Literature DB >> 35992066

Plasma cells arise from differentiation of clonal lymphocytes and secrete IgM in Waldenström macroglobulinemia.

Jun Hee Lim1,2,3, James Q Wang4, Fiona Webb5, Kartik Saxena1, Daniel Enosi Tuipulotu3, Abhimanu Pandey3, Si Ming Man3, Dipti Talaulikar1,2,3.   

Abstract

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is characterized by bone marrow infiltration with malignant lymphoplasmacytic cells (LPCs), a smaller population of plasma cells (PCs), and hypersecretion of IgM monoclonal protein. Here, we show that CD45low, CD38+, and CD138+ PCs and CD45high, CD38-, CD138-, CD19+, and CD20+ LPCs carry a heterozygous L265P mutation in the Toll-like receptor signaling adaptor MYD88. Both PCs and LPCs express the same auto-reactive IgHV sequences, suggesting a similar clonal origin and role for auto-antigens in WM cell survival. PCs are primarily responsible for IgM production even without substantial cell proliferation. When cultured in isolation, LPCs give rise to more differentiated PCs and secrete less IgM. Our analyses suggest that malignant PCs arise from the clonal LPC population, and are primarily responsible for IgM secretion in WM. Targeting malignant PCs may have therapeutic benefits in the treatment of WM and improve the duration of response and potentially, survival.
© 2022 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Cell biology; Immune system disorder; Immunology

Year:  2022        PMID: 35992066      PMCID: PMC9389254          DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  iScience        ISSN: 2589-0042


Introduction

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare subtype of mature indolent B cell lymphoma, a cancer of mature B lymphocytes which is characterized by the presence of monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM) hypersecretion and the accumulation of heterogeneous malignant B cells in the bone marrow (BM) (Owen et al., 2003; Lynch et al., 2017; El-Ayoubi et al., 2017). It is classified as a malignancy with plasmacytic differentiation. Two distinct subsets of cells in WM can be identified depending on their morphology and immunophenotypic characteristics: a predominant population of lymphoplasmacytic cells (LPCs) which are phenotypically defined as CD19+, CD20+, and CD138- and plasma cells (PCs) which are phenotypically defined as CD38+ and CD138+, with lower levels of CD45 and CD19 and variable CD20 (Lin et al., 2005; Morice et al., 2009; Wada et al., 2016). In WM, the abnormal LPCs cause cytopenias due to gradual marrow infiltration. PCs are non-dividing terminally differentiated mature effector B cells that produce antibodies and contribute to immunity (Calame, 2001). PCs are unlikely to contribute significantly to cytopenias, due to their low proportions in the bone marrow (El-Ayoubi et al., 2017). Mutations in the gene encoding the Toll-like receptor adaptor protein called myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MYD88) occur in over 90% of patients with WM (Xu et al., 2013; Varettoni et al., 2013), making WM one of the rare lymphomas with a signature single mutation that can be used to diagnose cases in clinical practice. The most common Myd88 mutation results in a leucine-to-proline substitution at position 265, named MYD88 L265P (Ngo et al., 2011). This mutation is not found in normal tissues of patients with WM or in B cells from healthy donors, suggesting that a potential oncogenic event in MYD88 is linked to malignant transformation of B cells in patients with WM (Xu et al., 2014). MYD88 contains three main domains, an N-terminal death domain (DD), an intermediate linker domain (ID), and a C-terminal Toll/interleukin-1 receptor-like domain (TIR). Following ligand binding, the cytoplasmic TIR domain of Toll-like receptors associates with TIR domain of MYD88 via a homotypic TIR-TIR interaction (Dunne et al., 2003). IL-1 receptor-associated kinases (IRAKs) are then recruited to MYD88 via a DD domain interaction and is autophosphorylated, leading to the activation of both the canonical NF-kB pathway and the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway to promote cell survival (Muzio et al., 1997; Lin et al., 2010). The MYD88 L265P mutation is located within the MYD88 TIR domain and causes constitutive formation of the TLR-MYD88-IRAKs signaling complex to induce aberrant activation of NF-κB signaling, promoting malignant cell proliferation in WM (Treon et al., 2012). In addition, MYD88 L265P mutation can trigger B cell receptor (BCR) pathway crosstalk via a MYD88-TLR9-BCR (IgM) supercomplex resulting in chronically activated BCR signaling, which in turn can promote cell survival via NF-κB and mTOR signaling (Phelan et al., 2018). An increased level of IgM paraprotein or monoclonal IgM in circulation of patients with WM may cause symptomatic hyperviscosity (Lynch et al., 2017), which is observed in up to 30% of patients with WM and manifests as neurological and bleeding symptoms (Mehta and Singhal, 2003; Stone and Bogen, 2012). The serum IgM levels inducing hyperviscosity-related symptoms are diverse in individual patients with WM (“symptomatic threshold”) (Fahey et al., 1965) but generally WM guidelines recommend initiation of plasmapheresis at levels of >60 g/L even in asymptomatic patients with WM (Gustine et al., 2017b). Identifying the cellular fraction(s) responsible for the secretion of IgM is therefore important in understanding the pathogenesis of WM and could potentially provide new targets or avenues for treatment. Small retrospective studies have shown a lack of concordance between LPC numbers in the bone marrow and IgM levels (Pasricha et al., 2011; De Tute et al., 2013). There is evidence of concordance between PC numbers in the BM and IgM levels suggesting that PCs are the primary secretors of IgM (Pasricha et al., 2011). Despite this clear relationship, PCs in WM have not been comprehensively analyzed to determine their immunophenotypic and molecular features, and secretory function. Here, we characterized the immunophenotype, molecular genetics, and secretory function of PCs and LPCs from WM.

Results

Quantification of plasma cell and lymphoplasmacytic cell populations in WM cell lines and patients with WM

To investigate the characteristics of PCs and LPCs in WM cells and patients, we sorted PCs and LPCs from WM cell lines and patients using a conservative sorting strategy (Figure 1A). We analyzed the two WM cell lines and identified 10.16% PCs (CD45low/CD38+/CD138+) and 11.72% LPCs (CD45high/CD138-/CD19+/CD20+) in MWCL-1 and 1.48% PCs (CD45low/CD38+/CD138+) and 29.03% LPCs (CD45high/CD138-/CD19+/CD20+) in BCWM.1. We did not include CD38-/CD138+ cells regardless of CD45 expression level to clearly distinguish features of PCs and LPCs (Figure 1B). We also analyzed three BM aspirates of patient with WM using CD319 antibody instead of CD138 to gate PCs, because anti-CD138 antibody (DAKO) does not bind to PCs in frozen patient samples and CD319 is reported to be an alternative PC marker in the presence of anti-CD138 immunotherapeutic drugs (Soh e al., 2021). We identified in three patients: 0.82% PCs and 7.52% LPCs in patient 1, 3.43% PCs and 2.64% LPCs in patient 2, 16.28% PCs and 4.98% LPCs in patient 3 (Figure 1C). These results show that the portions of PCs and LPCs are variable in WM cell lines and patient samples.
Figure 1

Gating strategy for sorting plasma cells (PCs) and lymphoplasmacytic cells (LPCs) from WM cell lines and patient bone marrow

(A) A graphical representation of the gating strategy.

