Jianghong Zhong1,2, Chanyu Zheng3, Haiqiang Gao3, Wei Tong4, Hui Hui4, Jie Tian1,2,4. 1. School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China. 2. Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine (Beihang University), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing, 100191, China. 3. School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China. 4. CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, The State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Abstract
It is challenging to visualize noninvasively the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps, known as NETosis, and therefore difficult to monitor disease progression. A desirable molecular imaging probe is the iron oxide nanoparticle (NP) that could induce reactive oxygen species. Here, we used C57BL/6 mice with pristane-induced lupus, which mimics systemic lupus erythematosus. Administration of anti-Ly6G antibody-conjugated NP allowed detection of NETosis with fluorescent molecular imaging, as evidenced by flow cytometric analysis of citrullinated histone H3 expression in lung neutrophils. This finding was consistent with NP-induced blood NETosis in a spontaneous lupus model of B6.MRL-lpr mice. A chronic assessment was performed in which the lupus mice were protected from enhanced oxidative burst by anti-Ly6G NP. This NP can migrate from the peritoneal cavity to the lungs, as visualized by magnetic particle imaging. Overall, our study provides evidence for a highly sensitive assessment of NETosis in lupus through magnetic particle imaging.
It is challenging to visualize noninvasively the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps, known as NETosis, and therefore difficult to monitor disease progression. A desirable molecular imaging probe is the iron oxide nanoparticle (NP) that could induce reactive oxygen species. Here, we used C57BL/6 mice with pristane-induced lupus, which mimics systemic lupus erythematosus. Administration of anti-Ly6G antibody-conjugated NP allowed detection of NETosis with fluorescent molecular imaging, as evidenced by flow cytometric analysis of citrullinated histone H3 expression in lung neutrophils. This finding was consistent with NP-induced blood NETosis in a spontaneous lupus model of B6.MRL-lpr mice. A chronic assessment was performed in which the lupus mice were protected from enhanced oxidative burst by anti-Ly6G NP. This NP can migrate from the peritoneal cavity to the lungs, as visualized by magnetic particle imaging. Overall, our study provides evidence for a highly sensitive assessment of NETosis in lupus through magnetic particle imaging.
Recently, extensive evidence of the oxidative stress-mediated formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), known as NETosis, has been associated with poorer prognosis in patients with lupus [1, 2, 3] and lung disease [4, 5, 6]. However, it remains a challenge for NETosis detection to discover imaging-based biomarkers.Biomarker imaging is traditionally understood as imaging of molecular probes. Given the limitations of conventional molecular probes, iron oxide nanoparticles (NP) have been considered as an innovative solution. Recently, injectable NP ferumoxytol has received marketing approval [7]. Immediately, the application of ferumoxytol expanded into lupus diagnosis [8]. It will be interesting for the concept to integrate both molecular biomarkers and NP within new imaging instruments. It may enable a promising new imaging solution, i.e. magnetic particle imaging (MPI) through the application of oscillating magnetic fields for detection and field gradients for localization [9, 10, 11].We have previously found that a natural mutation in the Ncf1 gene impairs the formation of the NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2) complex and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [1, 12], promotes the proliferation of autoreactive CD4 T cells in spontaneous arthritis [13, 14], enhances autoimmune encephalomyelitis in the absence of inducible nitric oxide [15], promotes the spread of psoriasis through innate production of interleukin 17 (IL-17) [16, 17, 18], activates STAT1 signaling in exaggerated lupus [19], and suppresses NETosis in neutrophils prepared from patients with the chronic granulomatous disease and autoimmune disorders [3, 20]. 147-base pair of NET DNA is typically packed around a histone octamer composed of two copies of each of the histones H3, H4, H2A, and H2B [21]. NET-mediated cytokine induction was observed to depend on H3 citrullination [22], which may provide a new mechanistic paradigm and therapeutic avenue to treat chronic inflammatory diseases. Of importance, NOX2 complex-regulated NETosis was further found in both mouse models and human patients in a nanoparticle size-dependent manner [23, 24, 25]. Therefore, the idea may be interesting to combine both the size-dependent effect and additional NET markers such as Ly6G and H3cit to increase the targeting specificity of NP in tracking lupus.Here we report the study of anti-Ly6G antibody-conjugated NP (Ly6G-NP) in lupus models using in vivo imaging systems. Two models have been developed by C57BL/6J (B6) mice with pristane-induced lupus and B6.MRL-lpr mice with a mutation in the Fas gene leading to spontaneous lupus, respectively. We observed a high accumulation of fluorescent Ly6G-NP in the lungs of the lupus mice. The mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) of Ly6G-NP are associated with the expression of citrullinated histone H3 (H3cit), which is a known biomarker for NETosis [19, 20]. The safety of Ly6G-NP was evaluated by examining the level of ROS production in lupus mice. We found lower ROS in the presence of Ly6G-NP using chemiluminescence imaging. The transport of NP from the peritoneal cavity to the lungs was visualized through MPI. Thus, this study provides an approach to the visualization of NETosis in lupus.
