As water rises in the pores of a partially immersed porous film due to capillary action, it carries along ions that are dissociated from the pore walls, generating a streaming current and potential. The water and current flows are sustained due to water evaporation from the unsubmerged surfaces. Traditionally, inert graphite (C) electrodes are used to construct water-evaporation-induced generators (WEIGs) that harness this electricity. WEIGs are environmentally friendly but have weak power outputs. Herein, we report on C/metal WEIGs that feature C top electrodes and metal bottom electrodes, as well as metal/metal WEIGs. Operating in a NaCl solution that facilitates the Galvanic corrosion of the metal (Cu, steel, and Al) electrodes, these Galvanic WEIGs outperform a C/C WEIG by thousands of times in power output. Equally interestingly, the asymmetric environments and potential differences between the two electrodes of a WEIG facilitate metal corrosion and fabrication of compact Galvanic WEIGs. This study clearly shows that one should choose electrodes with caution for the construction of true WEIGs.
As water rises in the pores of a partially immersed porous film due to capillary action, it carries along ions that are dissociated from the pore walls, generating a streaming current and potential. The water and current flows are sustained due to water evaporation from the unsubmerged surfaces. Traditionally, inert graphite (C) electrodes are used to construct water-evaporation-induced generators (WEIGs) that harness this electricity. WEIGs are environmentally friendly but have weak power outputs. Herein, we report on C/metal WEIGs that feature C top electrodes and metal bottom electrodes, as well as metal/metal WEIGs. Operating in a NaCl solution that facilitates the Galvanic corrosion of the metal (Cu, steel, and Al) electrodes, these Galvanic WEIGs outperform a C/C WEIG by thousands of times in power output. Equally interestingly, the asymmetric environments and potential differences between the two electrodes of a WEIG facilitate metal corrosion and fabrication of compact Galvanic WEIGs. This study clearly shows that one should choose electrodes with caution for the construction of true WEIGs.
As water flows in the channels of a porous
medium, it carries along
ions that have dissociated from functionalities such as phenol groups
on the pore walls, generating a streaming current and potential.[1−5] A streaming current is also produced by water rise caused by capillary
action in the hydrophilic pores of a partially immersed thin film,
and this water and current flow are sustained due to water evaporation
from the unsubmerged surfaces.[6] Since the
seminal report of Guo and Zhou on the harnessing of this streaming
current via a water-evaporation-induced generator (WEIG) fabricated
using films of fused carbon soot particles,[6−8] WEIGs have also
been constructed from carbon nanotube mats,[9] partially fused cellulose acetate nanofiber mats,[10] cotton fabric coated with carbon particles,[11,12] films of Al2O3 and other metal oxide particles,[13] porous printed graphene oxide films,[14] and 3D graphene membranes.[15,16] We have also recently reported on WEIGs from carbon nanofiber mats
(CNMs),[17] carbon nanotube mats,[18] and thin-layer chromatography plates.[19] While WEIGs convert thermal energy from their
surroundings into electricity and are environmentally friendly,[7] the areal power densities of these devices are
typically below ∼100 nW/cm2.[17] The low power densities limit their applicability.To boost the power densities of WEIGs, Dao et al.[9] produced a floating WEIG from a carbon nanotube mat with
two ends connected to one another via “protected” Zn
wires. The high electric output of 17.4 μW/cm2 was
later determined to arise mostly from the corrosion of the Zn wires
because the replacement of the Zn wires with inert Au wires drastically
decreased the produced power.[20] Sun and
co-workers[21,22] fabricated Si pillar arrays.