(B) The application of this gating strategy for two WM cell lines. Single cells were gated using forward scatter (FSC-H vs. FSC-A) and dead cells showing positive signal for fixable viability stain 700 were excluded. From CD45low population gate, CD138 and CD38 co-expression was used to identify PCs. From CD45high population gate, the LPCs that showed negative staining for CD138 were first identified. The LPCs were further segregated based on CD19 and CD20 co-expression (LPC).

(C) Three WM patient samples were immunophenotyped using same gating strategy, except staining with CD319 Ab instead of CD138 Ab for PCs. The percentages of PCs and LPCs were calculated from live lymphocytes.

Gating strategy for sorting plasma cells (PCs) and lymphoplasmacytic cells (LPCs) from WM cell lines and patient bone marrow (A) A graphical representation of the gating strategy. (B) The application of this gating strategy for two WM cell lines. Single cells were gated using forward scatter (FSC-H vs. FSC-A) and dead cells showing positive signal for fixable viability stain 700 were excluded. From CD45low population gate, CD138 and CD38 co-expression was used to identify PCs. From CD45high population gate, the LPCs that showed negative staining for CD138 were first identified. The LPCs were further segregated based on CD19 and CD20 co-expression (LPC). (C) Three WM patient samples were immunophenotyped using same gating strategy, except staining with CD319 Ab instead of CD138 Ab for PCs. The percentages of PCs and LPCs were calculated from live lymphocytes.

The MYD88 L265P mutation is found in WM cell lines and the same IgHV isotype is conserved between PCs and LPCs

Given that the MYD88 L265P mutation is not found in normal tissues of patients with WM or in B cells from healthy donors, we used PCR to identify the presence or absence of this mutation in PCs and LPCs (Figure 2A). We found that the MYD88 L265P mutation was present in both FACS-sorted PC and LPC fractions of both WM cell lines (Figures 2B and 2C). Next, we investigated the IgHV sequence to verify clonally rearranged immunoglobulin (Ig) using FR3 primers targeting the Ig heavy chain. The expression of the same IgHV sequences was found in PCs and LPCs (IgHV3-15∗01 and IgHV3-23∗01 in MWCL-1 and BCWM.1, respectively) (Figure 2D). These results suggest that the PCs in the two WM cell lines were part of the malignant clone, and likely derived from differentiation of clonal LPCs carrying the MYD88 L265P mutation.
Figure 2

Determination of Myd88 mutation status and IgHV isoform by PCR

(A) Schematic representation of isolation of PCs and LPCs from WM cell lines using FACS.

(B) Myd88 PCR against genomic DNA extracted from PCs and LPCs (lane 1. MWCL-1 PCs; lane 2. MWCL-1 LPCs; lane 3. BCWM.1 PCs; lane 4, BCWM.1 LPCs; lane 5. heterozygous control; lane 6. wild-type control; lane 7. no template). The Myd88 primer set targets both wild-type and L265P mutant, and Myd88 L265P primer set targets L265P mutant only.

(C) Sanger sequencing result of Myd88 PCR amplicons from BCWM.1 and MWCL-1 PCs and LPCs.

(D) Summary of Myd88 and IgHV PCR amplicon sequencing.

Determination of Myd88 mutation status and IgHV isoform by PCR (A) Schematic representation of isolation of PCs and LPCs from WM cell lines using FACS. (B) Myd88 PCR against genomic DNA extracted from PCs and LPCs (lane 1. MWCL-1 PCs; lane 2. MWCL-1 LPCs; lane 3. BCWM.1 PCs; lane 4, BCWM.1 LPCs; lane 5. heterozygous control; lane 6. wild-type control; lane 7. no template). The Myd88 primer set targets both wild-type and L265P mutant, and Myd88 L265P primer set targets L265P mutant only. (C) Sanger sequencing result of Myd88 PCR amplicons from BCWM.1 and MWCL-1 PCs and LPCs. (D) Summary of Myd88 and IgHV PCR amplicon sequencing.

Chromosomal copy number changes are detected in MWCL-1 cell line and two patients with WM using SNP microarray

Deletions in chromosome 2p21, 17p11-p13.2, and 17q25.1–17q25.3 have been reported in MWCL-1 and its parental cells (Hodge et al., 2011). To investigate whether these copy number abnormalities are present in WM cells and patients, we performed DNA SNP microarray on the PCs and LPCs from two WM cell lines and six patients. In MWCL-1, the copy number losses of 11q23.2, 17p11.2-p13.1, and 17q25.1-q25.3, and the copy number gain of 11q23.2-q25 were detected in 95% of the clones from both PCs and LPCs (Table 1 and Figure S1), and the copy number loss of 6q11.1-q27 and 8p12-p23.3 was detected only in less than 10% of both populations (Table 1). We did not detect the copy number change of chromosome 2 in the MWCL-1 cell line as previously reported (Hodge et al., 2011).
Table 1

