subgroup analysis based on countries and (b) sensitivity analysis by eliminating each of the included studies. Publication bias was presented with funnel plot and Egger's test in each analysis which included over nine articles. Egger's linear regression method was used to detect asymmetry, and a p value less than .05 was considered the existence of publication bias. The trim and fill method , was further applied to confirm the stability of our estimates.

RESULTS

Study selection and quality assessment

We identified 1194 records after the initial retrieval. After evaluating the remaining articles according to the selection criteria, 23 studies published from 2006 to 2021 were identified for subsequent analysis (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1

Overview of studies search and selection.

Overview of studies search and selection. All of the 23 studies were hospital‐based studies. Two articles , only reported papillary thyroid microcarcinomas (in which the maximal diameters were less than 1 cm) and the rest reported PTC patients. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , The eligible studies were retrospective cohorts. Cao et al. conducted a case–control study, so we did not include this article for further evaluation. Baseline characteristics and NOS evaluation are shown in Tables 2 and 3. According to the included studies, all the subjects were from local medical centers, which may lead to great selection bias, and therefore we did not employ the first two scoring items (“representativeness of the exposed cohort,” “selection of the non‐exposed cohort”). Consequently, studies could be awarded a maximum of seven stars. A study with equal to or greater than five stars was considered as a high‐quality study. Three studies , , were classified as “moderate quality” (four stars), and the rest ranged from five to seven stars.
TABLE 2

Baseline characteristics of included studies.

AuthorYearCountryStudy designCasesPathology a Age (average ± SD)Gender (M/F)Follow up (year, average ± SD)Multifocality (M/U b )Size (mm)
Kim JM 38 2006KoreaRetrospective cohort662PTC44.877/5855.7 (0.25–9)266/396
Grogan 34 2013AmericaRetrospective cohort269PTC35.9 ± 15.589/1807.6 ± 8.1 (11–27)121/148
Kim KJ 30 2015KoreaRetrospective cohort1661PTMC45.5 ± 11.5 (13–83)392/19175.6 ± 0.9 (0.1–7.3)549/1112
Kim HJ 50 2015KoreaRetrospective cohort2095PTC46 ± 13275/18207 (0.1–7.3)672/142316 ± 12
Qu 42 2016ChinaRetrospective cohort496PTC43.8 ± 17.3 (7–85)160/33610.4 ± 5.7 (0.8–28.6)209/287
Tam 45 2016TurkeyRetrospective cohort912PTC49.2 ± 12.5193/7233.1 (0.5–8.3)308/604
Wang W 46 2016ChinaRetrospective cohort2211PTC44.3 ± 11.8/44.4 ± 12.3 d 507/17046 (0.5–15)636/1575
Kim SK 39 2016KoreaRetrospective cohort5656PTC48.0 ± 10.41002/46545.1 (0.5–17.8)1529/44276 ± 2
Wang F 21 2017Multinational c Retrospective cohort2624PTC46 (35–58)385/22394.8 (2.2–8.9)1000/162415 (10–25)
Hwangbo 35 2017KoreaRetrospective cohort3282PTC47 ± 112897/3855.8 (1.0–10.2)1285/19851.1 (0.1–2.0)
Kim Y 40 2017KoreaRetrospective cohort1928PTC53 (15–86)355/15737.8 (2–11.1)623/1305
Khan 37 2018PakistanRetrospective cohort209PTC35.6 ± 13.8 (12–74)63/1464.1 (1–16.3)87/122
Xu 47 2018ChinaRetrospective cohort3607PTC47.5 ± 2868/27395.7 (2.1–11.5)675/29326 ± 30
Gui 17 2018ChinaRetrospective cohort541PTMC47.2 ± 12.3128/4133.5 (2–5)146/3955.8 ± 2.4
Li 33 2018ChinaRetrospective cohort570PTC45.3 ± 10.5/43.3 ± 11.5 d 160/4101.6 (1–2.2)285/285
Ryu 44 2018KoreaRetrospective cohort390PTC46 (17–80)118/2726.75 (0.5–13)142/2481.61 ± 0.97
Nam 41 2018KoreaRetrospective cohort2384PTC52 (12–86)495/18897.8 (2–10.9)142/248
Geron 13 2019IsraelRetrospective cohort1039PTC48.4 ± 15.3222/81710.1 (4.7–16.3)534/50515 (10–25)
Feng 33 2019ChinaRetrospective cohort442PTC45.4 ± 12.3109/3333.6 (0.9–8.25)119/32312.3 ± 9.3
Choi 31 2019KoreaRetrospective cohort2390PTC52 (12–88)516/18747.7 (2–11.9)892/14981.3 (0.8–1.8)
Shin 51 2020KoreaRetrospective cohort2902PTC51 (43–58)619/22837.4 (5.3–10.3)1580/132211 (7–14)
Jiang 36 2020ChinaRetrospective cohort4107PTC45.21 (12–82)909/31983.75 (2–11.9)1058/38269.2 (1–80)
Woo 48 2021KoreaRetrospective cohort1249PTC47.4 ± 11.4154/10955.5 ± 2.7487/76210 ± 7

PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; PTMC, papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

M/U, multifocal/unifocal.

America, China, Italy, Poland, Australia, Spain.

The data were presented separately.

TABLE 3

Quality assessment.

SelectionComparabilityOutcome
StudiesRepresentativeness of the exposed cohort a Selection of the non‐exposed cohort b Ascertainment of exposureOutcome of interest was not present at start of study c Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysisAssessment of outcomeFollow‐up durationAdequacy of follow up of cohortsTotal
Kim JM 39 5
Grogan 35 5
Kim KJ 31 ★★6
Kim HJ 51 4
Qu 43 6
Tam 46 5
Wang W 47 4
Kim SK 40 5
Wang F 22 ★★6
Hwangbo 36 5
Kim Y 41 5
Khan 38 4
Xu 48 5
Gui 18 5
Li 34 ★★6
Ryu 45 6
Nam 42 5
Geron 14 ★★7
Feng 33 ★★6
Choi 32 ★★7
Shin 32 6
Jiang 37 6
Woo 49 ★★6

Patients were collected from certain medical institutions (subjects from Kim KJ and Gui were only consisted of PTMC).

Multifocal and unifocal cases were extracted from a single medical center (except for Wang F, Hwangbo and Geron et al.).

Outcome events include recurrence and death.

Baseline characteristics of included studies. PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; PTMC, papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. M/U, multifocal/unifocal. America, China, Italy, Poland, Australia, Spain. The data were presented separately. Quality assessment. Patients were collected from certain medical institutions (subjects from Kim KJ and Gui were only consisted of PTMC). Multifocal and unifocal cases were extracted from a single medical center (except for Wang F, Hwangbo and Geron et al.). Outcome events include recurrence and death.

The association between multifocality and clinicopathological features

ETE

Thirteen articles , , , , , , , , , , , , reported the results for ETE. The meta‐analysis suggested that multifocality is a risk factor of ETE (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.25–1.53, p < .001) (Figures 2 and 3A). The statistical heterogeneity was significant (I 2 = 88.2%, p < .001). Similarly, we further deduced a high heterogeneity in studies in China and Korea by subgroup analysis (I 2 = 59.6%, p = .12). Still, sensitivity analysis did not reverse the aforementioned result (the pooled RRs ranged from 1.01 to 2.27, p < .001) (Figure S1).
FIGURE 2

Summary of the results.

FIGURE 3

Forest plot of the studies. (A) Extrathyroidal extension and (B) lymphovascular invasion.

Summary of the results. Forest plot of the studies. (A) Extrathyroidal extension and (B) lymphovascular invasion.

Lymphovascular invasion

Six studies , , , , , covered lymphovascular events, and the I 2 was 65.5%. The analysis indicated that the data from Tam et al. was the source of the inconsistency; after excluding this study, the heterogeneity dropped to 0%. Finally, the pooled analysis implied that multifocality was a risk factor for lymphovascular invasion (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.04–1.55, p = .02) (Figures 2 and 3B).

CLNM

Ten articles , , , , , , , , , reported CLNM, and the pooled result suggested a strong relationship between multifocality and CLNM (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.12–1.30, p < .001) (Figures 2 and 4A). The I 2 was 75% with a significant difference, especially among East Asia countries. The sensitivity analysis also verified its robustness (the RR ranged from 1.06 to 1.49, p < .001) (Figure S2).
FIGURE 4

Forest plot of the studies. (A) Central lymph node metastasis, (B) lateral lymph node metastasis, and (C) distant metastasis.

