Literature DB >> 35997927

Glioma segmentation with DWI weighted images, conventional anatomical images, and post-contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging images by U-Net.

Amir Khorasani1, Rahele Kafieh2,3, Masih Saboori4, Mohamad Bagher Tavakoli5.   

Abstract

Glioma segmentation is believed to be one of the most important stages of treatment management. Recent developments in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols have led to a renewed interest in using automatic glioma segmentation with different MRI image weights. U-Net is a major area of interest within the field of automatic glioma segmentation. This paper examines the impact of different input MRI image-weight on the U-Net output performance for glioma segmentation. One hundred forty-nine glioma patients were scanned with a 1.5T MRI scanner. The main MRI image-weights acquired are diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) weighted images (b50, b500, b1000, Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map, Exponential apparent diffusion coefficient (eADC) map), anatomical image-weights (T2, T1, T2-FLAIR), and post enhancement image-weights (T1Gd). The U-Net and data augmentation are used to segment the glioma tumors. Having the Dice coefficient and accuracy enabled us to compare our results with the previous study. The first set of analyses examined the impact of epoch number on the accuracy of U-Net, and n_epoch = 20 was selected for U-Net training. The mean Dice coefficient for b50, b500, b1000, ADC map, eADC map, T2, T1, T2-FLAIR, and T1Gd image weights for glioma segmentation with U-Net were calculated 0.892, 0.872, 0.752, 0.931, 0.944, 0.762, 0.721, 0.896, 0.694 respectively. This study has found that, DWI image-weights have a higher diagnostic value for glioma segmentation with U-Net in comparison with anatomical image-weights and post enhancement image-weights. The results of this investigation show that ADC and eADC maps have higher performance for glioma segmentation with U-Net.
© 2022. Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apparent diffusion coefficient; Exponential apparent diffusion coefficient; Glioma; Segmentation; U-Net

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35997927     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-022-01164-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 2662-4729


  28 in total

1.  Brain tumor segmentation based on local independent projection-based classification.

Authors:  Meiyan Huang; Wei Yang; Yao Wu; Jun Jiang; Wufan Chen; Qianjin Feng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Brain tumor segmentation and grading of lower-grade glioma using deep learning in MRI images.

Authors:  Mohamed A Naser; M Jamal Deen
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 3.  Genetics of adult glioma.

Authors:  McKinsey L Goodenberger; Robert B Jenkins
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2012-12-11

4.  Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks in MRI Images.

Authors:  Sergio Pereira; Adriano Pinto; Victor Alves; Carlos A Silva
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 5.  Targeted delivery of antitumoral therapy to glioma and other malignancies with synthetic chlorotoxin (TM-601).

Authors:  Adam N Mamelak; Douglas B Jacoby
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.648

6.  Segmentation and grading of brain tumors on apparent diffusion coefficient images using self-organizing maps.

Authors:  C Vijayakumar; Gharpure Damayanti; R Pant; C M Sreedhar
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  Improving brain tumor segmentation on MRI based on the deep U-net and residual units.

Authors:  Tiejun Yang; Jikun Song; Lei Li; Qi Tang
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.535

8.  Glioma imaging in Europe: A survey of 220 centres and recommendations for best clinical practice.

Authors:  S C Thust; S Heiland; A Falini; H R Jäger; A D Waldman; P C Sundgren; C Godi; V K Katsaros; A Ramos; N Bargallo; M W Vernooij; T Yousry; M Bendszus; M Smits
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Generative Adversarial Networks to Synthesize Missing T1 and FLAIR MRI Sequences for Use in a Multisequence Brain Tumor Segmentation Model.

Authors:  Gian Marco Conte; Alexander D Weston; David C Vogelsang; Kenneth A Philbrick; Jason C Cai; Maurizio Barbera; Francesco Sanvito; Daniel H Lachance; Robert B Jenkins; W Oliver Tobin; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.

Authors:  David N Louis; Arie Perry; Pieter Wesseling; Daniel J Brat; Ian A Cree; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Cynthia Hawkins; H K Ng; Stefan M Pfister; Guido Reifenberger; Riccardo Soffietti; Andreas von Deimling; David W Ellison
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 13.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.