Chromosomal copy number changes in PCs and LPCs using SNP microarray

SampleCell fractionChromosomeStartStopSizeLoss/GainFrequency in sample
MWCL-1CD138+6q11.1-q2762009419170765619108 MBLoss<10%
8p23.3-p122407923349530533 MBLoss<10%
11q23.21139532951143241830.37 MBLossNA
11q23.2-q2511449427613494512020.4 MBGain>95%
17p13.1-p11.272908212071726513.4 MBLoss>95%
17q25.1-q25.373240165760493752.8 MBLoss>95%
CD19+6q11.1-q2762009419170765619108 MBLoss<10%
8p23.3-p122407923349530533 MBLoss<10%
11q23.21139532951143241830.37 MBLossNA
11q23.2-q2511449427613494512020.4 MBGain>95%
17p13.1-p11.272908212071726513.4 MBLoss>95%
17q25.1-q25.373240165760493752.8 MBLoss>95%
BCWM.1CD138+No copy number change detected
CD19+No copy number change detected
Patient 1CD138+3p26.3-p21.311411494916255049 MBLoss60%–70%
CD19+3p26.3-p21.311411494916255049 MBLoss25%
9p13.2-p13.236325964377492131.42 MBLoss50%
Patient 2CD138+No copy number change detected
CD19+No copy number change detected
Patient 3CD138+No copy number change detected
CD19+No copy number change detected
Patient 4CD138+6q13-q15777071079234080214.6 MBLoss100%
7q31.1-q32.311270241613061496717.9 MBLoss100%
22q11.2222696066232584880.56 MBLoss100%
CD19+6q13-q15777071079234080214.6 MBLoss100%
7q31.1-q32.311270241613061496717.9 MBLoss100%
22q11.2222696066232584880.56 MBLoss100%
Patient 5CD138+No copy number change detected
CD19+No copy number change detected
Patient 6CD138+No copy number change detected
CD19+No copy number change detected
Chromosomal copy number changes in PCs and LPCs using SNP microarray Of the six patients with WM, chromosomal changes were detected in two patients. In patient 1, AOH (absence of heterozygosity) of 3p21.31-p26.3 was found in 60% to 70% of PCs and in only 25% of LPCs and the copy number loss of 9p13.2 was found in LPCs alone (Table 1 and Figure S2). In patient 4, AOH in 6q13-q15 and 7q31.1–32.3 and the copy number loss of 22q11.22 were found at 100% of the clone from both cell populations suggesting germline changes, likely benign, in this patient (Table 1 and Figure S3). We did not detect any chromosomal copy number changes in the BCWM.1 cell line and the four remaining patients with WM including patient 2, patient 3, patient 5, and patient 6 (Table 1). Copy number changes and AOH were identified in MWCL-1 and two patient samples, patient 1 and patient 4. Of these, MWCL-1 and patient 4 had no differences in SNP microarray between paired PCs and LPCs. Only patient 1 had a differential result in the PC and LPC fractions. Patient 1 showed loss of 9p13.2 in the LPCs but not in the PCs. The genes located in the affected short arm of chromosome 9 include RNF38, MELK, ALL3, FBXO10, and PAX5. Overall, our results indicate that LPCs and PCs are derived from the same parental population and carry similar SNP microarray changes. No firm conclusions can be drawn on the basis of the one patient sample that had variable results between the LPC and PC population.

Somatic mutations identified by next-generation sequencing

Next-generation sequencing was performed to determine the somatic mutations in PCs and LPCs of the two WM cell lines (MWCL-1 and BCWM.1) and two WM patient samples (patient 3 and patient 4) using customized capture library covering approximately 200 genes, which are known to be related to tumorigenesis and lymphomagenesis. The mutational profile in the cellular compartments of the cell lines and the patient samples was analyzed. Somatic T/C mutation in MYD88 resulting in an L265P substitution was detected in both populations of two WM cell lines and patient 4, but not in patient 3 (Table 2). The truncated CXCR4 mutation, S338X was detected in both PC and LPC populations in patient 4 (Table 2). The frameshift mutation on ARID1A, which is a member of the switch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) family to regulate chromatin remodeling and modulate gene regulation, was detected in both cell populations of patient 4 (Guan et al., 2011). The ARID1A mutation has been reported to be found in 17% of patients with WM (Hunter et al., 2014). Mutations in NOTCH2 were found in all other samples except LPCs in the MWCL-1 cell line. PRDM2 gene was mutated in both populations in the two WM cell lines and in patient 4, and the LPCs population of patient 3. In addition, mutations in ALK, ATM, IKZF3, LONP1, MKI67, MTHER, OBSCN, PLEKHG1, SYNE1, TET2, TNFRSF11A, UNC80, and ZFHX4 were recurrent findings in all eight cell populations (two cell fractions from two cell lines and two patients) that were tested.
Table 2

Quantitation of somatic mutations identified in PCs and LPCs using NGS

MWCL-1
BCWM.1
Patient 3
Patient 4
CD138+CD19+/CD138-CD138+CD19+/CD138-CD138+CD19+/CD138-CD138+CD19+/CD138-
FCGR3A22113322
NOTCH21111111
PRDM21123111
DNMT3A111111
MTHER111111
MYD88111111
OBSCN331122
TET2222222
ALK2211
ATM1111
IKZF31111
LONP12211
MKI673311
MTRR3243
PLEKHG11133
SYNE11133
TNFRSF11A1111
UNC801111
ZFHX41122
ARID1A12
CARD1111
CLSTN111
CXCR411
DYNC2H122
ERAP222
FASN11
GSTP111
HDAC711
ID311
IGLL511
KLHL711
KDM6A11
KMT2D11
METAP211
MYC11
MYH411
PTPN2111
SALL311
TBC1D411
TET111
TP5311
XPC11
KMT2B1
MAP21

The Arabic numeral indicates the number of mutations which were found in each gene for each sample type.

Quantitation of somatic mutations identified in PCs and LPCs using NGS The Arabic numeral indicates the number of mutations which were found in each gene for each sample type. Our results indicate that most somatic mutations were present in both PCs and LPCs from patients and cell lines except for PRDM2, KMT2B, and MAP2. The PRDM2 mutation was seen in LPCs of patient 3 but not in PCs. The KMT2B mutation was only detected in PCs of BCWM.1 cell line and the MAP2 mutation was found in PCs of MWCL-1 cell line. Mutations in the gene encoding FCGR3A were detected in all samples. Among these mutations of FCGR3A, the FCGR3A-158V/F polymorphism is implicated in modulating IgG antibody binding and activation. It has been reported that the phenylalanine alone (F/F) is associated with decreased response to rituximab, due to the less binding affinity for IgG1 than valine homologous (V/V) or heterozygous (V/F) at 158 of FCGR3A (Koene et al., 1997; Weng and Levy, 2003). The FCGR3A F/F polymorphism was detected in PCs and LPCs from MWCL-1 cell line and patient 4, and the F/V polymorphism was detected in both populations from BCWM.1 cell lines and patient 3, suggesting that MWCL-1 and patient 4 may have reduced response to rituximab.