Forest plot of the studies. (A) Central lymph node metastasis, (B) lateral lymph node metastasis, and (C) distant metastasis.

LLNM

We used a fixed effect model to evaluate the risk of multifocality for lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) among four studies. , , , The analysis showed that there was a significant association between tumor multifocality and LLNM (RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.62–2.14, p < .001) (Figures 2 and 4B).

Distant metastasis

Five studies , , , , indicated that multifocality was related to distant metastasis, and the propensity of metastasis was higher in multifocal PTCs (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.03–1.76, p = .03) (Figures 2 and 4C).

Recurrence‐free survival

Six studies , , , , , provided multivariate adjusted data concerning the recurrence rate. Multifocal PTCs were easier to get involved in disease recurrence (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.50–2.07, p < .001) (Figures 2 and 5A).
FIGURE 5

Forest plot of the studies. (A) Recurrence‐free survival and (B) all‐cause mortality.

Forest plot of the studies. (A) Recurrence‐free survival and (B) all‐cause mortality.

All‐cause mortality

We failed to detect any predisposition in mortality for multifocal PTCs (p = .47) (Figures 2 and 5B). , More follow‐up data are required to investigate this association.

Publication bias

Funnel plots and Egger's tests did not detect a significant publication bias when confronted with ETE and CLNM (p values were .09 and .45, respectively; Figures S3 and S4). After using the trim and fill method, the results were still robust.

DISCUSSION

The natural evolution and specific clinical significance of multifocal PTCs remain inconsistent. This report was to summarize the clinicopathological performance of multifocal PTCs. To our knowledge, the results from 23 studies involving 41,616 patients revealed higher cumulative risks for multifocal PTCs, in developing into disease progression (Figure 2). Accordingly, multifocal PTCs are recommended to accept an intensive surveillance in case further intervention is required. In a study by Choi et al., multifocality is an independent risk factor for PTC recurrence. These patients usually present with advanced TNM staging. In contrast, Greca et al. argued that disease persistence was rare after total thyroidectomy in patients with multifocal PTCs. According to the ATA, before prophylactic cervical dissection, the risk factors for metastasis and recurrence (such as advanced/young age, lager tumor size, multiple sites, ETE, and LLNM) should be carefully considered. Notably, multifocal PTC has been classified in the moderate‐to‐high risk group. Moreover, except for multifocal PTCs larger than 1 cm, the latest ATA guideline did not recommend aggressive approaches for multifocal papillary thyroid microcarcinomas, for instance, postoperative radioiodine ablation. In our research, multifocal patients accounted for 36% of the PTC population, which is consistent with the findings of Natalia et al. Additionally, surgical approaches are heterogenous in different clinical centers for low‐risk patients. It was not until 2015 that the ATA guidelines negated prophylactic lymph node dissection as a routine choice. And the rate of local recurrence varies across studies because of this discrepancy. We did not include any cross‐sectional studies other than retrospective cohort studies to pursue intact time‐effect data with a higher level of evidence. We observed an issue with heterogeneity between research in China and Korea. Differences in the diagnostic criteria might be an explanation of this inconsistency. The proportion of thyroid microcarcinoma has gradually increased, which can be another source of the heterogeneity. Shin, Choi, and Li excluded patients with radiation exposure, and Shin and Choi did not pool the results for T4 staging or poorly differentiated PTCs. Kim JM and Jiang each selected their surgical planning. The operations were performed by Kim JM et al. prior to 2009, after that the ATA published guidelines for differentiated thyroid cancer. Jiang et al. performed operations according to Guidelines for the Chinese Thyroid Association. , ATA and NCCN guidelines emphasized preoperative fine needle aspiration (FNA) while Chinese clinicians focus on the distinguishing of undetermined nodules, which rely on intraoperative frozen section examinations. Furthermore, most Chinese surgeons hold a more positive attitude toward prophylactic central lymph node dissection. Additionally, the 2016 Korea Thyroid Association (2016 KTA/KSThR) advocated a tendentious recommendation for FNA for low risk nodules. From 2009 to 2013, inconsistencies have existed among the clinical centers in the Asian‐Pacific region. With the implementation of the 2015 ATA guidelines, surgical strategies for low‐to‐moderate PTCs will become standardized. Joseph, Kim and Zhang et al. performed meta‐analyses in 2018 and 2021, which reported that multifocality is positively correlated with lymph node metastasis (both in central and lateral compartments), advanced TNM stage and recurrence. Here, we conducted a more comprehensive analysis concerning unfavorable clinicopathologic features and time‐to‐event outcomes result from multifocal PTC, of which should be classified as a higher risk category. Similarly, the presence of multifocality strongly indicates an increased risk of recurrence. As with the results, we intended to address the value of close surveillance to assist personalized therapy, especially for suspicious nodules and regional lymph nodes of multifocal PTCs. Nevertheless, the extent of surgery and the postoperative follow‐up strategy require further investigation.

