Olivier Chabot1, Larry Lessard2, Martine Dubé1,2. 1. CREPEC, Department of Mechanical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, QC, Canada. 2. CREPEC, Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
With growing restrictions on the exploitation and trade of current stringed musical instruments fingerboard materials such as ebony and rosewood, for economical and ethical reasons, instrument makers are looking for alternative materials. The present work describes the development of a homogeneous 60% bio-based flax fibre composite material with physical properties similar to commonly used fingerboard woods. As a proof of concept, prototype guitar neck was built using the material, demonstrating its compatibility with existing guitar manufacturing techniques.
With growing restrictions on the exploitation and trade of current stringed musical instruments fingerboard materials such as ebony and rosewood, for economical and ethical reasons, instrument makers are looking for alternative materials. The present work describes the development of a homogeneous 60% bio-based flax fibre composite material with physical properties similar to commonly used fingerboard woods. As a proof of concept, prototype guitar neck was built using the material, demonstrating its compatibility with existing guitar manufacturing techniques.
The current state of stringed musical instrument designs has little evolved in the
past century, as they have already converged to the instruments used today,
including the materials used.
The usual guitar design includes various essences of wood, among them ebony
Dyospyros celebica
and rosewood Dalbergia latifolia
which are slow growing dense trees found in tropical regions, notably in
Brazil and Madagascar.These two woods are used primarily in the fingerboard (or fretboard) and the bridge
due to their hardness and stiffness (see Figure 1). These parts are under
considerable stress: the fingerboard is abraded by the strings during play and
stiffens the instrument neck to withstand the string tension and the bridge is a key
part fixing the strings onto the soundboard.
Figure 1.
Key parts of the acoustic guitar.
Key parts of the acoustic guitar.It is worth noting that the word fingerboard designates the part on which the string
are pushed against for any type of stringed instrument, whereas the word fretboard
designates the fingerboard of fretted instruments, such as the guitar. In this
research, the word fingerboard will be used when referring to the general part of a
stringed musical instrument and the word fretboard will be used to designate the
specific guitar part.The growing number of CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species)
regulations on the commerce of exotic woods
have made the supplying of exotic tone woods challenging for guitar makers
who may fall back on unregulated sources, facing legal consequences.
Growing regulations have also increased customer awareness.
Linked issues such as the increase in illegal logging, endangering ecosystems
in developing countries, especially those inhabited by aboriginal populations,
have motivated stringed instrument makers to look for a synthetic alternative
to conventional fingerboard woods.Commercially available alternatives to wood for fingerboards already exist for guitar
fretboards, where the most widely used is Richlite, a material made
of paper infused with phenolic resin.
The similarly named Rocklite is made of “wood fibres and
thermoset resin”.
According to guitar makers, the latter is more similar to wood than
Richlite and easier to work with.
The Corène material is similar to Richlite, but sold in shapes to accommodate
classical stringed instruments makers, such as those building cellos and violins.According to Godin Guitars,
Richlite is harder to work with than wood, both during shaping and gluing of
the fretboard. As for Rocklite, it is used by artisan guitar makers, but it remains
more expensive than exotic woods and, as of now it is not available on a commercial
scale. Corène fingerboards present the same issues as Richlite and its synthetic
nature makes it less popular to traditional instrument purchasers, who would rather
use natural or bio-based materials. Thus, motivation remains to develop a bio-based
material producible on an industrial scale and compatible with existing instrument
fingerboard manufacturing processes.The use of composite materials in musical instruments is well established, with
commercial composite instruments dating back to Ovation guitars in 1966, with its
glass fibre guitar body design.
With wood being a natural composite material having orthotropic mechanical
properties, it makes sense to try and replace it with synthetic composite materials
which can be designed to have similar properties. Nowadays, the use of synthetic
fibre composite materials in stringed instruments, especially guitars is widespread
with numerous companies currently offering carbon fibre instruments, like Rainsong
and KLOS,[12,13] with prices
in the same range as mid-scale wooden guitars. According to both company websites
and KLOS founder Adam Klosowiak, the main sale points of carbon fibre composite
acoustic guitars are their resistance to humidity and thermal stress, their loudness
and their stability trough time. However, the low variability in the properties of
carbon fibre composite materials can make the instrument seem ‘soul-less’ (a
property that is difficult to measure) to customers used to wood and its natural variability.