PCs do not proliferate in culture and are differentiated from LPCs

To examine how the PCs and the LPCs potentially contribute to cell proliferation and pathogenesis in WM, we cultured PCs, LPC, PCs plus LPCs, and unsorted cells for 72 h. The number of PCs (isolated from MWCL-1) decreased by 40% after 72 h of cell culture, consistent with the non-proliferative phenotype of PCs. Conversely, LPCs alone or co-cultures of PCs and LPCs (isolated from MWCL-1) both displayed moderate proliferation after 72 h of cell culture (130% and 112% of the initial population, respectively) whereas the unsorted population increased by 195.1% over the same period (Figure 3A).
Figure 3

The growth rate of PCs and LPCs isolated from WM cell lines

Unsorted cells, PCs alone, LPCs alone, and PCs with LPCs FACs-sorted from WM cell lines were seeded into 9-well plates at the same density. After 72 h, PCs, LPCs, and CD138-/CD38+ cells were sorted using flow cytometer and cell number was counted using 123count eBeads. Cell growth rate in MWCL-1 (A) and BCWM.1 (B). The absolute cell number of each fraction was shown in (C) MWCL-1 and (D) BCWM.1. The representative data are shown from two individual experiments. Data are presented as mean ± S.D.

The growth rate of PCs and LPCs isolated from WM cell lines Unsorted cells, PCs alone, LPCs alone, and PCs with LPCs FACs-sorted from WM cell lines were seeded into 9-well plates at the same density. After 72 h, PCs, LPCs, and CD138-/CD38+ cells were sorted using flow cytometer and cell number was counted using 123count eBeads. Cell growth rate in MWCL-1 (A) and BCWM.1 (B). The absolute cell number of each fraction was shown in (C) MWCL-1 and (D) BCWM.1. The representative data are shown from two individual experiments. Data are presented as mean ± S.D. The number of PCs (isolated from BCWM.1) increased by 256% of the initial population despite the non-proliferative feature of PCs (Figure 3B). Cell cultures of LPCs, co-cultures of PCs and LPCs (isolated from BCWM.1), and the unsorted population each proliferated by more than 500% of their respective initial population after 72 h of culture (Figure 3B). We investigated the absolute cell number of each cell population at 72 h to determine which cell population proliferates and differentiates after 72 h in culture. In the unsorted MWCL-1 cells, the absolute cell number of all three populations, PCs, LPCs, and CD138+/CD38- increased (Figure 3C). When PCs were cultured alone, the absolute cell number of three populations was decreased. When LPCs were cultured alone, the number of PCs and LPCs increased and CD138+/CD38- cells decreased. When PCs and LPCs were co-cultured, PCs and CD138+/CD38- cells decreased, and LPCs increased. These results suggest that LPCs and CD138+/CD38- cells proliferate without any stimuli and differentiate to PCs. PCs did not proliferate because PCs decreased in absence of LPCs and CD138+/CD38- cells (Figure 3C). In unsorted BCWM.1 cells, the cell number of all three populations, PCs, LPCs, and CD138+/CD38- cells increased (Figure 3D). In PCs alone, PCs decreased to 71% and LPCs increased 10-fold due to a small amount contamination during sorting. The proliferation of LPCs overcome the cell death of PCs and resulted in the increase of cell number in PCs alone culture (Figure 3B), because of the fast growth rate of BCWM.1 cells. In LPCs alone and PCs plus LPCs, the cell number of all three populations increased and these results suggest that the proliferation rate of LPCs in BCWM.1 may overcome the cell death of PCs in all four cell culture conditions, unsorted, PCs alone, LPCs alone, and PCs plus LPCs. Overall, PCs have poor proliferative capacity and tend to decrease in culture without the support of LPCs or CD138+/CD38-cells.

PCs are responsible for the production of IgM

Secretion of IgM from each cell population was determined after 72 h of culture. In MWCL-1 cells, we found that the PCs population produced the largest amount of IgM (5362 ng/mL per 104 cells on average) (Figures 3A and 4A). IgM production in unsorted, LPCs, and PCs plus LPCs was on average, 1026, 818, and 3108 ng/mL per 104 cells, respectively. The amount of IgM production is correlated with PC number at 72 h showing Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) of 0.997 between IgM amount and the number of PCs (Figures 3C and 4A. In BCWM.1 cells, PCs produced the largest amount of IgM (749 ng/mL per 104 cells on average). IgM productions in unsorted, LPCs, and PCs plus LPCs were 286, 118, and 296 ng/mL per 104 cells, respectively (Figure 4B). Next, we compared the amount of IgM paraprotein in blood and the number of PCs in patients with WM, which were analyzed using flow cytometry (Figure 1B). We found the amount of IgM paraprotein is correlated with the percentage of PCs in BM samples with a Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) of 0.8506 (Figure 4C). These results suggest that PCs are a major IgM producer in WM cell lines and by extrapolation, in patients, and that targeting PCs could be therapeutically beneficial in deepening responses in patients with WM.
Figure 4

IgM production in PCs and LPCs isolated from WM cell lines

After FACS sorting, each fraction of WM cell lines was cultured for 72 h without stimuli and supernatant was collected after 72 h for IgM ELISA.

(A) MWCL-1 and (B) BCWM.1. p values were calculated using one-way ANOVA (∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; n.s; not significant). We performed two individual experiments and the representative data are shown. Data are presented as mean ± S.D.

(C) The amount of IgM paraprotein (IgM PP) of patients with WM was examined in the blood samples and the portion of PCs and LPCs was determined using flow cytometer.

IgM production in PCs and LPCs isolated from WM cell lines After FACS sorting, each fraction of WM cell lines was cultured for 72 h without stimuli and supernatant was collected after 72 h for IgM ELISA. (A) MWCL-1 and (B) BCWM.1. p values were calculated using one-way ANOVA (∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; n.s; not significant). We performed two individual experiments and the representative data are shown. Data are presented as mean ± S.D. (C) The amount of IgM paraprotein (IgM PP) of patients with WM was examined in the blood samples and the portion of PCs and LPCs was determined using flow cytometer.