Water rising in such parallel pillars with spacing in the nanometer
range (smaller than the Debye length of the electric double layers
surrounding these pillars) produced up to 10 μW/cm2 of electricity. Herein, we report on the increase in the output
of our CNM-based WEIGs from 0.083 to 29 μW/cm2.The harvesting or the need to determine accurately the magnitude
of the streaming current has required the use of “inert”
electrodes, including graphite (C) electrodes,[23] in the fabrication of WEIGs. Cu foils corrode in salty
water but have still been used by accident or mistake as the electrodes.[9,14,17,24,25] Unfortunately, the contributions made by
the corrosion of Cu to the output of WEIGs have not been properly
acknowledged. We report here the purposeful use of corroding Cu, steel
(St), or Al electrodes to construct Galvanic WEIGs. Here, the alloy
steel rather than a pure metal is utilized because of its wide use
and ubiquitous occurrence around us. We compare the short-circuit
currents Is and open-circuit voltages Vo of C/C (top/bottom electrode), C/metal, and
metal/metal WEIGs obtained under different conditions to gauge the
contributions made to these quantities by Galvanic chemistry. Operating
in a 0.100 M NaCl solution, the IsVo values of metal/metal WEIGs may be 3 orders
of magnitude higher than that of a C/C WEIG, suggesting the drastic
power output enhancement by metal electrode corrosion. We further
show that the WEIG configuration creates different potentials and
chemical environments for the top and bottom electrodes. These differences
work synergistically to facilitate electrode corrosion. While such
Galvanic WEIGs utilizing only one electrolyte solution are compact
and easy to fabricate, they do eventually consume the metal electrodes.
They are green nonetheless because Cu, St, and Al are widely available
as waste materials, and sea water is plentiful. The simple fabrication
of Galvanic WEIGs may provide an incentive for the recycling of waste
metals.
Experimental Section
Materials
Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) with a number-average
molecular weight of 150 kDa was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) was purchased
from EMD Millipore Corporation. Adhesive copper foil tape, 6.0 mm
wide and 0.45 mm thick, used as electrodes was produced by Peyou and
purchased from Amazon. The colloidal graphite ink was purchased from
Electron Microscopy Sciences. Cold-rolled steel sheet, 0.79 mm thick,
was purchased from the home renovation store Rona. Aluminum electrodes
were prepared from commercial 0.25 mm-thick premium quality aluminum
foil (ALCAN) produced by Reynolds Consumer Products Canada Inc. The
fiberglass mesh (produced by Pazaka), used as the support for CNMs
in one case, was purchased from Amazon and features square holes of
the side length of 2.0 mm and a pore density of 224 holes per square
inch.
Material Characterization Facilities
The morphologies
of the nanofiber mats were analyzed using a Thermo Fisher Quanta 250
eSEM. For composition analysis, an EDAX Element energy dispersive
spectrometer (EDS) detector was used.
Electrospun Nanofiber Mats
To prepare electrospun nanofiber
mats, PAN was stirred in 90 °C DMF at 300 rpm for 3 h to yield
an 8.0 wt % homogeneous solution. After cooling, 12.0 mL of this solution
was drawn into a syringe bearing a 22 G needle with a bore diameter
of 0.7 mm before the syringe was mounted onto a pump. Electrospinning
was performed using a voltage drop of 18.0 kV and a distance of 20.0
cm between the tip of the syringe needle and a 12.0 cm × 12.0
cm glass plate collector that bore an aluminum foil on its back side.
The solution pumping rate was 0.397 mL/h, and the total fiber collection
time was 24 h per mat. Each spun mat was dried overnight in an oven
at 100 °C before it was cooled, detached from the collector,
and cut with scissors into the targeted dimension of 2.0 × 4.0
cm2.
Carbonization
To carbonize the PAN nanofibers, a mat
was sandwiched between two quartz plates, each with a mass of 7.4
g and an area of 3.5 × 6.0 cm. The mat was then heated in air
under the weight of one quartz plate to 280 °C at 2 °C/min
and held at the final temperature for 1 h to stabilize PAN. Subsequently,
the furnace atmosphere was replaced with N2, and a mat
was heated to a final temperature of 900 °C at 3 °C/min
and held at the final temperature for 60 min.
Plasma Treatment
Plasma treatment of each CNM was performed
in a Tergeo plasma cleaner (Pie Scientific) at 35 W and an oxygen
flow rate of 30 standard cubic centimeters per minute. The treatment
time for each sample was 1 min.
