The present study investigates the development of distinct UV-A and UV-B radiation filtering materials through the introduction of a heterocyclic bischalcone derivative [(3,5-bis{[4-(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]methylidene}piperidin-4-one] (B1) into the matrix of PVA/Piscean collagen blend films (1:1) prepared through the solution casting method and characterized. The dopant concentration varied from 0.25 to 4%. The scanning electron microscopy images showed the rough surface due to the uniform dispersion of dopant B1. The addition of different concentrations of B1 altered the mechanical strength with a proportional increase in Young's modulus (146-317 MPa), tensile strength (23.3-39.21 MPa), and decrease in its elongation at break (158.8-105.2%). As the dopant B1 belongs to the bischalcone class of compounds which absorb in the UV-vis region (370 nm λmax) due to the α, β unsaturated keto group, it was selected for doping. Dopant concentration-dependent increase in density was observed in films (31-162 mg/cm3). The bathochromic shift in UV absorption from 370 to 390 nm for λmax as well as hyperchromism was evidenced with proportional increase in the concentration of B1, indicating its capacity to block UV rays. On determining the UV filtering ability for all the prepared films, the one with 4% dopant showed a higher sun protection factor (SPF) with a value of 27.53 and ultraviolet protection factor (UPF) with a value of 58.23. In addition, the degradation of supercoiled PBR322 DNA on UV irradiation was effectively inhibited by these films with a dopant concentration of 0.5-4.0%, which might cause less harm to the skin. The inferences of the experiments would indicate the use of these water-insoluble films as UV blocking potential materials with a merit of SPF and UPF characteristics.
The present study investigates the development of distinct UV-A and UV-B radiation filtering materials through the introduction of a heterocyclic bischalcone derivative [(3,5-bis{[4-(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]methylidene}piperidin-4-one] (B1) into the matrix of PVA/Piscean collagen blend films (1:1) prepared through the solution casting method and characterized. The dopant concentration varied from 0.25 to 4%. The scanning electron microscopy images showed the rough surface due to the uniform dispersion of dopant B1. The addition of different concentrations of B1 altered the mechanical strength with a proportional increase in Young's modulus (146-317 MPa), tensile strength (23.3-39.21 MPa), and decrease in its elongation at break (158.8-105.2%). As the dopant B1 belongs to the bischalcone class of compounds which absorb in the UV-vis region (370 nm λmax) due to the α, β unsaturated keto group, it was selected for doping. Dopant concentration-dependent increase in density was observed in films (31-162 mg/cm3). The bathochromic shift in UV absorption from 370 to 390 nm for λmax as well as hyperchromism was evidenced with proportional increase in the concentration of B1, indicating its capacity to block UV rays. On determining the UV filtering ability for all the prepared films, the one with 4% dopant showed a higher sun protection factor (SPF) with a value of 27.53 and ultraviolet protection factor (UPF) with a value of 58.23. In addition, the degradation of supercoiled PBR322 DNA on UV irradiation was effectively inhibited by these films with a dopant concentration of 0.5-4.0%, which might cause less harm to the skin. The inferences of the experiments would indicate the use of these water-insoluble films as UV blocking potential materials with a merit of SPF and UPF characteristics.
For many years, plastics
such as polyethylene, polystyrene, polyethylene
terephthalate, and polypropylene have been widely used in the packaging
industry. However, the disposal of these materials after their end
use requires hundreds of years to degrade in environmental conditions.
Therefore, there had been an intensifying research for new materials
with high performance and at an inexpensive cost that can be defined
by recyclability, renewability, and biocompatibility. These polymers
were starch, cellulose, chitosan, clay, pectin, collagen, gelatin
and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), eudragit, and so forth.[1−4] The Piscean collagens were extracted from marine or freshwater fishes.