In addition, wood instruments are known to change in tonality over time as
the wood creeps and follows cycles of moisture absorption,
a phenomenon unseen in carbon fibre instruments.Natural fibre composite materials are an excellent alternative to the traditional
woods because they can be manufactured with the same techniques used for carbon
fibre composite materials, but behave more like wood when subjected to environmental
stress[16,17] In a previous study, Philips
demonstrated the suitability of flax fibre composite material as a stringed
instrument material by developing an efficient manufacturing method for a soprano
ukulele. With the existing motivations in replacing rosewood and ebony with cheaper,
more ethical and readily available materials, subsequent research was focused on
fingerboard material alternatives. Duraisamy
and Ohlmann
have done iterations on the design of a flax based composite material for
stringed instrument fingerboards. Duraisamy
studied the importance of the different material properties on the acoustic
behaviour of the composite, as well as the environmental effects on prospective and
actual fingerboard materials. Ohlmann
provided hybrid flax-carbon-balsa composite material layups matching closely
the acoustic behaviour of rosewood used for fretboard. However, according to head of
design at Godin guitars Daniel Fiocco,
because the fretboard is not a component of the guitar body and is not
resonating with a high amplitude, its acoustic properties are less important than
its physical properties.Thus, the objectives of this research are to develop a synthetic alternative to the
exotic woods used in the fingerboards of stringed instruments and to demonstrate its
compatibility with existing instrument manufacturing techniques and processes.
Developing a fingerboard material
In stringed instruments, the fingerboard serves two main purposes: Stiffen the
instrument neck, which is normally manufactured using softer woods
and provide a surface against which the musician can press the strings to
play the instrument. The fingerboard material must be resistant to abrasion because
the instrument strings are normally made of hard materials such as nylon and steel.
For the material to be manufactured into a fretboard, it should be compatible
with metal fret inserts which need to be pressed and glued into slots cut in the
material. Fretboards make the instrument easier to play because they help the
musician to always press the strings at the right length, as it is the case with the
guitar.The fingerboard surface is normally shaped into a compound radius shape by the
luthier, then metal frets can be inserted and finally the surface is finished and
polished to help the musician’s hand glide when playing and for aesthetics
reasons.
Requirements for a fingerboard material
A viable fingerboard material should be homogeneous trough the thickness so that
it can be cut into radius shapes. Also, throughout the life of the instrument,
it is common for a musician to have his fretboard sanded and refinished by a luthier.
To ensure compatibility with existing infrastructures and traditional
instrument crafting techniques, the material should be machinable with wood
cutting tools, while still being hard enough to withstand the abrasion caused by
prolonged playing by the musician. As the fingerboard is an important structural
component of the instrument, it should be stiff enough to withstand the string
tension, thus preventing creep in the long run which can deteriorate the sound
quality of the instrument,
as stringed instruments are meant to last decades. For the material to be
used in the manufacturing of guitars or other fretted stringed musical
instrument, it should be compatible with fret inserts, such as a thin slot can
be easily machined trough the thickness and a metal fret can be pressed into the
slot and bonded with polyvinyl adhesive.As the visual aspect of musical instruments can impact the sound perception of
players and listeners,
aesthetics are important in guitar making. A material having a similar
grain pattern and texture to wood is preferable to a completely homogeneous
material, as it creates a perceived uniqueness associated with higher end
instruments and validates the customer expectations.
The material colour should match the expected dark wood colour associated
to exotic woods such as rosewood and ebony, control on the material colour is
desirable as it allows the material to be matched to different wood essences.
According to Liu et al.,
in their review of woods for stringed instrument fingerboards, the
material surface colour should be “black, dark brown or dark purple-brown”, in
order to be in accordance with traditional aesthetics.
On the use of natural fibre reinforcement materials
As stated in literature review, works of Duraisamy and Ohlmann[17,19] focussed
on the use of flax fibre composite materials to replace Rosewood in musical
instrument fingerboards. Flax fibre are widely available natural fibres, they
are less dense than synthetic fibres and have a higher damping ratio, thus
making them similar to wood. The current design of the fingerboard material was
focused on flax fibre composite because its monolithic properties are similar to
those of ebony and its fibres can be moulded to produce a material with
wood-like texture.
Moreover, the production of flax composite material reinforcements
produces much less CO2 than synthetic fibres.[25,26]In fact,
the CO2 produced during the manufacturing of flax fibre
reinforcements can be offset by the CO2 absorbed during the growth of
the flax plants.