WEIG Fabrication
To fabricate a WEIG, a CNM was placed
on a microscopic slide or, in one case, on a fiberglass mesh. The
slides were cleaned via sonication in a mixture of acetone, ethanol,
and water at v/v/v = 2/1/1 for 30 min and dried in an 80 °C oven
for 1 h prior to use. After CNM deposition onto the substrate, a 6
mm-wide copper adhesive foil tape was affixed to the top end of the
CNM and was used as the top electrode. To the bottom end of the CNM
was first attached an electrical insulating tape that was 170 μm
thick, 40 mm long, and 9 mm wide to cover the width of the CNM. An
adhesive copper foil tape was then bonded over the insulating tape
as the bottom electrode. A similar fabrication procedure was used
to prepare aluminum (Al) and steel (St) electrodes.A graphite
bottom electrode was obtained by painting the graphite ink onto the
preapplied insulating tape and then allowing the solvent to evaporate.
Such a C strip was 70 ± 5 μm thick and ∼7 mm wide.
To fabricate a top electrode, the graphite ink was directly painted
onto the CNM close to the top edge and the supporting glass slide.
After solvent evaporation, a bridging C strip that was ∼5 mm
wide on the CNM and ∼2 mm wide on the glass substrate was obtained.
WEIG Characterization
The WEIG performance was evaluated
at 24 °C and a relative humidity between 30 and 40%. A multi
Autolab potentiostat (Metrohm) controlled by Nova electrochemical
data acquisition software was used to determine the open-circuit voltage Vo, short-circuit current Is, and current–voltage (I–V) curves.To start the characterization, a WEIG was
inserted into an empty 100 mL beaker. After the bottom and top electrodes
were connected to the “working electrode” and the “counter
electrode” ports of the potentiostat, 25 mL of Milli-Q water
or a NaCl Solution at 0.0010, 0.0100, 0.100, or 1.00 M was added to
the beaker until it was 5 mm above the bottom electrode. The electrochemical
measurements were initiated once the solution touched the CNM.The first characterization involved the determination of a WEIG’s
open circuit voltage (Vo) using the open
circuit potential function of the potentiostat. In this mode, the
voltage produced by the WEIG was measured as a function of time, while
the current flow through the external circuit was kept at zero. The
measurement was stopped once a stable voltage was achieved, which
normally occurred within 30–60 min.Next, the I–V curves were
obtained by using the cyclic voltammetry (CV) function of the potentiostat.
Depending on the electrode type, the voltage was scanned somewhere
in the range between −1.2 and +0.6 V at a sweeping rate of
100 mV/s. Is was obtained from the average
of the two intercepts made by each CV curve to the current axis that
crosses the voltage axis at zero.To determine how the Vo and Is values
of C/C, C/Cu, and Cu/Cu WEIGs changed
with the time of their operation in a 0.100 M NaCl solution, cells
after the determination of their initial Vo and Is values were short-circuited by
connecting their top and bottom electrodes with Cu wires. To remeasure
the Vo and Is values at a given operation time, the electrodes were disconnected
and connected to the working and counter electrode ports of the potentiostat.
The procedure mentioned above for Vo and Is measurement of pristine WEIGs was utilized
to determine Vo and Is WEIGs that were operating between 0 and 120 h.
Potentials of Individual Electrodes
To measure individually
the potentials of the top and bottom electrodes of different WEIGs,
the standard three-electrode configuration was used. While the electrode
of interest was used as the “working electrode,” the
other electrode of the WEIG was used as the “counter electrode.”
The “reference electrode” was an Ag/AgCl/KCl (3 M) electrode
that has a potential of 210 mV against the standard hydrogen electrode
(SHE). The reference electrode was connected to the operation medium
(water or 0.100 M NaCl solution) of a WEIG using a salt bridge made
of a U-shaped glass tube filled with Agar swollen with 1 M KNO3. In a measurement, one end of the salt bridge was placed
into the WEIG operation medium about 1–2 mm away from the bottom
electrode, which was separated from the conductive CNM by an insulating
tape. The measured values were corrected so that the reported Etop and Ebot values
were the potentials of the top and bottom electrodes relative to that
of the SHE.
Compact Galvanic WEIGs
A compact Al/Al Galvanic WEIG
was fabricated by placing the core part of this WEIG in a plastic
box that was 5.1 cm tall, 2.5 cm wide, and 1.1 cm thick rather than
a 100 mL beaker. When the lid was open after the addition of 1.0 mL
of a 0.100 M NaCl solution, the resultant WEIG displayed the Is and Vo values
of 0.91 V and 1.47 mA. After four of such compact Al/Al Galvanic WEIGs
were connected in series, a voltage of 3.76 V and a current of 1.47
mA were measured for the WEIG pack using a normal multimeter.
