Literature DB >> 35990455

Growth of Pentacene Crystals by Naphthalene Flux Method.

Xiaoran Yang1, Mingzhe Li1, Akira Maeno1, Takashi Yanase1, Seiya Yokokura1, Taro Nagahama1, Toshihiro Shimada1.   

Abstract

We report the crystal growth of pentacene from a solution of naphthalene. The solubility of pentacene in naphthalene was evaluated by optical absorption at elevated temperature. The crystal growth was performed in an H-shaped sealed glass tube or metal vessels sealed with ultrahigh-vacuum compatible flanges placed in heated two-zone aluminum blocks. The obtained crystals had a single-crystal-like appearance and flat surface. They were made of aligned microtwins of the "bulk type" (interlayer spacing 14.5 Å) polymorph.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35990455      PMCID: PMC9386793          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Organic semiconductors are recently gathering much attention for their application in flexible, light-weight, and printable electronic circuits.[1−9] It is necessary to design and synthesize molecules with a high performance for such applications, but there are still some ″missing links″ connecting molecular structures and the physical properties of the organic semiconductor materials. They include carrier mobilities, exciton binding energies, lifetimes, etc. It is highly desirable to make crystals of organic semiconductors and experimentally study their crystal structures and various physical properties in order to find a way to connect the molecular structures and the important physical properties as semiconductors, along with various applications summarized in recent reviews.[10−13] Pentacene (C14H22) is an important organic semiconductor from the early days of research.[14−28] Pentacene stands out for its relatively high field effect mobility. Its hole mobility is as high as 35 cm2/(V·s) in one report,[22] which exceeds amorphous silicon. In this study, we focused on a new method called the “naphthalene flux method”[29,30] to grow the pentacene crystals. This method uses a solid aromatic molecule (naphthalene; melting point, 80.2 °C) as the solvent, or flux, of the pentacene. It is well known that pentacene decomposes above its melting point; thus, the melt growth technique cannot be applied. The physical vapor transport (PVT) technique has mainly been used for the single crystal growth of molecules including pentacene for the device applications.[31−34] The solubility of pentacene in ordinary organic solvents is poor.[35,36] A 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene solution at 140 °C was used to grow pentacene thin film crystals to make transistors,[37,38] but the sizes of the crystals were quite inferior to that obtained by the PVT. We experimentally searched for a solvent of pentacene and found that pentacene can be dissolved in a naphthalene solution. The growth of crystal in solution will be easier to control, and the size of the crystals obtained by “naphthalene flux method” was comparable to or larger than that of the crystals obtained by the PVT method.

Experimental Section

Solubility Measurement

We first determined the temperature that is suitable for its crystal growth by measuring the solubility of pentacene in naphthalene. We measured the optical absorption of heated solutions of pentacene in naphthalene with excess amounts of pentacene. Since the optical density of a pentacene solution is high, the thickness of the solution must be thin. We used a glass capillary (2.4 mm inner diameter) to hold the solution. This requires handling of a very tiny amount of pentacene. Therefore, the typical procedure was as follows. About 1 mg of pentacene was placed in a test tube with 100 μL of chlorobenzene, which was pumped to 10 Pa and sealed by melting the glass tube. The test tube was then heated to 120 °C to dissolve the pentacene. A clear purple solution was obtained. The test tube was next opened while hot; 20 μL of the solution was transferred to the capillary by a micropipette; and the chlorobenzene was evaporated by heating it at 140 °C with pumping. About 400 mg of naphthalene was then added to the capillary, and the capillary was vacuum sealed. We placed the sealed capillary in a temperature-controlled aluminum block, which had light able to pass through both sides (Figure ). By heating the aluminum block, the naphthalene first melted at ∼80 °C; then, the pentacene started to dissolve into the naphthalene. The optical absorption of the solution was measured by a white LED light source and microspectrometer (Hamamatsu C12880MA; with Color Compass software). We recorded the absorption spectra every 10 °C. The concentration was calculated based on the Lambert–Beer formula:where I0 and I are the intensities (or power) of the incident light and the transmitted light, respectively. ε is the molar absorption coefficient, b is the light path (inner diameter of the capillary), and c is the concentration. I0 was measured by setting a capillary containing only naphthalene as a blank. Because ε is not known, we used the concentration at which all the pentacene was dissolved to calibrate the concentration c (see next section).
Figure 1

Solubility measurement device.

