Gregory Photopoulos1,2, Jennifer Hurry2, Joshua Murphy3, Jaysson Brooks4, Ryan Fitzgerald5, Craig Louer6, Kenneth Shaw3, Kevin Smit7, Firoz Miyanji8, Stefan Parent9, Ron El-Hawary10,11. 1. Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. 2. Division of Orthopedic Surgery, IWK Health Centre, 5850 University Avenue, P.O. Box 9700, Halifax, NS, B3K6R8, Canada. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scottish Rite for Children Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA. 5. Department of Pediatric Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Riley Children's Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 6. Division of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 7. Division of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, CHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 8. Department of Orthopaedics, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 9. Department of Orthopaedics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada. 10. Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. ron.el-hawary@iwk.nshealth.ca. 11. Division of Orthopedic Surgery, IWK Health Centre, 5850 University Avenue, P.O. Box 9700, Halifax, NS, B3K6R8, Canada. ron.el-hawary@iwk.nshealth.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of vertebral height and angular measurements for anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT). METHODS: Eight observers measured PA radiographs of 15 idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with AVBT, pre-operative and 4-year follow-up. Vertebral wedging, disc wedging, convex vertebral body heights, and concave vertebral body heights of the 3 apical vertebrae were measured. For each observer, there were a total of 90 measurements for vertebral body height and 75 measurements for all wedging types At least 14 days elapsed between first and second round measurements. RESULTS: From the pre-operative to the 4-year follow-up time-point, the total wedging angle over the 3 peri-apical levels fell from 30 ± 7° to 16 ± 6° (p < 0.001) and the difference between the convex and concave vertebral heights decreased from 9 ± 4 to 6 ± 3 mm (p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement for pre-operative vertebral body heights was good [ICC = 0.80; 95% CI (0.74-0.85)]. At 4-year follow-up there was a moderate agreement [ICC = 0.67 (0.59-0.74)]. There was a poor interobserver agreement for pre-operative wedging angle measurements [ICC = 0.41 (0.32-0.52)] and 4-year follow-up [ICC = 0.45 (0.36-0.56)]. The Limits of Agreement with the Mean (LOAM) for pre-op heights was ± 2.4 mm, similar to the follow-up ± 2.6 mm. When raters are averaged in random groups of two the agreement limits decrease to ± 1.8 mm pre-op and ± 1.6 mm at follow-up. Similarly for wedging angles, LOAM values among the 8 observers of ± 4.6° pre-op and ± 4.2° dropped to ± 2.7° for both pre-op and follow-up when random groups of two raters were averaged together. Intraobserver agreement ranged from good to excellent per individual (ICC = 0.84-0.94) for pre-operative vertebral body heights, but this decreased at 4-year follow-up (ICC = 0.52-0.88). Intraobserver agreement was low overall for wedging (pre-operative ICC = 0.41-0.71; 4-year follow-up ICC = 0.41-0.76). CONCLUSION: Based on 8 individual observers, interobserver agreement ranged from good (pre-operative vertebral body heights) to moderate (4-year follow-up vertebral body heights) to poor (all wedging angles). To improve the reliability of the measurement of wedging angles, we recommend averaging the measurements of at least two observers.
PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of vertebral height and angular measurements for anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT). METHODS: Eight observers measured PA radiographs of 15 idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with AVBT, pre-operative and 4-year follow-up. Vertebral wedging, disc wedging, convex vertebral body heights, and concave vertebral body heights of the 3 apical vertebrae were measured. For each observer, there were a total of 90 measurements for vertebral body height and 75 measurements for all wedging types At least 14 days elapsed between first and second round measurements. RESULTS: From the pre-operative to the 4-year follow-up time-point, the total wedging angle over the 3 peri-apical levels fell from 30 ± 7° to 16 ± 6° (p < 0.001) and the difference between the convex and concave vertebral heights decreased from 9 ± 4 to 6 ± 3 mm (p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement for pre-operative vertebral body heights was good [ICC = 0.80; 95% CI (0.74-0.85)]. At 4-year follow-up there was a moderate agreement [ICC = 0.67 (0.59-0.74)]. There was a poor interobserver agreement for pre-operative wedging angle measurements [ICC = 0.41 (0.32-0.52)] and 4-year follow-up [ICC = 0.45 (0.36-0.56)]. The Limits of Agreement with the Mean (LOAM) for pre-op heights was ± 2.4 mm, similar to the follow-up ± 2.6 mm. When raters are averaged in random groups of two the agreement limits decrease to ± 1.8 mm pre-op and ± 1.6 mm at follow-up. Similarly for wedging angles, LOAM values among the 8 observers of ± 4.6° pre-op and ± 4.2° dropped to ± 2.7° for both pre-op and follow-up when random groups of two raters were averaged together. Intraobserver agreement ranged from good to excellent per individual (ICC = 0.84-0.94) for pre-operative vertebral body heights, but this decreased at 4-year follow-up (ICC = 0.52-0.88). Intraobserver agreement was low overall for wedging (pre-operative ICC = 0.41-0.71; 4-year follow-up ICC = 0.41-0.76). CONCLUSION: Based on 8 individual observers, interobserver agreement ranged from good (pre-operative vertebral body heights) to moderate (4-year follow-up vertebral body heights) to poor (all wedging angles). To improve the reliability of the measurement of wedging angles, we recommend averaging the measurements of at least two observers.
Authors: Hana Kim; Hak Sun Kim; Eun Su Moon; Choon-Sik Yoon; Tae-Sub Chung; Ho-Taek Song; Jin-Suck Suh; Young Han Lee; Sungjun Kim Journal: Radiographics Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Fraser R Labrom; Maree T Izatt; Prathmesh Contractor; Caroline A Grant; Peter Pivonka; Geoffrey N Askin; Robert D Labrom; J Paige Little Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2020-05-25
Authors: T Barrett Sullivan; Tracey P Bastrom; Fredrick Reighard; Megan Jeffords; Carrie E Bartley; Peter O Newton Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2021-02-19
Authors: Daniel G Hoernschemeyer; Melanie E Boeyer; Madeline E Robertson; Christopher M Loftis; John R Worley; Nicole M Tweedy; Sumit U Gupta; Dana L Duren; Christina M Holzhauser; Venkataraman M Ramachandran Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 5.284