Results and Discussion
The hydrophilic CNMs were prepared
in several steps.[17] First, a PAN solution
was electrospun to yield a PAN nanofiber mat (Figure a1). After drying at 100 °C (a1 →
a2), the mat was heated in air at 280 °C for 1 h to convert PAN
into ladder-like moieties and then heated under nitrogen at 900 °C
for 1 h for carbonization (a2 → a3). The mat was hydrophilized
by treatment with oxygen plasma for 1 min (a3 → a4). The carbon
nanofibers possessed a diameter of 162 ± 24 nm. The mats were
110 ± 5 μm thick, 2.0 cm wide, and 4.0 cm long.
Figure 1
(a) Steps involved
for WEIG fabrication, and (b) photographs of
(1) a C/C WEIG in 0.100 M NaCl and the core parts of (2) C/C, (3)
C/Cu, (4) St/St, and (5) Al/Al WEIGs.
(a) Steps involved
for WEIG fabrication, and (b) photographs of
(1) a C/C WEIG in 0.100 M NaCl and the core parts of (2) C/C, (3)
C/Cu, (4) St/St, and (5) Al/Al WEIGs.To construct a WEIG, a CNM was first placed on
a microscope glass
slide before an insulating adhesive tape (9 mm wide, 40 mm long, and
170 μm thick) was placed across the width at the bottom end
of the CNM. The insulating tape was used mainly to avoid a short circuit
but to allow the probing of the streaming potential generated in the
aqueous phase in the nanochannels of a WEIG. Subsequently, a carbon
strip (obtained by evaporating water from a graphite ink), a Cu or
Al foil, or a steel strip was applied onto this insulating tape to
form the bottom electrode, while the top electrode was applied directly
onto the CNM without using a spacing insulating tape (a4 →
a5). After the two electrodes were connected with copper wires to
an external circuit and the assembly was placed into a 100 mL beaker,
25 mL of Milli-Q water or a NaCl solution was added to submerge the
bottom electrode and to start the operation of the WEIG. While Figure a6 shows a schematic
of a Cu/Cu WEIG and Figure b1 shows a photograph of a C/C WEIG, Figure b2–b5 shows photographs of the core
parts of C/C, C/Cu, St/St, and Al/Al WEIGs.
Electric Characteristics of the WEIGs
The “open
circuit potential” program of a potentiostat was used to determine
the open-circuit voltage, Vo. This was
followed by starting the CV program to obtain CV curves at a scanning
rate of 100 mV/s. While the CV curves from the first five scans for
all WEIGs operating in different media are shown in Figures S3, Figures S1e–h show the CV curves from the
second scan for the C/C, C/Cu, C/steel, and C/Al WEIGs operating in
Milli-Q water. The Is value for each WEIG
was obtained from the average of the two intercepts made by each CV
curve from the second scan to the current axis. Table S1 in the Supporting Information lists the Is and Vo values thus determined
for the different WEIGs operating in either water or 0.100 M NaCl
solution, and each value represents the average of three separate
WEIGs of a given type plus its standard deviation. These results are
replotted in Figure , while the corresponding errors that are provided in Table S1 are omitted for aesthetic appeal and
clarity.
Figure 2
Plots of (a) Is and (b) Vo values for normal WEIGs operating in Milli-Q water (H2O) and 0.100 M NaCl (NaCl), as well as for WEIGs submerged
under 0.100 M NaCl (S NaCl). Plot (c) shows how the ratio between
the IsVo value
of a given WEIG and that of the C/C WEIG operating in water changes
with the WEIG type and operation medium.
Plots of (a) Is and (b) Vo values for normal WEIGs operating in Milli-Q water (H2O) and 0.100 M NaCl (NaCl), as well as for WEIGs submerged
under 0.100 M NaCl (S NaCl). Plot (c) shows how the ratio between
the IsVo value
of a given WEIG and that of the C/C WEIG operating in water changes
with the WEIG type and operation medium.Figure c also shows
how the ratio between the IsVo value of a given WEIG and that of the C/C WEIG operating
in water changes with the WEIG type and operation medium. The different IsVo values are compared
because the current I through an external circuit
driven by an ideal WEIG increases linearly with the potential drop V across the circuit, and the maximum power output of such
a WEIG is IsVo/4.
