Vadim Ialyshev1, Ganjaboy Boltaev1, Mazhar Iqbal1, Mustafa Khamis2, Ali S Alnaser1. 1. Department of Physics, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, UAE. 2. Department of Biology, Chemistry and Environmental Sciences, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, UAE.
Abstract
The generation of laser-induced plasma at the gas-liquid interface provides many fundamental and interesting scientific phenomena such as ionization, sharp explosion, shock wave radiation, bubble creation, and water splitting. However, despite the extensive research in this area, there is no reference on the effect of the surrounding environment on the chemical processes that occur during the laser-induced plasma-water interaction. In this work, we investigate the effect of the surrounding gas environment on femtosecond laser-induced plasma when generated at the pure water-gas interface. Ultrashort laser pulses were applied to water in the presence of air and N2 and Ar gas environments. Formation of a significant number of nitrate-based species in water was observed after exposure to femtosecond laser-induced plasma in air and N2 environments. The detected NO3 ions formed in the laser-treated water led to the appearance of an absorption peak in the UV range, a significant decrease in the water pH value, and a significant increase in water's electrical conductivity. All induced properties of water were stable for 3 months of monitoring after laser treatment. Our work shows that the generation of laser-induced plasma in water propagating into a gaseous medium facilitates the interaction between the two media, as a result of which the compositions of substances present in the gaseous medium can be dissolved in water without increasing the gas pressure. The presented approach may find applications in areas such as water purification, material synthesis, and environmental stewardship.
The generation of laser-induced plasma at the gas-liquid interface provides many fundamental and interesting scientific phenomena such as ionization, sharp explosion, shock wave radiation, bubble creation, and water splitting. However, despite the extensive research in this area, there is no reference on the effect of the surrounding environment on the chemical processes that occur during the laser-induced plasma-water interaction. In this work, we investigate the effect of the surrounding gas environment on femtosecond laser-induced plasma when generated at the pure water-gas interface. Ultrashort laser pulses were applied to water in the presence of air and N2 and Ar gas environments. Formation of a significant number of nitrate-based species in water was observed after exposure to femtosecond laser-induced plasma in air and N2 environments. The detected NO3 ions formed in the laser-treated water led to the appearance of an absorption peak in the UV range, a significant decrease in the water pH value, and a significant increase in water's electrical conductivity. All induced properties of water were stable for 3 months of monitoring after laser treatment. Our work shows that the generation of laser-induced plasma in water propagating into a gaseous medium facilitates the interaction between the two media, as a result of which the compositions of substances present in the gaseous medium can be dissolved in water without increasing the gas pressure. The presented approach may find applications in areas such as water purification, material synthesis, and environmental stewardship.
Ultrafast lasers are used
in many applications to modify the chemical,
structural, and optical properties of materials.[1−4] The ultrafast nature and nonlinear
interaction of a high-intensity laser with matter lead to a decrease
in the zone of thermal influence with minimal collateral damage compared
to the results achieved using continuous-wave or long-pulse lasers.[5] These properties allow us to precisely modify
materials and to investigate ultrafast mechanisms during phase transitions
or biochemical and chemical reactions.[1,6−9]Laser irradiation of aqueous media plays an important role
in many
chemical[10,11] and atmospheric phenomena.[12] Photolysis of water is of paramount importance as it is
one of the possible sources of fuel that can be obtained by the dissociation
of water into hydrogen and oxygen.[13] It
has been shown that plasma generated by ultrashort laser pulses, especially
femtosecond pulses, can be used for the production of hydrogen.[14] Although the production of hydrogen by this
method is yet uneconomical, femtosecond lasers have recently received
considerable interest for their potential use in biological and medical
applications with many exciting and promising results.[15,16] Laser-generated plasma in liquids opens exciting applications including
reagent-free characterization of biological objects[17] and decontamination of polluted water.[18] These applications contributed significantly toward the
development of research on the complex interactions between laser-induced
plasma and liquid water. However, most of these studies were mainly
interpreted on the basis of physical phenomena, and only few reports
were devoted to the chemical processes that occur during the generation
of femtosecond laser-induced plasma in pure water. Hence, in most
of these studies, the generated products of such interactions were
ignored despite their importance in biology and medicine.Several
comprehensive reviews have recently appeared in the literature
on the interaction of nonequilibrium plasma with liquids.[19,20] A number of complex phenomena related to the plasma–water
