Literature DB >> 35992624

Hepatitis C patient communication source and modality preferences in the direct-acting antiviral era.

Julie Beaulac1, Kim Corace1,2, Louise Balfour1,2, Mark Kaluzienski2, Curtis Cooper1,2,3.   

Abstract

Background: Although hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment has improved dramatically, decision making related to treatment continues to be complex and challenging. Little data exists regarding patient information needs and preferences in the direct-acting antiviral (DAA) era.
Methods: We evaluated patient-perceived information needs and preferences when making HCV treatment decisions. A cross-sectional survey was conducted at two Ottawa-based sites: a hospital-located outpatient viral hepatitis clinic, and a community-based HCV patient support program.
Results: One hundred and seventeen patients completed the survey: the mean age was 52.1 years (range 23 to 78), and 64% were male, 81.5% were White, 48.6% were on disability support or leave, and 60.3% had a high school education or less. Although traditional sources of health information (e.g., direct communication with health care providers) remain preferred by most, a range of preferences were reported including utilization of newer technologies (e.g., emails, text messages). The telephone was rated as the preferred method of contact for medication reminders, with daily or weekly communication reported as most helpful. White participants, those more highly educated, and those with a higher income all indicated a greater acceptability for e-mail and/or text message communication for medication and appointment reminders. Conclusions: There is no single preferred source or method of communicating with patients. These findings indicate that a tailored multi-pronged approach, including newer technologies, is more likely to effectively educate and communicate with the heterogeneous population of individuals living with HCV.
Copyright © 2018 Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.

Entities:  

Keywords:  patient outcomes; quality of care; treatment adherence

Year:  2018        PMID: 35992624      PMCID: PMC9202763          DOI: 10.3138/canlivj.2018-0007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Liver J        ISSN: 2561-4444


  13 in total

1.  Primary care providers' sources and preferences for cognitive health information in the United States.

Authors:  Jan Warren-Findlow; Anna E Price; Angela K Hochhalter; James N Laditka
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 2.483

2.  The influence of locus of control on preferences for information and decision making.

Authors:  Hideki Hashimoto; Shunichi Fukuhara
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-11

Review 3.  Evidence Based Medicine and Shared Decision Making: the challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care.

Authors:  Alexandra Barratt
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-10-08

Review 4.  Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients' preferences matter.

Authors:  Albert G Mulley; Chris Trimble; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-11-08

5.  Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC).

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Edward H Wagner; Judith Schaefer; Lisa D Mahoney; Robert J Reid; Sarah M Greene
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Information needs and preferences of recently diagnosed patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Kylie I Bernstein; Stephen Promislow; Rachel Carr; Patricia Rawsthorne; John R Walker; Charles N Bernstein
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.325

Review 7.  Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship.

Authors:  Miriam McMullan
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-01-06

Review 8.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; France Légaré; Nananda F Col; Carol L Bennett; Michael J Barry; Karen B Eden; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Anne Lyddiatt; Richard Thomson; Lyndal Trevena; Julie H C Wu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-01-28

Review 9.  Shared decision making in mental health: prospects for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Robert E Drake; Delia Cimpean; William C Torrey
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.986

10.  The National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]: a national cross-sectional analysis of talking to your doctor and other healthcare providers for health information.

Authors:  Julie E Volkman; Tana M Luger; Kimberly L L Harvey; Timothy P Hogan; Stephanie L Shimada; Daniel Amante; D Keith McInnes; Hua Feng; Thomas K Houston
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.