| Literature DB >> 35990146 |
Abstract
In the era of big data and cloud computing, traditional college teaching model needs to be revolutionized in order to adapt to the needs of the present generation. The traditional college teaching model is currently facing unprecedented severe challenges which could be optimistically considered as a huge scope of development opportunity. In order to promote the gradual transformation of college teaching toward digitization, intelligence, and modernization, this paper comprehensively analyzes the impact of science and technology on college teaching. It further encourages the omnidirectional and multifaceted amalgamation of education with big data and cloud computing technology with an objective to improve the overall teaching level of colleges and universities. In order to realize the accurate evaluation of university teaching reform and improve teaching quality, the study presents an evaluation method of university teaching reform based on in-depth research network. Then, it further analyzes the main contents of university teaching reform, establishes the evaluation department of university teaching reform, and then establishes the evaluation model of university education reform. This is achieved by analyzing the relationship between university education reform and indicators using in-depth learning network followed by the development of simulation experiments pertinent to evaluation of university education reform. The results show that this method is helpful in improving the teaching quality.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35990146 PMCID: PMC9391095 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8169938
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Evaluation system of educational teaching reform.
| Evaluation object | Primary index | Secondary index |
|
| ||
| Teaching quality | Teaching preparation | Debug the teaching platform before implementing online teaching; set up preparation for online teaching emergencies; select the online teaching platform; remind students to prepare for class; clarify the course objectives and the actual teaching content in line |
| Teaching content | Online teaching content is well organized, informative, and of high quality; the teaching content is clearly explained; highlight the key points and difficulties of the teaching content; give off-class assignments; facilitate students' understanding of the course content | |
| Teaching resources | Select online course video materials; select online teaching course PF; select online teaching test bank; basically achieve the purpose of online teaching, satisfaction of solving problems for students; focus on the interaction rate with students during online teaching | |
| Teaching effect | Stimulate students' interest in learning, class acceptance rate, students' performance in the online test; focus on students' efficiency in completing assignments in class; focus on students' opinions about online teaching | |
Figure 1Cross-array module.
Figure 2Emotional model.
Evaluation criteria of educational teaching reform.
| Evaluation score | Estimated grade |
|
| |
| >0.75 | Excellent |
| 0.5∼0.75 | Good |
| 0.25∼0.49 | Fair |
| <0.25 | Poor |
Investigation of the credibility of the data of comprehensive student literacy evaluation based on the cloud platform (N = 550).
| Question | Options | Frequency | Percentage |
|
| |||
| (4) Credibility of student evaluation data based on cloud platform (single choice) | High | 289 | 55 |
| Medium | 188 | 32 | |
| Low | 55 | 10 | |
| Not indicative | 17 | 3 | |
Figure 3Learning performance of DBN model.
Figure 4Training performance of DBN model.
Model test results.
| Dataset | Expected output | Actual rating | Test output | Evaluation level | Relative error (%) |
|
| |||||
| 1 | 0.75 | Excellent | 0.81 | Excellent | 1.27 |
| 2 | 0.58 | Good | 0.61 | Good | 1.71 |
| 3 | 0.40 | General | 0.45 | General | 2.3 |
| 4 | 0.53 | Good | 0.56 | Good | 1.93 |
| 5 | 0.11 | Poor | 0.12 | Poor | 0 |
| 6 | 0.22 | Poor | 0.25 | Poor | 0 |
| 7 | 0.89 | Excellent | 0.88 | Excellent | 1.15 |
| 8 | 0.47 | General | 0.46 | General | 2.16 |
| 9 | 0.83 | Excellent | 0.82 | Excellent | 1.23 |
| 10 | 0.67 | Good | 0.67 | Good | 1.55 |
Statistical results of R and RMSE.
| Dataset |
| RMSE |
|
| ||
| 1 | 0.93 | 0.26 |
| 2 | 0.89 | 0.33 |
| 3 | 0.88 | 0.45 |
| 4 | 0.91 | 0.32 |
| 5 | 0.92 | 0.31 |
| 6 | 0.95 | 0.22 |
| 7 | 0.89 | 0.34 |
| 8 | 0.91 | 0.25 |
| 9 | 0.92 | 0.33 |
| 10 | 0.94 | 0.21 |
Online education quality assessment results.
| Level 1 indicators | Weighting of primary indicators | Secondary indicators | Secondary indicator weights | Weighting results | |
|
| |||||
| Teaching preparation | 0.1 |
| 0.3 | 0.65 | |
|
| 0.4 | 0.75 | |||
|
| 0.3 | 0.88 | |||
|
| 0.2 | 0.69 | |||
|
| 0.1 | 0.55 | |||
|
| |||||
| Teaching content | 0.2 |
| 0.2 | 0.32 | |
|
| 0.3 | 0.55 | |||
|
| 0.4 | 0.68 | |||
|
| |||||
| Teaching method | 0.3 |
| 0.2 | 0.57 | |
|
| 0.1 | 0.52 | 0.70 | ||
|
| 0.3 | 0.53 | |||
|
| |||||
| Teaching resources | 0.2 |
| 0.1 | 0.31 | |
|
| 0.2 | 0.49 | |||
|
| 0.1 | 0.88 | |||
|
| 0.1 | 0.77 | |||
|
| 0.2 | 0.54 | |||
|
| |||||
| Teaching effect | 0.2 |
| 0.3 | 0.59 | |
|
| 0.2 | 0.69 | |||
|
| 0.1 | 0.78 | |||
|
| 0.1 | 0.89 | |||