interaction have been developed in these reviews. It has been accepted
that the production of reactive oxygen and closely related reactive
nitrogen radicals plays a dominant role in plasma–water interaction
processes. However, those previous studies were focused on the properties
of plasma generated by four often used discharges: a pulsed direct
discharge in a liquid, a DC air glow discharge with a water electrode,
a pulsed plasma jet (nontouching), and a filamentary dielectric barrier
discharge, and there was no reference related to laser-induced plasma
interactions.[19]Strong laser irradiation
of water can cause intriguing phenomena
such as plasma generation, shock wave radiation, splitting, and sharp
explosions.[14,21,22] In addition, ionization of water leads to the generation of O+, H+, OH+, and H2O+ radicals.[22] The thermalized radical and
ionic species react with water molecules and other species in the
solution, forming a variety of species such as H2, H2O2, O2, and so forth.[14,22,23] However, despite the extensive research
in this area, there is no reference on the effect of the surrounding
environment on the chemical processes that occur during the laser-induced
plasma–water interaction.The actual effect of a plasma–air–water
interaction
is ultimately determined by the generated chemical species and their
diffusions, which are in turn determined by the laser (electric field
and photons), ions, and electron fluxes and energies. It is clear
that a more fundamental understanding of the processes occurring both
in water and at its boundary with the atmosphere, when exposed to
a laser, will eventually lead to a wider use of femtosecond lasers
in water purification as well as other fields.Recently, significant
efforts have been made to develop new methods
of water purification from hazardous organic waste. Methods such as
the irradiation of waste or the use of supercritical oxidation of
water have been proposed.[24] OH is a strong
oxidant, so the generation of OH in the treatment process can rapidly
oxidize various organic compounds in wastewater. Generating laser-induced
plasma in the air–water interface area can involve both physical
(ionization, shock waves, cavitation effects, and photolysis) and
chemical (formation of reactive species and oxidation of organic contaminants)
effects that play significant roles in the decomposition of organic
contaminants. Thus, the effect of the laser-induced plasma, on the
one hand, can create a large number of radicals directly in water
and, on the other hand, can introduce reactive species from the environment,
the amounts of which can be controlled by adjusting the laser treatment
parameters.In this work, we study the influence of the environment
on the
processes occurring in water during the generation of laser-induced
plasma near the gas–water interface. Laser-induced plasma is
generated in pure water in the presence of various gaseous media,
such as air, N2, and argon. To characterize and quantify
the changes occurring in water after the interaction with plasma,
UV–vis spectroscopy and ion chromatography (IC) were employed.
Significant changes in the optical absorption, pH, and electrical
conductivity were detected in water after treatment with laser-induced
plasma in the presence of air or nitrogen gas. IC analysis showed
the presence of a large number of nitrate ions, which were formed
in water due to the interaction of gaseous nitrogen molecules with
plasma at the water surface. We found that the formation process of
nitrate ions is significantly affected by the position of the laser
beam focus and the laser exposure time. We demonstrate that the generation
of laser-induced plasma in water near its surface contributes to a
significant dissolution of substances present in the gaseous medium
just above the water surface while not requiring (according to Henry’s
law) an increase in gas pressure. Improving the understanding of the
physical and chemical processes in the field of the plasma–liquid–gas
interaction will find applications in a wide range of fields, including
the science of aerosols, atmospheric and colloidal chemistry, phase
equilibrium and gas/liquid solubility, biology, water purification,
and environmental protection.
Experimental Section
Femtosecond laser
pulses were generated using a Yb-doped fiber
laser system (UFFL-300-2000-1030-300, Active Fiber Systems GmbH) with
a central wavelength of 1030 nm and a repetition rate of 50 kHz. An
average power of 10 W and a pulse duration of 40 fs were used for
the irradiation of liquid water.[25] The
laser beam was directed to a computer-driven galvanometric scanning
head (FARO tech., Xtreme-20) that controlled the movement of the beam
at a speed of 300 mm/s and a scanning interval of 50 μm. Laser
radiation was focused using a 160 mm F-Theta lens, which provided
a spot diameter of approximately 100 μm and a laser-scanned
area of 20 × 20 mm2. The scanning beam was directed
through a quartz window inside a glass beaker (40 mm in diameter)
that contained 30 mL of deionized water. Water purified in a Millipore
Elix5/Milli-Q system (a specific resistance > 18.2 MΩ·cm
and a pH of 6.4) was used in all experiments. The position of the
glass beaker was fixed in a special holder during the irradiation
experiments. The focus position of the laser beam was varied by up–down
movements of the holder. Air and N2 and Ar gases with 99.95%
purity flowed continuously through a cap with a flow rate of 2 L/min. Figure shows a sketch of
the experimental setup.