LIMITATION

Nevertheless, 23 studies in our research were performed retrospectively, which may exhibit selection bias and withdraw bias to some extent. Cases with recurrence or deterioration were more easily recorded. Given the restriction of clinical screening methods, postoperative occult lymph nodes may not be detected. On the other hand, the time‐to‐event data were constrained by different length of follow‐up. The representativity of patients was limited, for instance, geographical distribution and radiation exposure. Undoubtedly, many high‐risk features were associated with tumor invasion and local/distant metastasis for PTC, including but not restricted to multifocality alone. Therefore, the results should be treated with caution.

CONCLUSION

In summary, this study found that multifocal PTCs are predisposed to disease metastasis and recurrence. ETE and lymphovascular invasion are more likely to be concomitant with these patients. When possible, active surveillance should be considered. We look forward to subsequent prospective studies to guide personalized treatment and postoperative follow‐up.

FUNDING INFORMATION

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFC0119200).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose. Supplementary Figure S1 Extrathyroidal extension (sensitivity analysis). Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Figure S2 Central lymph node metastasis (sensitivity analysis). Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Figure S3 Extrathyroidal extension (funnel plot). Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Figure S4 Central lymph node metastasis (funnel plot). Click here for additional data file.
  60 in total

1.  Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Duval; R Tweedie
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Patients with Multifocal Macroscopic Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Have a Low Risk of Recurrence at Early Follow-Up after Total Thyroidectomy and Radioactive Iodine Treatment.

Authors:  Amanda La Greca; Bin Xu; Ronald Ghossein; R Michael Tuttle; Mona M Sabra
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2016-10-04

3.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Association of tumor size and focality with recurrence/persistence in papillary thyroid cancer patients treated with total thyroidectomy along with radioactive-iodine ablation and TSH suppression.

Authors:  Misbah Khan; Aamir Ali Syed; Amina Iqbal Khan; Syed Raza Hussain; Namra Urooj
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-05-26

5.  Total tumor diameter: the neglected value in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

Authors:  J-W Feng; H Pan; L Wang; J Ye; Y Jiang; Z Qu
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Comparison of the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of bilateral versus unilateral multifocal papillary thyroid cancer: An updated study with more than 2000 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Weibin Wang; Xingyun Su; Kuifeng He; Yanli Wang; Haiyong Wang; Haohao Wang; Yinu Zhao; Wenhe Zhao; Rasa Zarnegar; Thomas J Fahey; Xiaodong Teng; Lisong Teng
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Larissa Shamseer; Mike Clarke; Davina Ghersi; Alessandro Liberati; Mark Petticrew; Paul Shekelle; Lesley A Stewart
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-01

8.  Identifying risk factors for recurrence of papillary thyroid cancer in patients who underwent modified radical neck dissection.

Authors:  Young Jae Ryu; Jin Seong Cho; Jung Han Yoon; Min Ho Park
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  The Differences Between Multifocal and Unifocal Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in Unilateral Lobe: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Liang He; Zhihong Wang; Wenwu Dong; Wei Sun; Ping Zhang; Hao Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Thyroid cancers of follicular origin in a genomic light: in-depth overview of common and unique molecular marker candidates.

Authors:  Natalia Pstrąg; Katarzyna Ziemnicka; Hans Bluyssen; Joanna Wesoły
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.