WEIGs Operating in Milli-Q Water
The average Is and Vo values
of three C/C WEIGs are 2.3 ± 0.1 and 0.21 ± 0.02 V (Table S1 and Figure a,b), respectively. Owing to the inertness
and similarity of the two electrodes, which are comprised of a bottom
graphite electrode (strip) and a composite “top” electrode
consisting of a conducting CNM infused with a top graphite strip,
the current and potential measured in this case should be mostly due
to the electrokinetic effect. We verified this assumption by comparing
the IsVo values
of a C/C WEIG in water before and 15 min after its CNM was wrapped
with a parafilm film. The wrapping impeded the evaporation and thus
slowed the rising of water in the CNM, causing the WEIG’s IsVo to drop by 93%.
We also added enough water to completely submerge the top electrode
to yield a “submerged WEIG” featuring no capillary water
rise. The submersion decreased the Is and Vo values from 2.3 ± 0.1 μA and 0.21
± 0.02 V to 0.5 ± 0.2 μA and 0.05 ± 0.01 V, respectively,
corresponding to a IsVo drop of 95 ± 2%. Since the I–V curves of these WEIGs are straight lines, and the maximum
power output of these devices is , the >90% drop in IsVo when water rising was
eliminated
suggests that the electrokinetic effect accounted for >90% of the
measured power output for the C/C WEIGs operating in water.The Is and Vo values did not reach zero even for the wrapped and submerged WEIGs
because the top and bottom electrodes are similar but are still compositionally
different. Additionally, the positive signs of the measured Is and Vo values
suggest that the cations such as protons rose in the pores of the
CNMs. The dissociation of cations from the fibers is possible because
the zeta potential of fragments of these fibers was negative in water.[17]When the bottom electrode is changed from
Cu to St and then to
Al, the Vo value of the C/metal or the
metal/metal WEIGs operating in water increases due to the decrease
in the oxide reduction potential of the metals. Despite the higher Vo, Is of the metal-containing
WEIGs is increased by less than 2.5-fold relative to that of the C/C
WEIG. This result suggests that the surfaces of these metal electrodes
were passivated by compact and dense oxide layers that were not readily
perforated in water.[26,27] These oxide layers blocked access
of the bottom metal electrodes by OH– or water and
impeded the oxidation of the metal electrodes in Milli-Q water. Based
on the low ratios of the IsVo values of the C/Cu, Cu/Cu, C/St, and St/St WEIGs relative
to that of the C/C WEIG, the power outputs of these WEIGs should be
mostly derived from the electrokinetic effect.In the previous
paragraphs, we have intentionally avoided the quantification
of contributions made by the electrokinetic effect and redox reactions
to the measured Vo and Is values because this is a challenging task. As will be
discussed later, the electrokinetic effect and redox reactions work
synergistically to boost each other in a Galvanic WEIG, and the power
produced when these two effects operate in unison is much greater
than the sum of powers produced from each effect operating alone.
Thus, we cannot assume that Vo or Is is the sum of voltages or currents produced
from the electrokinetic effect and a redox reaction operating alone.
If we have to quantify the percentage ϵ of contributions made
by redox reactions toward the power output of a metal-bearing WEIG, eq can be usedwhere and are the IsVo values for a metal-bearing WEIG and a C/C
WEIG, respectively. Using eq , the ϵ values for the C/Cu, C/St, C/Al, Cu/Cu, St/St,
and Al/Al WEIGs operating in water are 48 ± 25, 0, 89 ±
26, 48 ± 8, 18 ± 14, and 87 ± 19%, respectively.