Figure 1
Experimental setup: movement of the beam from
the femtosecond laser
source (FS) was controlled by a scanning head (SH) and focused in
water inside a glass beaker. The gas was fed into the beaker through
an inlet port.
Experimental setup: movement of the beam from
the femtosecond laser
source (FS) was controlled by a scanning head (SH) and focused in
water inside a glass beaker. The gas was fed into the beaker through
an inlet port.To study the influence of the environment, a cap
was placed on
the glass beaker through which the corresponding gas flowed. A double-beam
UV–vis–NIR spectrophotometer (Unicam Helios Alpha) was
used in the optical absorbance measurement mode. The U-4100 model
was used for the measurement of a broad range of wavelengths that
extended from 200 to 2500 nm; the U-3900 model was used for shorter
wavelength measurements up to 190 nm over a narrower range of 800
nm. The spectrophotometer was operated with a fixed spectral resolution
of 2 nm. The measurements were performed in quartz cuvettes. Inorganic
ions were determined using a Shimadzu Prominence ion chromatograph
system (Japan) equipped with a conductivity detector. Sodium carbonate
(Na2CO3) and sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO3) from Sigma-Aldrich were used for the preparation of eluents
(1.8 mmol/l Na2CO3 + 1.7 mmol/l NaHCO3). Standard solutions of anions (F–, Cl–, NO2–, NO3–, PO43–, and SO4–) and cations (Na+, K+, Mg2+, and
Ca2+) were prepared with Sigma-Aldrich reference solutions.
Calibration solutions were made by diluting appropriate standard solutions
right before their application. All solutions were kept in glass or
high-density polyethylene containers at room temperature. Electrical
conductivity and pH were measured using an HI 2300 EC/TDS/NaCl meter
(HANNA Instruments, USA) and the Hach sensION+ (Thomas Scientific,
USA), respectively.
Results and Discussion
Effect of the Focus Position on UV Absorbance
The first step in studying the interaction of water with the femtosecond
laser beam was to determine how the properties of water changed depending
on the position of the laser-beam focus. The irradiation was carried
out under an ambient atmosphere with a fixed time of 20 min and a
laser intensity of 6 × 1013 W/cm2 to produce
continuous plasma. The position of the laser focus was determined
by the plasma glow at the lowest laser power. The optical absorption
of the samples was measured after laser exposure. Figure a shows the typical absorption
spectra of water where the laser-beam focus position was varied from
0 mm (water surface) to a depth of 20 mm under the water surface.
A broad absorbance peak appeared in the UV region of the spectrum,
and no signal was detected at the longer wavelength. As can be seen
from Figure b, the
intensity of the absorbance peak increased as the focus moved deeper
from the surface, reaching a maximum absorbance value at a position
of 5 mm. With further immersion of the focus, the intensity of the
absorption signal decreased significantly. These results clearly show
that the position of plasma in water is one of the important parameters
in the formation of active radicals in water.
Figure 2
(a) Typical UV spectra
of laser-treated water in an air environment
at different laser-beam focus positions. (b) Absorbance peak intensity
plotted as a function of focus position.
(a) Typical UV spectra
of laser-treated water in an air environment
at different laser-beam focus positions. (b) Absorbance peak intensity
plotted as a function of focus position.
Effect of the Environment on UV Absorbance
In order to investigate the effect of the environment on the femtosecond
laser-induced plasma–water interaction, the glass beaker was
tightly closed with a cap through which air and N2 and
Ar gases flowed. All samples were irradiated using the same laser
parameters and exposure time and a focus position at 5 mm. Figure displays the spectra
obtained under each condition.
