Literature DB >> 36000027

Clinical characteristics of paraneoplastic syndromes in patients with head and neck cancer.

Wenwen Diao1, Ya Liang2, Liming Gao3, Yingying Zhu1, Xiaoli Zhu1, Shuting Yu1, Xin Xia1, Xingming Chen1.   

Abstract

Background: To summarize the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and prognosis of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients with paraneoplastic syndromes (PNS).
Methods: The clinical data of 1958 patients with HNC admitted to our hospital from January 1996 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic and cancer-related characteristics were extracted. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared by log-rank test. Cox regression was performed to evaluate prognostic factors and hazard ratio.
Results: Totally 40 HNC patients with PNS were included in the final analysis, including 36 men and four women with a mean age of 60.4 years (range 40-82). PNS was dermatologic or cutaneous in 23 (57.50%) patients, endocrine in 10 (25.00%), neurologic in five (12.50%), and osteoarticular or rheumatologic in two (5.00%). Twenty-five (62.50%) patients had Stage III/IV cancer. PNS regressed after antitumor therapy in 28 (70.00%) patients. Recurrence of PNS was observed in nine of 12 (75.00%) patients with cancer recurrence or metastasis. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of patients with PNS were 51.52% and 44.44%, respectively. The DFS (p = .001) and OS (p = .003) of patients presented with PNS prior to HNC diagnosis were significantly longer than those of patients with synchronous or metachronous PNS. PNS diagnosed before HNC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.11-0.85, p = .02), Stage IV disease (aHR: 3.27, 95% CI: 1.18-9.05, p = .02), and smoking history (aHR: 3.69, 95% CI: 1.04-13.05, p = .04) were significantly associated with OS and DFS. Conclusions: Early recognition of PNS could provide clues about underlying tumor condition and result in early diagnosis. Prompt detection of cancer-associated syndromes could lead to a more favorable prognosis for these patients.
© 2022 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  head and neck cancer; paraneoplastic syndrome; prognosis; treatment

Year:  2022        PMID: 36000027      PMCID: PMC9392377          DOI: 10.1002/lio2.849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol        ISSN: 2378-8038


BACKGROUND

Paraneoplastic syndrome (PNS) in patients with malignant tumors is defined as a series of clinical signs and symptoms that are caused by tumor‐related biological factors, including hormones, antibodies, lymphocytes, and cytokines, rather than by direct tumor invasion or metastasis or disruption of normal functions of the involved organs or tissues. PNS may occur prior to, concurrent with, or subsequent to an underlying malignancy. PNS, which is also called paraneoplastic conditions, paraneoplastic effects, paraneoplastic phenomena, paraneoplastic disturbances, and remote effects, was first reported in cancer patients in 1949. PNS has a wide range of clinical manifestations and can involve multiple organs. It has been classified into six types : cutaneous or dermatologic, endocrine, neurologic, osteoarticular or rheumatologic, hematologic, and ocular. Endocrine PNS is widely distributed in the lungs, gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, thyroid gland, adrenal medulla, and skin. PNS rarely involves patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), but may be the first or most distinguishing manifestation. The most frequent type of PNS in patients with malignancies of the larynx and hypopharynx is dermatologic, particularly Bazex syndrome (acrokeratosis paraneoplastica) followed by hypercalcemia. The appearance of PNS has been shown to be associated with a poor prognosis of patients, and influence the selection of treatment strategy. Identifying PNS is also clinically important, as it can be diagnostic of cancer at a relatively early stage, thus improving patient survival. Only a few case reports or studies with a small sample size have evaluated PNS in patients with HNC. Herein, this study aimed to explore the association between PNS and HNC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients

This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with HNC who were admitted to Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 1996 to December 2020. In the process of diagnosis and treatment for patients with head and neck tumors diagnosed in hospital outpatient clinics, nasopharyngeal cancer, hypopharyngeal cancer, and laryngeal cancer are mainly treated by the Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery. Whereas, all patients with oral cavity cancer and some patients with oropharynx cancer would be referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for surgical treatment according to the scope of the departments and individual willingness. In addition, patients with oropharynx cancer rarely consulted at our hospital. Therefore, there were no oral cavity cancer patients and few oropharynx cancer patients included in this study in our department. During the data collection phase, age, gender, smoking history, alcohol use, timing of PNS, type of PNS, type of HNC, tumor stage, tumor grade, immunohistochemical markers, serum biomarkers, recurrence, and survival time were extracted. Follow‐up duration was calculated from the date of diagnosis. Follow‐up information was based on outpatient medical records and telephone calls. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Informed consent was not required of the patients given the retrospective nature of the study. Patient data were anonymized in the article. Patients meeting these criteria were included: patients diagnosed with HNC. Patients with malignancies other than head and neck, or patients with autoimmune disease were excluded. The study flowchart is shown in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1