They have several advantages over mammalian collagen such as easy
extractability, low cost, and devoid of a religious barrier. It was
reported that the Fish Collagen Peptide Market size would exceed USD
685 Million in 2020 and was estimated to register over 5.5% compound
annual growth rate between 2021 and 2027.[5] Increasing acceptance of fish collagen peptide as an animal-based
ingredient in nutraceuticals and food and beverage industry is expected
to propel the market growth. Of late, the word cosmeceuticals is coined
to illustrate the medicinal use of a cosmetic product. Many skin care
products based on collagen blended with compounds of medicinal value
are being marketed. The products which protect skin from damage due
to the exposure of sun rays are listed under cosmeceuticals. The degradation
of collagen leads to wrinkles that accompany aging. Continuous UV
radiation from the sun reduces the production of type I collagen which
is the major structural protein found in human skin, the reduction
of type I collagen and it causes premature skin aging which is associated
with skin carcinoma.[6] Therefore, photoprotection
is required for the skin to prevent damages. The UV filters used are
divided into two classes based on the nature of working. The inorganic
filters reflect light are called physical filters, whereas organic
UV filters absorb light and termed as chemical filters. Usually, the
physical UV filters contain metallic oxides, such as ZnO, TiO2, and CuO which provide better protection than the chemical
filters as they are insoluble in water. However, their film forming
nature on the skin was not well accepted by the consumers, also making
formulations was difficult as they tend to break emulsions. On the
other hand, chemical UV filters usually exhibit high absorbance in
the UV region due to the presence of chromophoric groups such as single
or multiple aromatic rings, often in conjugation with carbon carbon
double bonds and/or carbonyl moieties. After rigorous toxicological
evaluations, they are put into the market. The accepted class of UV
filtering materials in practice are the following: benzophenone derivatives, p-aminobenzoic acid and its derivatives, salicylates, cinnamates,
camphor derivatives, triazine derivatives, benzotriazole derivatives,
benzimidazole derivatives, and others.[7]The blends of natural and synthetic polymer stand for an innovative
class of materials with better biocompatibility and mechanical properties
than those of single-component.[8−10] The PVA is a water-soluble synthetic
polymer and is biocompatible, biodegradable, non-toxic, and odorless.
It also possesses high mechanical strength and chemical resistance.
By blending collagen with PVA, weak properties of collagen such as
poor mechanical strength and fast biodegradation rate could be overwhelmed.[10] The pigment responsible for tanning of the skin
is melanin, though it helps in protecting the skin from UV-induced
DNA degradation, the abnormal accumulation of melanin due to higher
tyrosinase activity results in uneven patches on the skin causing
an aesthetic problem. Therefore, natural tyrosinase inhibitor curcumin
is one of the choices as a skincare ingredient in cosmetic products.
The bischalcones, synthetic curcuminoids were found to absorb UV radiations
and also inhibited tyrosinase enzyme activity which equal the property
of curcumin with a better solubilty profile.[11] They exhibited promising antiviral, radioprotective, and antiangiogenic
properties.[12,13] In addition to being used in
pharmaceutical industries, chalcones also find wide applications in
dyes and cosmetic compositions.[14,15] Based on the previous
work from our group on bischalcone derivatives as optical materials,[15−19] it was thought to fabricate eco-friendly films of PVA/collagen blend
doped with heterocyclic chalcone [3,5-bis{[4-(methylsulfanyl) phenyl]methylidene}
piperidin-4-one (B1)] to study the UV enduring property.
Therefore, the study aimed to prepare PVA/collagen/B1 blend films where the acid-soluble collagen (ASC) was isolated from
the skin of Indian oil sardine (Sardinella longiceps).[20]
Experimental Section
Materials
The fish Indian oil sardine
was collected from a market in Mangalore. The skin portions of the
fishes were removed and washed with cold distilled water and stored
at −20 °C for further use. Chemicals used in the study
such as acetic acid (M.W. 60.05 g/mol, 0.5 M in water), butanol (M.W.
74.12, 10% w/v in water), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium
salt (M.W. 372.24, 0.5 M in water), tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane
(M.W. 121.14, 0.05 M), and PVA of M.W. 60,000–1,25,000, Alcoholysis
degree of PVA is 98–99%, 2% w/v in water, were procured from
Merck, India. The bischalcone derivative [3,5-bis{[4-(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]methylidene}piperidin-4-one
(B1)] was synthesized, purified, and characterized at
Research laboratory, Industrial Chemistry, Mangalore University, Karnataka,
India.[15]
Fabrication of the PVA/Collagen/B1 Composite
Films
The isolated ASC from the skin of Indian oil sardine
(S. longiceps) was taken for the study
using the method reported by Nagai and Suzuki (2000a) with a little
modification. Amicon Ultra centrifugal filters (Millipore) 100 kDa
cutoff filters were used for concentrating the proteins. The isolated
collagen was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM),
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), thermogravimetric
analysis (TGA), and UV analysis. The protein patterns of the isolated
collagen sample was analyzed using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis according to the method of Laemmli using 10% resolving
gel and 6% stacking gel.[20] The PVA acts
as a base matrix for the preparation of PVA/collagen blend films doped
with different concentrations of B1 by the solution casting
method. PVA was dissolved in double distilled water and collagen solution
was prepared by acetic acid (A.R. Grade). Different concentrations
of B1 (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4%) (w/v) was dissolved in
dimethyl sulfoxide were added to PVA (2%)/collagen (2%) blend solution
and it was stirred at 4 °C (350 rpm) for 12 h on a magnetic stirrer,
further sonicated for 5 min, and it was uniformly poured onto the
Petri plate as a thin film and dried at 40 °C for 24 h. The films
were cooled to room temperature, slowly peeled off from the Petri
plate and stored in a polyethylene bag.