Results
Ly6G-NP imaging associated with NETosis
To comprehensively mimic both NADPH oxidase-dependent and independent ROS signalling that may contribute to NETosis in lupus, we used the NADPH oxidase inhibitor apocynin in a mouse model [26, 27]. The dual-mode scanning of fluorescent Ly6G-NP in vitro was performed. Each vial sample contained a volume of 20 μL. Fluorescence intensity and MPI signal at different concentrations of Ly6G-NP were recorded (Figure 1a and 1b). In the range of 0–25 μg/mL, both the fluorescence intensity (Y = 1.56 ×105 X + 2.017 × 107, R2 = 0.7441, P < 0.05) and MPI signal (Y = 0.4378X + 1.367, R2 = 0.8020, P < 0.05) of Ly6G-NP showed a linear correlation with the probe concentration. We intranasally injected 8-week-old B6 mice, with fluorescent Ly6G-NP on 6-day-post-immunization (DPI) of pristane. In vivo optical imaging of lupus mice was performed at both 6 h and 24 h after injection of Ly6G-NP into mice. After optical imaging, flow cytometric analysis of both lungs and spleen was performed. The representative graph of fluorescent molecular imaging is shown in Figure 1c. We found a lower radiation efficiency of the lungs from the apocynin-treated mice (Figure 1d and 1e) than that in the control mice receiving phosphate buffer saline (PBS). To better understand the radiation efficiency of Ly6G-NP imaging, the underlying immune responses were analyzed using flow cytometric gating strategies (Figure S1). Compared with control mice, apocynin-treated mice showed lower ROS production (Figure 2a) and H3cit expression (Figure 2b) in splenic neutrophils ex vivo after stimulation with phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA). It did not affect the level of H3cit expression in splenic monocytes (Figure 2c). These results suggest that fluorescent molecular imaging of Ly6G-NP was associated with NETosis.
Figure 1
Fluorescent molecular imaging of lupus mice. The dual-mode scanning of fluorescent AF647-conjugated Ly6G-NP in vitro was performed with six vial samples. a, Optical intensity and, b, MPI signal were recorded, whereas both optical signal (R2 = 0.7441, P < 0.05) and MPI signal (R2 = 0.8020, P < 0.05) of Ly6G-NP showed a linear correlation with the probe concentration, c, in the range of 0–25 μg/mL. C57BL/6J mice with pristane-induced lupus (PIL) were treated with the NADPH oxidase inhibitor apocynin (5 mmol/L) in drinking water, whereas the same volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was used as a negative control. Both groups of mice were injected intranasally with the fluorescent Ly6G-NP on 6 day-post-immunization (DPI) of pristane, which was scanned by optical imaging at 6 h and 24 h, respectively. d, A representative graph of optical imaging at 24 h after injection of Ly6G-NP. e, In vivo radiant efficiency of Ly6G-NP in the lung region. f, Ex vivo radiant efficiency of Ly6G-NP in the lung. Each symbol represents one animal in graph e and f. The mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) is shown in each graph quoting the P value: P < 0.05 ∗, which is determined by the Mann-Whitney U test.