Desired physical properties
To ensure the material is sufficiently stiff to maintain the structural integrity
of the guitar, its mechanical properties should be close to those of ebony and rosewood.
According to Liu et al.,
the fingerboard material should have a density higher than
0.8 g/cm3, as density is correlated with wear resistance and
hardness for woods. Considering this requirement, a synthetic fingerboard should
have hardness and wear resistance equal to or higher than those of commonly used
woods. Liu et al.
have also addressed requirements on the hygroscopic behaviour of a
fingerboard material, as the dimensional stability of parts used in a musical
instrument is of great importance because a small change in dimension can affect
the justness, play-ability and timbre of the instrument,
the synthetic material should have hygroscopic properties similar to
those of commonly used wood or be more stable to humidity, while still being
less inert than carbon fibre composite materials, as to allow the material to
have slight changes in mechanical behaviour while maintaining the structural
integrity of the instrument. According to the study performed by Duraisamy,
flax composite materials absorb significantly less moisture than
Rosewood, a common fretboard material, and their resonant frequency varies in
similar way, showing that the hygroscopic effect on their mechanical properties
is similar.
Flax fibre composite material
With all these requirements in consideration, a flax based composite material was
designed. We used the Sicomin Infugreen810 resin to obtain a larger
bio-based fraction.
The design iterations on the composite material were all performed using the
vacuum assisted resin transfer moulding process (VARTM), as it allows the production
of low porosity parts and is easily scalable for large production of planar parts,
such as guitar fretboard blanks.
Manufacturing
One of the principal challenges in manufacturing a flax composite fretboard
material was the homogeneity trough thickness, as composite materials are
usually laminated from a number of plies. Reaching the required part thickness
from the fretboard blank measurements (533 mm x 73 mm x 9.9 mm) prescribed by
Godin Guitars was also a challenge.The previous work of Ohlmann
recommended the use of a [±25
] layup of flax composite material as a wood replacement for guitar
fingerboards, a sample of flax composite material made from non-crimp fabric
with a [±256] layup was manufactured. The material was deemed not
viable, because the differences in ply angles trough the thickness caused
delamination when machining the part with common lutherie tools (wood planer and
chisel), because low shear strength planes occurred between plies. Additionally,
the knitting threads used to keep the flax fibres together in the fabric before
infusion were visible in the manufactured part, which made it not suitable for a
finished musical instrument (see Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Delamination and visible non-crimp fabric stabilizing threads on a
flax composite material sample.
Delamination and visible non-crimp fabric stabilizing threads on a
flax composite material sample.Subsequently, another flax composite material was produced using oriented unbound
flax fibres to reproduce the distribution of wood fibres in wood (see Figure 3). As the fibres
were bundled into a single pack, there was no interface between plies, no
knitting threads and the resulting material was homogeneous
trough-the-thickness.
Figure 3.
Sample made from oriented loose flax fibres (unfinished infusion to
show wet and dry fibres).
Sample made from oriented loose flax fibres (unfinished infusion to
show wet and dry fibres).The loose fibres were obtained by removing the stabilizing threads from flax
non-crimp composite reinforcement fabric. The resulting fibres were bundled to
form an oriented composite part, as the fibres where stacked to ± 5 degrees
locally, the wavy finish of natural wood fibres was reproduced. To obtain a
planar part, a steel caul plate was used, the fibre bundle was placed on a
planar mould and a plate with the same dimensions as the desired part was placed
on the bundle. For this material, the vacuum assisted infusion was performed
without infusion media, as the permeability across the part in the fibre
direction was sufficient to ensure infusing the whole part during the resin work
time.In addition to the loose flax fibre composite material, we manufactured a
material using a newly developed flax reinforcement fabric from Texonic,
see Figure 4.
The fabric consists of unidirectional flax fibres maintained with a sprayed
adhesive on one side and is meant to be used as a decorative ply in layups, in
the same way as the Ekoa material by Lingrove.
Figure 4.
Bounded flax reinforcement fabric from Texonic
Bounded flax reinforcement fabric from TexonicTo obtain the required thickness for a guitar fretboard blank, a
layup was manufactured using the resin infusion process. Only
zero degree plies were used to get as close as possible to the
ratio of fingerboard woods. A polished aluminium flat mould
was used. Because the individual fibres would easily break apart from the
reinforcement fabric, they were stacked on the mould using
InstaTack fixative agent. The infusion was performed in the
fibre direction so as to allow any gas bubbles to escape trough the channels
between the individual fibres. For the second material, an infusion media was
used to facilitate the resin flow across the part (see Figure 5).
