| Literature DB >> 35999533 |
Ziyi Feng1, Yucong Diao1, Hongfei Ma1, Minghui Liu1, Meijun Long1, Shuang Zhao1, Hui Wu1, Yang Wang2.
Abstract
The literature has shown that mobile phone addiction is an important risk factor for depression. However, the internal mechanisms of mobile phone addiction leading to depression are still not clear. This study examined the mediating role of sleep quality and moderating role of peer relationships in the association between mobile phone addiction and depression. A sample of 450 Chinese medical students were recruited to complete measures of mobile phone addiction, depression, sleep quality and peer relationships. In this study, SPSS 25.0 and macro PROCESS were used to conduct statistical analysis on the collected data. The results showed that sleep quality partially mediated the association between mobile phone addiction and depression. Moreover, the effect of sleep quality on depression was moderated by peer relationships. The present study can advance our understanding of how and when mobile phone addiction leads to depression. Limitations and implications of this study are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Depression; Medical students; Mobile phone addiction; Peer relationships; Sleep quality
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35999533 PMCID: PMC9396829 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04183-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Psychiatry ISSN: 1471-244X Impact factor: 4.144
Fig. 1Hypothesis model
Annotation: This hypothetical model consists of two parts: Hypothesis 1. Sleep quality mediates the association between mobile phone addiction and depression. Hypothesis 2. The mediating effect of sleep quality on the association between mobile phone addiction and depression is moderated by peer relationships. Hypothesis 2 includes: 1. Peer relationships moderate the effect of mobile phone addiction on depression. 2. Peer relationships moderate the effect of mobile phone addiction on sleep quality. 3. Peer relationships moderate the effect of sleep quality on depression
Demographic variables and mobile phone usage
| Variables | n | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.754 | |||
| Male | 174 | 38.7 | |
| Female | 276 | 61.3 | |
| 0.278 | |||
| Clinical medicine | 382 | 84.9 | |
| No clinical medicine | 68 | 15.1 | |
| 0.000*** | |||
| Yes | 253 | 56.2 | |
| No | 197 | 43.8 | |
| 0.050* | |||
| <3000 RMB | 32 | 7 | |
| 3000–6000 RMB | 120 | 26.7 | |
| 6000–9000 RMB | 114 | 25.3 | |
| >9000 RMB | 184 | 40.9 | |
| 0.244 | |||
| <1000 RMB | 37 | 8.2 | |
| 1000–1500 RMB | 176 | 39.1 | |
| 1500–2000 RMB | 170 | 37.8 | |
| >2000 RMB | 67 | 14.9 | |
| 0.001** | |||
| Cities and towns | 341 | 75.8 | |
| Countryside | 109 | 24.2 | |
| 0.926 | |||
| Complete family | 395 | 87.8 | |
| Incomplete family | 55 | 12.2 | |
| 0.982 | |||
| Yes | 169 | 37.6 | |
| No | 281 | 62.4 | |
| 0.13 | |||
| < 2 years | 47 | 10.4 | |
| 2–4 years | 129 | 28.7 | |
| > 4 years | 274 | 60.9 | |
| 0.000*** | |||
| < 4 hours | 82 | 18.2 | |
| 4–6 hours | 191 | 42.4 | |
| > 6 hours | 177 | 39.3 | |
| 0.561 | |||
| < 30 RMB | 49 | 10.9 | |
| 30–50 RMB | 179 | 39.8 | |
| 50–100 RMB | 123 | 27.3 | |
| 100–150 RMB | 38 | 8.4 | |
| > 150 RMB | 61 | 13.6 |
*p < 0.05
**p < 0.01
***p < 0.001
Descriptive statistics and intercorrelations between variables
| Variable | M | SD | Depression | Mobile phone addiction | Poor sleep quality | Peer relationships |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depression | 5.09 | 4.48 | 1.00 | |||
| Mobile phone addiction | 2.57 | 0.72 | 0.37a | 1.00 | ||
| Poor sleep quality | 4.18 | 2.86 | 0.62a | 0.27a | 1.00 | |
| Peer relationships | 47.02 | 11.98 | −0.37a | −0.14a | -0.24a | 1.00 |
aCorrelation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)
Conditional process analysis
| Model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1: The total effect model (criterion: depression) | ||||||
| R | R2 | F | P | β | t | P |
| 0.41 | 0.17 | 18.55 | < 0.001 | |||
| Constant | −0.49 | −1.80 | 0.07 | |||
| Only child | 0.25** | 2.69 | < 0.01 | |||
| Family income per month | −0.04 | − 0.99 | 0.32 | |||
| Family area | 0.08 | 0.70 | 0.48 | |||
| Time spent on the phone every day | 0.07 | 1.24 | 0.21 | |||
| Mobile phone addiction | 0.34*** | 7.42 | < 0.001 | |||
| Model 2: Mediator variable model (criterion: poor sleep quality) | ||||||
| R | R2 | F | P | β | t | P |
| 0.36 | 0.13 | 9.51 | < 0.001 | |||
| Constant | −0.41 | −1.46 | 0.14 | |||
| Only child | 0.14 | 1.52 | 0.12 | |||
| Family income per month | 0.08 | 1.72 | 0.08 | |||
| Family area | −0.11 | −0.94 | 0.34 | |||
| Time spent on the phone every day | 0.04 | 0.62 | 0.53 | |||
| Mobile phone addiction | 0.22*** | 4.81 | < 0.001 | |||
| Peer relationships | −0.21*** | −4.75 | < 0.001 | |||
| Mobile phone addiction x Peer relationships | 0.04 | 1.08 | 0.27 | |||
| Model 3: Dependent variable model (criterion: depression) | ||||||
| R | R2 | F | P | β | t | P |
| 0.71 | 0.50 | 50.81 | < 0.001 | |||
| Constant | −0.49* | −2.31 | 0.02 | |||
| Only child | 0.17* | 2.32 | 0.02 | |||
| Family income per month | −0.02 | −0.65 | 0.51 | |||
| Family area | 0.14* | 1.58 | 0.11 | |||
| Time spent on the phone every day | 0.05 | 1.03 | 0.30 | |||
| Mobile phone addiction | 0.20*** | 5.44 | < 0.001 | |||
| Poor sleep quality | 0.49*** | 13.74 | < 0.001 | |||
| Peer relationships | −0.21*** | −5.96 | < 0.001 | |||
| Poor sleep quality x Peer relationships | −0.11** | −3.11 | 0.002 | |||
| Mobile phone addiction x Peer relationships | −0.03 | −1.15 | 0.24 | |||
N = 450
*p < 0.05
**p < 0.01
***p < 0.001
Fig. 2Peer relationships moderate the relation between sleep quality and depression