Figure 2
ROS production of splenic myeloid cells in lupus mice. PIL mice of C57BL/6J strain were treated with apocynin, while PBS was used as a negative control. Both groups of mice were injected with Ly6G-NP (5 g/mL) at 6 DPI of pristane, and spleen cells were harvested 24 h after injection of Ly6G-NP. Both dihydrorhodamine (DHR) assay and citrullinated histone H3 (H3cit) expression were determined after ex vivo stimulation with phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA, 100 ng/mL). a, DHR staining of myeloid cells in a relative unit (RLU, DMSO was used as the negative control). b, Mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) of H3cit staining in splenic neutrophils (CD11b+Ly6G+). c, MFI of H3cit staining in splenic monocytes (CD11b+Ly6G−). Each symbol represents one animal in each graph, and the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) is shown. Interaction ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, row factor ∗p < 0.05, and column factor ∗∗p < 0.01 as determined by two-way ANOVA test in a. The P value is defined by the Mann-Whitney U test: P < 0.05 ∗ in b.
Fluorescent molecular imaging of lupus mice. The dual-mode scanning of fluorescent AF647-conjugated Ly6G-NP in vitro was performed with six vial samples. a, Optical intensity and, b, MPI signal were recorded, whereas both optical signal (R2 = 0.7441, P < 0.05) and MPI signal (R2 = 0.8020, P < 0.05) of Ly6G-NP showed a linear correlation with the probe concentration, c, in the range of 0–25 μg/mL. C57BL/6J mice with pristane-induced lupus (PIL) were treated with the NADPH oxidase inhibitor apocynin (5 mmol/L) in drinking water, whereas the same volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was used as a negative control. Both groups of mice were injected intranasally with the fluorescent Ly6G-NP on 6 day-post-immunization (DPI) of pristane, which was scanned by optical imaging at 6 h and 24 h, respectively. d, A representative graph of optical imaging at 24 h after injection of Ly6G-NP. e, In vivo radiant efficiency of Ly6G-NP in the lung region. f, Ex vivo radiant efficiency of Ly6G-NP in the lung. Each symbol represents one animal in graph e and f. The mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) is shown in each graph quoting the P value: P < 0.05 ∗, which is determined by the Mann-Whitney U test.ROS production of splenic myeloid cells in lupus mice. PIL mice of C57BL/6J strain were treated with apocynin, while PBS was used as a negative control. Both groups of mice were injected with Ly6G-NP (5 g/mL) at 6 DPI of pristane, and spleen cells were harvested 24 h after injection of Ly6G-NP. Both dihydrorhodamine (DHR) assay and citrullinated histone H3 (H3cit) expression were determined after ex vivo stimulation with phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA, 100 ng/mL). a, DHR staining of myeloid cells in a relative unit (RLU, DMSO was used as the negative control). b, Mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) of H3cit staining in splenic neutrophils (CD11b+Ly6G+). c, MFI of H3cit staining in splenic monocytes (CD11b+Ly6G−). Each symbol represents one animal in each graph, and the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) is shown. Interaction ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, row factor ∗p < 0.05, and column factor ∗∗p < 0.01 as determined by two-way ANOVA test in a. The P value is defined by the Mann-Whitney U test: P < 0.05 ∗ in b.
NP-induced NETosis
To demonstrate the direct association of NP with NETosis, we collected blood cells from a spontaneous lupus model of B6.MRL-lpr mice. These were analyzed together with healthy individuals from the naïve B6 mice. Blood cells were incubated for 2 h in the presence of unconjugated NP (1 μg/mL), followed by immunostaining of DNA, H3cit, and Ly6G to qualify NETs (Figure 3a). We found that a strong increase in H3cit expression was induced by NP for samples prepared from lupus mice (Figure 3b).
Figure 3
Immunostaining of the blood NETs. Blood samples were prepared using B6.MRL-lpr lupus-susceptible mice, and H3cit expression was determined after ex vivo stimulation with 1 g/mL NP. a, Representative graphs of NETosis in blood cells by using Ly6G, H3cit, and DNA staining. Scale bar indicates 300 m. b, MFI of H3cit staining in NETs. Each symbol represents one animal in each graph, and the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) is shown. Row factor ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and column factor ∗∗p < 0.01 as determined by two-way ANOVA test. The P value is defined by the Mann-Whitney U test: p < 0.05 ∗, p < 0.01 ∗∗.