Instrumental Analysis
Structural
confirmation of B1-doped PVA/collagen-fabricated composite
films was carried out using FTIR spectroscopic analysis (between 4000
and 500 cm–1) by using a Shimadzu FTIR instrument
(Model: IR Prestige-21, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan). The surface
morphology of the films was analyzed by a field emission scanning
electron micrograph (Carl Zeiss Microscopy Ltd). TGA was carried out
to analyze the thermal decomposition of fabricated films by using
TA instruments (Model; SDTQ600, TA Instruments, UK). The thermal scanning
was carried out at a uniform scanning rate of 10 °C/min over
the temperature range of 25–700 °C. Mechanical properties
of the nanocomposite films were measured by using Zwick & Roell
2020 (Loadcell 100 N) testing machine with a test speed of 12.5 mm/min.
The mechanical property was done in Konkan Specialty Poly products
Pvt Ltd, KIADB Industrial Area, Baikampady Mangalore. The sun protection
factor (SPF) and ultraviolet protection factor (UPF) was calculated
based on UV absorbance and transmittance values obtained from a spectrophotometer
(Spectroquantpharo 300) at the UV region (290–400 nm).
Density of the Cross-Linked Composite Film
The density of all prepared cross-linked film samples were analyzed
using the liquid displacement method with ethanol as a liquid.[21,22] At first, a known weight (W) of the sample (35 mg) was immersed
in a graduated cylinder containing a known volume (V1) of ethanol for 15 min. The volume of ethanol with the
sample was measured (V2). Then, the sample
was removed from the cylinder, and the volume of ethanol (V3) was also recorded. Volumes of each of samples
were measured in triplicates. Density was calculated by the following
equation
In vitro SPF Determination
of the Fabricated Films
The SPF of the fabricated films was
determined through UV absorbance value as calculated from the Mansur
equation.[23−25]where CF = correction factor (10), EE = erythmogenic
effect of radiation with wavelength λ, I = solar
intensity spectrum, and Abs(λ) = spectrophotometric absorbance
values at wavelength.Where the prepared composite films were
scanned between 290 and 320 nm by using a UV spectrophotometer and
the obtained absorbance values were multiplied with the respective
EE (λ) and I (λ) values (constant value as shown in Table ).[26] Then, their summation was taken and multiplied with the
correction factor (10).
Table 1
Values of EE (λ) x I at Different
Wavelengths
Wavelength (λ nm)
Value of EE (λ) × I (λ) (normalized)
290
0.0150
295
0.0817
300
0.2874
305
0.3278
310
0.1864
315
0.0837
320
0.0180
The percentage of UV protection is equal to 100-(100/SPF).[27]
In vitro UPF Determination
of Fabricated Composite Films
The procedure used for UPF
determination by the in vitro method was reported by Cunha et al.,
and the standard mentioned was Australia/New Zealand standard, AS/NZS
4399:1996.[28] The UPF is a standard used
to measure the effectiveness of sun-protective fabrics. It provides
both UV-A and UV-B radiation protection. An in vitro method of determining UPF of the fabricated films was calculated
through the UV transmittance value by UV–vis spectroscopy.
The transmittance data were used to calculate the UPF using the following
equation.[29]where E(λ) is the relative
erythema action spectrum, S(λ) is the spectral irradiance (W
m–2 nm–1), T(λ) is the average
spectral transmittance of fabric, d(λ) is the bandwidth, and
λ is the wavelength.The percentage blocking for UV-A
(320–400 nm) was calculated by using the following equation,[29]The percentage blocking for UV-B (280–320
nm) was calculated
by using the following equationAfter the estimation of SPF and UPF,
the possible use of these
developed films in cosmetic as well as textile industries demanded
their toxicity assay. Therefore, protection of DNA degradation by
these fabricated films was undertaken.
In vitro DNA Degradation
Study of the Fabricated Composite Film
In a 96-well plate,
supercoiled PBR322 (4361 bp) about 200 ng was treated in Tris buffer
(5 mM Tris–HCl, 50 mM NaCl, pH 7.2) to yield a total volume
of 10 μL. The well containing this mixture was covered with
different membrane samples and then UV irradiated at a wavelength
of 365 nm for 1 h at 37 °C. The reaction was quenched by the
addition of 3 μL loading buffer, and then, the resulting solutions
were loaded on a 1% agarose gel. Electrophoresis was carried out at
80 V for 1 h in TAE buffer (pH 8.0). The DNA bands were visualized
under UV light and photographed.