Solubility measurement device.

Crystal Growth

Since the materials are air sensitive at elevated temperatures[35,36] and naphthalene is highly volatile,[39,40] the growth process was performed in a vacuum-sealed H-shaped glass tube. The heater used in this experiment can be separately controlled on both sides. The method is schematically illustrated in Figure a. (i) Pentacene is completely dissolved into naphthalene by elevating the temperature of both sides. The right side was then set at a slightly lower temperature, and both sides were very slowly cooled. The pentacene crystal grew in the left side. The right side was cooled first before the naphthalene on the left side had solidified in order to collect the naphthalene on the right side by vapor transport (ii). At the end, the left side contained pentacene crystal and the naphthalene was completely collected on the right side (iii). A typical temperature profile is shown in Figure b. Some images about the growth experiment can be found in the Supporting Information (Figures S1 and S2).
Figure 2

Crystal growth scheme. (a) Schematics of the naphthalene flux method. (b) Temperature (T)–time(t) profiles of the left and right sides.

Crystal growth scheme. (a) Schematics of the naphthalene flux method. (b) Temperature (T)–time(t) profiles of the left and right sides. We also scaled up the crystal growth system using an ultrahigh vacuum compatible apparatus sealed with ConFlat flanges and metal bellow valves.

Characterization

The surface morphology of the pentacene crystal was observed by a laser microscope (Keyence KN-7200). Polarization optical microscopy (Olympus BX51) was used to evaluate the crystal orientation of the pentacene crystal. The θ–2θ (Rigaku Miniflex 600) and pole figure (Rigaku SmartLab) X-ray diffraction (XRD) were used to evaluate the crystallinity and the crystal structure.

Results and Discussion

The solubility of pentacene in naphthalene at RT is low, while the solubility will gradually increase as the temperature increases. Figure a shows the sample used for the solubility measurement, and Figure b is the obtained absorbance curve.
Figure 3

(a) Solubility measurement sample (pentacene–naphthalene at 90 °C). (b) Absorbance spectrum of pentacene dissolved in naphthalene.

(a) Solubility measurement sample (pentacene–naphthalene at 90 °C). (b) Absorbance spectrum of pentacene dissolved in naphthalene. Figure shows the optical absorbance at 528 nm of two samples containing 0.20 and 0.15 wt % of pentacene in naphthalene as a function of the temperature. As noted, the two curves agree at the lower temperatures, but the curve for the lower pentacene content becomes constant at 230 °C. This result can be explained as follows.
Figure 4

Solubility measurement curves of pentacene in naphthalene. (a) and (b) contain 0.20 and 0.15 wt % pentacene in naphthalene, respectively.

Solubility measurement curves of pentacene in naphthalene. (a) and (b) contain 0.20 and 0.15 wt % pentacene in naphthalene, respectively. The concentration of the pentacene in the solution should be approximately the same at the beginning because all of the soluble pentacene is dissolved in equilibrium with the pentacene solid. The solubility then increases with the temperature, and the curve becomes a straight line after the pentacene is completely dissolved. The absorbance value of the straight line corresponds to εbc in eq 1. We can calculate c from the pentacene:naphthalene ratio charged in the capillary, and b is from the diameter of the capillary. If we assume that the molar absorption coefficient of pentacene in naphthalene is a constant, we can evaluate ε from the data shown in Figure , which was ∼1.1 × 103 L mol–1 cm–1. The error remains in the ε value because it is difficult to estimate the light path in a capillary with accuracy.
Figure 5

(a) Obtained pentacene crystals at different growth temperatures by the naphthalene flux method. (b) Laser microscope image of a pentacene crystal. (c) Polarization microscope images of a pentacene crystal. The brightness of the crystal changed (see circle) when the dial was rotated 90°.