WEIGs Operating in NaCl Solutions
In a 0.100 M NaCl
solution, the Vo value of the C/C WEIGs
decreased somewhat (Figure b), and the Is value increased
slightly (Figure a),
increasing IsVo by 2.9 times relative to that measured in water (Figure c). A drop in Vo following the replacement of water by a salt solution
as the operating medium for a WEIG has been observed by others[6,9] and is caused here by decreases in the zeta potential of the electric
double layer around the carbon nanofibers. The higher Is is attributable to increased contributions from redox
reactions of the two nonidentical C electrodes. As the salt concentration
increased, the electric resistance between the bottom C electrode
and the “top” electrode decreased. The increased ion
transport accelerated the redox reactions, such as the reduction of
epoxide groups on the surfaces of the carbon fibers and the oxidation
of −C=C– units at the bottom C electrode,[28] increasing the redox current.The Vo values of the metal-containing WEIGs increased
substantially (Figure b), and Is increased by up to 1000-fold
(Figure a) when the
operation medium was changed from water to 0.100 M NaCl or other NaCl
solutions (Figure S3). For the C/Cu, C/St,
and C/Al WEIGs in 0.100 M NaCl, their IsVo values increased by 39, 980, and 2120
times, respectively. Meanwhile, the IsVo enhancement factors were 280, 3270,
and 2410 for the Cu/Cu, St/St, and Al/Al WEIGs.The Is value increased drastically
in a NaCl solution because the metal oxide layers on the electrodes
were perforated or destroyed by Cl– ions. In the
case of Cu, the reaction:converts a compact passivating Cu2O layer into a loose CuCl layer.[26,27] At sufficiently
high NaCl concentrations, CuCl can even be converted into the soluble
CuCl2–.[26,27] Exposure to
OH– facilitates Cu oxidation to Cu2O
via the following reaction, for exampleTo gain insights into the Vo changes,
we determined the electric potentials, Etop and Ebot, of the top and bottom electrodes
of various WEIGs, respectively, relative to that of the standard hydrogen
electrode (SHE). The results are summarized in Table S2 and Figure .
Figure 3
Plots of the electric potentials, Etop and Ebot, of the (a) top and (b) bottom
electrodes, respectively, relative to that of the SHE for various
WEIGs operating in different media.
Plots of the electric potentials, Etop and Ebot, of the (a) top and (b) bottom
electrodes, respectively, relative to that of the SHE for various
WEIGs operating in different media.Results of Figure reveal several trends. First, Etop changes
only slightly especially among the C/metal WEIGs. Second, Ebot decreases from Cu to St and then further
to Al for either the C/metal or the metal/metal WEIG series in either
water or 0.100 M NaCl. Third, changing the operation medium from Milli-Q
water to 0.100 M NaCl caused a substantial drop in Ebot for a given WEIG. Since Vo = Etop – Ebot, the changes in Ebot were mainly
responsible for the observed Vo variations
among the different WEIGs.Ebot changes
from metal to metal because
their oxidation potentials differ. Equations S1–S3 (Supporting Information) provide possible oxidation
reactions of Cu, Fe, and Al and their associated oxidation potentials.
Moving from Cu to Fe and then to Al, the reduction potentials of their
oxides decrease following the decreasing trend in Ebot.Ebot for a metal-bearing
WEIG drops
as the operating medium is changed from water to a NaCl solution due
to the increased accessibility of the electrode. For a Cu bottom electrode
undergoing reaction 2, its Nernst equation isAs the metal surfaces became accessible
and the probed OH– concentration increased, Ebot decreased.The reduction reaction
involving metal corrosion is normally[29,30]with its reduction potential given bySince the major reaction at the top
electrode is the same regardless
of the electrode used, Etop should not
change significantly from one electrode to another, as is observed
here. We further note that this reaction is indeed possible because
the measured Etop values are ∼0.5
V. This value can be achieved from eq by assuming the appropriate O2 pressure PO2 and OH– concentrations
at the top electrode, which is a composite electrode, as discussed
in the Supporting Information.We
performed various experiments to seek support for the proposed
redox reactions. To demonstrate the involvement of O2,
we determined the Is and Vo values of three C/Al WEIGs operating in 0.100 M NaCl
in an inflatable polyethylene glove bag that was briefly evacuated
and then backfilled with N2 or O2. These values
