Chaoran Zhang1, Trana Hussaini2, Eric M Yoshida3. 1. Internal Medicine Residency Training Program, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia. 2. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia. 3. Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this review was to evaluate pharmacotherapeutic treatments for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) through a literature search of current published data. A review of the current clinical data for each treatment is discussed. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search for articles using EMBASE (1980 to April 1, 2018), and MEDLINE (1948 to April 1, 2018) using Ovid, to identify studies investigating various therapies in PSC. Search terms included the following: primary sclerosing cholangitis, cholangitis, sclerosing cholangitis; ursodeoxycholic acid, glucocorticoids, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, methotrexate, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, penicillamine, anti-TNF, antibiotics, and probiotics. We also performed a review of current clinical trials using ClinicalTrials.gov. We considered for review relevant studies published in English, pilot studies, and randomized controlled trials involving human subjects. Results: Therapies that have been investigated in the management of PSC include those used in search terms and others that were not included in our search parameters. Analysis of published data involving each therapy was explored and none have shown any sustained, significant benefit in the treatment of PSC. In terms of relevance to patient care and clinical practice, this review evaluates and compares various pharmacotherapeutic treatments for PSC where liver transplantation remains the only definitive treatment. Conclusions: To date, no clinical study of any drug has demonstrated effectiveness in terms of survival benefit or a decreased need for liver transplantation. More clinical studies are needed, and patients need to be adequately informed before any medical therapy for PSC is undertaken.
Background: The objective of this review was to evaluate pharmacotherapeutic treatments for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) through a literature search of current published data. A review of the current clinical data for each treatment is discussed. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search for articles using EMBASE (1980 to April 1, 2018), and MEDLINE (1948 to April 1, 2018) using Ovid, to identify studies investigating various therapies in PSC. Search terms included the following: primary sclerosing cholangitis, cholangitis, sclerosing cholangitis; ursodeoxycholic acid, glucocorticoids, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, methotrexate, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, penicillamine, anti-TNF, antibiotics, and probiotics. We also performed a review of current clinical trials using ClinicalTrials.gov. We considered for review relevant studies published in English, pilot studies, and randomized controlled trials involving human subjects. Results: Therapies that have been investigated in the management of PSC include those used in search terms and others that were not included in our search parameters. Analysis of published data involving each therapy was explored and none have shown any sustained, significant benefit in the treatment of PSC. In terms of relevance to patient care and clinical practice, this review evaluates and compares various pharmacotherapeutic treatments for PSC where liver transplantation remains the only definitive treatment. Conclusions: To date, no clinical study of any drug has demonstrated effectiveness in terms of survival benefit or a decreased need for liver transplantation. More clinical studies are needed, and patients need to be adequately informed before any medical therapy for PSC is undertaken.
Authors: Peter P Stanich; Einar Björnsson; Andrea A Gossard; Felicity Enders; Roberta Jorgensen; Keith D Lindor Journal: Dig Liver Dis Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 4.088
Authors: Paul Angulo; Robert L MacCarty; Pamela B Sylvestre; Roberta A Jorgensen; Russell H Wiesner; Nicholas A LaRusso; Keith D Lindor Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: J H Tabibian; E Weeding; R A Jorgensen; J L Petz; J C Keach; J A Talwalkar; K D Lindor Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: David N Assis; Osama Abdelghany; Shi-Ying Cai; Andrea A Gossard; John E Eaton; Jill C Keach; Yanhong Deng; Kenneth D R Setchell; Maria Ciarleglio; Keith D Lindor; James L Boyer Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Keith D Lindor; Kris V Kowdley; Velimir A C Luketic; M Edwyn Harrison; Timothy McCashland; Alex S Befeler; Denise Harnois; Roberta Jorgensen; Jan Petz; Jill Keach; Jody Mooney; Carol Sargeant; Julie Braaten; Tamara Bernard; Debra King; Ellen Miceli; Jeff Schmoll; Tanya Hoskin; Prabin Thapa; Felicity Enders Journal: Hepatology Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: D H Van Thiel; P Carroll; K Abu-Elmagd; H Rodriguez-Rilo; W Irish; J McMichael; T E Starzl Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Naoki Ikenaga; Zhen-Wei Peng; Kahini A Vaid; Susan B Liu; Shuhei Yoshida; Deanna Y Sverdlov; Amanda Mikels-Vigdal; Victoria Smith; Detlef Schuppan; Yury V Popov Journal: Gut Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 23.059