| Literature DB >> 35992337 |
Anna M Kolkmann1,2, Anon Van Essen1, Mark J Post1,2, Panagiota Moutsatsou1,2.
Abstract
The use of fetal bovine serum (FBS) in animal cell culture media is widely spread since it provides a broad spectrum of molecules that are known to support cell attachment and growth. However, the harvest and collection procedures of FBS raise ethical concerns and serum is an ill-defined and expensive component. This is especially problematic when it comes to regulatory approval for food applications like cultured meat. The aim of this study is to develop a chemically defined, cost efficient serum-free and animal-free medium that supports the attachment and expansion of bovine myoblasts while maintaining their differentiation capacity. Bovine satellite cells were harvested and isolated from a fresh sample of skeletal muscle tissue and cultured in planar systems. The efficacy of the tested formulations was assessed with metabolic assays and cell counting techniques. Optical microscopy was used to observe cellular morphology and statistical analysis was applied. Based on a comprehensive literature analysis, a defined serum-free medium (SFM) composition was developed consisting of DMEM/F12 as basal medium, supplemented with L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate, fibronectin, hydrocortisone, GlutaMAX™, albumin, ITS-X, hIL-6, α-linolenic acid, and growth factors such as FGF-2, VEGF, IGF-1, HGF, and PDGF-BB. To our knowledge, this is the first defined serum-free and animal free medium formulation specific for bovine myoblasts to date. We conclude that the SFM formulation supported exponential cell growth up to 97% of the serum-containing golden standard growth medium. All reagents used in this study are chemically defined.Entities:
Keywords: animal free medium; cultured meat; medium development; myoblasts; satellite cells; serum-free medium
Year: 2022 PMID: 35992337 PMCID: PMC9385969 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.895289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Overview of the 5-step methodology for the animal-free medium development.
| Step 1 | Step 2 Substitution/elimination | Step 3 GF addition | Step 4 Concentration optimisation | Step 5Long term validation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal (F10) | Basal (F10 → DMEM/F12) | Basal (DMEM/F12) | Basal (DMEM/F12) | Basal (DMEM/F12) |
| Insulin | Insulin, transferrin, selenium → ITS-X | ITS-X | ITS-X | ITS-X |
| Transferrin | ||||
| Sodium selenite | BSA → HSA Fetuin | HSA Fetuin | HSA | HSA |
| BSA Fetuin | Fibronectin | Fibronectin | Fibronectin | Fibronectin |
| Vitronectin | Somatotropin | Somatotropin |
| |
| Fibronectin | Dexamethasone → Hydrocortisone | Hydrocortisone | Hydrocortisone | Hydrocortisone |
| Somatotropin | bIL-6 → hIL-6 | hIL-6 | hIL-6 | hIL-6 |
| Dexamethasone | α-linolenic acid | α-linolenic acid | α-linolenic acid | α-linolenic acid |
| bIL-6 | FGF-2 | FGF-2 | FGF-2 | FGF-2 |
| α-linolenic acid | Asc-2-P | Asc-2-P | Asc-2-P | Asc-2-P |
| FGF-2 | Heparan sulphate | Heparan sulphate |
| |
| IGF1 | IGF1 | IGF1 | ||
| LIF |
| |||
| PDGF-BB | PDGF-BB | PDGF-BB | ||
| VEGF | VEGF | VEGF | ||
| HGF | HGF | HGF |
FIGURE 1Schematic overview of the study.
Overview of the first formulation components with indication of their respective functions, final concentrations and references.