Figure 3
UV spectra of water irradiated by a femtosecond
laser under different
environment conditions: untreated water (green), air flow (blue dots),
argon flow (black line), and nitrogen flow (red line). The exposure
time is 20 min, the laser power is 10 W, and the gas flow rate is
2 L/min.
UV spectra of water irradiated by a femtosecond
laser under different
environment conditions: untreated water (green), air flow (blue dots),
argon flow (black line), and nitrogen flow (red line). The exposure
time is 20 min, the laser power is 10 W, and the gas flow rate is
2 L/min.Inspection of Figure reveals that a strong absorbance peak is
observed when irradiation
was carried out in flowing air and N2 gas. However, a much
weaker peak is obtained in the case of Ar gas. Furthermore, irradiation
of the water samples under an air or nitrogen flow gave the same absorbance
value at λmax ∼ 220 nm. This clearly
points out that the most likely candidate responsible for the appearance
of the strong peak is nitrogen gas, which could be dissolved in water
during the interaction with the femtosecond laser. It is worth mentioning
that the obtained absorbance in Figure is significantly higher than that obtained in Figure under static air
irradiation. This increase could be explained by the removal of water
vapor that occurs during the laser treatment, which tends to reduce
the laser energy and hence its effectiveness in water photolysis.
Effect of the Exposure Time on UV Absorbance
Figure a shows
the spectra of water irradiated for different exposure times at a
fixed focus position of 5 mm under flowing air. Inspection of this
figure reveals that the intensity of the absorption spectra increased
with increasing laser exposure time with a simultaneous increase in
λmax from 214 to 221 nm. Upon analyzing the data
for the exposure time dependence of the peak areas, it was found that
the absorbance increased nonlinearly. It can be seen from Figure b that the intensity
of the absorbance peak increased nonlinearly with increasing laser
exposure time. It should be mentioned that the intensity of the absorbance
peaks did not change even after 3 months.
Figure 4
(a) UV absorption spectra
of water irradiated with the femtosecond
laser (a power of 10 W; a gas flow rate of 2 L/min, and a focus position
of 5 mm) for different exposure times. (b) Plot of the absorbance
peak areas vs laser exposure time.
(a) UV absorption spectra
of water irradiated with the femtosecond
laser (a power of 10 W; a gas flow rate of 2 L/min, and a focus position
of 5 mm) for different exposure times. (b) Plot of the absorbance
peak areas vs laser exposure time.
Content Analysis
To identify the
species formed in water after laser exposure, the samples were analyzed
by the IC method. Figure a shows chromatogram examples for the water samples irradiated
for different exposure times at a focus position of 5 mm and under
flowing air and Ar gas. These measurements revealed that only one
signal, which corresponds to the NO3 anion, was observed
from the water treated under flowing air. The intensity of the peak
increased with increasing laser exposure time. The calculated concentration
of the nitrate species in the laser-treated water irradiated for 25
min was about 50 mg/L. At the same time, no signals were detected
from the water treated under flowing Ar gas.
Figure 5
(a) Ion chromatograms
of water irradiated for different exposure
times under flowing air and Ar gas. The inset shows the ion concentration
curve. (b) Comparative UV absorption spectra of water irradiated in
N2 for 25 min and nitric acid with a molarity of 0.001
M.
(a) Ion chromatograms
of water irradiated for different exposure
times under flowing air and Ar gas. The inset shows the ion concentration
curve. (b) Comparative UV absorption spectra of water irradiated in
N2 for 25 min and nitric acid with a molarity of 0.001
M.The results of pH and electrical conductivity measurements
of the
treated samples showed an increase in water acidity and electrical
conductivity as laser exposure increases. As can be seen from Table , after 5 min of irradiation,
water acquires acidic properties. For comparison, the absorbance spectrum
and pH/conductivity data of nitric acid with a molarity of 0.001 M
are shown in Figure b and Table , respectively.
