Paige N Mass1,2, Rohan N Kumthekar3, Bradley C Clark4, Justin D Opfermann5, Elizabeth D Sherwin6, Luigi DiBiase7, Charles I Berul8,6. 1. Shiekh Zayed Institute, Children's National Hospital, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20010, USA. pmass@childrensnational.org. 2. Department of Cardiology, Children's National Hospital, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20010, USA. pmass@childrensnational.org. 3. Division of Cardiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. 4. Division of Cardiology, Children's Hospital at Montefiore, New York, NY, USA. 5. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 6. Department of Cardiology, Children's National Hospital, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20010, USA. 7. Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 8. Shiekh Zayed Institute, Children's National Hospital, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20010, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac ablation catheters are small in diameter and pose ergonomic challenges that can affect catheter stability. Significant finger dexterity and strength are necessary to maneuver them safely. We evaluated a novel torque tool to reduce muscle activation when manipulating catheters and improve perceived workload of ablation tasks. The objective was to evaluate measurable success, user perception of workload, and muscle usage when completing a simulated ablation task with and without the use of a catheter torque tool. METHODS: Cardiology attendings and fellows were fitted with surface electromyographic (EMG) sensors on 6 key muscle groups in the left hand and forearm. A standard ablation catheter was inserted into a pediatric cardiac ablation simulator and subjects navigated the catheter tip to 6 specific electrophysiologic targets, including a 1-min simulated radiofrequency ablation lesion. Time to complete the task, number of attempts required to complete the lesion, and EMG activity normalized to percentage of maximum voluntary contraction were collected throughout the task. The task was completed 4 times, twice with and twice without the torque tool, in semi-randomized order. A NASA Task Load Index survey was completed by the participant at the conclusion of each task. RESULTS: Time to complete the task and number of attempts to create a lesion were not altered by the tool. Subjectively, participants reported a significant decrease in physical demand, effort, and frustration, and a significant increase in performance. Muscle activation was decreased in 4 of 6 muscle groups. CONCLUSION: The catheter torque tool may improve the perceived workload of cardiac ablation procedures and reduce muscle fatigue caused by manipulating catheters. This may result in improved catheter stability and increased procedural safety.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac ablation catheters are small in diameter and pose ergonomic challenges that can affect catheter stability. Significant finger dexterity and strength are necessary to maneuver them safely. We evaluated a novel torque tool to reduce muscle activation when manipulating catheters and improve perceived workload of ablation tasks. The objective was to evaluate measurable success, user perception of workload, and muscle usage when completing a simulated ablation task with and without the use of a catheter torque tool. METHODS: Cardiology attendings and fellows were fitted with surface electromyographic (EMG) sensors on 6 key muscle groups in the left hand and forearm. A standard ablation catheter was inserted into a pediatric cardiac ablation simulator and subjects navigated the catheter tip to 6 specific electrophysiologic targets, including a 1-min simulated radiofrequency ablation lesion. Time to complete the task, number of attempts required to complete the lesion, and EMG activity normalized to percentage of maximum voluntary contraction were collected throughout the task. The task was completed 4 times, twice with and twice without the torque tool, in semi-randomized order. A NASA Task Load Index survey was completed by the participant at the conclusion of each task. RESULTS: Time to complete the task and number of attempts to create a lesion were not altered by the tool. Subjectively, participants reported a significant decrease in physical demand, effort, and frustration, and a significant increase in performance. Muscle activation was decreased in 4 of 6 muscle groups. CONCLUSION: The catheter torque tool may improve the perceived workload of cardiac ablation procedures and reduce muscle fatigue caused by manipulating catheters. This may result in improved catheter stability and increased procedural safety.
Authors: Richard A Friedman; Edward P Walsh; Michael J Silka; Hugh Calkins; William G Stevenson; Larry A Rhodes; Barbara J Deal; Grace S Wolff; David R Demaso; Debra Hanisch; George F Van Hare Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Anthony Aizer; Jessica K Qiu; Austin V Cheng; Patrick B Wu; Chirag R Barbhaiya; Lior Jankelson; Patrick Linton; Scott A Bernstein; David S Park; Douglas S Holmes; Larry A Chinitz Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2020-04-27
Authors: Marius Bohnen; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Gregory F Michaud; Roy M John; Laurence M Epstein; Christine M Albert; Bruce A Koplan Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2011-05-27 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: George F Van Hare; Harold Javitz; Dorit Carmelli; J Philip Saul; Ronn E Tanel; Peter S Fischbach; Ronald J Kanter; Michael Schaffer; Ann Dunnigan; Steven Colan; Gerald Serwer Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2004-07
Authors: George F Van Hare; Steven D Colan; Harold Javitz; Dorit Carmelli; Timothy Knilans; Michael Schaffer; John Kugler; Craig J Byrum; J Philip Saul Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.749