| Component | Function | Concentration | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bovine serum albumin | major component of FBS; can bind a wide range of essential compounds such as steroid hormones, metals, and vitamins; may act as detoxifying protein | 5 mg/ml |
|
| Insulin | Glucose and amino acid uptake, lipogenesis, and intracellular transport; synthesis of proteins and nucleic acids | 5 μg/ml |
|
| Transferrin | Essential trace element that binds iron and facilitates its transport into the cells; acts as detoxifying compound by removing trace amounts of toxic metals | 30 μg/ml |
|
| Sodium Selenite | Essential trace element that acts as co-factor for glutathione peroxidase and other enzymes, thus serving as an antioxidant | 2 ng/ml |
|
| Dexamethasone | Was shown to improve myogenesis | 0.196 μg/ml |
|
| Fetuin | Was found to be a major cell attachment factor in serum and was also shown to promote spreading and growth | 500 μg/ml |
|
| Vitronectin | Vitronectin is characterized to be a major attachment factor, that is, present in FBS; It was shown that the cell attachment activity of vitronectin was 8–16 fold greater than that of fibronectin | 10 μg/ml |
|
| Fibronectin | Known to enhance cell attachment | 10 μg/ml |
|
| Somatotropin (aka cow growth hormone—CGH) | It was shown that CGH, in combination with insulin, stimulated the formation of myotubes in chick embryonic myoblasts | 2 ng/ml |
|
| α-linolenic acid (ALA) | The supplementation of growth medium with fatty acids such as ALA or oleic acid (OA) was shown to enhance satellite cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner | 1 μg/ml |
|
| FGF-2 | The addition of FGF-2 was shown to stimulate the proliferation of skeletal muscle cell lines while inhibiting the differentiation of these cells | 5 ng/ml |
|
FIGURE 2For all graphs, cell growth was measured with MTS or HCA and expressed as percentages of GM (control, not shown in graph). (A) Effect of the addition of insulin (I), transferrin (T) and sodium selenite (S) in comparison to supplementation of SFM with commercial Gibco® ITS-X (X = Ethanolamine) at day 7 of culture. Asterisks (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001) indicate significant effect of the presence of ITS (-X) in the serum-free formulation [SFM w/o ITS (-X)]. (B) Effect of attachment factors [vitronectin (v), fibronectin (fib) and fetuin (fet)] at different concentrations on cell growth in SFM and expressed as % of growth achieved in GM (bars not shown) on days 4 and 7. (C) Effect of L-Ascorbate-2-phosphate and heparan sulphate on cell proliferation on days 4 and 7. For all conditions, time significantly impacted cell proliferation (p < 0.001). (D) Effect of different basal media and time, DMEM/F-12 and Ham’s F-10 Nutrient Mix on cell expansion on days 4 and 7. Asterisks (***p < 0.001) indicate that the mean value is significantly different between DMEM/F12 & F10 and that there is a significant time effect for DMEM/F12. (E) Effect of dexamethasone and hydrocortisone on cell proliferation on days 4 and 6. Asterisks (***p < 0.001) indicate that there is a significant time effect for—DEX + HYDR. (F) Comparison of bIL-6 with hIL-6 on days 4 and 6. SFM with hydrocortisone and DMEM/F12 in both cases.
FIGURE 3Stepwise regression analysis in JMP®. Scatter plot showing the actual values and the values predicted by the model. Effect summary of all factors and factor combinations that were selected by the model, ranked based on their respective p-values.
FIGURE 4(A) displays the effects that significant growth factors and growth factor combinations had on cell growth (according to JMP analysis) in comparison to SFM w/o additional GFs (apart from FGF-2). Data is normalised as % of growth compared to the control (GM). The three most effective growth factor combinations were tested again and the results are shown in (B).
FIGURE 5(A–K) illustrate the findings of the dose-response studies. HCA measurements were performed on days 3 (△) and 5 (■). Asterisks (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001) indicate significant difference compared to the control (initial component concentration, indicated with a dashed line) .
FIGURE 6Multi-passage assay of two different donors indicated (each in duplicates) in SFM and GM. The line graph shows the means of the cumulative population doublings over the number of passages for GM and SFM. The error bars indicate standard deviations. Asterisks indicate significant differences of population doublings per passage between the two conditions. At P1 the number of population doublings is >0 due to the short pre-expansion of cells after their isolation and prior to their freezing in liquid nitrogen.
FIGURE 7Phase contrast microscopy images of cell proliferation cultures at confluence for P2 (A,B) and P6 (C,D) with SFM and GM. In general, the cells growing in SFM show a more rounded morphology compared to GM.
FIGURE 8Phase contrast microscopy images of cell differentiation culture at day 7 of differentiation. Cells from ISO44 (A) and ISO45 (B) that were growing in SFM were seeded for differentiation at—16 population doublings. After 24 h in SFM, and when the cells reached a 90% confluency, differentiation was induced with DMEM (1 g/L glucose) + 2% FBS.