| Literature DB >> 35997363 |
Giovanni Sgroi, Roberta Iatta, Piero Lovreglio, Angela Stufano, Younes Laidoudi, Jairo Alfonso Mendoza-Roldan, Marcos Antonio Bezerra-Santos, Vincenzo Veneziano, Francesco Di Gennaro, Annalisa Saracino, Maria Chironna, Claudio Bandi, Domenico Otranto.
Abstract
During 2021, we collected blood and serum samples from 135 persons exposed to tick bites in southern Italy. We serologically and molecularly screened for zoonotic tickborne pathogens and only molecularly screened for Candidatus Midichloria mitochondrii. Overall, 62 (45.9%) persons tested positive for tickborne pathogens. Coxiella burnetii was detected most frequently (27.4%), along with Rickettsia spp. (21.5%) and Borrelia spp. (10.4%). We detected Candidatus M. mitochondrii DNA in 46 (34.1%) participants who had statistically significant associations to tickborne pathogens (p<0.0001). Phylogenetic analysis of Candidatus M. mitochondrii sequences revealed 5 clades and 8 human sequence types that correlated with vertebrates, Ixodes spp. ticks, and countries in Europe. These data demonstrated a high circulation of tickborne pathogens and Candidatus M. mitochondrii DNA in persons participating in outdoor activities in southern Italy. Our study shows how coordinated surveillance among patients, clinicians, and veterinarians could inform a One Health approach for monitoring and controlling the circulation of tickborne pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: Borrelia; Candidatus Midichloria mitochondrii; Coxiella; Italy; One Health; Rickettsiae; bacteria; endosymbiont; parasites; ticks; vector-borne infections; zoonoses
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35997363 PMCID: PMC9423927 DOI: 10.3201/eid2809.220329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 16.126
Bacteria investigated by molecular methods in a study on the relationship between endosymbiont Candidatus Midichloria mitochondrii and tickborne pathogens in humans exposed to tick bites, Italy, 2021
| Tickborne bacteria | Target gene | Primers | Sequence, 5ˈ → 3ˈ | Base pairs | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| IS1111a | Trans1 | TATGTATCCACCGTAGCCAGT | 687 | ( |
|
|
| Trans2 | CCCAACAACACCTCCTTATTC |
|
|
|
| CS 78F | GCAAGTATCGGTGAGGATGTAAT | 401 | ( | |
|
|
| CS 323R | GCTTCCTTAAAATTCAATAAATCAGGAT |
|
|
| Flagellin | FLA1 | AGAGCAACTTACAGACGAAATTAAT | 482 | ( | |
|
|
| FLA2 | CAAGTCTATTTTGGAAAGCACCTAA |
|
|
|
| 16S rRNA | EHR 16SD | GGTACCYACAGAAGAAGTCC | 345 | ( |
| EHR 16SR | TAGCACTCATCGTTTACAGC |
Serologic and PCR findings for tickborne pathogens in humans exposed to tick bites, Italy, 2021*
| Tickborne pathogens | Serology | PCR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. patients | % Patients (95% CI)† | No. patients (%) | % Patients (95% CI)† | ||
| Single infections | |||||
|
| 21 | 15.6 (10.4–22.6) | 7 | 5.2 (2.5–10.3) | |
|
| 14 | 10.4 (6.3–16.7) | 6 | 4.4 (2.0–9.4) | |
|
| 5 | 5 (1.6–8.4) |
| 6 | 4.4 (2.0–9.4) |
| Co-infections | |||||
|
| 11 | 11 (4.6–14.0) | NA | NA | |
|
| 2 | 2 (0.4–5.2) | NA | NA | |
|
| 1 | 1 (0.1–4.1) |
| 1 | 0.7 (0.1–4.1) |
| Total | 54 | 54 (32.1–48.4) | 20 | 14.8 (9.8–21.8) | |
*Based on 135 persons tested. NA, not applicable †Exact binomial 95% CI.