Results and Discussion
Composite PVA/Collagen/B1 Film Synthesis
The ASC blended with PVA was to increase the thermal stability
and to strengthen the film upon which resulted in good quality films.
The PVA contains considerable amounts of hydroxyl groups and also
the hydroxyproline component of collagen act as hydrogen donors, whereas
amide linkage −NH–C=O– would acts as acceptors
in a polymer matrix.[30] Upon the addition
of B1, the stable composite films were formed. The compound B1 is polar in nature with −C=O– and
−NH– groups of the piperidone core. Therefore, strong
interaction formed between dopant and matrix by non-covalent interaction
of hydrogen bond type (Figure a,b). The characteristics of the developed
films (Figure ) with
varying concentrations of B1 were determined for noting
the change in physicochemical properties.
Figure 1
Plausible hydrogen bonding
between (a) PVA/collagen and (b) PVA/collagen/B1.
Figure 2
Different concentrations of B1-doped PVA/collagen
films: (a) PVA (2%), (b) PVA (2%)/collagen (2%), (c) PVA/collagen/B1
(0.25%), (d) PVA/collagen/B1 (0.5%), (e) PVA/collagen/B1 (1%), (f)
PVA/collagen/B1 (2%), and (g) PVA/collagen/B1 (4%).
Plausible hydrogen bonding
between (a) PVA/collagen and (b) PVA/collagen/B1.Different concentrations of B1-doped PVA/collagen
films: (a) PVA (2%), (b) PVA (2%)/collagen (2%), (c) PVA/collagen/B1
(0.25%), (d) PVA/collagen/B1 (0.5%), (e) PVA/collagen/B1 (1%), (f)
PVA/collagen/B1 (2%), and (g) PVA/collagen/B1 (4%).
Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy
Analysis
The microscopy of surface changes in the PVA and
PVA/collagen blend film doped with different concentrations of B1 is shown in Figure a–g. The pure PVA film was uniform in composition and
the film looks smooth, indicating its amorphous nature. When collagen
was mixed with PVA it showed a dense fibrous morphology, as shown
in Figure a,b. The
SEM analysis of different concentrations of B1-doped
composite films showed that there was a gradual change in morphology
as the dopant concentration increased. The dopant crystals were distributed
as microcrystals in the PVA/collagen matrix. It could be observed
that as the concentration of B1 ranged from 0.25 to 4%,
the dopant was uniformly dispersed and embedded in the polymer matrix.
It was also observed that the dopant strongly adhered to the matrix
which exhibited modification in the physical and chemical characteristics
of the film.
Figure 3
SEM micrographs of PVA/collagen blend films doped with
different
concentrations of B1: (a) PVA(2%), (b) PVA(2%)/collagen(2%),
(c) PVA/collagen/B1(0.25%), (d) PVA/collagen/B1(0.5%), (e) PVA/collagen/B1(1%),
(f) PVA/collagen/B1(2%), and (g) PVA/collagen/B1(4%).
SEM micrographs of PVA/collagen blend films doped with
different
concentrations of B1: (a) PVA(2%), (b) PVA(2%)/collagen(2%),
(c) PVA/collagen/B1(0.25%), (d) PVA/collagen/B1(0.5%), (e) PVA/collagen/B1(1%),
(f) PVA/collagen/B1(2%), and (g) PVA/collagen/B1(4%).
FTIR Analysis
The interaction between
PVA/collagen/B1 blended films was investigated using
FTIR, as shown in Figure a–g.
Figure 4
FTIR spectra of PVA/collagen blend films doped with different
concentrations
of B1: (a) PVA(2%), (b) PVA(2%)/collagen(2%), (c) PVA/collagen/B1(0.25%),
(d) PVA/collagen/B1(0.5%), (e) PVA/collagen/B1(1%), (f) PVA/collagen/B1(2%),
and (g) PVA/collagen/B1(4%).