Figure 5.
Vacuum assisted resin transfer moulding process schematics.
Vacuum assisted resin transfer moulding process schematics.For both manufacturing techniques, a blend of epoxy resin pigments was added to
reproduce the colour of fingerboard woods. A combination of carbon black (5%)
and ferrous oxide brown (1%) from Rayplex Limited
was used to mimic the colour of Ebony wood.Machinability tests were performed using a wood chisel and a wood planner. The
material made with adhesive bonded flax was deemed superior as a fingerboard
material, because the seemingly higher fibre content made it behave more like
wood when machined. The material can be machined with a wood planner to remove
arbitrary thin shavings without delamination, see Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Coarsely planned flax composite material sample.
Coarsely planned flax composite material sample.
Physical properties of the composite material
Fibre volume fraction and porosity content of the composite material were
measured. The fibre volume fraction was measured from microscopy pictures (see
Figure 7) using the
Fiji distribution of the ImageJ software.
The microscopy pictures were stitched together and a binary mask was
applied where the black content was taken as the resin and void, and the white
content the fibres, resulting in a fibre volume fraction of 29%. This result can
be validated by calculating the mass ratio of the dry fibres used in the parts
and the final part weight which is equal to 28%.
Figure 7.
Microscopy picture with binary mask and grid to show fibre
distribution.
Microscopy picture with binary mask and grid to show fibre
distribution.The machinability and homogeneity trough-the-thickness of the composite material
are due to the fibre distribution across the part thickness. Because of the
absence of stabilizing threads in the reinforcement fabric, the flax fibre can
shift when the vacuum pressure is applied. The displacement of the fibres in the
thickness direction disrupts the ply sequence, thus preventing the formation of
resin rich planes between plies where uncontrolled shear rupture is possible.
This allows the manufacturing of a material where properties in the lateral
directions are very similar to those in the thickness direction.The porosity content was computed from the part density and fibre/matrix mass
fractions with equation (1) from Monti et al.where ρ
is the composite part density measured from its mass and volume,
ρ
is the fibre density taken from Ref
, ρ
is the matrix density obtain from the manufacturer
and ϕ
is the fibre mass fraction obtained from the measured fibre volume
fraction. The part porosity content is 6 ± 2%, which is in
accordance with typical values found in the literature for flax composites.The bio-based content was computed from the resin and flax fabric mass fractions.
The flax was taken to be 100% bio based and according to the manufacturer the
Infugreen810 resin mixed with the hardener is 31% bio-based. With a fibre mass
fraction of 42% computed from the measured fibre volume fraction, the material
is 60% bio-based.
Mechanical properties comparison with usual fingerboard woods
The mechanical properties of the flax composite material were measured and
compared with those of ebony wood (Diospyros Ebenum) and
rosewood (Dalbergia latifolia), commonly used woods in stringed
instrument fingerboards.
The longitudinal E
and tangential E
modulus were measured in accordance with the ASTM D3039 test method.
The longitudinal modulus test samples were manufactured with dimensions
(150 × 12.5 × 1) and the lateral modulus samples dimensions (100 × 25.4 × 3),
dimensions are length, width and thickness in millimetres. The ebony wood
properties were taken from Liu et al.
The results are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Flax composite and fingerboard woods properties.
Material
EL (GPa)
ET (GPa)
ρ
(g/cm3)
Flax
19 (1)
3.1 (0.2)
1.18 (0.06)
Ebony
18 (2)
—
1.21 (0.01)
Rosewood
14 (1)
—
0.75 (0.01)
Standard deviations are shown in parentheses
Flax composite and fingerboard woods properties.Standard deviations are shown in parenthesesTo ensure the commercial viability of the flax composite material for an
industrial scale musical instrument production, its compatibility with polyvinyl
adhesive was investigated. The adhesive bond strength with polyvinyl adhesive
was measured in accordance with the ASTM D5869 test method,
as a reference the epoxy resin adhesive shear strength was also measured.
