| Literature DB >> 35992701 |
Yogesh S Nimonkar1, Tejashree Godambe1, Apurva Kulkarni1, Tarachand Patel1, Dhreej Paul1, Debarati Paul2, Vinay Rale3, Om Prakash1.
Abstract
We reported our comparative observations on oligotrophs vs. copiotrophs from a hyper-alkaline and hypersaline habitat, Lonar Lake, situated in the Buldhana district of Maharashtra, India. Cell numbers of oligotrophic and copiotrophic microbes from the sediment were enumerated by the three-tube most probable number (MPN) method using an array of nutrient-rich and oligotrophic (≈10-20 mg carbon L-1) media offering simulated natural conditions of pH and salinity. A total of 50 strains from 15 different genera and 30 different species were isolated from the highest positive dilutions of MPN to identify the taxa of oligotrophs and copiotrophic microorganisms dominating in Lonar Lake. We did not get any true oligotrophs due to their adaptation to higher carbon levels during the isolation procedure. On the contrary, several true copiotrophs, which could not adapt and survive on a low-carbon medium, were isolated. It is also observed that changes in medium composition and nutrient level altered the selection of organisms from the same sample. Our data indicate that copiotrophic microorganisms dominate the eutrophic Lonar Lake, which is also supported by the past metagenomics studies from the same site. We also reported that quick depletion of carbon from oligotrophic medium worked as a limiting factor, inducing cell death after 2-3 generations and preventing the development of visible colonies on plates and sufficient optical density in liquid medium. Therefore, a long-term supply of low levels of carbon, followed by isolation on enriched media, can serve as a good strategy in isolation of novel taxa of microorganism, with industrial or environmental importance.Entities:
Keywords: growth-rate; industrial enzymes; lifestyle switch; microbial-ecology; nutrient cycling; nutrition
Year: 2022 PMID: 35992701 PMCID: PMC9386271 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.939984
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Figure 1Utilization of different carbon sources by the isolates. Dextrose proved to be the most suitable one for stable growth.
Figure 2(A–D) Growth of (A) NA10LO17, (B) LA9LO6, (C) LAD3LO11, and (D) NAD2LO24 in different carbon concentrations (20, 200, and 1,000 mg L−1).
Comparative study of bacterial load in oligotrophic and nutrient-rich mediums detected by MPN method and list of representative taxa cultivated from highest positive dilutions.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| NB | 10−9, 10−10, 10−11 | 2.15 × 1010 |
|
| LB | 10−7, 10−8, 10−9 | <24 × 108 |
|
| TSB | 10−9, 10−10, 10−11 | 0.75 × 1010 |
|
| R2A | 10−7, 10−8, 10−9 | 4.62 × 108 |
|
| RAVAN | 10−7, 10−8, 10−9 | 1.5 × 108 |
|
| Synthetic | 10−6, 10−7, 10−8 | 2.4 × 107 |
|
| NB-D | 10−3, 10−4, 10−5 | 2.40 × 104 |
|
| LB-D | 10−4, 10−5, 10−6 | 0.93 × 105 |
|
| TSB-D | 10−4, 10−5, 10−6 | 0.42 × 105 |
|
| R2A-D | 10−3, 10−4, 10−5 | 4.62 × 104 |
|
| RAVAN-D | 10−3, 10−4, 10−5 | 2.4 × 104 | Not cultivated |
NB-D, LB-D, and TSB-D = 1,000-fold diluted; R2A = 100-fold diluted; Ravan-D = 10-fold diluted.
List of facultative oligotrophs and their physiological growth response on different levels of carbon, NaCl, and pH.
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 7 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | |
| 8 | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | |
| 9 | ND | ND | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | |
| 10 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | |
| 11 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | |
| 12 | ND | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 22 | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | |
| 23 | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 24 | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 25 | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 27 | ND | ND | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | + | |
| 30 | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 32 | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | + | |
| 33 | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 34 | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 35 | ND | ND | + | + | + | – | + | + | – | + | + | |
| 36 | ND | ND | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 37 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | |
| 38 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | |
| 39 | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 40 | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 43 | ND | ND | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | + | |
| 44 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | |
| 45 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | |
| 47A | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 47B | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | + | |
ND, no data.
List of copiotrophic organism and their growth response on different levels of carbon, NaCl, and pH.
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 1 | – | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | + | |
| 2 | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 3A | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 3B | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 4 | – | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | + | |
| 6 | – | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 13 | – | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 14 | – | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | |
| 17 | – | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | |
| 18 | – | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | |
| 19 | – | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | |
| 20 | – | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | + | |
| 21 | – | – | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | |
| 28 | – | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | |
| 31 | ND | ND | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | + | |
| 41 | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 42 | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 46A | – | – | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 46B | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | |
| 46C | ND | ND | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | |
| 48 | – | – | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | + | |
| 49 | – | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | |
| 50 | – | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | |
Doubling time (G) and growth rate (k) of selected facultative oligotrophs on different carbon levels.
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 0.96 | 1.04 | |
| 200 | 2.00 | 0.50 | |
| 1,000 | 1.45 | 0.69 | |
| 20 | 3.56 | 0.28 | |
| 200 | 1.33 | 0.75 | |
| 1,000 | 1.13 | 0.89 | |
| 20 | 3.17 | 0.32 | |
| 200 | 1.38 | 0.73 | |
| 1,000 | 1.86 | 0.54 | |
| 20 | 15.08 | 0.07 | |
| 200 | 1.51 | 0.66 | |
| 1,000 | 2.67 | 0.37 | |
| 20 | 7.67 | 0.13 | |
| 200 | 6.14 | 0.16 | |
| 1,000 | 4.02 | 0.25 | |
| 20 | 6.26 | 0.16 | |
| 200 | 1.78 | 0.56 | |
| 1,000 | 2.24 | 0.45 | |
| 20 | 1.88 | 0.53 | |
| 200 | 1.49 | 0.67 | |
| 1,000 | 2.22 | 0.45 |