Flow chart of the analysis of patients with paraneoplastic syndromes

Flow chart of the analysis of patients with paraneoplastic syndromes

Diagnosis of PNS

PNS was diagnosed based on clinical, radiological, and/or biological manifestations associated with tumor without direct invasion. Of the six categories of PNS, four were observed in our study (cutaneous or dermatologic, endocrine, neurologic, osteoarticular, or rheumatologic). Each PNS type was diagnosed as previously described. , , , These syndromes may occur before, at the same time, or after diagnosis of the underlying malignancy. Neoplasms and PNS may develop simultaneously, with treatment of the neoplasm resulting in regression of PNS and recurrence of the neoplasm being accompanied by recurrence of PNS in the absence of genetic or other possible causes.

Statistical analysis

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of treatment initiation to the date of death or last follow‐up, and disease‐free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from treatment initiation to the date of recurrence, death, or last follow‐up. DFS was defined as the primary endpoint, whereas OS was the secondary endpoint. All the data collected in this study were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 software. Categorical data were expressed as n (%), and differences between the two groups were examined by chi‐square test or Fisher's exact test. OS and DFS were calculated using Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log‐rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were performed to assess prognostic factors and corresponding hazard ratios. p Value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1958 patients (1588 men and 370 women) were diagnosed with HNC. Of these patients, 1258 (62.25%) were diagnosed with laryngeal carcinoma, 238 (12.16%) with hypopharyngeal carcinoma, 85 (4.34%) with oropharyngeal carcinoma, and 377 (19.25%) with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. There were 40 patients (2.04% of all HNC), including 36 men (90.00% of PNS patients) and four women (10.00%) with a mean age of 60.4 years (range: 40–82 years), were diagnosed with PNS. Twenty‐seven patients (67.50%) were current or former smokers, and 20 (50.00%) were drinkers. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common pathological type, occurring in 30 patients (75.00%). PNS was dermatologic or cutaneous in 23 (57.50%) patients, endocrine in 10 (25.00%), neurologic in five (12.50%), and osteoarticular or rheumatologic in two (5.00%). The diagnosis of PNS was synchronous (within 1 month after cancer diagnosis) in four (10.00%) patients, metachronous (longer than 1 month after cancer diagnosis) (mean 4 months, range 1–9 months) in 11 (27.50%), and preceding cancer diagnosis (mean 5.3 months, range 1–16 months) in 25 (62.50%). Twenty‐five patients (62.50%) had Stage III/IV disease, five (12.50%) had Stage I, and 10 (25.00%) had Stage II tumor. Patients with PNS diagnosed after HNC tended to have more advanced‐stage tumors (Stage III–IV, 9/11). All demographic and cancer‐related characteristics of these 40 patients are listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1

Demographic and cancer‐related characteristics of patients included

Site of primary tumorTotal
LarynxOropharynxHypopharynxNasopharynx
Sex
Male2024103690.00%
Female2002410.00%
Age (year)
≤5560131025.00%
>55162393075.00%
Smoking history
Yes151382767.50%
No71141332.50%
Alcohol use
Yes90451845.00%
No130072255.00%
PNS type
Cutaneous111382357.50%
Endocrine70031025.00%
Neurologic2111512.50%
Rheumatic200025.00%
Timing of PNS
Prior132372562.50%
Synchronous3001410.00%
Metachronous60141127.50%
TNM stage
I3101512.50%
II60131025.00%
III4023922.50%
IV91151640.00%
Histology
Squamous cell carcinoma1224123075.00%
Neuroendocrine neoplasms4000410.00%
Adenocarcinoma5000512.50%
Undifferentiated carcinoma100012.50
Treatment
S6000615.00%
RT2101410.00%
S + RT90201127.50%
S + CRT201037.50%
CRT311111640.00%

Abbreviations: CRT, chemoradiotherapy; PNS, paraneoplastic syndrome; RT, radiotherapy; S, surgery.