FTIR spectra of PVA/collagen blend films doped with different
concentrations
of B1: (a) PVA(2%), (b) PVA(2%)/collagen(2%), (c) PVA/collagen/B1(0.25%),
(d) PVA/collagen/B1(0.5%), (e) PVA/collagen/B1(1%), (f) PVA/collagen/B1(2%),
and (g) PVA/collagen/B1(4%).Figure a represents
the pure PVA film with a broad −OH stretching vibrations band
between 3304 and 2924 cm–1 which could be attributed
to the −C-H stretching vibration band. The −C=O
stretching vibration of the PVA backbone was observed at 1720 cm–1. The −C=O carbonyl stretching vibration
was observed at 1652 cm–1.[18,31,32]Figure b represents
the PVA/collagen blend film indicated the formation of hydrogen bonding
between PVA and collagen. The broad bands at 3280 cm–1 (Amide A, the stretching of −N–H and −O–H)
confirmed the presence of collagen in the PVA matrix, where −N-H
stretching vibration of the amide A band and also due to the hydroxyl
group (-O-H) of the PVA matrix which indicated the presence of a hydrogen
bond between the PVA and collagen. The band at 2922 cm–1 which could be attributed to the −C-H stretching vibration.
The band at 1646 cm–1 was related to the −C=O
stretching (Amide I), the absorption band appeared at 1550 cm–1 (Amide II) might be due to the bending vibration
of the −N-H group coupled with the −C-N stretch. The
absorption band appeared at 1323 cm–1 might be due
to −CH2 wag of proline and glycine. The PVA/collagen
blend gave a strong -O–H stretching band, very weak amide I
and II band and the shift of −O-Hstretch to a lower position
from 3304 to 3280 cm–1 indicated that the occurrence
of cross-linking between hydroxyl groups of PVA with the amide group
of collagen might be through a hydrogen bond.[10,33]Besides, the IR spectra of PVA/collagen blends doped with
different
concentrations of B1 showed that the position of amide
bands were almost at the same wavenumbers for all the blends, as shown
in Figure c–g.
The different concentrations of the B1-doped PVA/collagen
composite film also gave strong −O–H stretching bands
with a shift from high frequency to low frequency. This indicated
there could be a hydrogen bonding between the dopant and matrix. The
bands at 2922 cm–1 are related to the stretching
of the aliphatic −C–H group. The vibration of the aromatic
ring was observed at 1610–1570 cm–1. The
band at 1680 cm–1 corresponded to carbonyl stretching
vibration for the α, β unsaturated keto group. No further
variation was observed in PVA/collagen/B1 composite films
compared with a pure PVA film.[34]
Thermogravimetric Analysis
TGA was
used to determine the thermal stability of fabricated films. The analysis
was carried out in the range of 25–800 °C in the air at
a heating rate of 10 °C/min. The thermogram is represented in Figure . The thermogram
of developed films revealed weight loss which was observed in three
stages. From the graph, it could be inferred that below 100–150
°C, all the samples lost water due to the absorption of moisture
by the polymer leading to weight loss. For the PVA film, the weight
loss (10%) occurred at 190 °C, weight loss (15%) occurred at
260 °C, weight loss (80%) occurred at 432 °C and complete
degradation occurred at 700 °C. The first region 100–200
°C could be attributed to the loss of absorbed water molecules.
The second region between 200 and 300 °C related to the loss
of water bound to the polymer matrix. The third region between 340
and 400 °C was associated with the decomposition and carbanization
of the polymer. Meanwhile, collagen blended with the PVA film showed
weight loss of 15% at 150 °C, weight loss of 20% at 252 °C,
weight loss of 90% at 428 °C, and complete degradation was observed
at 700 °C. The films with different concentrations of B1 doped into the PVA/collagen blend showed weight loss of 15% at 145
°C and weight loss of 20% at 260 °C. The decomposition of
weight loss of 15–20% was observed at around 145–260
°C. Upon heating of the PVA/collagen blend, the major changes
could be attributed to collagen. The collagen undergoes denaturation
leading to conformational changes upon heating. Breaking of various
cross-links by nonenzymatic glycosylation of lysine and hydroxylysine
at the intermolecular level, where as at intramolecular level it caused
the breaking of the disulfide bridge. The hydrogen bonded water molecule
would be released, causing the collapse of the triple-helical structure.
All these phenomena caused by heating would result in a random fragmentation
of a larger molecule into smaller ones with the reduction in banding
periodicity (D = 38 ± 10 nm) of collagen on
heating over 100 °C. This phenomenon occurred due to the breaking
of cross-links. The unfolding took place at a thermally less stable
domain located in gap regions.[35] This caused
reduced banding periodicity while maintaining the ultrastructure intact.
Major degradation, 91% of weight loss occurred at 444 °C, indicating
the production of gaseous elements, and complete degradation at 700
°C.