Table 1
Change of pH and Electrical Conductivity
Values of Water Depending on the Exposure Time
exposure time (min)
5
10
15
20
25
HNO3
pH
3.75
3.54
3.26
3.1
2.97
2.96
conductivity, μS/cm
110
161
219
285
344
360
Discussion
The laser parameters used
in this work (a laser power of 10 W and a pulse duration of 40 fs)
together with a diameter of the focused laser spot of 100 μm
yielded to an intensity on the order of 1013 W/cm2. Such a high-intensity ultrashort (fs) laser pulse allows for the
generation of plasma through ionization of water by multiphoton absorption
and by cascade ionization. The plasma creates a wide range of chemical
particles and physical effects, which include radical and reactive
particles, ions, electrons, UV radiation, electric fields, heat, and
shock waves. The basic chemical reactions that occur during the generation
of femtosecond laser-induced plasma in pure liquid water are given
in eqs –5.[22,26,27]On the other hand, the formation of
long-lived chemical products (O3, H2O2, NO3–, and NO2–) in water was shown to be produced by a gaseous discharge plasma
at the gas–liquid interface.[20,24,28,29] Furthermore, these
studies revealed that nitrogen products could be formed in water through
the dissolution of nitrogen oxides formed in air plasma by gas-phase
reactions of the dissociated N2 and O2 as given
in eqs –9.[19,24,28,29]The generated reactive species in the
gaseous phase move to the
liquid phase by convection and diffusion. The parameters that control
the solubility of the gaseous species at the water interface are affected
by the ratio of species concentrations in the gas and liquid at the
interface and by the Henry’s law coefficient (kH).[19] Species that have low
values of kH display low solubility and
hence are difficult to be transferred from the gas to the liquid phase.Plasma generation in water close to the surface can contribute
to a greater involvement of particles from the gaseous environment
in the interaction of plasma and water, thereby increasing their solubility
in water. To realize this process, the plasma generated by the laser
in water must also propagate outward. The size of the laser-induced
plasma is determined by the Rayleigh length (ZR), which is defined by the waist radius (w) and the wavelength (λ) of the
laser as given in Figure .[30] Inserting the values of a waist
radius (w0) of 50 μm (see the Experimental Section) and a wavelength of the laser
of 1030 nm in the equation yields a Rayleigh length of 8 mm and a
confocal parameter, which is twice the Raleigh length, of 16 mm. It
is also well known that the generated plasma in the liquid can be
expanded and increase in its volume by two processes.[23,31] The first process is the thermal expansion around the breakdown
site that yields the formation of water bubbles, and the second one
is the continued ionization that leads to the formation of a new plasma
up the beam path (in the direction of the laser) from the original
breakdown site. The generated water vapor, in turn, contributes to
the spread of plasma in the air.
Figure 6
Rayleigh length criterion. ZR is the
Raleigh length, w0 is the waist radius,
and f is the focal length.
Rayleigh length criterion. ZR is the
Raleigh length, w0 is the waist radius,
and f is the focal length.The observed dependence of the peak intensity on
the focus position
of the laser as given in Figure could be explained by the size of the plasma in contact
with water. Focusing the laser beam at the water surface led to a
slight appearance of nitrogen radicals (low absorbance signal) which
indicates small contact between the plasma and water, leading to insufficient
ionization of water. A deeper focus of the plasma in water leads to
an increase in contact volume of water subjected to the plasma, which
results in the formation of more radicals that can react with species
dissolving from the gaseous phase in contact with the plasma. Furthermore,
the formation of a shock wave by laser plasma in water facilitates
the diffusion of the reaction products throughout the entire volume
of water. Further increasing the depth of the laser focus in water
will result in decreasing its contact with the gaseous phase and hence
prevent the formation of gaseous particles that can penetrate into
water from air, leading to the observed decrease in peak intensity
(Figure ).To
identify the ions contributing to the observed signal in Figures and 4, the treated water samples were analyzed by IC and are presented
in Figure . As can
be seen from this figure, only one peak appeared in the chromatograph,
which corresponds to the NO3– anion.
The absence of the expected appearance of NO2– anions can be explained by their transformation into NO3–, which is usually accelerated in acidic conditions.[32] The pH measurements of the treated water showed
a decrease in its value with an increase in laser exposure time (Table ). The observed increase
in the concentration of nitrate ions with a simultaneous decrease
in pH suggests the formation of nitric acid by laser-induced plasma.
This implies that the concentration of nitrate ions and protons in
this solution should be equal. To confirm, we have calculated the
concentration of protons from the pH value and the concentration of
nitrate ions from IC. For 25 min laser-treated water, the pH value
was 2.94. This corresponds to a molar concentration of H+ of 1 × 10–3 mol/L. The measured NO3–ion concentration in this solution was 50 mg/L.
This corresponds to a nitrate concentration of 0.8 × 10–3 mol/L. These values are in close agreement with each other and hence
lend further support to our claim of the formation of nitric acid
in the treated water solution.In order to identify the ions
contributing to the observed UV spectra
of the laser-treated water, Gaussian function fitting of the absorbance
peak was performed, which showed the existence of three signals centered
at 196, 217, and 222 nm (Figure ). These signals can be ascribed to the optical absorption
of different forms of NO3 ions in water.[28] The peak centered at 222 nm could be ascribed to the presence
of conjugation of three or more nitrate ions that leads to the formation
of trimers, tetramers, or higher order species. The peaks at 217 nm
could be ascribed to the existence of monomers and dimers in the solution.