Discussion

This study aimed to comprehensively characterize PCs which are postulated to play an important role in WM using immunophenotyping, MYD88 analysis, SNP microarray and next-generation sequencing; cell culture and quantification of IgM production to determine the secretory function of PCs relative to LPCs. MYD88 L265P is the most common somatic mutation in patients with WM occurring in nearly 90% of cases (Treon et al., 2012). To demonstrate that the PCs are clonally related to LPCs, we performed MYD88 mutation analysis. MYD88 L265P was detected in both PC and LPC populations of the WM cell lines as well as one of the two patient samples tested. The other patient was negative for MYD88 L265P and did not demonstrate the mutation in either PCs or LPCs. This result suggests that the MYD88 L265P mutation, when present, co-exists in the PCs derived from WM samples. The demonstration of heterozygous MYD88 L265P mutation on NGS in both populations of two cell lines and one of the two patients further points toward a similar clonal origin. This also potentially explains the similar rate of MYD88 L265P mutation detection in CD19-sorted or unsorted populations in earlier studies (Varettoni et al., 2017; Gustine et al., 2017a). Additionally, the analysis of IGHV sequences of WM cells can provide information about tumor cell origin and antigen dependence since IGHV3 gene rearrangements have been demonstrated in 77% of patients with WM with intermediate to high mutation rates (Gachard et al., 2013). In MWCL-1 cell line, both PCs and LPCs showed IGHV3-15∗01 while in BCWM-1, both expressed IGHV3-23∗01. These findings suggest that PCs are likely derived from differentiation of malignant LPCs in WM. The low mitotic index of plasma cells limits the utility of cytogenetic studies; however, fluorescent in situ hybridization or SNP microarray can be used to overcome this limitation (Cigudosa et al., 1998). In our study, there were no differences in SNP microarray identified between PCs and LPCs from either of the two cell lines or five of six patient samples examined (patients 2–6). However, patient 1 had a loss of 9p13.2 in the LPCs but not in the PCs. Deletion of the long arm of chromosome 6 is the most frequent cytogenetic abnormality seen in WM with a frequency of 38%–54% and is associated with adverse clinical and biological features along with deletion of 11q and trisomy 4 (Hunter et al., 2014; Nguẏen-Khac et al., 2013; Chang et al., 2009). Trisomy 18 (15%), 13q deletions (13%), 17p (TP53) deletions (8%), and trisomy 4 (8%) are some of the other aberrations seen (Nguyen-Khac et al., 2013). Deletions in the long arm of chromosome 6 (6q) involve genes that affect NF-kB including TNFAIP3 and HIVEP2, genes relating to apoptosis such as FOXO3, the BCL2 family of proteins (BCLAF1), and BTK (IBTK). The impact of 6q deletions on these genes remains to be elucidated. A 108MB deletion of 6q11.1-q27 was detected in <10% of both PC and LPC populations of MWCL-1. It was not detected in BCWM.1. Of the six patients with WM evaluated using SNP microarray, only two showed chromosomal abnormalities. Patient 1 had 49MB AOH in 3p26.3-p21.31 in 60%–70% of both PCs and LPCs along with differential copy number loss of 1.42MB in 9p13.2 in LPCs alone. Deletions of chromosome 9p has not been previously demonstrated in WM as a recurrent abnormality; however, t(9; 14) which juxtaposes PAX5 and IgH has been reported in WM but is not specific to this disease, being present in other low-grade lymphomas showing plasmacytic differentiation (George et al., 2005). One patient (patient 4) showed two regions of AOH, the first, a 14.6MB in 6q13-q15 and the second, 17.9MB in 7q31.1–32.3 along with a 562KB copy number loss of 22q11.22 in 100% of both populations, suggestive of a germline change. Another gene at this locus is RNF38 which plays a role in oncogenesis and has potential association with colonic adenocarcinomas but has no established role in lymphomagenesis. Thus, the significance of our finding remains uncertain at this stage but could be explored further in a larger number of samples to demonstrate differential loss in LPCs compared to PCs. Otherwise, no differences in microarray findings were noted in the cellular fractions of the WM cell lines or the other patient samples. Activating CXCR4 mutations (G protein-coupled chemokine receptor) are found in nearly one-third of patients with WM and more than 30 different types of nonsense and frameshift mutations in CXCR4 have been described with the most common variant being the C-terminus truncated mutation S338X (Hunter et al., 2014; Poulain et al., 2016). Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated enhanced and sustained AKT and ERK signaling leading to increased cell migration, adhesion, and survival of WM cells (Cao et al., 2015). Moreover, the presence of CXCR4 mutation in MYD88-mutated patients with WM on Ibrutinib is predictive of slower responses and low response rates (Treon et al., 2015). CXCR4 S338X mutation was found in both populations of one of the clinical samples and this patient showed high level (>90%) BM involvement and consequent cytopenias compared to the other patient not showing this mutation. These results are consistent with previous reports suggesting that patients with both MYD88 and truncated CXCR4 mutations have high BM LPC involvement and are more symptomatic (Chang et al., 2009; Treon et al., 2014; Schmidt et al., 2015; Cao et al., 2017). KMT2D mutations were observed in 24% of patients with WM in one study using NGS (Cigudosa et al., 1998). Other less common recurrent somatic abnormalities in WM include ARID1A (17%), CD79B (8%–15%), TP53 (10%), PRDM1 (6%), NOTCH2 (5%), and TRAF3.7,11 The frameshift mutation on ARID1A was detected in both cell populations of patient 2. NOTCH2 mutation was found in all samples except LPCs in BCWM.1 cell line. Altered NOTCH pathway signaling in lymphomas is associated with shorter PFS (Progression-free survival) and OS (Overall survival). Other mutations which have been previously described in WM include PRDM2 and SYNE1. PRDM2 gene mutation was noted in both populations in two WM cell lines and one clinical sample while the other patient sample only had this mutation in the CD19+ population. Novel mutations that have not been previously reported in WM but noted in our analysis include ALK, ATM, IKZF3, LONP1, MKI67, MTHER, MTRR, OBSCN, PLEKHG1, SYNE1, TET2, TNFRSF11a, UNC80, and ZFHX4. Some of these mutations have a well-known association with lymphomagenesis and solid organ malignancies. Of these, ALK, ATM, and TET2 have prognostic relevance—ALK mutation in anaplastic lymphoma being associated with favorable prognosis while ATM and TET2 confers adverse prognosis and shorter PFS in some lymphoid malignancies (Choi et al., 2016; Lemonnier et al., 2012). Mutations in FCGR3A were detected in all patients and polymorphisms within this gene have been associated with a favorable response to rituximab-based therapy (Treon et al., 2011). In summary, our mutational profiling indicates a similar clonal origin for both the LPC and PC in WM. Additionally, we have found some novel mutations not previously described in WM some of which may have prognostic relevance. However, the small number of clinical samples and the lack of clinical information (relapsed/refractory status and their prior treatments) which may affect the mutational profile due to clonal evolution is a limitation of this study which precludes definitive conclusions. The demonstration of newer mutations not previously seen in patients with WM may be further studied in a larger patient cohort to determine if these are recurring mutations as some of these may have prognostic significance or may even be potentially targetable. In MWCL1 cell line, the increase of PCs in the unsorted population is due to the simultaneous differentiation of LPCs because PCs are non-proliferative by itself. The decrease of LPCs and CD138+/CD38- cells in the PCs alone population is due to differentiation into PCs and the proliferation of LPCs and CD138+/CD38- cells did not overcome the rate of differentiation to PCs in this population (Figures 3A and 3C). In BCWM.1, the increase of PCs alone is the result of the differentiation of LPCs and CD138+/CD38- cells as result of minor contamination during sorting, and the increase of LPCs is the result of proliferation (Figures 3B and 3D). Our final objective was to determine which cellular fraction was responsible for IgM hypersecretion for which isolated PCs and LPCs from both cell lines were cultured for 72 h with culture media analyzed for IgM secretion. We found that unstimulated culture studies performed on the unsorted and LPCs alone demonstrated increase in the number of PCs (using CD138+/CD38+ enumeration) after 72 h in both cell lines supporting the long-held hypothesis of spontaneous differentiation (Figure 3). Subsequent determination of IgM secretion by ELISA confirmed the predominant role of PCs in its production as evidenced by the high IgM levels generated by PCs alone while smaller amounts noted from the LPC fraction is likely produced by the newly differentiated PCs. We also determined that the IgM production is correlated with PCs percentage in patients with WM (Figure 4). PCs can initiate the development of various malignancies, including multiple myeloma (Pal Singh et al., 2018). Therefore, therapeutic targeting of key molecules that drive differentiation and proliferation of PCs could improve the treatment outcome in malignancies driven by PCs. For instance, Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) plays a critical role in the proliferation and survival of PCs (Pal Singh et al., 2018). Therefore, inhibitors of BTK are promising treatment options not only in WM but also in malignancies such as multiple myeloma (Hendriks et al., 2014; Von Suskil et al., 2021). From a clinical perspective, this study has a potentially important implication for therapy. As we have shown for the first time, using cell culture techniques that the PC compartment is the major producer of IgM protein, there may be a role for targeting PCs to deepen responses. In summary, our findings also confirm the common derived hypothesis that PCs in WM are formed by differentiation of LPCs and hence are clonally related.

