| Literature DB >> 35993044 |
Suman Mann1, Amit Kumar Bindal2, Archana Balyan3, Vijay Shukla4, Zatin Gupta5, Vivek Tomar6, Shahajan Miah7.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most prevalent form of cancer that can strike at any age; the higher the age, the greater the risk. The presence of malignant tissue has become more frequent in women. Although medical therapy has improved breast cancer diagnostic and treatment methods, still the death rate remains high due to failure of diagnosing breast cancer in its early stages. A classification approach for mammography images based on nonsubsampled contourlet transform (NSCT) is proposed in order to investigate it. The proposed method uses multiresolution NSCT decomposition to the region of interest (ROI) of mammography images and then uses Z-moments for extracting features from the NSCT-decomposed images. The matrix is formed by the components that are extracted from the region of interest and are then subjected to singular value decomposition (SVD) in order to remove the essential features that can generalize globally. The method employs a support vector machine (SVM) classification algorithm to categorize mammography pictures into normal, benign, and malignant and to identify and classify the breast lesions. The accuracy of the proposed model is 96.76 percent, and the training time is greatly decreased, as evident from the experiments performed. The paper also focuses on conducting the feature extraction experiments using morphological spectroscopy. The experiment combines 16 different algorithms with 4 classification methods for achieving exceptional accuracy and time efficiency outcomes as compared to other existing state-of-the-art approaches.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35993044 PMCID: PMC9388317 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6392206
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Figure 1Overall frame.
Figure 2NSPFB decomposition process.
Figure 3NSDFB decomposition process.
Figure 4Original image normalized map.
Higher-order Z-moment values of n and m.
|
|
| Z-moment quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 2,6,10 | 32 |
| 11 | 3,7,11 | |
| 12 | 0,6,8,10 | |
| 13 | 1,5,7,13 | |
| 14 | 2,6,8,16 | |
| 15 | 3,7,9,15 | |
| 16 | 0,2,4,14,16 | |
| 17 | 1,5,9,15,17 |
Algorithm 1SVM-based classification method.
Figure 5Original breast image.
Experimental methods.
| Method name | Classification | Feature extraction | Image decomposition |
|---|---|---|---|
| SVMI1 | SVM linear | Higher-order Zernike moments, SVD | NSCT |
| SVMI2 | SVM linear | Low-order Zernike moments | Biorthogonals3.8 |
| SVMI3 | SVM linear | Low-order Zernike moments | Daubechies9 |
| SVMI4 | SVM linear | Low-order Zernike moments | Symlet9 |
| SVMp5 | SVM polynomial | Higher-order Zernike moments, SVD | NSCT |
| SVMp6 | SVM polynomial | Low-order Zernike moments | Biorthogonals3.8 |
| SVMp7 | SVM polynomial | Low-order Zernike moments | Daubechies9 |
| SVMp8 | SVM polynomial | Low-order Zernike moments | Symlet9 |
| SVMR9 | SVM RFB | Higher-order Zernike moments, SVD | NSCT |
| SVMR10 | SVM RFB | Low-order Zernike moments | Biorthogonals3.8 |
| SVMR11 | SVM RFB | Low-order Zernike moments | Daubechies9 |
| SVMR12 | SVM RFB | Low-order Zernike moments | Symlet9 |
| DT13 | Decision tree | Higher-order Zernike moments, SVD | NSCT |
| DT14 | Decision tree | Low-order Zernike moments | Biorthogonals3.8 |
| DT15 | Decision tree | Low-order Zernike moments | Daubechies9 |
| DT16 | Decision tree | Low-order Zernike moments | Symlet9 |
Figure 6Graphical analysis of accuracy of the test set.
Accuracy of the test set.
| Test set precise rate (%) | SVM linear | SVM polynomial | SVM RFB | Decision tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 95 | 95 | 38 | 75 |
| 20 | 88 | 88 | 35 | 70 |
| 40 | 85 | 85 | 37 | 68 |
| 60 | 86 | 86 | 38 | 60 |
| 80 | 82 | 82 | 40 | 65 |
Figure 7Graphical analysis of training time.
Training time.
| Train time (s) | SVM linear | SVM polynomial | SVM RFB | Decision tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
| 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.15 | 0.135 | 0.12 |
| 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.45 | 0.4 |
| 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.54 | 0.48 |
| 0.8 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.63 | 0.56 |
| 1.2 | 1.4 | 1 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.99 | 0.88 |
| 2 | 2 | 1.2 | 1.08 | 0.96 |