Demographic and cancer‐related characteristics of patients included Abbreviations: CRT, chemoradiotherapy; PNS, paraneoplastic syndrome; RT, radiotherapy; S, surgery. Of 23 patients presented with paraneoplastic skin lesions, including 13 (56.52%) with Bazex syndrome, five (21.74%) with acanthosis nigricans, three (13.04%) with dermatomyositis, and two (8.70%) with bullous pemphigus. Besides, the onset of PNS tended to be more rapidly resistant to routine treatment. Of the 10 patients with endocrine PNS, six (60.00%) had hypercalcemia, three (30.00%) had syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) and one (10.00%) had ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome. Of the five patients with neurologic PNS, three (60.00%) had cerebellar degeneration, one (20.00%) had encephalomyelitis, and one (10.00%) had Lambert–Eaton syndrome. The electromyogram of the patient with Lambert–Eaton syndrome showed facilitation after high frequency continuous electrical stimulation. Anti‐Hu and anti‐Yo antibodies were detected in the serum and the cerebrospinal fluid of two patients with cerebellar degeneration, with no specific antibody detected in the other three patients with neurologic PNS. Patients with paraneoplastic arthritis complained of acute asymmetric polyarthritis but had no specific biological or radiological features. No patient was diagnosed with rheumatoid nodules or was positive for rheumatoid factor or antinuclear antibodies. For treatment strategy, 20 patients underwent surgery with or without radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, four patients with early stage disease received radiotherapy alone, and the remaining 16 patients, including 11 with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, were administered with chemotherapy. As to survival status, 17 patients died before the last follow‐up. One patient with laryngeal small cell endocrine carcinoma and hypercalcemia died of the disease before completion of anticancer treatment, and one patient with atypical carcinoid and encephalomyelitis died of tumor after surgery. Five of the 16 patients who received chemoradiotherapy without complete response died at 14, 18, 28, 40, and 51 months, respectively. Ten patients died 8–76 months (median 26 months) after cancer recurrence or metastasis after complete remission. Symptomatic treatments for PNS included skin‐directed therapy for cutaneous PNS, intravenous fluids/bisphosphonates for hypercalcemia, ketoconazole/metyrapone for Cushing's syndrome (CS), fluid restriction for SIADH, immunomodulatory therapy for neurologic PNS and NSAIDs, and steroids for rheumatologic PNS. Of all these 40 patients, 31 (77.50%) received local and systemic treatment (including surgery, radiotherapy, surgery plus radiotherapy, surgery plus chemoradiotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy). PNS regressed after treatment of tumor. Nine of the 12 patients who experienced cancer recurrence or metastasis also had recurrence of PNS. The median follow‐up time was 40.5 months (range: 2–269 months). The 5‐year OS and DFS rates for HNC patients with PNS were 51.52% and 44.44%, respectively. The OS and DFS rates were significantly different among patients with different types of PNS. The DFS (p = .001) and OS (p = .003) of patients who presented with PNS prior to HNC diagnosis were significantly longer than those of patients with synchronous or metachronous PNS. Stage IV disease was associated with significantly poorer DFS (p < .001) and OS (p = .007) compared with other stages. There was a trend of shorter DFS (p = .08) and OS (p = .05) in patients with a history of smoking compared with those without, but there was no statistical difference. Table 2 shows the prognostic factors of OS and DFS based on Cox regression analysis. PNS diagnosed before HNC (adjusted hazard ration [aHR]: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.11–0.85, p = .02), Stage IV disease (aHR: 3.27, 95% CI: 1.18–9.05, p = .02) and smoking history (aHR: 3.69, 95%CI: 1.04–13.05, p = .04) were significantly associated with OS and DFS.
TABLE 2

Univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors for OS and DFS among HNC patients with PNS

DFSOS
Multivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
Univariate analysis (p)aHR (95% CI) p Univariate analysis (p)aHR (95% CI) p
Sex
Male.39.12
Female
Age (year)
≤55.41.29
>55
Smoking history
Yes.083.13 (1.02–9.64).047.053.69 (1.04–13.05).04
No
Alcohol use
Yes.80.87
No
Neoplasm site
Larynx.98.96
Other
PNS type
Cutaneous.40.13
None‐cutaneous
Timing of PNS
Prior.0010.33 (0.13–0.87).02.0030.31 (0.11–0.85).02
Syn−/metachronous
TNM stage
IV< .0014.74 (1.75–12.83).002.0073.27 (1.18–9.05).02
I/II/III
Treatment
S ± RT/CRT.76.93
RT/CRT

Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; DFS, disease‐free survival; OS, overall survival; PNS, paraneoplastic syndrome; RT, radiotherapy; S, surgery.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors for OS and DFS among HNC patients with PNS Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; DFS, disease‐free survival; OS, overall survival; PNS, paraneoplastic syndrome; RT, radiotherapy; S, surgery. Our literature review included 30 HNC patients with PNS (9, 40–54). The clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of these patients are summarized in Table 3. On PubMed, we searched 16 relevant full texts with paraneoplastic syndromes and head and neck cancer as the subject words over the recent 20 years. Male patients accounted for a greater proportion of patients in these studies (27/30). The median age of the patients was 60 years in these studies. Squamous cell carcinoma (16/30) was the mainly histological type. The majority of the PNS cases were cutaneous (17/30). All characteristics mentioned above in these studies are consistent with ours. However, more than half of the primary tumor sites were nasopharynx (17/30). Among these studies, systemic treatment was the most common. Most paraneoplastic skin lesions responded well to glucocorticoid. Eight cases with available follow‐up data died of primary tumor and the other cases were alive during the follow‐up period.
TABLE 3

Review of published series consisting of HNC patients with PNS cases

Year of publicationNo. of patientsSex, M/FMedian ageType of HNC (number of patients)Type of PNSTreatmentFollow‐up (median months)Ref
200211/066Hypopharyngeal CarcinomaPolyarteritisCRT + methylprednisolone6 10
200322/058

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (1)

Oropharyngeal carcinomas (1)

Dermatomyositis (2)CRT+ prednisone (2)15.5 11
200643/166

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (1)

Nasopharyngeal lymphoma (1)

Hypopharyngeal carcinoma (1)

Laryngeal carcinoma (1)

Dermatological (1)

Endocrine (1)

Rheumatological (1)

Encephalomyelitis (1)

RT (1)/CT (1)/ S + RT (1)/ IT (1)

3.5

12
200911/060Oropharyngeal carcinomaBazex syndromeS + RT36 13
200911/046Laryngeal carcinomaDermatologicalS12 14
201021/128Nasopharynxgeal carcinoma (2)Hematologic syndromes (2)CRT+ prednisone (2)19 15
201111/058Nasopharyngeal carcinomaDermatomyositisS + CRT60 16
201311/038Oropharyngeal lymphoepithelial carcinomaCerebellar degenerationS+ prednisone18 17
201411/063Oropharyngeal carcinomaDermatomyositisS + CRT11 18
201511/052Hypopharyngeal carcinomaHematologic syndromesPalliative RT3 19
201511/060Hypopharyngeal carcinomarheumatologicalCRT5 20
201711/068Oropharyngeal carcinomaNeurological syndromeCRT18 21
201811/078Oropharyngeal neuroendocrine carcinomaLambert–Eaton myasthenic syndromeCRT16 22
201911/0Middle‐agedNasopharyngeal carcinomaCerebellar DegenerationCRTNR 23
202111/068Laryngeal neuroendocrine carcinomaLambert–Eaton myasthenicS+ CRT36 24
2021105/550Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (10)Dermatomyositis (10)RT (3)/CRT (6)/Palliative CRT (1)15/NR (1) 25

Abbreviations: CRT, chemoradiotherapy; CT, chemotherapy; F, female; HNC, head and neck cancer; IT, immunotherapy; M, male; NR, no report; PNS, paraneoplastic syndrome; Ref, reference number; RT, radiotherapy; S, surgery.

Review of published series consisting of HNC patients with PNS cases Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (1) Oropharyngeal carcinomas (1) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (1) Nasopharyngeal lymphoma (1) Hypopharyngeal carcinoma (1) Laryngeal carcinoma (1) Dermatological (1) Endocrine (1) Rheumatological (1) Encephalomyelitis (1) 3.5 Abbreviations: CRT, chemoradiotherapy; CT, chemotherapy; F, female; HNC, head and neck cancer; IT, immunotherapy; M, male; NR, no report; PNS, paraneoplastic syndrome; Ref, reference number; RT, radiotherapy; S, surgery.