were 86 ± 9 μA and 0.89 ± 0.02 V, respectively, under
N2 and increased to 487 ± 27 μA and 1.02 ±
0.05 V when the atmosphere was changed to O2. The Is value did not decrease to zero even under
N2 because O2 could not have been fully removed
from such a bag under our experimental conditions.As discussed
in the Supporting Information, energy dispersive
spectroscopy (EDS) and other methods were used
to identify the oxidized products formed on the bottom electrodes
of metal-bearing WEIGs. For the C/Cu and Cu/Cu WEIGs, the major oxidized
product was Cu2O. Meanwhile, it was most likely that a
mixture of Fe(OH)2, Fe2O3, and Fe(OH)3 at the bottom electrode of the C/St or St/St WEIGs (Figure S6). For the C/Al and Al/Al WEIGs, Al3+ was the major product. Titration of the used salt solution
with 1.0 M NaOH produced a precipitate, which was indicative of Al(OH)3 or Al2O3 formation. This precipitate
redissolved upon further titration with a 10 M NaOH solution that
was indicative of Al(OH)4– formation.[29]Another trend revealed by Figure b is that the Is value
was further increased from a C/metal WEIG to its corresponding metal/metal
WEIG operating in a NaCl solution. In a C/metal WEIG, the OH– ions produced from the reduction of oxygen at the “top electrode”
diffuse to the bottom electrode to become consumed. In a metal/metal
WEIG, the OH– ions produced near the top metal electrode
can be partially consumed via a side reaction. For a Cu top electrode,
for example, the side reaction can beWe have deduced CuO formation at the
top electrode again via EDS
analysis or from the green color of the formed product (Figure S2j). Although this reaction, unlike Galvanic
corrosion, does not produce electrons that flow through the external
circuit, the elimination of some OH– ions near the
electrode can reduce the polarization potential derived from an electric
double layer formed at the electrode/solution interface. The partial
elimination of this electrode polarization effect increased the Is value for the main corrosion reactions occurring
at the different electrodes.[31]
Galvanic WEIGs
Galvanic cells normally consist of compositionally
different metal electrodes immersed in separate solutions that are
connected by a salt bridge or separated by a porous membrane.[31] The metal/metal WEIGs here operate despite the
use of the same metal as the top and bottom electrodes and the use
of a single electrolyte solution. Such a Cu/Cu, St/St, or Al/Al WEIG
produces electricity because the two electrodes are at different potentials
due to a streaming potential and their different chemical environments.
These differences cause the bottom electrode to become cathodic and
the top metal electrode anodic despite their intrinsically identical
chemical compositions. The use of a single electrolyte solution simplifies
Galvanic cell fabrication.The role played by the environmental
asymmetry and the potential difference between the two electrodes
of a meta/metal WEIG operating in 0.100 M NaCl is best witnessed by
comparing the IsVo values of a normal and a submerged WEIG. The IsVo values of submerged Cu/Cu,
St/St, and Al/Al WEIGs are decreased by 99.6, 99.5, and 99.9%, respectively,
relative to their Galvanic counterparts (Figure c). Therefore, the Galvanic reactions empower
a metal-containing WEIG, and the WEIG configuration works synergistically,
in turn, to facilitate the Galvanic corrosion of the metal electrodes.
Power Output, Service Life, and Compact Galvanic WEIGs
To gain a better view of the power characteristics of the metal/metal
WEIGs, we performed loading studies of St/St WEIGs prepared on a fiberglass
mesh operating in 1.00 M NaCl and Milli-Q water. The porous substrate
was used rather than a glass slide to accelerate water evaporation,[17] and a higher than normal NaCl concentration
was utilized to increase the output of such a WEIG (Figure S4). Figures a and S7 show the results of the
loading studies. The maximum power outputs from such devices (3 in
each case) operating in the 1.00 M NaCl solution and water are 232
± 33 μW and 165 ± 19 nW at external resistance loadings
of 100 Ω and 100 kΩ, respectively. Since the area of the
CNM is 8.0 cm2, the respective areal power densities of
this device are 29 ± 5 μW/cm2 and 21 ±
3 nW/cm2 in the two media. Thus, the use of NaCl increased
the output density of the St/St WEIG by (1.4 ± 0.3) × 103 times.
Figure 4
(a) Variation in Iex, Vex, and output power IexVex as a function of external
(ex) load Rex for a St/St WEIG operating
in 1.00 M NaCl.
