| Literature DB >> 35991057 |
Yang Chen1,2,3, Xudong Shen1,2,3, Hu Liang1,2,3, Guoxiang Li1,2,3, Kexing Han4, Chaozhao Liang1,2,3, Zongyao Hao1,2,3.
Abstract
Background: The main objective of this study is to explore the effects of hepatitis C (HCV) on the prevalence rate of kidney stones in US women. Method: Dates for HCV infection and kidney stones were collected from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database, a cross-sectional study. The analysis samples included adults aged ≥20 years and women from six consecutive cycles of the NHANES 2007-2018. The association between HCV infection and kidney stones was performed by using logistic regression models. Subgroup analyses were conducted to find sensitive crowds.Entities:
Keywords: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(NHANES); cross-section study; hepatitis C virus (HCV); kidney stone; nephrolithiasis
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35991057 PMCID: PMC9389117 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.940905
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Flowchart of the sample selection from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007–2018.
Baseline characteristics of US female participants in NHANES from 2007–2018, weighted.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age(years) | 47.69 ± 17.10 | 51.61 ± 15.81 | <0.0001 |
| Total calcium(mg/dl) | 9.37 ± 0.37 | 9.38 ± 0.45 | 0.214 |
| Serum creatinine(mg/dl) | 0.77 ± 0.27 | 0.84 ± 0.66 | <0.0001 |
| BMI(kg/m2) | 28.99 ± 7.48 | 31.00 ± 7.85 | <0.0001 |
|
| <0.0001 | ||
| Mexican American | 7.97 | 6.82 | |
| Other hispanic | 6.03 | 4.5 | |
| Non-hispanic white | 66.38 | 75.87 | |
| Non-hispanic black | 11.78 | 6.96 | |
| Other race | 7.85 | 5.84 | |
|
| <0.0001 | ||
| No | 98.81 | 97.1 | |
| Yes | 1.19 | 2.9 | |
|
| <0.0001 | ||
| Yes | 69.53 | 52.13 | |
| No | 30.38 | 47.74 | |
| Unclear | 0.09 | 0.14 | |
| Education level(%) | 0.4675 | ||
| Less than high school | 15.56 | 16.85 | |
| High school | 22.06 | 23.05 | |
| More than high school | 62.3 | 59.99 | |
| Unclear | 0.08 | 0.11 | |
|
| 0.6637 | ||
| Cohabitation | 60.16 | 61.51 | |
| Solitude | 39.8 | 38.46 | |
| Unclear | 0.04 | 0.03 | |
| PIR(%) | 0.0717 | ||
| <1.39 | 31 | 34.27 | |
| 1.39–3.49 | 23.54 | 23.23 | |
| ≥3.49 | 38.03 | 34.63 | |
| Unclear | 7.43 | 7.87 | |
|
| <0.0001 | ||
| Yes | 12.1 | 21.53 | |
| No | 86.95 | 77.55 | |
| Other | 0.95 | 0.92 | |
| Total water(%) | 0.0562 | ||
| <2000 ml | 51.47 | 52.22 | |
| 2000–2500 ml | 7.82 | 9.81 | |
| More than 2500 ml | 26.3 | 25.12 | |
| Unclear | 14.41 | 12.86 | |
| Physical activity(%) | 0.001 | ||
| Never | 32.89 | 37.69 | |
| Moderate | 36.74 | 37.04 | |
| Vigorous | 30.35 | 25.24 | |
| Unclear | 0.02 | 0.03 | |
|
| 0.0854 | ||
| Yes | 22.72 | 25.07 | |
| No | 50.2 | 46.6 | |
| Unclear | 27.08 | 28.33 | |
|
| <0.0001 | ||
| No | 89.69 | 79.54 | |
| Yes | 8.37 | 16.67 | |
| Borderline | 1.87 | 3.43 | |
| Unclear | 0.07 | 0.36 |
Statistically significant, p < 0.05; Mean+SD for continuous variables. P-value was calculated by weighted linear regression model.
% for categorical variables, P-value was calculated by weighted chi-square test.
HCV, Hepatitis C virus; BMI, Body mass index (kg/m2); PIR, Ratio of family income to poverty.
Figure 2Prevalence of kidney stone and HCV infection from 2007–2018.
Figure 3Importance of the variables in the machine learning model, scaled to a maximum of one.
Analysis between confounders and renal stone prevalence.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| HCV(–) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| HCV(+) | 1.96(1.31, 2.92) | 1.96(1.31, 2.93) | 1.70(1.13, 2.56) |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Mexican American | 2.24(0.65, 7.73) | 2.07(0.58, 7.40) | 1.75(0.47, 6.54) |
| Other hispanic | 2.36(0.68, 8.21) | 1.90(0.52, 6.94) | 1.92(0.51, 7.28) |
| Non-hispanic white | 1.60(0.88, 2.91) | 1.50(0.82, 2.76) | 1.49(0.81, 2.75) |
| Non-hispanic black | 1.90(0.85, 4.22) | 1.49(0.65, 3.40) | 1.41(0.61, 3.25) |
| Others | 10.83(2.54, 46.13) | 5.40(1.08, 26.94) | 8.17(1.62, 41.22) |
|
| |||
| <25 | 2.60(1.16, 5.83) | 1.95(0.84, 4.49) | 2.10(0.91, 4.86) |
| 25–30 | 2.53(1.31, 4.88) | 1.99(1.01, 3.93) | 2.45(1.24, 4.83) |
| >30 | 1.38(0.73, 2.62) | 1.39(0.72, 2.67) | 1.24(0.64, 2.40) |
Model 1, no covariates were adjusted.
Model 2, Model 1+age, race were adjusted.
Model 3, Model 2+diabetes, blood pressure, education, marital status, BMI, serum calcium, PIR, ever receive blood transfusion, total water, physical activity, alcohol use, serum creatinine were adjusted. The subgroup analysis was stratified by race and BMI, not adjusted for the stratification variable itself.