DISCUSSION

PNS develops during different phases of the cancer process, with an estimated incidence of 1%–8%. , , The appearance of PNS may be the first sign of malignancy in a few cancer patients facilitating diagnosis at early and potentially reversible stage. However, PNS associated with HNC is rare, and the incidence of PNS in patients with HNC remains unclear. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study enrolling the largest sample size of HNC patients with PNS. Paraneoplastic cutaneous and dermatologic syndromes, consisting of many cutaneous lesions, were the most common type of PNS in HNC patients in the present study. Four types of paraneoplastic skin lesions were observed in 23 patients. Bazex syndrome has been reported to be the most frequent paraneoplastic lesion of the skin. These lesions are commonly atypically located, with blue to violet discoloration, and are refractory to treatment. Acanthosis nigricans is often associated with abdominal adenocarcinoma, with 60% of them arising in the stomach. However, acanthosis nigricans is also associated with larynx and hypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma. Bullous pemphigoid is a fairly common subepidermal blistering disease and is associated with many tumor types, including carcinoma of the larynx. Of the 23 patients with paraneoplastic cutaneous and dermatologic syndromes, 16 were diagnosed with PNS before HNC, and their prognosis was significantly better than that of patients with other types of PNS. Most endocrine PNS associated with non‐endocrine neoplasms were observed in patients with highly malignant tumors, such as lung, breast, prostate, ovarian, skin, colon cancers, and hematological malignancies. However, endocrine PNS may be associated with tumors arising from various tissue actually. , , , , , Hypercalcemia of malignancy is one of the most common types of endocrine PNS, with an incidence up to 10% among advanced‐stage tumors, and a nearly 50% 30‐day mortality rate. , Eighty percent of hypercalcemic patients with solid tumors had increased concentrations of parathyroid hormone‐related protein in plasma. The mean survival time after the diagnosis of hypercalcemia in cancer patients is about 54.9 days, making hypercalcemia an important negative prognostic factor for them. Calcium concentrations should be measured regularly for cancer patients with poor status irrespective of tumor stage. In the present study, six patients diagnosed with hypercalcemia all had advanced disease, and four of them died at 4, 8, 15, and 18 months, respectively. SIADH is observed in 1%–2% of patients with malignant tumors. , Hyponatremia is associated with increased all‐cause mortality and increased risk of malignancies, especially lung and head‐and‐neck. Successful treatment of the underlying tumor resulted in the normalization of sodium concentration within several weeks. CS is considered to be of paraneoplastic origin in approximately 10% of the patients diagnosed with this disease, and approximately half of them have CS secondary to lung neuroendocrine tumors. , , CS in these patients is caused by tumor secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone or corticotrophin‐releasing hormone. , Neither SIADH nor CS is common in patients with HNC. In our study, three patients had SIADH, and two of them died at 40 and 41 months, respectively. The remaining one patient was alive without disease at 150 months. CS was observed in only one patient with laryngeal small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, who was alive with no evidence of disease 201 months after surgery and radiotherapy. None of these patients was observed to have carcinoid syndrome. PNS is regarded as autoimmune condition due to the activation of the immune system destroying distant tumors. It occurs frequently in cancer patients, but has been reported occasionally in patients with laryngeal cancers. Because neural tissues secrete onconeural proteins, they are damaged by immune‐mediated inflammation. Both central and peripheral nervous systems could be affected. The median survival of patients with positive anti‐Hu antibodies is significantly longer than that of negative ones, regardless of the primary tumor stage. The detection of paraneoplastic antineuronal autoantibodies could lead to the diagnosis of the underlying primary malignancy or recurrent tumor. , The present study included three patients with cerebellar degenerations, of whom two were found to have anti‐Hu and anti‐Yo antibodies in serum and cerebrospinal fluid , and were alive at 14 and 74 months, respectively. The key features of paraneoplastic rheumatism included a short interval between arthritis and neoplasia (within 12 months before or after cancer diagnosis), older age, asymmetric joint involvement, sudden onset, greater predominance in the lower extremities than in hands and wrists, absence of rheumatoid factor, rheumatoid nodules and erosions on radiograph, no family history of rheumatic disease, and nonspecific synovial histopathology. All of these features were present in our patients without symmetry and hand involvement, which has been reported previously. Tumors in two patients were diagnosed after articular PNS had laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. One of them died of lung metastasis at 76 months after surgery and postoperative radiotherapy, and the other was alive 34 months after surgery. Treatment approaches for these patients depended on the type and location of PNS. Neurologic PNS, such as paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis, subacute sensory neuronopathy, and paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration, required immediate symptomatic treatment to prevent devastating neurologic disability or death. Treatment strategies are composed of two aspects: treatment of the underlying tumor, consisting of combinations of surgery and radiation/chemotherapy generally applied to these neoplastic disorders in the absence of PNS and treatment of the presumptive immune‐mediated disorder, based on immunosuppression with intravenous immunoglobulins, steroids, other immunosuppressive drugs or plasma exchange. However, immune therapy usually has no or modest effect on the central nervous system syndromes, whereas such therapy is beneficial for PNS affecting the neuromuscular junction. Symptomatic therapy should be offered to all patients with PNS. Because dermatological PNS frequently precedes the underlying tumor, timely recognition of PNS may improve the prognosis of patients. However, hypercalcemia is often a late manifestation of the tumor and has a negative prognostic impact. PNS type was not a significant predictor of patient outcomes, which might be due to the small number of patients in each group. In the present study, the median follow‐up time was 41.5 months, with a 5‐year OS and DFS rate of 57% and 53%, respectively. Factors significantly associated with OS and DFS included PNS diagnosed before HNC, Stage IV disease, and smoking history. There were also several limitations in this study. First, there were unavoidable biases due to its retrospective nature. Second, this was a single‐center analysis with a limited number of patients, unless it enrolled much more patients than any other studies published before. In addition, as described in the methods, there were no oral cavity cancer patients and few oropharynx cancer patients included in this study in our department, which might induce an unavoidable selection bias, and future cohort study that include oral cavity cancer and other sites of head and neck cancers is need to further explore the prevalence and manifestations of PNS. Thus, all conclusions should be interpreted with caution.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, a prompt and correct diagnosis of any type of PNS could lead to better prognosis. Early recognition of PNS may provide clues about underlying tumor condition and result in early diagnosis. Timely detection of cancer‐associated syndromes could give more favorable prognosis for these patients.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  56 in total

