Literature DB >> 35991734

Predictors of intraoperative pain during cesarean delivery under regional anesthesia.

Emma Frank1, Emily E Sharpe2, Grace Kohn3, Belinda Kohl-Thomas1, Courtney Shaver4, Michael P Hofkamp5.   

Abstract

It is unclear why some patients experience pain during cesarean delivery despite receiving appropriate regional anesthesia. Our primary aim was to determine what demographic and clinical variables predict intraoperative pain during cesarean delivery with neuraxial anesthesia. From July 2019 through March 2020, we administered a previously validated patient satisfaction survey to parturients who had a cesarean delivery under regional anesthesia for nonemergent obstetric indications. We performed a post hoc analysis restricted to subjects who had single injection spinal and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Parturients who did and did not report pain differed in height, intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine dose, and the time from incision to wound closure. We performed an ordinal logistic regression analysis on the 168 subjects with complete data using the aforementioned variables along with the time of day of cesarean delivery. Incision to wound closure time (P < 0.01) predicted intraoperative pain. The multivariate logistic regression model was statistically significant (P < 0.01) and had a receiver operator curve value of 0.74. The duration of time from incision to wound closure predicted intraoperative pain during cesarean delivery under regional anesthesia.
Copyright © 2022 Baylor University Medical Center.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; conduction; obstetrical; pain; procedural

Year:  2022        PMID: 35991734      PMCID: PMC9373768          DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2086789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)        ISSN: 0899-8280


  15 in total

1.  Measurement of patient satisfaction as an outcome of regional anesthesia and analgesia: a systematic review.

Authors:  C L Wu; M Naqibuddin; L A Fleisher
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  ED50 and ED95 of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine coadministered with opioids for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Yehuda Ginosar; Edward Mirikatani; David R Drover; Sheila E Cohen; Edward T Riley
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Adverse Events and Factors Associated with Potentially Avoidable Use of General Anesthesia in Cesarean Deliveries.

Authors:  Jean Guglielminotti; Ruth Landau; Guohua Li
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 4.  Patient Satisfaction in Anesthesia: Implementation, Relevance, and Identification of Meaningful Measures.

Authors:  Anum Wazir; Aesha Shukla; Richard P Dutton
Journal:  Adv Anesth       Date:  2018-09-27

5.  Effects of a height and weight adjusted dose of local anaesthetic for spinal anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section.

Authors:  J M Harten; I Boyne; P Hannah; D Varveris; A Brown
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Intraoperative pain during caesarean delivery: Incidence, risk factors and physician perception.

Authors:  Amir Keltz; Philip Heesen; Daniel Katz; Ido Neuman; Anna Morgenshtein; Karam Azem; Yair Binyamin; Eran Hadar; Leonid A Eidelman; Sharon Orbach-Zinger
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 3.651

7.  The development of a maternal satisfaction scale for caesarean section.

Authors:  P J Morgan; S Halpern; J Lo
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.603

8.  Synergistic effect of intrathecal fentanyl and bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

Authors:  Jaishri Bogra; Namita Arora; Pratima Srivastava
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2005-05-17       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 9.  Inadequate neuraxial anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective caesarean section: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Patel; J Kua; N Sharawi; M E Bauer; L Blake; S R Moonesinghe; P Sultan
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 12.893

Review 10.  Measuring women's childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments.

Authors:  Helena Nilvér; Cecily Begley; Marie Berg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.