Immunostaining of the blood NETs. Blood samples were prepared using B6.MRL-lpr lupus-susceptible mice, and H3cit expression was determined after ex vivo stimulation with 1 g/mL NP. a, Representative graphs of NETosis in blood cells by using Ly6G, H3cit, and DNA staining. Scale bar indicates 300 m. b, MFI of H3cit staining in NETs. Each symbol represents one animal in each graph, and the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) is shown. Row factor ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and column factor ∗∗p < 0.01 as determined by two-way ANOVA test. The P value is defined by the Mann-Whitney U test: p < 0.05 ∗, p < 0.01 ∗∗.
Oxidative regulation and emigration of Ly6G-NP
To evaluate the neutrophil-dependent effects of Ly6G-NP associated with oxidative stress, we injected it once at a dose of 50 μg/mouse into the peritoneal cavity of B6 mice at 0 DPI of pristane. In vivo small animal imaging was performed using a luminol-based chemiluminescent probe L-012 (1 mg/mouse) every week for one month (Figure 4a). We show decreased production of ROS in the presence of Ly6G-NP at both 7 and 14 DPI of pristane, compared with the control group of mice (Figure 4b). To further validate the emigration of Ly6G-NP and the effect on NETosis, these lupus mice were scanned 24 h after intranasal injection of AF647-conjugated Ly6G-NP (5 μg/mouse), i.e., 28 DPI of pristane, using dual-modular molecular imaging. We find that these two groups of mice showed similar radiation efficiency of fluorescent Ly6G-NP on the upper surface near the lung (Figure S2), whereas the magnetic signal intensity of the lung was higher in lupus mice receiving Ly6G-NP than in controls (Figure 5a and 5b). These results suggest that Ly6G-NP can be migrated from the peritoneal cavity to the lung and accumulate in the lung for 4 weeks, but they did not affect the detection of dynamic NETosis through a fluorescent molecular probe (Figure 5c).
Figure 4
Chemiluminescence imaging of lupus mice. Each B6 mouse was administrated intraperitoneally at a dose of 200 μL with both 50 μg Ly6G-NP and PBS at 0 DPI of pristane. Production of ROS was detected using a luminol-based molecular imaging probe L-012 (1 mg/mouse) at the indicated time point. a, A representative graph of small animal imaging at 7 DPI of pristane. b, Optical radiance on the top of the abdomen after injection of pristane. Each symbol represents one animal, and the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) is shown in b. The P value is defined by the Mann-Whitney U test: p < 0.05 ∗.
Figure 5
Magnetic particle imaging of the inflammatory tissues. Each B6 mouse was administrated intraperitoneally at a dose of 200 μL with both 50 μg Ly6G-NP and PBS at 0 DPI of pristane. Fluorescent AF647-conjugated Ly6G-NP (5 g/mouse) was injected intranasally into mice one day before magnetic particle imaging. a, Representative graphs of magnetic particle imaging at 28 DPI of pristane. a1, Tissues (kidney, spleen, liver, lung, and heart) were harvested from a mouse after optical imaging, compared with a standard marker containing 0.1 g Ly6G-NP. a2, Magnetic particle imaging of these tissues; a3, Magnetic particle imaging of. the tissues excluding the liver. a4, Schematic representation of Ly6G-NP distribution in the tissues. b, Statistics of Ly6G-NP distribution in the lung ex vivo. Each symbol represents one animal, and the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) is shown in b. The P value is defined by the Mann-Whitney U test: p < 0.05 ∗. c, A study scheme of fluorescent Ly6G-NP through dual-modular molecular imaging for NETosis detection in priming and chronic phases of lupus, respectively.