Figure 5
TGA thermograms of PVA/collagen blend films doped with different
concentrations of B1: (a) PVA(2%), (b) PVA(2%)/collagen(2%),
(c) PVA/collagen/B1(0.25%), (d) PVA/collagen/B1(0.5%), (e) PVA/collagen/B1(1%),
(f) PVA/collagen/B1(2%), and (g) PVA/collagen/B1(4%).
TGA thermograms of PVA/collagen blend films doped with different
concentrations of B1: (a) PVA(2%), (b) PVA(2%)/collagen(2%),
(c) PVA/collagen/B1(0.25%), (d) PVA/collagen/B1(0.5%), (e) PVA/collagen/B1(1%),
(f) PVA/collagen/B1(2%), and (g) PVA/collagen/B1(4%).
Mechanical Properties
The variation
in the mechanical properties of the fabricated composite films is
shown in Table . The
addition of different concentrations of B1 increased Young’s
modulus (146–317 MPa). Tensile strength decreased initially
for PVA/collagen and PVA/collagen/B1 (0.25%) and then increased from
(23.3–39.21 MPa) and decreased its elongation at break (158.8–105.2%).
The crystallites could be formed by the interchain H-bonding between
PVA and collagen increased the crystallinity of the matrix (Figure a,b) which lead to
internal friction in the matrix. Many hydroxyl groups present on the
surface of the PVA could easily form hydrogen bonds with other polymers.[36,37] The glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline are the three major amino
acids present in collagen responsible for hydrogen bonding.[20] The presence of B1 further enhanced
the crystalline nature by network of hydrogen bonds formed between
the -C=O- and −N–H of the dopant and amide linkage
of collagen as well as −O-Hof PVA, respectively,[38] witnessing an increase in Young’s modulus
and a decrease in the elongation at break of composite films. The
tensile strength of the composite film (PVA/collagen/B1) was much higher than those of the pure PVA film and PVA/collagen
films, which indicated that the introduction of B1 into
the matrix; could stack to form crystallite regions played a key role
in the enhancement of the toughness of films.[30,39,40]
Table 2
Mechanical Property of the Fabricated
Composite Films
S. no.
Samples
Young’s
modulus (MPa)
Tensile strength (MPa)
Elongation at break (%)
Stress at break (MPa)
Thickness (mm)
1.
PVA
146
23.3
158.8
14.8
0.071
2.
PVA/collagen
186
18.0
155.3
4.38
0.062
3.
PVA/collagen/B1(0.25%)
199
16.6
145.7
6.45
0.070
4.
PVA/collagen/B1(0.5%)
201
28.7
135.0
4.9
0.080
5.
PVA/collagen/B1(1%)
270
31.0
129.2
5.54
0.097
6.
PVA/collagen/B1(2%)
299
35.2
111.1
5.21
0.062
7.
PVA/collagen/B1(4%)
317
39.21
105.2
5.05
0.046
As the concentration of B1 increased, so the density
of all cross-linked films were increased, as shown in Figure . The addition of collagen
as well as B1 into the PVA matrix increased the density
of films due to interchain interactions resulting in rigid regions
in the matrix which was also evidenced in SEM images (Figure ). The analysis further confirmed
that a higher crosslinking density lead to a higher Young’s
modulus.[41]
Figure 6
Density of the cross-linked composite
film, the columns represent
the mean ± SEM of seven independent experiments: (a) PVA(2%),
(b) PVA(2%)/collagen(2%), (c) PVA/collagen/B1(0.25%), (d) PVA/collagen/B1(0.5%),
(e) PVA/collagen/B1(1%), (f) PVA/collagen/B1(2%), and (g) PVA/collagen/B1(4%).
Density of the cross-linked composite
film, the columns represent
the mean ± SEM of seven independent experiments: (a) PVA(2%),
(b) PVA(2%)/collagen(2%), (c) PVA/collagen/B1(0.25%), (d) PVA/collagen/B1(0.5%),
(e) PVA/collagen/B1(1%), (f) PVA/collagen/B1(2%), and (g) PVA/collagen/B1(4%).