Limitations of this study

In this study, we used two WM cell lines (MWCL-1 and BCWM.1), and primary cells from patients with WM to characterize the molecular genetics and secretory function of PCs. However, experiments performed using cell lines may not mimic the complex biological processes in vivo. Furthermore, our study used a small number of patients, limiting us to draw firm conclusions regarding chromosomal copy number changes in patients with WM. Therefore, future studies using a larger cohort of patients with WM could provide further insights into the genetic and secretory function of PCs.

STAR★Methods

Key resources table

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Dipti Talaulikar (Dipti.Talaullikar@act.gov.au).

Materials availability

This study did not generate new unique reagents.

Experimental model and subject details

Cell lines and tissue culture

The human Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) cell lines, MWCL-1 and BCWM.1 were provided by the Ansell lab at the Mayo Clinic and the Treon lab at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute respectively.

Human study oversight

Patient samples were obtained from the ACT Haematology Research Tissue Bank. Bone marrow (BM) aspirates were collected after informed consent from six WM patients (four males and two females) with a median age of 71 years (range 56 to 78 years) after informed written consent was obtained. The selected patients were based on availability of BM samples. All the experiments were conducted as per guidelines of the ACT Health Human Research Ethics Committee (ACTH-HREC) under the protocol number ETHLR.12.170.

Method details

Cell line culture

Both WM cell lines were maintained in RPMI1640 containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum FBS (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 1× antibiotic-antimycotic (ThermoFisher, USA).

Cell sorting to isolate plasma cell and lymphoplasmacytic cell subpopulations

Flow cytometry sorting and magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) were used to sort cellular fractions from two WM cell lines and six WM patient samples. The sorted cellular fractions were applied for each experiment as summarised in Table S1.

Flow cytometry sorting

Both WM cell lines were pelleted by centrifugation at 300g and resuspended in PBS. A total of 5 × 105 cells were stained with fixable viability stain 700 at room temperature for 10 min in the dark and washed twice with PBS containing 2.5% FBS. Next, the cells were stained with the appropriate antibody combinations outlined in the Key resources table and Figure 1A and incubated at room temperature for 30 min in the dark. Cells were then washed twice in PBS containing 2.5% FBS and resuspended in a final volume of 200 μL PBS containing 1% FBS. The cells were then analysed by flow cytometry on a BD APF LSRII cytometer (BD Biosciences). For cell sorting, a total of 5 × 107 cells were stained with the antibody panel described in the Key resources table and separated using the BD FACS Aria I cell sorter (BD Biosciences). Firstly, cells were displayed on a forward scatter (FSC-A) versus side scatter (SSC-A) plot to discriminate debris and aggregates with low forward scatter and high side scatter. Doublets were eliminated using a forward-scatter height (FSC-H) versus forward-scatter area (FSC-A) plot. The negative fraction was gated using flexible viability stain 700 for live cell fractions and the live cells were then evaluated for expression of the cell surface markers. Cell preparations stained with antibodies against all markers except one (fluorescence minus one controls, FMO) were used to determine the gating boundary between positive and negative stained cells. For PCs, CD45low/CD138+/CD38+ cells were selected and for LPCs, CD45high/CD138-/CD19+/CD20+ cells were selected (Morice et al., 2007; Peceliunas et al., 2011; Howard et al., 2011). The purity of sorted cells was ascertained by running an aliquot of sorted cells back on the sorter, after finishing the sort. Flow cytometric analysis and cell sorting was performed at the Flow Cytometry Facility at the John Curtin School of Medical Research, ANU. Data was analysed using FlowJo v10.

Magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS)

Two cultured WM cell lines were sorted into CD138+ (PCs) and then CD19+/CD138- population (LPCs) using MACS Separator. This process was also applied to frozen BM from six WM patients. To elaborate, frozen BM aspirate was thawed using a 37 °C waterbath and then incubated with CD138 microbeads. The BM-bead mixture was filtered through a whole blood magnetic column where the magnetic beads attached to the CD138+ PCs remain in the column and the CD138- cells pass through and are collected for subsequent CD19 enrichment. An elution buffer then releases the beads from the magnet and the CD138+ eluate is collected. The CD138- cells were then incubated with CD19 microbeads and the cell-bead mixture was filtered through a whole blood magnetic column where the magnetic beads attached to the CD19+ lymphocytes remain in the column. All other cell types passing through the filter were discarded. An elution buffer was then used to release the beads from the magnet and the CD19+ eluate was collected. DNA extraction was performed on each eluted cell population using the QIAamp DNA mini kit (QIAGEN). The concentration of genomic DNA was quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific).