Chemiluminescence imaging of lupus mice. Each B6 mouse was administrated intraperitoneally at a dose of 200 μL with both 50 μg Ly6G-NP and PBS at 0 DPI of pristane. Production of ROS was detected using a luminol-based molecular imaging probe L-012 (1 mg/mouse) at the indicated time point. a, A representative graph of small animal imaging at 7 DPI of pristane. b, Optical radiance on the top of the abdomen after injection of pristane. Each symbol represents one animal, and the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) is shown in b. The P value is defined by the Mann-Whitney U test: p < 0.05 ∗.Magnetic particle imaging of the inflammatory tissues. Each B6 mouse was administrated intraperitoneally at a dose of 200 μL with both 50 μg Ly6G-NP and PBS at 0 DPI of pristane. Fluorescent AF647-conjugated Ly6G-NP (5 g/mouse) was injected intranasally into mice one day before magnetic particle imaging. a, Representative graphs of magnetic particle imaging at 28 DPI of pristane. a1, Tissues (kidney, spleen, liver, lung, and heart) were harvested from a mouse after optical imaging, compared with a standard marker containing 0.1 g Ly6G-NP. a2, Magnetic particle imaging of these tissues; a3, Magnetic particle imaging of. the tissues excluding the liver. a4, Schematic representation of Ly6G-NP distribution in the tissues. b, Statistics of Ly6G-NP distribution in the lung ex vivo. Each symbol represents one animal, and the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) is shown in b. The P value is defined by the Mann-Whitney U test: p < 0.05 ∗. c, A study scheme of fluorescent Ly6G-NP through dual-modular molecular imaging for NETosis detection in priming and chronic phases of lupus, respectively.
Discussion
We report that Ly6G-NP can be used as a molecular imaging probe to monitor NETosis by tracking H3cit expression in priming and chronic phases of lupus through a sensitive MPI scanner.The dissection of NETs subunits is an area of increasing investigation since NETs were discovered in inflammatory diseases [28, 29, 30]. Recently, a list of common immunologic targets of NETs has been identified in both the cellular and extracellular fluid components of lung samples using proteomic analysis and intravital microscopy imaging. One of the commonly used biomarkers is the expression of H3cit as the origin of the citrullinome in both lupus and lung diseases [19, 31, 32]. Compared with intravital fluorescence microscopy, noninvasively molecular imaging can directly visualize the redox regulation of immune response to stimuli [10, 17, 33]. However, the lack of molecular probes is a problem for NETosis detection [19, 32, 34].Ferumoxytol is a prescription drug used in the United States to treat iron deficiency anemia and has recently shown promise as a molecular probe in clinical diagnosis [9, 10]. Herrmann and colleagues found that nanoparticles as small as 10 nm size enhance NETosis in a manner dependent on the NOX2 complex-derived ROS [35]. Based on NP of size 14 nm, Chandrasekharan and colleagues used Ly6G-NP at a clinically relevant dose (5–5.5 mg Fe/kg, 40 g protein/mouse) to track neutrophils toward inflammation by magnetic particle imaging [36]. The distribution of Ly6G-NP concentrated in the liver [36].In this study, we coupled the size-dependent effect of fluorescent NP with the selective recognition ability of anti-Ly6G antibodies (10 nm, 5 g NP conjugated with 2 μg antibody per mouse) to track neutrophils [37, 38]. Based on this molecular imaging probe of fluorescent Ly6G-NP, we show that fluorescent molecular imaging of lupus mice can quantify NETs. It was successful in noninvasively tracking H3cit expression in the lung, although in vivo signals were detected weaker than ex vivo signals due to optical absorption properties of tissues. Similar results of lungs displayed with an MPI scanner. One of the most important advantages of MPI is that the linear correction improved between detection signals with a low abundance of NP, compared with fluorescent molecular imaging. However, the liver highlighted as a potential downstream of metabolic pathways for NP.In summary, our study provides an opportunity to assess noninvasively the NETs formation by tracking H3cit expression in lung disease with Ly6G-NP. Of importance, using Ly6G-NP could protect against oxidative stress in the priming stage of lupus, and did not affect on the re-detection of NETosis after a prolonged period.
Limitations of the study
To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time to visualize noninvasively the NETosis by tracking H3cit with anti-Ly6G iron oxide nanoparticles in a lupus mouse model. In our study, the lupus mice were scanned by fluorescence molecular imaging, showing the accumulation of Ly6G-NP in the lung. This fluorescence molecular imaging was associated with the H3cit expression of neutrophils by flow cytometric analysis. The ROS production was evaluated by chemiluminescent imaging, whereas magnetic particle imaging validates the NP distribution, respectively. However, we observed over 95% of administered NP accumulated in the liver 24 h after injection into the mice. We hypothesized that it is safe for lupus mice with the accumulation of NP. This hypothesis and the potential role of NETs in the liver require further experimental study, despite complementary applications of multimodal molecular imaging.