For every lap shear test sample, two composite material samples were
manufactures with dimensions (101.6 × 25.4 × 3) millimetres, the samples were
bonded on a 25.4 mm distance, allowing for a
6.45 cm2 overlap bond surface. As recommended
per the adhesive manufacturer guidelines, fixturing pressure was used by means
of a manual clamping device. The shear strength of bonded joints in wood has
significant variability across wood species and testing conditions, thus
experimental results are not easily reproducible. According to Chahud et al.,
the shear strength of bonded joints with polyvinyl adhesive in wood is
between 2 and 10 MPa, the results are presented in Table 2. The adhesive bond strength
using polyvinyl adhesive remains lower than the epoxy bond strength, but is in
the interval of strengths for bonded wood joints.
Table 2.
Adhesive shear strength of fingerboard materials.
Material-adhesive
Shear strength (MPa)
Flax-epoxy
6.8 (0.1)
Flax-polyvinyl
2.8 (0.4)
Wood-polyvinyl
2–101
Standard deviations are shown in parentheses, 1.
Adhesive shear strength of fingerboard materials.Standard deviations are shown in parentheses, 1.
Aesthetics
The blend of epoxy pigments used allowed for a close match to the colour of ebony
wood, see Figure 8. As
the flax fibres have a pale colour, any dark tone could be achieved by adjusting
the pigment quantities, such as the colour of rosewood. According to Vincent
Cléroux, a luthier at Godin Guitars, some guitar models are best made with
specific colour tones of wood to match the overall look of the instrument.
Sourcing a specific wood colour can be troublesome; thus, our flax based
material could increase productivity and allow more possibilities in colour
tones.
Figure 8.
Colour comparison between finished ebony wood and flax composite
material with epoxy pigments.
Colour comparison between finished ebony wood and flax composite
material with epoxy pigments.The fingerboard surface is normally polished to a glossy finish, for aesthetics
purposes and to allows the musician’s fingers to better slide when he is
playing. As the part has to be machined before the surface is finished, the
surface finish cannot rely on a good mould finish and treatment, as would
normally be done for composite material parts. Due to the material homogeneity,
an excellent surface finish was obtainable by abrasion with 200–500 grit
sandpaper and polishing with wood finish oil.
Material industrialisation
Much of the present work was focused on the development of a material using the
resin infusion process as it is easily scalable and suitable for sheet parts.
The manufacturing processes for guitar fretboards currently used by instrument
makers require fixed dimension rectangular blanks which can be cut from large
sheets of infused flax composite material.To assert the industrial viability of the flax composite material, the price of
the raw material needed to produce a single guitar fretboard blank was
calculated, as it is the instrument part with the most synthetic material
alternatives to be compared to. The gross price of flax reinforcement fabric was
obtained from Texonic and the resin price was obtained from a Sicomin sales
representative. The price of the required raw materials to produce a single
fretboard blank is 33.00 $, with the resin costing 8.50 $ and the flax
reinforcement fabric costing 24.50 $ (prices are in Canadian dollars). The resin
transfer moulding consumables cost and labour cost were not included in the
price, as they would differ greatly from the actual costs of producing the
material on a large scale.The preliminary cost assessment demonstrates that the flax composite material
could be viable on an artisan scale, meaning that it could be competitive to the
Rocklite fretboard material currently used by luthiers as a synthetic
alternative to exotic woods. However, the cost of the raw materials should be
reduced for it to be viable on an industrial scale, as it is still significantly
higher than the retail cost of materials used in large scale production
(rosewood, ebony and Richlite).For the sake of comparison, customer retail prices were used, the prices were
taken from the wood to works Web site, a popular retail Web site used by luthiers,
the prices are shown in Table 3.
Table 3.
Guitar fretboard material prices comparison.
Material
Price (CAD $)
Rosewood
14.00
Ebony wood
27.00
Richlite
24.00
Rocklite
45.00
Flax composite
33.00a
aPrice of raw materials only.
Guitar fretboard material prices comparison.aPrice of raw materials only.
Guitar Prototype
In order to demonstrate the viability of our fingerboard material, we built a
prototype by replacing the fretboard on a used guitar. A generic half scale
classical guitar was used.The finished flax fretboard on the guitar prototype is shown at Figure 9. A sound sample of the guitar
prototype with a flax fretboard being played can be found here.
Figure 9.
Guitar fretboard prototype.
Guitar fretboard prototype.