These conjugations lead to the observed red shift in the absorption
spectra as compared to the spectra of the dilute solution of nitric
acid which occurs at λmax of 211 nm (data not shown).
The red shift of the absorbance spectrum with increasing laser exposure
time can be explained by the formation of a higher order of conjugation,
which results in a decrease in the energy gap between the highest
occupied molecular orbital and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital
in the NO3 ions.[33] This proposition
is supported by the lack of other ions that could be retrieved from
IC measurements. Furthermore, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is excluded from this analysis since its λmax (160 nm) is located outside the wavelength range of the spectrophotometer.[28] The peak at 196 nm, which appeared even after
processing in the Ar gas environment (see Figure ), did not change its position with increasing
laser exposure time and, therefore, was attributed to unknown radicals
formed in water during laser irradiation.
Figure 7
Segregation of the absorbance
spectrum of water after 25 min of
laser exposure by Gaussian function fitting. It reveals that the peak
consists of three peaks.
Segregation of the absorbance
spectrum of water after 25 min of
laser exposure by Gaussian function fitting. It reveals that the peak
consists of three peaks.
Conclusions
The laser-induced plasma–liquid
interface provides many
fundamental and interesting scientific phenomena such as ionization,
sharp explosion, shock wave radiation, bubble creation, and splitting.
The coupling of liquid phase plasma kinetics with gas-phase reactivity
remains a challenge and requires a systematic study of plasma–liquid–air
interactions and subsequent chemical reactions in the liquid phase.
In our study, we focused on the effect of the surrounding environment
on the processes that occur in water during the generation of laser-induced
plasma at the water–gas interface. Plasma was generated in
pure water using a femtosecond laser in the presence of different
surrounding environments such as air and N2 and Ar gases.
We observed a large number of species from the environment—in
particular, nitrate ions—dissolved in water after laser plasma
generation near the water surface. Moreover, the number of these species
was found to depend on the position of the laser focus in water and
on the laser exposure time. The formation of reactive nitrogen (and
possible oxygen) species in water can be used for water cleaning and
disinfection, which has high impact and tremendous potential in the
fields of laser nanosurgery, environmental protection, colloidal chemistry,
and gas/liquid solubility. This laser-driven approach can increase
the solubility of hydrophobic gases in water at low pressure, which
would allow the use of such modified water as a new solvent for green
organic chemistry and biology. Moreover, a high solubility of gases
in water offers a new and potentially effective way to produce nanobubbles.
The high surface area-to-volume ratio of nanobubbles can enhance the
rates of gas solution reactions[34] and may
play an important role in a host of biological phenomena and processes.[35]
Authors: Bruce C Garrett; David A Dixon; Donald M Camaioni; Daniel M Chipman; Mark A Johnson; Charles D Jonah; Gregory A Kimmel; John H Miller; Thomas N Rescigno; Peter J Rossky; Sotiris S Xantheas; Steven D Colson; Allan H Laufer; Douglas Ray; Paul F Barbara; David M Bartels; Kurt H Becker; Kit H Bowen; Stephen E Bradforth; Ian Carmichael; James V Coe; L Rene Corrales; James P Cowin; Michel Dupuis; Kenneth B Eisenthal; James A Franz; Maciej S Gutowski; Kenneth D Jordan; Bruce D Kay; Jay A Laverne; Sergei V Lymar; Theodore E Madey; C William McCurdy; Dan Meisel; Shaul Mukamel; Anders R Nilsson; Thomas M Orlando; Nikolay G Petrik; Simon M Pimblott; James R Rustad; Gregory K Schenter; Sherwin J Singer; Andrei Tokmakoff; Lai-Sheng Wang; Curt Wettig; Timothy S Zwier Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: M Said Alghabra; Rami Ali; Vyacheslav Kim; Mazhar Iqbal; Philipp Rosenberger; Sambit Mitra; Ritika Dagar; Philipp Rupp; Boris Bergues; Deepak Mathur; Matthias F Kling; Ali S Alnaser Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 14.919