Genomic DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from PC and LPC populations from WM cell lines and WM patients using the QIAamp DNA mini kit following the manufacturers’ instructions (QIAGEN). The concentration of genomic DNA from each of the cell populations was quantified using the Qubit dsDNA BR assay kit (Molecular probes).

Mutational analysis of Myd88 and IgHV isotyping

Genomic DNA (20 ng) of each population was amplified with MyTaq HS DNA polymerase (BIOLINE) for 36 cycles in a T10 Thermal Cycler (BIO-RAD, USA): 95 °C for 15 s, 56 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C for 20 s. Primer sequences for MYD88 were as follows: Myd88 forward primer 5′-AATGTGTGCCAGGGGTACTTG-3′; Myd88 reverse primer 5′-GCCTTGTACTTGATGGGG-3′; Myd88 reverse primer for mutant (L265P) 5′-CCTTGTACTTGATGGGGAACG-3′. Primers were designed and evaluated to produce a 159bp amplicon which allowed for the detection of the Myd88 T>C substitution that encodes for the oncogenic MYD88 L265P variant (Xu et al., 2013). The immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgHV) was amplified with Biomed-2 specific primers for FR3 (Van Dongen et al., 2003). PCR products were analysed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. Gels were stained with GelRed (Biotium) and visualized using a Biorad ChemiDoc Touch imaging system. PCR products were excised from agarose gels and purified using the QIAquick gel extraction kit (QIAGEN), and then analysed by DNA Sanger sequencing performed at the Biomolecular Resource Facility (BRF) at the John Curtin School of Medical Research, ANU. Sequencing was analysed using NCBI IgBLAST tool.

DNA single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray

DNA extracted from PCs and LPCs (500 ng) from two cell lines and six patient samples was sent to a NATA accredited referral laboratory (Victorian Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Cytogenetics, The Royal Children's Hospital, for SNP microarray processing using the Illumina Infinium CoreExome SNP microarray. Data was returned from the referral laboratory via OwnCloud employing a secure login. SNP microarray variant call files and quality data were downloaded to the secure network in our organisation where they were accessed to be analysed using Karyostudio™ software.

Next generation sequencing

We designed a customized Capture Library targeting approximately 200 genes known to be related with tumorigenesis and lymphomagenesis (Morin et al., 2013; Lacy et al., 2020; Pasqualucci et al., 2011; Schmitz et al., 2018). The customized capture library was designed using SureDesign program and produced by Agilent. PCs and LPCs from both cell lines and two patient samples were used for this analysis. Genomic DNA (50 ng) was fragmented to between 150 bp and 200 bp in size using a Covaris S220 sonicator (Covaris) and the quality and quantity of fragmented DNA was assessed using Bioanalyser High Sensitivity DNA kit (Agilent Technologies, USA). The NGS library was prepared according to manufacturer’s manual for SureSelectXT Low Input Target Enrichment System for Illumina Paired-End Multiplexed Sequencing Library using Custom 0.5 - 2.9 Mb Capture library (Aqilent Technologies). The purified libraries were assessed using Bioanalyser High Sensitivity DNA kit and were sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq500 platform according to Illumina protocols, generating paired-end 100 bp reads. Somatic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) were identified in genomes using Agilent SureCall version 4.0 to be aligned to the human reference genome (GRCh37/HG19). We considered variants to generate an amino acid change, including frame shift, by filtering against variant allele frequency according to 1000G using cut offs scores of <0.1. The variants were further filtered for two tests; MAF dbSNP and SIFT score using cut offs scores of <0.1 for each test and the variants in intersection portion of three tests were selected as final list.

Determination of cell growth rate in each cell fractions from WM cell lines

FACS-sorted cells (5 × 104 cells per well for MWCL-1 cells; 2.5 × 104 cells per well for BCWM.1 cells) were seeded in 96-well plates and were cultured independently in the absence of mitogenic or cytokine stimulation for 72 h. A lower number of BCMW.1 sorted cells were seeded compared with MWCL-1 sorted cells to prevent the cell death during the 72 h of nutrient deprivation, because the doubling time of BCWM.1 cells is approximately 3-fold shorter is shorter than that of MWCL-1 cells. Cells were enumerated at the start and the end of culture to determine proliferation and differentiation. To determine the number of cells 72 h after culture without stimuli, 10 μL of 123count eBeads (ThermoFisher) was added to each sample of antibody-stained cells prior to flow cytometric analysis. The number of beads was counted at same time as flow cytometric analysis and cell counting for WM cell lines with a BD APF LSRII cytometer (BD Biosciences). The number of cells in the 200 μL of sample was then determined as follows: Absolute count (cells/μL) = [(Cell count X eBeads volume)/(eBead count X Cell volume)] x (eBeads Concentration)

ELISA

The sorted PC and LPC populations from the two cell lines were plated in a 96-well plate at a density of 1 × 106 cells/mL in 200 μL and cultured in RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS and 1 × antibiotic-antimycotic (ThermoFisher) without stimuli for 72 h. Cell-free supernatants were collected from each well and the IgM concentration was determined using the human IgM ELISA kit (Abcam, UK) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The optical densities were measured with an infinite M200PRO (TECAN, Switzerland) at a wavelength of 450 nm and at 570 nm as reference. The concentration of IgM was calculated from an IgM standard curve.