The guitar prototype assembly
To assemble the prototype, first the old fretboard was removed from the guitar by
heating the adhesive and loosening the joint between the two parts. Then,
following the guitar building advice and techniques from Gore and Gilet,
the flax fretboard blank was squared with a manual wood planner, allowing
the fret slots to be cut precisely perpendicular to the fretboard. To ensure the
note played were accurate to the guitar scale (the distance between the bridge
and the top, see Figure
1) the old fretboard fret placement was used as a reference.A manual saw was used to machine the fretboard slots, then the fretboard blank
was roughly cut to the neck dimensions. To bond the fretboard onto the neck, we
used epoxy adhesive, as it allowed to fill the imperfections between the
fretboard and neck surface. If the two surfaces had been perfectly planar,
polyvinyl adhesive would have been used; thus, its suitability for fretboard
assembly is yet to be completely demonstrated. To securely bond the fretboard to
the neck it was clamped with numerous clamps and a metal bar acting as a
stabiliser, as recommended by Gore and Gilet .
After the fretboard was bonded to the neck, it was trimmed to neck
dimensions using a precision hand saw and a sanding block, the guitar assembly
was then ready for the frets to be inserted.
Fret installation
The guitar normally has frets which complicates the building process, as they
have to be pressed into the fretboard material. This allowed us to test the flax
composite material compatibility with fret inserts, demonstrating its viability
for other fretted instruments (banjo, ukulele and others).According to Gore and Gilet
the frets can either be pressed in before or after the fretboard is
bonded onto the guitar, we chose to press them after, as the guitar neck was
already finished this allowed us to precisely sand the fretboard to the neck
dimensions. The machined fret slots had a width of 0.80 mm and a depth of
2.5 mm, a guide was used to ensure constant depth and perpendicularity when
cutting the slots. To install the frets, a polyvinyl adhesive was deposited in
the slots and the frets were hammered in. The fret slot width used was tested
for wood and for the flax fretboard, the frets could be inserted without trouble
or excessive bending of the neck while being securely in place for both, an
increase of the width used for wood was not necessary as opposed to carbon fibre fretboards.
Surface finish and playability
The fingerboard (and neck) are the main parts of the instruments with which the
musician interacts. Notwithstanding the instruments aesthetics and acoustics,
how the musician feels the instrument is of primordial importance.To obtain a good surface finish, the flax fretboard was sanded using sanding
paper from 200 to 500 grit, and then the surface was polished using a cotton
towel and wood polishing oil recommended by Lutherie Denalt.
A good surface finish was harder to obtain using the flax material as
small strands of fibre would detach from the resin matrix when sanding with
coarser paper, these small strands would then have to be sanded out using the
smaller grit paper. Also, the matrix hardness which is higher than common wood
hardness, made removing large amount of matter harder, but allows for a more
durable material in the long run.The surface finish of the flax fretboard and its perceived hardness was deemed
acceptable by Lutherie Denalt
and the finished guitar prototype demonstrated the possible viability of
the flax fibre material as a fretboard material according to Godin Guitars
luthier Vincent Cléroux.
Conclusion
To conclude, a suitable flax reinforced composite material fingerboard material was
developed by doing iterations on the manufacturing method using different types of
flax reinforcement. The approach where a non-laminate and homogeneous
trough-the-thickness material was produced allowed for good machinability using
common lutherie tools, thus demonstrating compatibility with existing production
equipment. The material manufactured with a novel type of unidirectional flax
reinforcement fabric stabilised with adhesive instead of knitting threads was chosen
due to its wood-like behaviour when machined. The physical and mechanical properties
of the flax material were measured and were found to be similar to those of rosewood
and ebony, which are commonly used fingerboard materials. To demonstrate the
material viability as a fretboard material, a guitar prototype was manufactured by
replacing the wood fretboard of a classical guitar. Guitar frets were installed into
the flax material, which was shaped into a guitar fretboard and a good quality
finish was obtained. The resulting prototype was evaluated by experienced luthiers.
The material viability on an industrial musical instrument production line remains
to be proven, as well as its economical viability, but it is at the time of writing
this article the synthetic fingerboard alternative having the highest bio-based
content with a mass fraction of 60% bio-based materials.
Authors: Johannes Schindelin; Ignacio Arganda-Carreras; Erwin Frise; Verena Kaynig; Mark Longair; Tobias Pietzsch; Stephan Preibisch; Curtis Rueden; Stephan Saalfeld; Benjamin Schmid; Jean-Yves Tinevez; Daniel James White; Volker Hartenstein; Kevin Eliceiri; Pavel Tomancak; Albert Cardona Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 28.547