Materials and methods
Animals
Founders of B6 (C57BL/6J, Stock No: 000664) and B6.MRL-lpr (Stock No: 000482) mice are originally from the JAX Lab (Bar Harbor, Maine) and maintained by the Charles River laboratory (Beijing, China) as inbred lines. The primers for Faslpr genotyping are as following: 5′-TAG AAA GGT GCA CGG GTG TG-3’ (mutant reverse), 5′-GTA AAT AAT TGT GCT TCG TCA G-3’ (common), 5′-CAA ATC TAG GCA TTA ACA GTG-3’ (wild type reverse). Littermate male mice were used in our experiments, and the identity was blinded for the investigator. Mice were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions in individually ventilated cages with wood shaving bedding in a climate-controlled environment having a 12-h light/dark cycle. We have mixed experimental cages of 6- to 8-week-old homozygous littermates. Each adult mouse weighed approximately 25 g. Experimental groups were randomized and distributed among mixed cages. The animal study protocols were approved by animal ethics committee in Beihang University, China (BM20210060).
Antibodies
The following antibodies were purchased from BioLegend, as, CD11b (clone: M1/70, APC), Ly6G (clone: 1A8, PerCP/Cy5.5), Ly-6C (clone: HK1.4, PerCP/Cy5.5), PDC-TREM (clone: 4A6, PE), TCR γ/δ (clone: GL3, PE/Cyanine7), and Ki67 (clone: 16A8, APC). Antibodies for CD16/CD32 (clone: 2.4G2, purified), CD45 (clone: 30-F11, PE-Cyanine7), Gr-1 (clone: RB6-8C5, APC), CD3ε (clone: 145-2C11, PerCP/Cy5.5), CD4 (clone: RM4-5, FITC), B220 (clone: RA3-6B2, PerCP/Cy5.5), MHC II Ap (clone: AF6-120.1, FITC), and IL-17 (clone: TC11-18H10, PE) were purchased from BD Biosciences. Antibodies for H3cit (clone: H3 citrulline R2+R8+R17, Catalog No. ab5103), IgG H&L (goat anti-rabbit, Catalog No. ab175471, PE) were purchased from abcam. Antibodies for Ly6G (clone: 1A8, Biotin) and its isotype control IgG2a were purchased from Leinco Technologies. The use of antibodies is according to the suggestions from the source companies, and the classical dilution ratio of the stock solution is 1:200 for flow cytometry staining.
Pristane induced lupus
Mice were injected intraperitoneally with 300 mL of pristane (Catalog No. P2870, Sigma-Aldrich, US). The presence of serum anti-double stran-ded DNA (anti-dsDNA) IgG antibody was identified by Crithidia luciliae assay (Catalog No. KMS-H6290C, Kmaels, China).
In vivo optical imaging
Each mouse was injected intraperitoneally with 200 μL 1.25% avertin (2,2,2-tribromoethanol, Catalog No. T903147-5g, Macklin, China). When mice were anaesthetized, a chemiluminescent prob L-012 (Catalog No. 120-04891, Wako, Tokyo, Japan) was injected with a dose of 1 mg/mouse for the detection of ROS by using bioluminescent imaging model of the IVIS ® Spectrum in vivo imaging system (PerkinElmer, Shanghai, China). To perform fluorescent molecular imaging of each mouse, we prepared the fluorescent probe by using the protocol: 5 μg of AF647-iron oxide nanoparticles-neutravidin (10 nm, Catalog No. CM1, NanoparTZ, Loveland, CO, US) was mixed with 2 μg anti-Ly6G-biotin antibody in purified water, incubated on the ice for 10 min, and sorted by using the DynaMagTM-15 (Thermofisher, Catalog No. 12301D, Shanghai, China). Each lupus mouse was scanned by using fluorescent molecular imaging model of the IVIS Spectrum imager at 24 h after intranasal administration of 5 μg fluorescent Ly6G-NP.