Quantification and statistical analysis

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using PRISM 9.0. Statistical significance was defined as NS, not statistically significant and p > 0.05; ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01. One-way ANOVA was used to analyse IgM secretion among samples. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to measure the association between IgM secretion and number of PCs. Data are presented as mean ± S.D. The details of statistical tests are provided in the relevant results section and figure legends.
REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Antibodies

Alexa 647-CD319BD Biosciences#564338; RRID:AB_2738754
APC-CD138DAKO#C7256; RRID:N/A
APC-H7-CD19BD Biosciences#560177; RRID:AB_1645470
BV421-CD38BD Biosciences#562444; RRID:AB_11151894
PerCP-CD20BD Biosciences#347674; RRID:AB_400339
V500-CD45BD Biosciences#560777; RRID:AB_1937324
Fixable viability stain 700BD Biosciences564997; RRID:AB_2869637
CD138 microbeadsMiltenyl Biotec#130-111-744
CD19 microbeadsMiltenyl Biotec#130-050-301

Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

AutoMACS running buffer & elution bufferMiltenyl Biotec#130-091-211
MyTaq HS DNA polymeraseBIOLINE#BIO-21111
GelRedBiotium#41003
123 count eBeadsAffymetrix#01-1234

Critical commercial assays

Qubit dsDNA BR assay kitMolecular probes#Q32850
Whole blood column kitMiltenyl Biotec#130-093-545
QIAamp DNA mini kitQIAGEN#51304
QIAquick gel extraction kitQIAGEN#28704
High sensitivity DNA kitAgilent Technologies#5067-4626
SureSelectXT Low Input Target Enrichment SystemAgilent Technologies#G9707B
Human IgM ELISA kitAbcam#ab137982

Oligonucleotides

Biomed-2 IGHv-specific primers FR3(Van Dongen et al., 2003)PMID: 14671650
VH1: TGGAGCTGAGCAGCCTGAGATCTGA(Van Dongen et al., 2003)PMID: 14671650
VH2: CAATGACCAACATGGACCCTGTGGA(Van Dongen et al., 2003)PMID: 14671650
VH3: TCTGCAAATGAACAGCCTGAGAGCC(Van Dongen et al., 2003)PMID: 14671650
VH4: GAGCTCTGTGACCGCCGCGGACACG(Van Dongen et al., 2003)PMID: 14671650
VH5: CAGCACCGCCTACCTGCAGTGGAGC(Van Dongen et al., 2003)PMID: 14671650
VH6: GTTCTCCCTGCAGCTGAACTCTGTG(Van Dongen et al., 2003)PMID: 14671650
VH7: CAGCACGGCATATCTGCAGATCAG(Van Dongen et al., 2003)PMID: 14671650
JH: CCAGTGGCAGAGGAGTCCATTC(Van Dongen et al., 2003)PMID: 14671650
Myd88 F: AATGTGTGCCAGGGGTACTTG(Xu et al., 2013)PMID: 23321251
Myd88 R: GCCTTGTACTTGATGGGG(Xu et al., 2013)PMID: 23321251
Myd88 L265P R: CCTTGTACTTGATGGGGAACG(Xu et al., 2013)PMID: 23321251

Software and algorithms

Flow JoBD Bioscienceshttps://www.flowjo.com
PRISM 9GraphPad Software, Inc.http://www.graphpad.com
Surecall 3.5 MacAgilent Technologieshttps://www.agilent.com/search/?Ntt=surecell
  55 in total

Review 1.  Plasma cells: finding new light at the end of B cell development.

Authors:  K L Calame
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 2.  Evidence-based focused review of management of hyperviscosity syndrome.

Authors:  Marvin J Stone; Steven A Bogen
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Novel multi-parameter flow cytometry sensitively detects phenotypically distinct plasma cell subsets in plasma cell proliferative disorders.

Authors:  W G Morice; C A Hanson; S Kumar; L A Frederick; C E Lesnick; P R Greipp
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Mutational and structural analysis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma using whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Ryan D Morin; Karen Mungall; Erin Pleasance; Andrew J Mungall; Rodrigo Goya; Ryan D Huff; David W Scott; Jiarui Ding; Andrew Roth; Readman Chiu; Richard D Corbett; Fong Chun Chan; Maria Mendez-Lago; Diane L Trinh; Madison Bolger-Munro; Greg Taylor; Alireza Hadj Khodabakhshi; Susana Ben-Neriah; Julia Pon; Barbara Meissner; Bruce Woolcock; Noushin Farnoud; Sanja Rogic; Emilia L Lim; Nathalie A Johnson; Sohrab Shah; Steven Jones; Christian Steidl; Robert Holt; Inanc Birol; Richard Moore; Joseph M Connors; Randy D Gascoyne; Marco A Marra
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Lymphoid neoplasms associated with IgM paraprotein: a study of 382 patients.

Authors:  Pei Lin; Suyang Hao; Beverly C Handy; Carlos E Bueso-Ramos; L Jeffrey Medeiros
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Somatic mutations in MYD88 and CXCR4 are determinants of clinical presentation and overall survival in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia.

Authors:  Steven P Treon; Yang Cao; Lian Xu; Guang Yang; Xia Liu; Zachary R Hunter
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Prevalence and clinical significance of the MYD88 (L265P) somatic mutation in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia and related lymphoid neoplasms.

Authors:  Marzia Varettoni; Luca Arcaini; Silvia Zibellini; Emanuela Boveri; Sara Rattotti; Roberta Riboni; Alessandro Corso; Ester Orlandi; Maurizio Bonfichi; Manuel Gotti; Cristiana Pascutto; Silvia Mangiacavalli; Giorgio Croci; Valeria Fiaccadori; Lucia Morello; Maria Luisa Guerrera; Marco Paulli; Mario Cazzola
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Clinical Impact of the 2016 Update to the WHO Lymphoma Classification.

Authors:  Ryan C Lynch; Dita Gratzinger; Ranjana H Advani
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-07

9.  Genetics and Pathogenesis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Roland Schmitz; George W Wright; Da Wei Huang; Calvin A Johnson; James D Phelan; James Q Wang; Sandrine Roulland; Monica Kasbekar; Ryan M Young; Arthur L Shaffer; Daniel J Hodson; Wenming Xiao; Xin Yu; Yandan Yang; Hong Zhao; Weihong Xu; Xuelu Liu; Bin Zhou; Wei Du; Wing C Chan; Elaine S Jaffe; Randy D Gascoyne; Joseph M Connors; Elias Campo; Armando Lopez-Guillermo; Andreas Rosenwald; German Ott; Jan Delabie; Lisa M Rimsza; Kevin Tay Kuang Wei; Andrew D Zelenetz; John P Leonard; Nancy L Bartlett; Bao Tran; Jyoti Shetty; Yongmei Zhao; Dan R Soppet; Stefania Pittaluga; Wyndham H Wilson; Louis M Staudt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Analysis of the coding genome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Laura Pasqualucci; Vladimir Trifonov; Giulia Fabbri; Jing Ma; Davide Rossi; Annalisa Chiarenza; Victoria A Wells; Adina Grunn; Monica Messina; Oliver Elliot; Joseph Chan; Govind Bhagat; Amy Chadburn; Gianluca Gaidano; Charles G Mullighan; Raul Rabadan; Riccardo Dalla-Favera
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 38.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.