| Literature DB >> 35995916 |
Muazzam Faiz1, Danial Habib2,3, Imran Siddique4, Jan Awrejcewicz5, Witold Pawłowski6, Sohaib Abdal2,7, Nadeem Salamat2.
Abstract
This presented work investigate the bio-convections effects of the magnetized time dependent axisymmetric flow of Carreau-nanomaterial performances with multiple slip effects over a stretching sheet. The momentum, heat, concentration and density of motile micro-organism are renovated into the system of equation via using well known similarity revolution. Well known Mathematical computational techniques and software (i.e. bvp4c and MATLAB) are used to draw graphical and tabular results. Velocity profile equation [Formula: see text], energy equation [Formula: see text], volumetric nanoparticles [Formula: see text], density motile microorganism [Formula: see text].The Carreau viscosity model is use to reduce the viscosity of fluid when [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. Besides we moderate this into power law index with [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] partial slip condition of velocity is also instigated at the surface. Gravity dependent gyrotactic nanoparticles are utilized for well observing axisymmetric flow with convective boundary layer condition and comparatively better heat transfer rate result and applicable to maximum realistic approach.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35995916 PMCID: PMC9395528 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18344-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Flow configuration with motile microorganisms.
Figure 2Flow chart of numerical scheme (Bvp4c).
Assessment of numerical computational results for different values of the magnetic factor .
| Makinde et al.[ | Azam et al.[ | Present results | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.17372 | 1.17372 | 1.17372 |
| 0.5 | 1.36581 | 1.36581 | 1.36581 |
| 1 | 1.53571 | 1.53571 | 1.53571 |
| 2 | 1.83049 | 1.83049 | 1.83049 |
| 3 | 2.08484 | 2.08485 | 2.08485 |
Numerical and computational results for accuracy check of for different values of the velocity slip factor β.
| Exact[ | HPM[ | Perturbation[ | Asymptotic[ | RK-45[ | Present (Bvp4c) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.173721 | 1.178511 | 1.173721 | 1.173734 | 1.173734 | |
| 0.1 | 1.153472 | 1.157311 | 1.153489 | 1.153485 | 1.153485 | |
| 0.2 | 1.134017 | 1.136998 | 1.13409 | 1.134031 | 1.134031 | |
| 0.5 | 1.079949 | 1.08082 | 1.08101 | 1.079964 | 1.079964 | |
| 0.1 | 1.001834 | 1.000308 | 1.009522 | 1.001850 | 1.001850 | |
| 0.2 | 0.878425 | 0.874453 | 0.930213 | 0.878444 | 0.878444 | |
| 0.5 | 0.650528 | 0.645304 | 1.201623 | 1.529918 | 0.650550 | 0.650550 |
| 1 | 0.46251 | 0.458333 | 0.574163 | 0.462547 | 0.462547 | |
| 2 | 0.29905 | 0.296532 | 0.310715 | 0.299099 | 0.299099 | |
| 5 | 0.149393 | 0.148454 | 0.14959 | 0.149455 | 0.149455 | |
| 10 | 0.082912 | 0.082532 | 0.082833 | 0.082974 | 0.082974 | |
| 20 | 0.044368 | 0.044228 | 0.044337 | 0.044423 | 0.044423 | |
| 50 | 0.018732 | 0.018698 | 0.018727 | 0.018770 | 0.018770 | |
Numerical analysis of skin friction coefficient for the values of δ.
| 0.1 | 0.1 | 3 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | n = 0.5 | n = 1.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 0.5094 | 0.5103 | ||||||
| 0.3 | 0.5093 | 0.5102 | ||||||
| 0.4 | 0.5092 | 0.5101 | ||||||
| 0.3 | 0.5261 | 0.5271 | ||||||
| 0.5 | 0.5403 | 0.5501 | ||||||
| 0.7 | 0.5543 | 0.5581 | ||||||
| 2 | 0.5094 | 0.5103 | ||||||
| 4 | 0.5093 | 0.5102 | ||||||
| 6 | 0.5092 | 0.5101 | ||||||
| 0.2 | 0.4972 | 0.4982 | ||||||
| 0.3 | 0.4857 | 0.4865 | ||||||
| 0.4 | 0.4749 | 0.4761 | ||||||
| 2 | 0.3165 | 0.3175 | ||||||
| 3 | 0.2312 | 0.2325 | ||||||
| 4 | 0.1826 | 0.1842 | ||||||
| 0.4 | 0.5195 | 0.5198 | ||||||
| 0.8 | 0.5095 | 0.5109 | ||||||
| 1 | 0.5099 | 0.5100 | ||||||
| 0.4 | 0.5072 | 0.5100 | ||||||
| 0.8 | 0.5164 | 0.5174 | ||||||
| 1 | 0.5313 | 0.5323 | ||||||
Numerical analysis of Local Nusselt number for the values of δ.
| 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | n = 0.5 | n = 1.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 0.5094 | 0.5103 | |||
| 0.3 | 0.5093 | 0.5102 | |||
| 0.4 | 0.5092 | 0.5101 | |||
| 0.2 | 0.2438 | 0.2451 | |||
| 0.3 | 0.2531 | 0.2583 | |||
| 0.4 | 0.2609 | 0.2624 | |||
| 0.4 | 0.2335 | 0.2425 | |||
| 0.8 | 0.2266 | 0.2282 | |||
| 1 | 0.2212 | 0.2231 | |||
| 0.4 | 0.2343 | 0.2352 | |||
| 0.8 | 0.2244 | 0.2362 | |||
| 1 | 0.2182 | 0.2367 | |||
Numerical analysis of Sherwood number for the values of .
| 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | n = 0.5 | n = 1.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.5611 | 0.6112 | ||
| 3 | 0.5806 | 0.6114 | ||
| 5 | 0.5788 | 0.6116 | ||
| 0.4 | 0.5835 | 0.5880 | ||
| 0.8 | 0.5665 | 0.5689 | ||
| 1 | 0.5529 | 0.5540 | ||
| 0.4 | 0.5858 | 0.5890 | ||
| 0.8 | 0.5610 | 0.5640 | ||
| 1 | 0.5455 | 0.5465 | ||
Numerical analysis of motile microorganisms for the values of .
| 2 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | n = 0.5 | n = 1.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0.4312 | 0.4156 | |||
| 3 | 0.4218 | 0.3919 | |||
| 4 | 0.4144 | 0.3846 | |||
| 1 | 0.4127 | 0.3455 | |||
| 3 | 0.4043 | 0.3356 | |||
| 5 | 0.3964 | 0.3141 | |||
| 0.4 | 0.4112 | 0.3956 | |||
| 0.8 | 0.4204 | 0.387 | |||
| 1 | 0.4292 | 0.3835 | |||
| 0.4 | 0.4146 | 0.3987 | |||
| 0.8 | 0.4070 | 0.3874 | |||
| 1 | 0.4024 | 0.3821 | |||
Figure 3(a–d) Illustrating the effect of unsteadiness parameter on .
Figure 4(a–d) Illustrates the effect of on .
Figure 5(a–d) Illustrates the effect of magnetic parameter on .
Figure 6(a, b) Illustrates the effect of Biot number on .
Figure 7(a, b) Illustrating the impact of Brownian motion parameter over .
Figure 8(a) Depicts thermophoresis on while (b) depicts Prandtl number on .
Figure 9Depicts the effect of Lewis number on .
Figure 10(a) Depicts the effect of while (b) depicts on .