(a) Obtained pentacene crystals at different growth temperatures by the naphthalene flux method. (b) Laser microscope image of a pentacene crystal. (c) Polarization microscope images of a pentacene crystal. The brightness of the crystal changed (see circle) when the dial was rotated 90°. The obtained solubility and temperature data were used as the basis to determine the condition for crystal growth. We used a 0.15 wt % pentacene mixture with naphthalene, and the temperature profile is shown in Figure b. The periods and temperatures in the profile were determined on a trial-and-error-basis. Some of the pentacene crystals at different maximum temperatures are shown in Figure a. We found that pentacene crystals can be obtained at the highest temperatures of 220–240 °C, and the largest crystal (about 1.1 cm) was obtained at 240 °C. When the highest temperature is above 260 °C, the results were not stable and most of the crystals were a powder. We picked the crystal with well-defined faces and removed any visible impurities under the microscope and then cleaned the surface with acetone for subsequent measurements. Figure b shows a laser microscope image of a pentacene crystal in order to measure the thickness and evaluate the flatness of the surface. The thickness of crystal was about 14 μm; it is a plate-like crystal. A piece of the pentacene crystal was characterized by a polarization microscope (Figure c). We can see the change in the contrast by rotating the sample, which is caused by the optical anisotropy of the pentacene crystal. The sample was characterized by X-ray diffraction to determine the crystal structure. Figure a shows the out-of-plane (θ–2θ) scan X-ray diffraction. It shows periodic peaks corresponding to the layered stacking of the herringbone lattice of pentacene. There are more than 10 reported structures of pentacene, which are basically classified into three groups,[41−46]i.e., the “bulk type” (layer spacing d = 14.5 Å; high temperature form), single crystal type (d = 14.5 Å; obtained by PVT), and “thin film type” (d = 15.5 Å; obtained by thin film deposition). The differences in these structures are rather slight, but the electronic band structure is very dependent on the polytype.[47] We can rule out the possibility of the “thin film phase” because the (0 0 1) diffraction appears below 2θ = 6.0°. From the out-of-plane scan, it is suggested that the “bulk type” is formed. However, the large single crystals can be somewhat warped during the handling, and the accuracy of interlayer spacing (d) from this XRD is not conclusive. The three-dimensional lattice parameters must be evaluated to confirm the crystal structure.
Figure 6

Out-of-plane X-ray diffraction of a pentacene plate-like crystal.

Out-of-plane X-ray diffraction of a pentacene plate-like crystal. We measured a pole figure of the pentacene plate crystal by 5-axis XRD equipment (Figure ). 2θ was set to 17.7°, which corresponds to the (1 1 1) diffraction for the single crystal type and (1 0–3) diffraction for the bulk type. The result is shown in Figure . Four spots appeared. It shows that the plate-like pentacene crystal is made of twins. To analyze the orientations of the twins, we calculated the diffraction peaks of each polytype of pentacene near 2θ = 17.7°.
Figure 7

Pole figure of pentacene crystal (2θ = 17.7°).

Figure 8

Φ (β) scan of pole figure spot (2θ = 17.7°, α = 16°).

Pole figure of pentacene crystal (2θ = 17.7°). Φ (β) scan of pole figure spot (2θ = 17.7°, α = 16°). By calculating the reciprocal lattice of each unit lattice, we have identified the spots in the pole figure, which appeared 11–18° off from the surface normal (α), that is, the (1 0–3) diffraction of the ″bulk type″ pentacene (α = 16°). The (1 1 1) diffraction of the ″single crystal type″ should appear at α = 69°, which is distinctly different from the result. As for the twin orientation, each {1 0–3} diffraction is separated into two spots. This means that the a* and/or c* axes are separated in the reciprocal space. Because the a–b plane of the layered structure should be common to explain the flatness of the crystal surface, the c* axis is also common. It follows that the b axis in the real space has different directions in the twin. Assuming that the a axis is common, the Φ (β) scan shown in Figure , which shows a 12° separation of the two-fold symmetric peaks, can be reasonably explained. The model structure of the twins in the real space is Figure , which was drawn using a software VESTA[48] using the atomic coordinate in ref (40). The model structure of the twins in the real space is shown in Figure . The competition among weak interactions, anisotropic van der Waals force and the coincident epitaxy, determines the twinning in pentacene on aligned polymer substrates.[49] We consider that this concept can also be applied to the present case because the coincident epitaxial relation is maintained if the twinned layer is formed on a pentacene surface. As for the size of each twin crystal, we could not resolve the distribution by geometrically scanning the XRD spot, which means that it was smaller than the X-ray spot (0.5 mm) of the measurement. The detail of the XRD data analysis is found in the Supporting Information (Tables S1–S4, Figure S3).
Figure 9

Model of the twin structure.

