| Literature DB >> 35991782 |
Mohit Sharma1, Shilpi Gupta2, Deepak P Bhayya2, Kanchi Upadhyay2, Divya Pandya3, Ankita Srivastava4, Shweta Gupta5.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to assess the variations in root canal morphology of permanent maxillary first molar with the use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods: One hundred extracted teeth were cleaned and arranged in U shape template mimicking natural arch in set of five teeth. These arches were scanned in CBCT and were analyzed by expert radiologist for number of roots, number of canals per root, and Vertucci classification. Result: A maximum number of permanent maxillary first molars had three roots, and only 2% had two roots. All the palatal roots and 99% of distobuccal roots had one canal, but one of the distobuccal roots had two canals. Incidence of two canals in MB root is more frequent (60%) than incidence of one canal. The most common type of Vertucci's classification for MB root is a type I, followed by type IV, type II, type VI, type V, type VII. How to cite this article: Sharma M, Gupta S, Bhayya DP, et al. CBCT Analysis of Maxillary First Molar in Indian Population. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(3):258-262.Entities:
Keywords: CBCT laboratory study; Maxillary first molar; Root canal morphology; Variation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35991782 PMCID: PMC9357535 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Clin Pediatr Dent ISSN: 0974-7052
Fig. 1Arrangement of hundred teeth on twenty templates of modeling wax
Fig. 2Scanning of sample by CBCT
Distribution of study samples according to number of roots
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 03 | 98 (98.0) |
| 02 | 02 (2.0) |
| Total | 100 (100.0) |
Fig. 3The number of roots in each study sample was distributed
Distribution of study sample according to number of canals in roots
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| 03 | Mesiobuccal | 40 (40.82) | 58 (59.18) | 98 (100.0) | χ2 = 140.246, df = 2 | 0.000 (< 0.001) |
| Distobuccal | 97 (98.98) | 01 (1.02) | 98 (100.0) | |||
| Palatal | 98 (100.0) | 00 (0.0) | 98 (100.0) | |||
| 02 | Mesiobuccal | 01 (50.0) | 01 (50.0) | 02 (100.0) | Not applied | Not applicable |
| Disto buccal fused with palatal | 00 (0.0) | 02 (100.0) | 02 (100.0) | |||
Fig. 4Study samples were distributed according to the number of canals in the roots
Vertucci's classification of root canal
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Type I | 39 (39.80) | 97 (98.98) | 98 (100) | 01 (50.0) | 00 (0.0) |
| Type II | 22 (22.45) | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) |
| Type III | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) |
| Type IV | 25 (25.51) | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) | 02 (100.0) |
| Type V | 04 (4.08) | 01 (1.02) | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) |
| Type VI | 05 (5.10) | 00 (0.0) | 0 (0.00) | 01 (50.0) | 00 (0.0) |
| Type VII | 03 (3.06) | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) |
| Type VII | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) | 00 (0.0) |
| Total | 98 (100.0) | 98 (100.0) | 98 (100.0) | 02 (100.0) | 02 (100.0) |
| Chi-square test | χ2 = 141.000, df = 10 | Not applied | |||
| 0.000 (<0.001) | Not applicable | ||||
Fig. 5Vertucci classification of root canals