| Literature DB >> 35992420 |
Chao Liu1,2, Hao Chen2,3, Fang Zhou4, Chao-Hung Chiang5, Yi-Lang Chen6, Kan Wu2,7, Ding-Hau Huang8, Chia-Yih Liu9, Wen-Ko Chiou6,9,10.
Abstract
Loving-kindness meditation (LKM) was first practiced by Buddhists and then developed by clinical psychologist. Previous studies on LKM have mainly focused on the impact of real person-guided meditation on depression, anxiety, and other negative psychology. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this study explored the effect and mechanism of media-guided LKM on the improvement of social presence, mindfulness, spirituality, and subjective wellbeing (SWB). From the viewpoint of positive psychology, this study compared the different media effects of animated pedagogical agent (APA)-guided LKM and audio-guided LKM. A total of 82 flight attendants were recruited from airlines; then, they were randomly assigned to two groups: APA group (41 participants) and audio group (41 participants), which both underwent an 8-week LKM training intervention. The aforementioned four main variables were measured pre and post the meditation experiment. The results indicated that both APA-guided meditation and audio-guided meditation significantly improved subjects' spirituality and SWB. Compared with audio-guided meditation, APA-guided meditation significantly improved the subjects' spirituality, SWB, and social presence. Audio-guided meditation has no significant effect on social presence. This study highlights APA-guided meditation has a positive effect on spirituality, SWB, and social presence, which may provide individuals with a simple and easy method to improve their mental health.Entities:
Keywords: animation guidance; loving-kindness meditation; mindfulness; spirituality; subjective wellbeing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35992420 PMCID: PMC9382197 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Demographic characteristics of participants.
| Characteristic | Total | APA | Audio | |
| Age (SD) | 28.48 (7.25) | 27.64 (7.63) | 29.32 (6.92) | |
| Gender | Male (%) | 32(39%) | 16(39%) | 16(39%) |
| Female (%) | 50(61%) | 25(61%) | 25(61%) | |
| Education | High school degree (%) | 7(8%) | 4(10%) | 3(7%) |
| Associate degree (%) | 44(54%) | 22(54%) | 22(54%) | |
| Bachelor degree (%) | 31(38%) | 15(36%) | 16(39%) |
FIGURE 1Animated pedagogical agent (APA) cartoon image design.
FIGURE 2Procedure flowchart.
ANOVA results.
| Measure | Variable | F | p | η2 |
| MAAS | Time | 2.679 | 0.104 | 0.033 |
| Group | 0.001 | 0.973 | <0.001 | |
| Time × Group | 0.405 | 0.527 | 0.005 | |
| SAIL | Time | 26.750 | <0.001 | 0.251 |
| Group | 4.197 | 0.044 | 0.050 | |
| Time × Group | 2.776 | 0.100 | 0.034 | |
| SWB | Time | 27.826 | <0.001 | 0.258 |
| Group | 1.696 | 0.196 | 0.021 | |
| Time × Group | 5.655 | 0.020 | 0.066 | |
| SPS | Time | 13.210 | <0.001 | 0.142 |
| Group | 1.326 | 0.253 | 0.016 | |
| Time × Group | 4.484 | 0.035 | 0.054 |
Only significant differences are marked with *; *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 3Comparison of four measures between animated pedagogical agent (APA) and audio group. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Means and standard deviations for each measure of each group, pre- and post-assessment.
| Group | Measure | Mean (SD) | |
|
| |||
| Pre | Post | ||
| APA | MAAS | 3.728 (0.623) | 3.893 (0.648) |
| SAIL | 4.219 (0.687) | 4.823 (0.719) | |
| SWB | 3.336 (1.473) | 4.941 (1.873) | |
| SPS | 3.033 (0.749) | 3.699 (0.789) | |
| Audio | MAAS | 3.778 (0.630) | 3.851 (0.534) |
| SAIL | 4.102 (0.726) | 4.411 (0.698) | |
| SWB | 3.463 (1.252) | 4.071 (1.740) | |
| SPS | 3.131 (0.807) | 3.303 (0.796) | |