UV–Vis Spectral Analysis
Basically,
the PVA film was transparent to UV radiation. The collagen absorbed
at a wavelength of 225 nm. The addition of different concentrations
of B1 to the PVA/collagen matrix as a dopant shifted
its λmax 370 to 390 nm in the UV-A (320–400
nm) region, as shown in Figure . The bathochromic shift caused by the intercalation of B1 into the matrix. The absorption maxima were influenced
by the strong interaction between matrix and dopant by a hydrogen
bond resulting in the alteration of molecular packing.[42] Carbonyl compounds show both π to π*
(intense and shorter wavelength) and n to π* (less intense and
longer wavelength) transitions. The bathochromic shift might be attributed
to (i) possible intermolecular hydrogen bonding between −C=O-
of the dopant and −O-H of the polymer chain and (ii) the bathochromic
shift of about 20 nm was observed upon the addition of the dopant
could be due to the J aggregate formation of dopants in the polymer
matrix. The large dipole moment associated with the piperidone ring
influenced head-to-tail alignment with +I effect. It was observed
that the presence of the electron-donating −SCH3 group enhanced the bathochromic effect due to long-range polarization.[17,18,43] However, increasing the concentration
of B1 in the matrix increased the extent of absorption
intensity (hyperchromism) at 390 nm as it was evident with crystals
of B1 uniformly embedded in the PVA/collagen matrix as
it was reflected in SEM images (Figure ).
Figure 7
UV spectra analysis of PVA/collagen blend films doped
with different
concentrations of B1: (a) PVA(2%), (b) B1, (c) PVA(2%)/collagen(2%),
(d) PVA/collagen/B1(0.25%), (e) PVA/collagen/B1(0.5%), (f) PVA/collagen/B1(1%),
(g) PVA/collagen/B1(2%), and (h) PVA/collagen/B1(4%).
UV spectra analysis of PVA/collagen blend films doped
with different
concentrations of B1: (a) PVA(2%), (b) B1, (c) PVA(2%)/collagen(2%),
(d) PVA/collagen/B1(0.25%), (e) PVA/collagen/B1(0.5%), (f) PVA/collagen/B1(1%),
(g) PVA/collagen/B1(2%), and (h) PVA/collagen/B1(4%).
Sun Protection Factor (SPF) and Ultra Protection
Factor (UPF)
At what percentage a material can protect against
UV rays was determined by the in vitro calculation
of SPF. It provides the capability of the material to protect against
only UV-B radiation. The UPF is one of the important parameters used
to measure the UV-blocking capability of materials. It provides capacity
for both UV-A and UV-B protection. These tests are fast, reliable,
and economically feasible methods based on UV spectral transmission
measurements and have no UV dosage cumulating response. Higher SPF
and UPF values result in effective materials that prevent sunburn.[44] Values between 15 and 30% have been suggested
as good, as it indicates that these agents can block 93–97%
UV radiation, whereas values > 50% are capable of blocking about
98%
UV radiation.[23]
In vitro SPF Determination
of Fabricated Films
An in vitro method of
determining SPF of the fabricated films was calculated through the
UV absorbance value by using the Mansur equation, as shown in Table . The SPF of the pure
PVA film was obtained 0.794. When it was blended with collagen, the
SPF value was found to be 2.968. The B1 alone exhibited
an SPF value of 9.003. When the blend film was fabricated with B1, the implication was an increase in SPF values proportional
to dopant concentration. The SPF values were found to be in range
of 5.41–27.53. The higher the SPF, the more effective the product
is in preventing sunburn. The PVA/collagen/B1 (4%) composite film
filters 96.37% of UV-B light. Therefore, PVA/collagen/B1 composite
films might protect the skin from the harmful effects of the sun.
It is also noteworthy that an additional property of probable tyrosinase
activity inhibition by B1 synergetically improved the
utility of these combinations in skincare products.
Table 3
The SPF and UPF Values of Developed
Composite Films
% blocking
S.no.
Samples
UVA
UVB
SPF
UVP (%)
UPF
UPF ratings
1.
PVA
12.63
16.15
0.79
nil
0.03
Nonrateble
2.
PVA/collagen
31.21
71.34
2.96
66.30
5.71
Nonrateble
3.
PVA/collagen/B1 (0.25%)
65.98
92.43
5.41
81.55
7.01
Nonrateble
4.
PVA/collagen/B1 (0.5%)
85.77
96.18
9.33
89.29
18.38
Good protection
5.
PVA/collagen/B1 (1%)
66.09
97.07
9.57
89.56
22.50
Moderate protection
6.
PVA/collagen/B1 (2%)
90.23
99.75
9.75
89.75
48.09
Excellent protection
7.
PVA/collagen/B1 (4%)
98.07
99.97
27.53
96.37
58.23
Excellent protection
In vitro UPF Determination
of Fabricated Composite Films
The UPF value calculated for
the films according to the formulae described in the previous section
is represented in Table .The UPF value of the pure PVA film was obtained as 0.034.