Magnetic particle imaging
We used iron oxide nanoparticles-neutravidin with fluorescent dye AF647 (10 nm, Catalog No. CM1, NanoparTZ, Loveland, CO, US) to conjugate anti-Ly6G-biotin antibody at a mass ratio of 5:2. This Ly6G-NP was sorted and injected intraperitoneally in lupus mice at a dose of 50 μg/mouse, whereas PBS was used as the negative control. On 28 DPI of pristane, i.e., 24 h after intranasal administration of fluorescent Ly6G-NP (2 μg of antibody conjugated to 5 μg of NP per mouse), the lungs were harvested. The tissue sample was scanned (MOMENTUM, Magnetic Insight, Alameda, CA, USA) with a magnetic field gradient strength of 6 T/m, a detection limitation of 100 nM NP [10]. Two-dimensional imaging was performed using the following parameters: FOV: 5 × 10 cm; scan mode: isotropic; total time: 2 min. VivoQuant software (VivoQuant 4.0, Invicro, Boston, MA, USA) was used to analyze the images.
Flow cytometry analysis
The single-cell suspensions derived from spleens were analyzed with flow cytometry. Red blood cells were lysed with Ammonium-Chloride-Potassium (ACK) buffer to make single-cell suspensions [18]. Single-cell suspensions of the lymph nodes were generated through 40 μm filters (Falcon cell strainer, Catalog No. 352340, China) by gravity. The cell density was counted by using EVE automated cell counter (NanoEntek, Seoul, Korea). The cell sample was stained with a LIVE/DEAD® fixable near-IR dead cell stain (ThermoFisher, Catalog No. L10119, China). After an anti-mouse CD16/CD32 Fc block, extracellular antigens were stained 20 min at 4 °C in PBS with 1% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, ThermoFisher, Catalog No. 26140079, China). To measure intracellular ROS, the staining of 3 μM Dihydrorhodamine 123 (DHR, ThermoFisher, Catalog No. D23806, China) was conducted respectively after cell surface markers staining, followed by stimulation of 100 ng/mL of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, Sigma-Aldrich Co., CAS No. 16561-29-8, China) for 30 min. To detect the intracellular expression of H3cit, the cells were stimulated with 100 ng/mL of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, Sigma-Aldrich Co., CAS No. 16561-29-8, China) and 1 μg/mL of ionomycin (ThermoFisher, Catalog No. I24222, China) in the presence of 5 μg/mL of brefeldin A (BFA, ThermoFisher, Catalog No. B7450, China) for 4 h at a humidified 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator (BB150, Thermo Scientific, Beijing, China). The stock solutions of PMA, ionomycin, and brefeldin A were prepared with dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich Co., CAS No. 67-68-5, China). For intracellular staining of H3cit, cells were fixed and permeabilized by Foxp3/transcription factor fixation/permeabilization concentrate and diluent solutions (eBioscience, Catalog No. 00-5521-00, China) and permeabilization buffer (eBioscience, Catalog No. 00-8333-56, China). Samples were acquired using BD FACSCanto II cell analyzer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, US). The workstation is managed by FACSDiva software version 8.0 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, US), and the data were analysed using the FlowJo software version 10.4 (TreeStar, Ashland, OR, US).
Immunofluorescence microscopy
A blood sample of 30 μL was collected from the submandibular facial vein for each mouse. Red blood cells were lysed with ammonium-chloride-potassium (ACK) buffer to make single-cell suspensions [18]. To prepare the samples, the glass-coverslip (Jingan, Shanghai, China) was coated with 5 μg/mL of fibronectin (Sigma, Catalog No. F-0895, China) overnight at 4 °C. To detect NETs, blood cells were incubated in DMEM (gibco, ThermoFisher, Catalog No. A41921, China) for 2 h at a humidified 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for them to adhere to the glass-coverslips coated with fibronectin. Blood cells were then treated with 1 μg/mL of NP (10 nm, Catalog No. CM1, NanoparTZ, Loveland, US) for 2 h at the 5% CO2 incubator in order to trigger NETosis. Furthermore, the cells were stained with the Hoescht 33258 (Blue-absorbing). Then, cells were fixed the cells with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma, Catalog No. 158127, China) plus 0.5% glutaraldehyde (Sigma, Catalog No. 6257, China) in PBS (gibco, ThermoFisher, Catalog No. 10010023, China). Samples were blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma, Catalog V900933, China) in PBS, washed by using 1% FBS+0.05% Tween 20 (Sigma, Catalog No. P1379, China) in PBS. After an anti-mouse CD16/CD32 Fc block, extracellular antigens Ly6G were stained 10 min at 4 °C in PBS. Subsequently, samples were incubated with anti-histone 3 citrulline R2+R8+R17 (Abcam), followed by Alexa Fluor 568–conjugated rabbit anti-goat. Samples were mounted in ProLong Gold (ThermoFisher, Catalog No. P36930, China) and examined by Andor Dragonfly 200 confocal microscope (Oxford, Shanghai, China) and analyzed using Fiji/ImageJ software. NET release was quantitated using ImageJ software.