The plotted values are the averages for three WEIGs, and the error
bars are not shown to allow a clear viewing of the different sets
of data. Also shown are variations in the Is and Vo values of (b) Cu/Cu, (c) St/St,
and (d) Al/Al WEIGs operating in 0.100 M NaCl solution as a function
of the cell operation time under short-circuit conditions, as well
as photographs of € a compact Al/Al WEIG, and (f) four such
WEIGS being used to illuminate a white-light LED.
(a) Variation in Iex, Vex, and output power IexVex as a function of external
(ex) load Rex for a St/St WEIG operating
in 1.00 M NaCl.
The plotted values are the averages for three WEIGs, and the error
bars are not shown to allow a clear viewing of the different sets
of data. Also shown are variations in the Is and Vo values of (b) Cu/Cu, (c) St/St,
and (d) Al/Al WEIGs operating in 0.100 M NaCl solution as a function
of the cell operation time under short-circuit conditions, as well
as photographs of € a compact Al/Al WEIG, and (f) four such
WEIGS being used to illuminate a white-light LED.One may have the urge to use the power outputs
for the above two
types of WEIGs and an equation similar to eq to quantify the contributions that are made
by the electrokinetic effect and redox reactions to the power output
of a Galvanic WEIG. However, we caution against such an attempt because
the electrokinetic effect and redox reactions work synergistically
to boost each other in a Galvanic WEIG, and the power produced when
these two effects operate in unison is much greater than the sum of
powers produced from each effect operating alone. For example, the
power output of a WEIG operating 0.100 M NaCl without the electrokinetic
effect may be reduced by up to 99.9%, as discussed above.Figure b–d
shows how the Is and Vo values of the Cu/Cu, St/St, and Al/Al WEIGs changed
with operation time in a 0.100 M NaCl solution under short-circuit
conditions, which were used to maximize current dissipation. The lifetime
decreased from the St/St to the Cu/Cu and Al/Al WEIG, following the
decreasing trend in the electrode thickness (Supporting Information).The need for only one electrolyte solution
prompted us to fabricate
a compact Al/Al WEIG in a rectangular plastic container that is 5.1
cm tall, 2.5 cm wide, and 1.1 cm thick (Figure e). This WEIG can be capped and portable.
When four such compact WEIGs were connected in series, the WEIG pack
gave a current reading of 1.47 mA and a voltage of 3.76 V, as measured
using a normal multimeter. Figure f shows that the pack can light a LED bulb, and this
bright illumination was maintained continuously for ∼80 h before
the light intensity was seen visually to dim and disappear eventually
by 106 h.We want to point out finally that the output of a
WEIG cell can
be further increased by increasing the width of the CNM. We have shown
previously that the Is value of WEIG cells
increased linearly with the width of the CNM.[17]
Conclusions
In summary, various electrodes have been
used for the fabrication
of CNM-based WEIGs. Our systematic study indicates that the C/C, C/Cu,
Cu/Cu, C/St, Cu/Cu, and St/St WEIGs in water harnessed mostly the
streaming currents and potentials. The replacement of water with a
NaCl solution as the operation medium activates Galvanic corrosion
of the bottom metal electrodes and drastically increases the power
output of the devices. A Galvanic St/St WEIG operating in 1.00 M NaCl
has a high output density of 29 μW/cm2. This output
drops by 99.9% when the streaming potential and asymmetric environments
of the two electrodes are eliminated by submerging both electrodes
into the salt solution. Thus, the WEIG configuration facilitates Galvanic
corrosion, and Galvanic corrosion empowers WEIGs. While the high electric
output and the simplicity of assembling these Galvanic WEIGs facilitate
their practical applications and provide an incentive for metal recycling,
one should cautiously choose one’s electrodes if one’s
intention is to fabricate a WEIG. Last but not the least, we are the
first to determine the electric potentials of the individual electrodes
relative to that of the SHE. Such information provides insights into
the redox reactions occurring in a WEIG and should be used regularly
in the future for WEIG characterization..
Authors: Frank H J van der Heyden; Douwe Jan Bonthuis; Derek Stein; Christine Meyer; Cees Dekker Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2007-03-13 Impact factor: 11.189