Literature DB >> 35997072

BehaviorDEPOT is a simple, flexible tool for automated behavioral detection based on markerless pose tracking.

Christopher J Gabriel1,2, Zachary Zeidler1, Benita Jin1,3, Changliang Guo4, Caitlin M Goodpaster2, Adrienne Q Kashay5, Anna Wu1, Molly Delaney5, Jovian Cheung5, Lauren E DiFazio6, Melissa J Sharpe6, Daniel Aharoni4, Scott A Wilke5, Laura A DeNardo1.   

Abstract

Quantitative descriptions of animal behavior are essential to study the neural substrates of cognitive and emotional processes. Analyses of naturalistic behaviors are often performed by hand or with expensive, inflexible commercial software. Recently, machine learning methods for markerless pose estimation enabled automated tracking of freely moving animals, including in labs with limited coding expertise. However, classifying specific behaviors based on pose data requires additional computational analyses and remains a significant challenge for many groups. We developed BehaviorDEPOT (DEcoding behavior based on POsitional Tracking), a simple, flexible software program that can detect behavior from video timeseries and can analyze the results of experimental assays. BehaviorDEPOT calculates kinematic and postural statistics from keypoint tracking data and creates heuristics that reliably detect behaviors. It requires no programming experience and is applicable to a wide range of behaviors and experimental designs. We provide several hard-coded heuristics. Our freezing detection heuristic achieves above 90% accuracy in videos of mice and rats, including those wearing tethered head-mounts. BehaviorDEPOT also helps researchers develop their own heuristics and incorporate them into the software's graphical interface. Behavioral data is stored framewise for easy alignment with neural data. We demonstrate the immediate utility and flexibility of BehaviorDEPOT using popular assays including fear conditioning, decision-making in a T-maze, open field, elevated plus maze, and novel object exploration.
© 2022, Gabriel et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automated behavioral analysis; conditioned fear; decision-making; deeplabcut; minicam; mouse; neuroscience; open-source; rat

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35997072      PMCID: PMC9398447          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.74314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.713


  52 in total

1.  Computer-assisted behavioral assessment of Pavlovian fear conditioning in mice.

Authors:  S G Anagnostaras; S A Josselyn; P W Frankland; A J Silva
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  HippoBellum: Acute Cerebellar Modulation Alters Hippocampal Dynamics and Function.

Authors:  Zachary Zeidler; Katerina Hoffmann; Esther Krook-Magnuson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Enhanced male-evoked responses in the ventromedial hypothalamus of sexually receptive female mice.

Authors:  Kensaku Nomoto; Susana Q Lima
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  MIN1PIPE: A Miniscope 1-Photon-Based Calcium Imaging Signal Extraction Pipeline.

Authors:  Jinghao Lu; Chunyuan Li; Jonnathan Singh-Alvarado; Zhe Charles Zhou; Flavio Fröhlich; Richard Mooney; Fan Wang
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 5.  Genetic Dissection of Neural Circuits: A Decade of Progress.

Authors:  Liqun Luo; Edward M Callaway; Karel Svoboda
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  Neural substrates underlying effort, time, and risk-based decision making in motivated behavior.

Authors:  Matthew R Bailey; Eleanor H Simpson; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Automated classification of self-grooming in mice using open-source software.

Authors:  Bastijn J G van den Boom; Pavlina Pavlidi; Casper J H Wolf; Adriana H Mooij; Ingo Willuhn
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 8.  Neurobehavioral perspectives on the distinction between fear and anxiety.

Authors:  Jennifer N Perusini; Michael S Fanselow
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Female mice ultrasonically interact with males during courtship displays.

Authors:  Joshua P Neunuebel; Adam L Taylor; Ben J Arthur; S E Roian Egnor
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  High-throughput ethomics in large groups of Drosophila.

Authors:  Kristin Branson; Alice A Robie; John Bender; Pietro Perona; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 28.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.