Statistics
Statistical analyses were performed with Graph Prism software, version 8.4.3 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, UAS). Unless otherwise stated, the Mann-Whitney U test was used. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered as significant: ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01. The mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) is shown for all the results.
Declarations
Author contribution statement
Jianghong Zhong: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.Chanyu Zheng: Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.Haiqiang Gao; Wei Tong; Hui Hui: Performed the experiments; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.Jie Tian: Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.
Funding statement
Jie Tian was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0700401] and [2017YFA0700200].Jie Tian was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China [62027901] and [81827808].Hui Hui was supported by Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [2018167].Jie Tian was supported by the Project of High-level Talents Team Introduction in Zhuhai city [Zhuhai HLHPTP201703].Jianghong Zhong was supported by Beihang University [KG160-80401].
Data availability statement
Data included in article/supp. material/referenced in article.
Declaration of interest’s statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary content related to this article has been published online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10043.
Authors: Jason S Knight; Venkataraman Subramanian; Alexander A O'Dell; Srilakshmi Yalavarthi; Wenpu Zhao; Carolyne K Smith; Jeffrey B Hodgin; Paul R Thompson; Mariana J Kaplan Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Felix C Weber; Tamás Németh; Janka Z Csepregi; Anne Dudeck; Axel Roers; Béla Ozsvári; Eva Oswald; László G Puskás; Thilo Jakob; Attila Mócsai; Stefan F Martin Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Mona H C Biermann; Malgorzata J Podolska; Jasmin Knopf; Christiane Reinwald; Daniela Weidner; Christian Maueröder; Jonas Hahn; Deborah Kienhöfer; Alexandre Barras; Rabah Boukherroub; Sabine Szunerits; Rostyslav Bilyy; Markus Hoffmann; Yi Zhao; Georg Schett; Martin Herrmann; Luis E Munoz Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Anja Strangfeld; Martin Schäfer; Philip C Robinson; Jinoos Yazdany; Pedro M Machado; Milena A Gianfrancesco; Saskia Lawson-Tovey; Jean W Liew; Lotta Ljung; Elsa F Mateus; Christophe Richez; Maria J Santos; Gabriela Schmajuk; Carlo A Scirè; Emily Sirotich; Jeffrey A Sparks; Paul Sufka; Thierry Thomas; Laura Trupin; Zachary S Wallace; Sarah Al-Adely; Javier Bachiller-Corral; Suleman Bhana; Patrice Cacoub; Loreto Carmona; Ruth Costello; Wendy Costello; Laure Gossec; Rebecca Grainger; Eric Hachulla; Rebecca Hasseli; Jonathan S Hausmann; Kimme L Hyrich; Zara Izadi; Lindsay Jacobsohn; Patricia Katz; Lianne Kearsley-Fleet Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Yanming Wang; Ming Li; Sonja Stadler; Sarah Correll; Pingxin Li; Danchen Wang; Ryo Hayama; Lauriebeth Leonelli; Hyunsil Han; Sergei A Grigoryev; C David Allis; Scott A Coonrod Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2009-01-19 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Jianghong Zhong; Tatjana Scholz; Anthony C Y Yau; Simon Guerard; Ulrike Hüffmeier; Harald Burkhardt; Rikard Holmdahl Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Elizabeth A Middleton; Xue-Yan He; Frederik Denorme; Robert A Campbell; David Ng; Steven P Salvatore; Maria Mostyka; Amelia Baxter-Stoltzfus; Alain C Borczuk; Massimo Loda; Mark J Cody; Bhanu Kanth Manne; Irina Portier; Estelle S Harris; Aaron C Petrey; Ellen J Beswick; Aleah F Caulin; Anthony Iovino; Lisa M Abegglen; Andrew S Weyrich; Matthew T Rondina; Mikala Egeblad; Joshua D Schiffman; Christian Con Yost Journal: Blood Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 25.476