Literature DB >> 35991709

Writing Instruction Improves Students' Writing Skills Differentially Depending on Focal Instruction and Children: A Meta-Analysis for Primary Grade Students.

Young-Suk Grace Kim1, Dandan Yang1, Marcela Reyes2, Carol Connor1.   

Abstract

We investigated the effect of writing interventions on written composition for students in primary grades (K-G3) with a focus on whether effects vary as a function of different dimensions of composition outcomes (i.e., quality, productivity, fluency, and other), instructional focus (e.g., transcription, self-regulation strategies such as Self-Regulated Strategy Development [SRSD]), and student characteristics (i.e., initially weak writing skills). A total of 24 studies (number of effect sizes, k = 166; N = 5589 participants) met inclusion criteria. The overall mean effect size was moderate and positive (ES = .31) with some variation across the dimensions of composition: .32 in writing quality, .31 in writing productivity, .15 in writing fluency, and .34 in writing: other. SRSD had large and consistent effect sizes across the outcomes (.59 to 1.04) whereas transcription instruction did not yield statistically significant effects on any dimensions of composition due to large variation of effects across studies. Variation in instructional dosage (total length of instruction) did not explain variation in the effect sizes. Lastly, the average effect on writing quality was larger for writers with weaker writing skills compared to those with typical skills.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Writing; instruction; meta-analysis; moderation; primary grade

Year:  2021        PMID: 35991709      PMCID: PMC9390887          DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Res Rev        ISSN: 1747-938X


  18 in total

1.  Evaluating the dimensionality of first-grade written composition.

Authors:  Young-Suk Kim; Stephanie Al Otaiba; Jessica S Folsom; Luana Greulich; Cynthia Puranik
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Kindergarten Predictors of Third Grade Writing.

Authors:  Young-Suk Kim; Stephanie Al Otaiba; Jeanne Wanzek
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2015-01-01

3.  Developmental Relations between Reading and Writing at the Word, Sentence and Text Levels: A Latent Change Score Analysis.

Authors:  Yusra Ahmed; Richard K Wagner; Danielle Lopez
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2014-05-01

4.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.

Authors:  M Egger; G Davey Smith; M Schneider; C Minder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-13

5.  Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates.

Authors:  Larry V Hedges; Elizabeth Tipton; Matthew C Johnson
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 5.273

6.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias.

Authors:  C B Begg; M Mazumdar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The nature of written language deficits in children with SLI.

Authors:  Clare Mackie; Julie E Dockrell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  A Lattice Model of the Development of Reading Comprehension.

Authors:  Carol McDonald Connor
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2016-10-11

9.  Expanding the Direct and Indirect Effects Model of Writing (DIEW): Reading-Writing Relations, and Dynamic Relations As a Function of Measurement/Dimensions of Written Composition.

Authors:  Young-Suk Grace Kim; Steve Graham
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2021-10-11

10.  The Impact of Transcription Writing Interventions for First-Grade Students.

Authors:  Jeanne Wanzek; Brandy Gatlin; Stephanie Al Otaiba; Young-Suk Grace Kim
Journal:  Read Writ Q       Date:  2016-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.