Review 1.  Cushing's syndrome.

Authors:  John Newell-Price; Xavier Bertagna; Ashley B Grossman; Lynnette K Nieman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Acrokeratosis paraneoplastica (Bazex syndrome) - a systematic review on risk factors, diagnosis, prognosis and management.

Authors:  F Räßler; S Goetze; P Elsner
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Management of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: report of an EFNS Task Force.

Authors:  C A Vedeler; J C Antoine; B Giometto; F Graus; W Grisold; I K Hart; J Honnorat; P A E Sillevis Smitt; J J G M Verschuuren; R Voltz
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.089

4.  Neurologic paraneoplastic syndromes with neurotologic manifestations.

Authors:  A J Gulya
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Paraneoplastic cerebellar disorders.

Authors:  R W Baloh
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 6.  Hyercalcaemia in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Patrick J Bradley; David Hoskin
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  Characteristics and survival of 26 patients with paraneoplastic arthritis.

Authors:  J Morel; V Deschamps; E Toussirot; E Pertuiset; C Sordet; P Kieffer; J M Berthelot; H Champagne; X Mariette; B Combe
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Paraneoplastic Cerebellar Degeneration in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Unique Association.

Authors:  S Bhardwaj; S Khasani; D Benasher; E G Stein; T Meghal; N Jacoby; Y J Huang
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.648

9.  Paraneoplastic Cerebellar Degeneration and Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome Associated with Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Oropharynx.

Authors:  Junji Takasugi; Munehisa Shimamura; Toru Koda; Toshihiro Kishikawa; Atsushi Hanamoto; Hidenori Inohara; Kazuaki Sato; Eiichi Morii; Masakatsu Motomura; Manabu Sakaguchi; Yuji Nakatsuji; Hideki Mochizuki
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 1.271

10.  Dermatomyositis and malignancy of the pharynx in Caucasian patients: report of two observations.

Authors:  C Botsios; P Ostuni; P Boscolo-Rizzo; M C Da Mosto; Leonardo Punzi; C Marchiori
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 3.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.