| Literature DB >> 35997347 |
Shengyu Fu1,2, Qi Zhao1,2.
Abstract
Since they lack native soluble membrane antigens, the analysis and selection of antigen-specific antibodies are commonly performed on whole live cells. Here, we have developed a simple and convenient enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based on cell membrane antigens. Soluble cell membrane proteins isolated from Raji cells were immobilized on the polystyrene microplate, which permitted the assessment of a therapeutic anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody. The experiments showed less variability in the intra-assay. Compared to the living cell ELISAs, the advantage of the assay is avoiding cell losses and high variation of optical density (OD) readings. We provide a quantitative and reproducible ELISA that can be potentially applied to the development of specific antibodies against cell surface antigens.Entities:
Keywords: CD22; ELISA; monoclonal antibodies
Year: 2022 PMID: 35997347 PMCID: PMC9396980 DOI: 10.3390/antib11030053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibodies (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4468
Figure 1Titration curves of antibodies in binding assay against membrane antigens. Total soluble membrane proteins of Raji cells were used to detect chimeric anti-CD22 antibody (■) and anti-TNF α antibody (▼). The averages of samples were plotted against antibody concentration.
Summary of intra-assay and inter-assay variability of EC50 of chimeric anti-CD22 antibodies.
| Experiment | Mean | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| EC50 (μg/mL) | 28.3 | 28.09 | 32.27 | 29.55 |
| SD | 1.12 | 1.16 | 1.17 | |
| SEM | 2.35 | |||
| CV% | 3.9 | 4.1 | 3.6 | 7.9 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
* Number of sample or experiment.
Figure 2Effect of concentration of membrane antigen in chimeric anti-CD22 antibody binding assay. Membrane antigen was immobilized in a 96-well microplate at five different concentrations (1 μg/mL; 10 μg/mL; 0.1 mg/mL; 0.5 mg/mL; 1 mg/mL). Various concentrations of chimeric anti-CD22 antibody were used to detect membrane antigen. The averages of samples were plotted against the antibody concentration.
Figure 3Binding characteristics of phage-displayed anti-CD22 scFvs. Different scFv mutants were displayed with phagemid vector. Overnight cultures of scFv-phages were incubated with Raji cell membrane, and bound scFv-phages were detected with an HRP-conjugated anti-M13 secondary antibody. HL represents the parental scFv clone. M13KO7 helper phages are used as the negative control. Data shown are means ± SEM of 2–3 separate experiments each performed in triplicate.