When it was blended with collagen, the UPF value enhanced 5.71. However,
PVA/collagen/B1 films were prepared there was an increase
in UPF values (7.01 to 58.23) with respect to the increase in concentration
of the dopant, as indicated in Table . The higher the UPF, the more effective the product
is in filtering sunrays. Moreover, UPF ratings of the composite film
[PVA/collagen/B1 (4%)] reached the highest level (50+)
[AS/NZS 4399-1996 standard]. The PVA/collagen/B1 (4%)
fabricated film showed a higher UPF value of 58.23, which could protect
98% of UV-A light. Therefore PVA/collagen/B1 (4%) fabricated
films might protect the skin from harmful effects of the sun as well
as fabrics. These composite films could also be used as a packaging
material for cosmetics also.
In vitro vDNA Degradation
Study of the Fabricated Composite Films
Even though chemical
filters offer better UV absorption range they often suffer from a
toxic effect; hence, their use in cosmetics might be restricted. In
the present study, fabricated films rated for excellent protection
factors especially with 4% dopant combination. The toxic effect might
prove to be a disadvantage for applications. Hence, the assay to test
the capacity of these fabricated composite films against DNA degradation
was carried out on PBR322 DNA. The DNA degradation studies were usually
carried out by agarose gel electrophoresis, as shown in Figure . The smearing band produced
during electrophoresis indicated the DNA degradation.[45] Lane 1(C) is the control PBR322 DNA without photo-irradiation
showed intact supercoiled form, which confirmed there was no photocleavage
occurred. Lane 2 (UV) is the control PBR322 DNA subjected to photo-irradiation
showed a diminishing supercoiled band due to photocleavage. Lanes
S1 to S3 containing PVA, PVA/collagen blend film, and PVA/collagen
blend film with 0.25% B1 showed specific UV-irradiated
DNA which also clearly showed the diminished visibility of DNA band
(number 2) including loss of DNA integrity. It clearly showed that
there is a possibility of DNA photocleavage. In the case of Lanes
S4 to Lane S7, containing PVA/collagen blend film with the increase
in concentrations of B1 (0.5–4%), showed similar
results compared to the control (C), and the resultant DNA showed
an intact supercoiled form of DNA as separate clear two bands (Figure ). The DNA damage
could occur when DNA directly absorbs a UV-B photon. The UV-B light
causes the formation of thymine dimers which bond together into pyrimidine
dimers, leads to the disruption in the strand, the enzymes cannot
copy, and the cell cannot carry out its normal functions. It causes
sunburn, triggering the production of melanin. This incorrect repair
or a missed dimer could lead to cancerous cells formation. The obtained
results indicated that the DNA is protected against UV radiation with
the PVA/collagen blend film with the increase in concentrations of B1. The composite films exhibited enhanced UPF values upto
58.23. Among tested films, the composite film with B1 (4%) dopant emerged as the best one to protect against UV rays with
effective inhibition of DNA degradation, proving the nontoxic nature
of composite films.
Figure 8
DNA protection study of PVA/collagen blend film doped
with different
concentrations of B1: Lane 1 (C) shows control PBR322
DNA without photo-irradiation and Lane 2 (UV) shows control PBR322
DNA subjected to photo-irradiation (S1) PVA(2%), (S2) PVA/collagen(2%),
(S3) PVA/collagen/B1(0.25%), (S4) PVA/collagen/B1(0.5%), (S5) PVA/collagen/B1(1%),
(S6) PVA/collagen/B1(2%), and (S7) PVA/collagen/B1(4%).
DNA protection study of PVA/collagen blend film doped
with different
concentrations of B1: Lane 1 (C) shows control PBR322
DNA without photo-irradiation and Lane 2 (UV) shows control PBR322
DNA subjected to photo-irradiation (S1) PVA(2%), (S2) PVA/collagen(2%),
(S3) PVA/collagen/B1(0.25%), (S4) PVA/collagen/B1(0.5%), (S5) PVA/collagen/B1(1%),
(S6) PVA/collagen/B1(2%), and (S7) PVA/collagen/B1(4%).
Conclusions
The composite films fabricated
by PVA/collagen doped with B1 turned out to be excellent
UV filtering materials with
a dopant-dependent change in SPF (5.41 to 27.53) and UPF (7.01 to
58.23) values. The film with 4% dopant B1 had showed
the highest SPF and UPF values. The inhibition of DNA degradation
by these films under UV irradiation would make these films as excellent
nontoxic UV filtering materials. This study also indicated the cosmeceutical
value of fabricated films.
Authors: Carla S Cunha; Pedro J Castro; Sérgio C Sousa; Robert C Pullar; David M Tobaldi; Clara Piccirillo; Maria M Pintado Journal: Int J Biol Macromol Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 6.953