Clinical findings in 13 patients tested positive for tickborne pathogens, Italy, 2021*
| Patient no. | Tickborne pathogens detected | Clinical findings | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rash | Axillary lymphadenomegaly | Fever | Myalgia | Headache | ||
| 1 | N | Y | N | N | N | |
| 2 | N | N | N | N | Y | |
| 3 | N | Y | Y | Y | N | |
| 4 | N | N | Y | Y | N | |
| 5 | N | N | Y | Y | N | |
| 6 | N | Y | Y | Y | N | |
| 7 | N | N | Y | N | N | |
| 8 | N | N | Y | Y | N | |
| 9 | N | N | Y | Y | Y | |
| 10 | N | N | Y | Y | N | |
| 11 | N | Y | N | N | N | |
| 12 | Y‡ | N | Y | N | N | |
| 13 | Y§ | N | N | N | N | |
*Pathogen detected by PCR. †Pathogen detected by serology. ‡Maculopapular rash. §Erythematous macular rash.
Characteristics of persons tested by serology and PCR for tickborne pathogens in humans exposed to tick bites, Italy, 2021*
| Characteristics | Serology† |
| PCR† | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. positive/no. tested | % Positive (95% CI) | p value | Χ2 | No. positive/no. tested | % Positive (95% CI) | p value | Χ2 | ||
| Age range, y | 0.396 | 0.7 | 0.614 | 0.2 | |||||
| 25–49 | 22/61 | 36.1 (25.2–48.6) | 8/61 | 13.1 (6.8–23.8) | |||||
| 50–68 | 32/74 | 43.2 (32.6–54.6) |
|
|
| 12/74 | 16.2 (9.5–26.2) |
|
|
| Sex | 0.396 | 0.7 | 0.120 | 2.4 | |||||
*Number and percentage of patients testing positive out of the total number examined for each category. †Exact binomial 95% CI is given; Χ2 and p values are given for each category.
Tickborne pathogens and Candidatus Midichloria mitochondrii detected in humans exposed to tick bites, Italy, 2021*
| Tickborne pathogens | No. patients | % Patients (95% CI)‡ | Χ2 | p value | OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 7 | 6 | 85.7 (48.7–97.4) | 8.8 | 0.003 | 13.2 |
|
| 6 | 5 | 83.3 (43.6–97.0) | 6.9 | 0.008 | 11.0 |
|
| 6 | 5 | 83.3 (43.6–97.0) | 6.9 | 0.008 | 11.0 |
|
| 1 | 1 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Total | 20 | 17 | 85.0 (63.9–94.7) | 26.0 | .001 | 16.1 |
*NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio. †Number and percentage of patients positive for tickborne pathogens and Candidatus M. mitochondrii. ‡Exact binomial 95% CI.
Figure 1Distribution of 17 persons in whom Candidatus Midichloria mitochondrii and tickborne pathogens were detected, Italy, 2021. Inset shows region of interest in southern Italy (green shading). APU, Apulia; BAS, Basilicata; B. lusitaniae, Borrelia lusitaniae; CAM, Campania; C. burnetii, Coxiella burnetii; R. raoultii, Rickettsia raoultii.
Figure 2Maximum-likelihood phylogenic tree of endosymbiont Candidatus Midichloria mitochondrii clades detected with tickborne pathogens in humans exposed to tick bites, Italy, 2021. The tree corresponds to the IQ-TREE (http://www.iqtree.org) inferred from 38 partial (202 bp) DNA sequences with 28.7% of informative sites by using the Kimura 3-parameter model with empirical frequencies plus regression (TPM3+F+R2) model under 1,000 bootstrap replicates and maximum-likelihood method. Accession numbers and species name are indicated at the tip of each branch. Bold blue text indicates sequences amplified in the study area. The tree includes 123 query sequences representing all 16S rRNA entries from GenBank (blue circles on left) placed at the branch and leaf nodes by using the APPLES algorithm (https://github.com/balabanmetin/apples). The ClustalX (http://www.clustal.org/clustal2) sequence alignment viewer of the informative sites from the 16S rRNA alignment and their 50% consensus are shown. Colored column at far right denotes taxonomic annotation; purple indicates clade A, blue indicates clade B, green indicates clade C, yellow indicates clade D, green indicates clade E, gray indicates outgroup. Ca., Candidatus.