Literature DB >> 35996033

Indications and surgical route for hysterectomy for benign disorders: a retrospective analysis in a large Australian tertiary hospital network.

Chloe Higgins1, Rebecca Mcdonald2,3, Ben Willem Mol4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hysterectomy is a common but expensive and morbid procedure. Alternative treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) are effective in up to 80% of cases, but there is substantial variation in surgical approach and pre-operative management of HMB. This study aims to assess the approach to hysterectomies for benign indications including alternative treatments and route of operation.
METHODS: We retrospectively collected patient and surgical data on all hysterectomies for benign indications from 1/4/2018 to 31/6/2020 at our tertiary-led hospital network.
RESULTS: Hysterectomies were performed in 582 women at a median age of 49(44-56) with a median BMI of 27.9(24.5-33.3)kg/m2 and 251(43%) were referred from private rooms. Hysterectomies for HMB were performed laparoscopically (TLH)(156, 51.7%) more often than abdominally (TAH)(133, 44%) or vaginally (4.3, 13%), with wide variation between sites. Approach was predicted by a history of previous abdomino-pelvic surgery and uterine size but not by other patient factors (BMI, parity or comorbidities). Referral source, on the other hand, was a significant predictor of route of hysterectomy. In women with HMB without uterine abnormalities, 45% tried a levonorgestrel intrauterine device and 25% tried endometrial ablation before proceeding to surgery. The use of alternative therapies pre-operatively did not vary between sites or referral sources.
CONCLUSIONS: The variations in route of hysterectomy that are unexplained by patient factors suggest room for improvement and raises the question whether some of the patients undergoing a TAH may have been candidates for less invasive surgery. Uptake of alternative management strategies for HMB could also be improved.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hysterectomy; Minimally invasive; Surgical route

Year:  2022        PMID: 35996033     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06736-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.493


  3 in total

1.  Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Rosalie J Fergusson; Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez; Anne Lethaby; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-29

2.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy and barriers to using minimally invasive methods.

Authors:  Monika Janda; Nigel R Armfield; Gayle Kerr; Suzanne Kurz; Graeme Jackson; Jason Currie; Katie Page; Edward Weaver; Anusch Yazdani; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.100

3.  Changes in Hysterectomy Route and Adnexal Removal for Benign Disease in Australia 2001-2015: A National Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Natalie De Cure; Stephen J Robson
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-05-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.