Model of the twin structure. Finally, we examined the possibility of scaling up the growth apparatus. Although H-shaped glass tubes are good for a laboratory scale, it is too time-consuming for the production. We have built an ultrahigh-vacuum compatible stainless steel two-room vessel as shown in Figure a. By using a two zone furnace and a similar temperature profile as described above, we succeeded in the growth of pentacene crystals shown in Figure b.
Figure 10

(a) Scaling up of the growth apparatus. (b) Obtained pentacene crystals.

(a) Scaling up of the growth apparatus. (b) Obtained pentacene crystals.

Conclusions

In this experiment, we determined the suitable temperature and concentration for pentacene crystal growth from a naphthalene flux solution. The relatively high solubility of pentacene in naphthalene (0.15 wt % at 230 °C and more in elevated temperatures) provides the possibility for pentacene inkjet printing application. Through trial and error, we successfully established the growth parameter and obtained plate-like crystals of pentacene with almost 1 cm sizes. We analyzed the crystal structure by X-ray diffraction and found that ″bulk type″ (interlayer spacing 14.5 Å) polymorph crystals were formed. The crystals were made of aligned microtwins.
  19 in total

1.  Amorphouslike density of gap states in single-crystal pentacene.

Authors:  D V Lang; X Chi; T Siegrist; A M Sergent; A P Ramirez
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Molecular design and ordering effects in π-functional materials for transistor and solar cell applications.

Authors:  Pierre M Beaujuge; Jean M J Fréchet
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Noncontact atomic force microscopy of perfect single crystals of pentacene prepared by crystallization from solution.

Authors:  Kazuya Sato; Takahiro Sawaguchi; Masafumi Sakata; Kingo Itaya
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.882

4.  All-polymer field-effect transistor realized by printing techniques.

Authors:  F Garnier; R Hajlaoui; A Yassar; P Srivastava
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Inkjet printing of single-crystal films.

Authors:  Hiromi Minemawari; Toshikazu Yamada; Hiroyuki Matsui; Jun'ya Tsutsumi; Simon Haas; Ryosuke Chiba; Reiji Kumai; Tatsuo Hasegawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  The Emergence of Organic Single-Crystal Electronics.

Authors:  Hui Jiang; Wenping Hu
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Growth kinetics of Pseudomonas putida G7 on naphthalene and occurrence of naphthalene toxicity during nutrient deprivation.

Authors:  I S Ahn; W C Ghiorse; L W Lion; M L Shuler
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1998-09-05       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  An ultra-lightweight design for imperceptible plastic electronics.

Authors:  Martin Kaltenbrunner; Tsuyoshi Sekitani; Jonathan Reeder; Tomoyuki Yokota; Kazunori Kuribara; Takeyoshi Tokuhara; Michael Drack; Reinhard Schwödiauer; Ingrid Graz; Simona Bauer-Gogonea; Siegfried Bauer; Takao Someya
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Bottom-up growth of n-type monolayer molecular crystals on polymeric substrate for optoelectronic device applications.

Authors:  Yanjun Shi; Lang Jiang; Jie Liu; Zeyi Tu; Yuanyuan Hu; Qinghe Wu; Yuanping Yi; Eliot Gann; Christopher R McNeill; Hongxiang Li; Wenping Hu; Daoben Zhu; Henning Sirringhaus
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  Recent Progress in High Linearly Fused Polycyclic Conjugated Hydrocarbons (PCHs, n > 6) with Well-Defined Structures.

Authors:  Wangqiao Chen; Fei Yu; Qun Xu; Guofu Zhou; Qichun Zhang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 16.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.